AJ WEBERMAN pro se

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

STEVEN RAMBAM, Plaintiff, vs. AJ WEBERMAN, MARK LEVY, JEWISH DEFENSE ORGANIZATION, Defendant

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No.: No. SC092414 MOTION TO COMPELL PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 415.10-415-95 CCP

Now comes the judgment debtor, AJ Weberman, and asks this court to order judgment creditor’s attorney, Gary Kurtz, to comply with the California Code of Civil procedure:

415.20. (a) In lieu of personal delivery of a copy of the summons

and complaint to the person to be served as specified in Section

416.10, 416.20, 416.30, 416.40, or 416.50, a summons may be served by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint during usual office hours in his or her office or, if no physical address is known, at his or her usual mailing address, other than a United States Postal Service post office box, with the person who is apparently in charge thereof, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and complaint by first-class mail, postage prepaid to the person to be served at the place where a copy of the summons and complaint were left. When service is effected by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at a mailing address, it shall be left with a person at least 18 years of age, who shall be informed of the contents thereof. Service of a summons in this manner is deemed complete on the 10^th day after the mailing.

Despite numerous phone calls and despite the fact that the judgment debtor

has been served at his home address plaintiff’s attorney continues to send

motions to judgment debtor’s personal mail box (PMB) which he accesses every

six weeks. SEE DEBTORS EXHIBIT A. This makes it impossible for him to receive

pleadings in a timely fashion.

Dated this 5^th day of March, 2007

AJ WEBERMAN pro se