SolarGeneral Proudly Presents...
...by James Mason
Previous Chapter | Index | Next Chapter
The pros and cons of terrorism have long been debated among revolutionaries from all sectors of political thought. When I was a member of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), or "Wobblies", in the mid-Seventies, there was division between sabotage and general strike. The IWW, like the National Socialists, had their high day decades ago and likewise both generally continue to cling to past ideas.
When the IWW had millions in its ranks, a general strike could have crippled the System. You may recall that the Czar of Russia was overthrown by a general strike. However, with a membership currently at about six hundred, a general strike called by the IWW would look about as promising as a couple of Stormtroopers leafleting the White House and calling for a White Workers' revolution.
Sabotage, on the other hand, required few people who, with organization, could cripple the System or, at least, make their demands felt. The System in the mid-Thirties outlawed the IWW and everyone with a union card was soon in jail. The lesson was this: a terrorist organization cannot be a public organization. The Irish Republic Army (IRA), as an example, on the other hand remains secret as it remains effective. It keeps the demand for a free Ireland alive. As soon as England decides that the price being exacted by the IRA for Northern Ireland is too much to continue to pay, they will end up turning it over to the Irish Republic .
The Irish Republic does not condone the IRA. They do this in order to maintain peace between themselves and England. Otherwise England might attack IRA bases in Ireland just the way Israel does with Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) bases in Lebanon and other Mid-East nations.
Let us compare the Irish Republic with today's legalistic National Socialist parties and the IRA with America 's future White terrorists. The overground parties will continue to denounce the terrorists though they will benefit from their labor when victory has been secured. It's only proper that they should do this as the overground's membership are not terrorists by nature and there would be no point inviting System wrath down upon innocent, unsuspecting heads.
Make no error however, when terrorism comes alive in America as a group activity the legal, overground parties will suffer losses in both jailed members and in dropouts. When the System demands blood the legals will suffer along with the captured terrorists even though these legals may be pacifist (just as today's Canadian comrades who are jailed for two years for teaching that the "Gassed Six Million" is pure myth). Such injustice only spurs the terrorist and adds to his numbers. The common White Man in Canada probably doesn't even know of these injustices resulting from Canada 's ratification of the "Genocide Law" or, if he does, he could careless. After all, he's having fun watching Gary Coleman growing up on TV.
If a Canadian blows up a Canadian police station however, the news reaches sixty million viewers that week. Thus, the cost of one bomb equals sixty million leaflets (which the Movement could neither produce nor distribute). Terrorism is good economics. When the public hears that the "White Liberation Front" has bombed the Toronto police station demanding the release of a certain number of political prisoners serving terms for their use of "free speech", the public is at once informed and this information could not have been more cheaply spread or more quickly.
I use the name "White Liberation Front" in this article to suggest reality. Future terrorists are of course free to adopt any name they choose so long as it denotes unity of all White forces. Its originators could have been an NS section, a Klan section, or what have you. But in no case would I hope that its use would be adopted by those who merely print one more of the same, old newsletters and operate out of P.O. boxes. Publishers should not set policy because they lack the warriors to carry it out. True terrorists are warriors and it is up to the New York Times, Time Magazine, etc., to print their demands for them. It is a waste of time for those without warriors to vainly call for them.
The "WLF", by any name, IS coming to America . So far the only die-hard, actual terrorists we've seen have been Puerto Ricans demanding independence. But like the cockroach, they never seem to die out. Just when you think you've got them all, you find you're reinfested again. Like the IRA, they don't go away. Sooner or later, the "tenant" must move out and turn the house over to the roaches. So far the White Right has had only "Lone Eagles" such as Franklin, Spisak, Cowan, Long, etc. The public soon gets over the "lone bigot" but they fear the GROUP, for the well-organized group, like the roaches, does not go away.
The Symbianese Liberation Army (SLA) was small, too small, to survive and its organization was all wrong. The WLF would be best built on "Three-plus-One": three privates and one unit leader who's the only contact with the group leader who heads three units. Likewise, three groups are headed by a lieutenant who only needs to know his own three group leaders and captain, who is over three lieutenants. Note that three units are equal to one group, three groups equal to one platoon (forty men counting the lieutenant), three platoons equal to one company with one captain (one hundred and twenty-one men). This system of "Three-plus-One" can be employed right up to the corps and army level.
In the above arrangement there wouldn't be any "captains" without troops unlike today's "Hollywooders" which have more "officers" than troopers. The "Lone Eagles" could be one-man units and still use the WLF label. Successful Lone Eagles could end up unit leaders as they selectively recruit others by their acts of devotion. Unsuccessful Lone Eagles who recruit Feds or finks can use their hindsight to educate others as I myself now do. The wise man will learn from the mistakes of others. Thus the WLF will be built by those who suffer success. Remember that survival is of the fittest. "Revolutionary Darwinism"?
The "Army of God" is a new group. Too new to judge its success. They fight abortion by blowing up abortion clinics. Also, their threat to blow up a judge has not been taken lightly.
While some terrorists do not telegraph their shots, some do. Of course, there are cranks too. Many snakes rattle their tails against leaves but everyone respects a true rattlesnake. "Don't Tread On Me" was once an American Revolutionary slogan and it was no bluff. The "Boston Tea Party" was a form of terrorist theatre, likewise if the WLF painted the Statue of Liberty red (perhaps using an old fashioned crop duster) and called the N.Y. Times with the message: "The whole national government is Red so we thought that the "Great Lady" needed to be Red too." Would it not be the same? Would it not get the message out? For those with a sense of humor but no stomach for violence, this form of action could help fill a few units of the WLF.
Some will favor non-homicidal violence like the Army of God while others will want to go all the way. No team is bound by the policy of any other. All are independent operators. Later, when mass coordination is needed and the WLF is built up to a large organization, teams and groups can share operations.
Voice graph analyzers can spot spies. Truth serum can reveal all they know. It wouldn't be surprising if the WLF began mailing the heads of uncovered finks to their federal bosses. Hitler said that terror could only be fought with terror.
If my peek into the future troubles the weak hearts of those parties who claim they can win at the ballot box, yet never run any candidates for office, it is rightly so. When terrorism by Whites becomes a true menace to the System then Big Brother will begin locking them up en masse. This will become educational for many of today's "leaders". (I suspect they'll maintain an entire prison block just for "Commanders" alone.) Chicken-hearted members will run. Still others will cooperate with the System. Everyone's true colors will be known to all. "Bad publicity" may be the best "Night of the Long Knives" of all.
In all fairness, many of today's booksellers will be made into martyrs once we get the Canadian type of "anti-hate" laws and these same people continue to publish or sell. A WLF demand for their release after a bombing of an FBI office will reach more TV viewers than all the books and leaflets produced by all of the legal, above ground groups since 1945. For one of the main goals of terrorism is to get your message heard. "Here's injustice; Here's revenge; Here's the solution." To ignore the solution brings more injustice which, in turn, causes more revenge. Countermeasures by the System will only serve to heighten further attacks by the WLF. Such is the fuel of revolution.
When the public gets tired of fear, they must concede something to the terrorist. In England it will be Northern Ireland. In America it could easily be racially segregated zones. It might mean the release of political prisoners and these, along with other terrorist leaders, could participate in the governments of these zones. Of course, these free zones, just like Northern Ireland , will have to be established for the masses to enjoy at the WLF's cost as the WLF will most likely continue to fight in other areas for ultimate White liberation everywhere.
What of the terrorist himself? St. Paul said in the New Testament that it was best not to marry but to remain unmarried like him. However, this was no command from God but only some advice. The reason Paul wrote this was because he was at the time a prisoner because of his religious (political) activities. He was advising those of his day that they should expect the same and not to commit others unless they were fully prepared to share the same fate. One cannot expect to be a revolutionary and not be jailed. One cannot be a revolutionary and expect to lead a normal existence. This does not rule out a family but it does rule it out in the commonly accepted sense. Families can be also used by the System as bait and as hostages, "leverage", etc., against the revolutionary.
Hence, it is probably best that a WLF member remain single– at least in the eyes of the State– and women who desire an active role in terrorism against the System cannot afford to have dependent children. Movement morality must be fitted to the person and specialties of the operations involved.
Some may want to rob a supermarket the day after payday, netting around $70,000.00, and then finance other, greater operations. Some may decide to become as "wolfpacks". Wolfpackers are rumored to be in existence today, a secret society of "wolves in sheep's clothes" posing as liberal renegades, miscegenators, etc., to lure victims to a sudden disappearance. The idea is said to have originated with the "pseudo-gangs" of Africa at the time the British were fighting the Mau Mau. They looked Black (chemicals on the skin and eyes), talked Black and smelled Black (captured clothes). The Mau Mau never knew the difference until they were shot in the back. One can only think of what a half-dozen or so pseudo-Jew wolfpackers could do in Hollywood society, etc. The WLF will not play by System rules (including those agreed to by legalistic parties).
Ever since entering prison, I've met many who claim to have shot Blacks on those occasions when, first, they were there and, second, it looked like they could get away with it. If true, the reaction of those discovering the bodies must have been that they were killed by other Blacks. Consider if these had been Lone Eagles and had deposited WLF notes on the corpses. It would appear (and be in reality) as an overnight wave of racial killings and the System and media outcry would be fantastic! Blacks would stay on their own side of town for a time. There would be a demand for a legal "crackdown". Blacks would counter with more "Zebra" type groups. The races would polarize and the respective peoples would come together for common defense. (Remember the Redleg and Jayhawkers wars in Missouri and Kansas before the Civil War? The Redlegs ran the anti-slavers out of Missouri and the Jayhawkers ran the slavers out of Kansas .)
Political power is gun powder, don't let anyone tell you different. Ballots are only a replacement for guns and when the ballot box does not serve someone, they fight with guns. Martin Luther King was a "pacifist" but his marches caused violence (including his own death) which, in turn, caused Blacks to burn many American cities. When American Whites get the spirit and organize as the Klan did after the Civil War in the South, the WLF will be born.
The WLF will need public support and, like the 1st Era Klan (33-1, some call it), they will use their loot to help widows and indebted farmers, etc., as well as to run out the modern-day "carpetbaggers". They will kill top JDL leaders as they will kill all enemies– Jew, Black, and traitor Whites who side against their own people. If the System tries to black out the news, the people will demand to know what's going on. ("Why has the Statue of Liberty been painted red??") With a strong, nationwide WLF, the murder of a mixed couple will cause the reaction that miscegenation is a bad risk. The following generation will know that it just isn't done. (Consider a mixed marriage in Northern Ireland today: a target for both sides.)
By the year 2000, terrorism will include atomic bombs, chemical as well as germ warfare. The successful terrorist group will be the one which bars no device and which is proficient in all. The Spisaks, Franklins and Mathews will be remembered for their moderate and humane treatment and style. The do-nothing, go-nowhere approach of today's overground groups are driving more people into becoming Lone Eagles for lack of any short-term victories since Rockwell's days. Since the Commander's death, fifteen years ago, the NS Movement has done NOTHING but divide and sub-divide into smaller and smaller "parties", all of which do little more than bicker and quarrel with one another. Only one national group, the National Socialist Liberation Front of Joseph Tommasi's creation, has claimed an underground section (part of which is in Canada, I expect).
I'll tell you that things are going to change in the next fifteen years or else you can kiss your White baby goodbye for it will have become brown! The other White Movements are doing little better. Now is the time to organize for the future. Canada today is America tomorrow. When they outlaw you, you'll either be an outlaw or you'll be nothing! If printing is all you can do, then print. But be prepared to go to jail for it. At least you'll be a point of injustice the WLF can protest.
Terrorists often become known and cannot always hide in a basement. In later stages, WLF teams and groups will hide in wilderness areas, always on the move, and they will sometimes fight hit-and-run engagements with the mongrelized U.S. Army. This will be a first since the Civil War and will certainly set the stage for open war.
Let us consider also a Russian invasion. Will you prefer to fight adjoined to some mixed American Freedom Fighters? The WLF must maintain its independence at all costs. A Russian invasion would only help us win our own territory and gain more sympathy with the general public. On the other hand, a war in which this country fought in the defense of Israel would put us in the "traitor" class except in the eyes of those few who saw the error of such a military sham on the part of "our" government.
In the end, the WLF may need to come out of the wilderness and into normal combat. This will require a general race war already in progress and reaching into the ranks of the armed forces. I can't predict everything but! can promise you that if you want a free and White America– or even a piece of it– it is going to be a long and DIRTY fight. Therefore, I suggest you'd best be prepared.
[This essay was issued by the Universal Order as a special supplement to SIEGE.]
Previous Chapter | Index | Next Chapter
Brought to you exclusively by SolarGeneral.com