        ĳ
                                +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
         ۲|O|u|t|b|r|e|a|k|𰰰
                                +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
                             Issue #3 - Page 5 of 12 
        ĳ


Disproving Evolution:


In all of these underground e-zines I am always finding texts bashing
creationalist ideas.  These texts almost never contain any credible 
evidence that have not already been disproven. This is why i wrote this 
text, just simply to use scientific evidence to disprove evolution (being 
one of the main THEORIES that people hold on to just to down creatioalist 
beliefs)  The information below will prove evolution is just another 
ignorant theory with nothing to back its claims.

Where has evolution ever been observed?  It involves changes in size, 
shape, color, and minor genetic alterations caused by one or two mutations 
over a long period of time, so how could the theory of evolution ever been 
observed?  Do you realize how complex living things are?  Textbooks show 
 an evolutionary tree, but where is its trunk and where are its branches?  
If there is no trunk or branches in the evolutionary tree, how did the 
first creatures appear in order for the theory of evolution to take place?  
These are all questions evolutionists should ask themselves, because there 
is simply no compelling evidence explaining any of these.  Well, if none 
of these questions can be answered, how can evolution possibly be a 
credible theory?

Most insects go through a complete metamorphosis; such as when a 
caterpillar builds a cocoon around itself. Its body inside then 
disintegrates into a thick, pulplike liquid.  After the adult insect 
emerges it becomes a completely different insect than it was in its larval 
stage.  These changes make the insect amazingly capable, and often 
beautiful, such as a butterfly. Food, habitat, and behavior of the larva 
also differ drastically from the adult. Evolution claims that mutations 
slightly alter an organism's genetic material, which later generations 
inherit. On rare occasions the alterations are beneficial, enabling the 
offspring to reproduce more of themselves and the improved genetic material 
after many generations, dramatic changes, even new organs, accumulate.  If 
this were true, each organism must be able to reproduce and must be 
superior, in some sense, to its ancestors. How then could insects or any 
other creature evolve over time in many stages, which, in fact, are what 
evolution states.

The simplest conceivable form of single-celled life should have at least 
600 different protein molecules.  The mathematical probability that only 
one typical protein could form by chance arrangements of amino acid 
sequences is far less than 1 in 10(450) (10 with an exponent of 450). To 
appreciate the magnitude of 10(450), realize that the visible universe is 
about 10(28) inches in diameter. With these kinds of mathematical odds 
against evolution, what scientific fact could be stated to outweigh this 
evidence?

Textbooks show a diagram of an ape gradually forming a human over time.  
Yet how was that first monkey created?  The first layers of sedimentary 
rock contain many fossils of complex creatures, such as fish, worms, and 
coral. What makes this strong evidence of creation is the fact these 
animals just appeared suddenly.  Not even the slightest of gradual change 
in appearance over time.

I hope that this shows you all that you should always get the facts from
both sides before you make any decisions about what you are going to spend
your entire life believing.  If you have any questions or comments please
feel free to contact me.

Ryan Gibson (ryan@insidergaming.net)
(http://www.insidergaming.com)

