Stephen Harrison
Email: vcu5080@hotmail.com
Pass: rec4on517
Cell #: 602-568-4195
Home #: 480-264-5545
Address: 26435 N. 42nd Place / Phoenix, AZ 85050-8943   MD1340
Birthdate: May 16, 1960
Social Security Number: 049-62-3400
Match.com Online Dating login : "AzSteve517"  email: vcu5080@hotmail.com   pass: rec4on517
Facebook.com Login: vcu5080@hotmail.com   pass: rec4on517

So much for "robust password security" huh Stephen.



From:GolfNow.com Phoenix
Subj: Reservation Confirmation - GolfNow.com/Phoenix
Date: 6/21/11 8:39:27 AM
Show details
Thank you Stephen Harrison,

Here are your tee time reservation details. . .

Group Name: Stephen Harrison - 4802645545
Golf Channel Solutions Confirmation Number: 8194050
Course Confirmation Number: 31B9A02
Location: GolfNow.com/Phoenix
Golf Course: Vista Verde Golf Club
Tee Date: Sunday, June 26, 2011
Tee Time: 9:50:00 AM
Number of Players: 1
Source: GolfNow.com/Phoenix

Other Information: Rate include golf cart and range balls. Carts 90 degrees weather and turf conditions permitting. Vista Verde's clubhouse and Golf Shop are not completed, however, there is now a temporary shop on site for check-in. Players are provided bottled water along with beverage cart service.


Payment Details:
$20.50 - Total Green Fees
$3.49 - Taxes and Fees
---------------------------------
$23.99 - Grand Total
$23.99 - Amount Paid Online
---------------------------------
$0.00 - Amount Due at Course
For 1 player, the non-tax amount due per player at the golf course is $0.00


These tee times are non-refundable and non-cancelable. If you or a member of your party becomes unable to play, you will still be charged for each round of golf you purchased. If the golf course is closed due to weather we will issue a refund.

These Tee Times are offered by GolfNow Phoenix and not the golf course. Call 1-800-767-3574 or email us at customerservice@golfchannelsolutions.com for assistance. 100% due online to GolfNow.

We ask that our customers adhere to golf course dress code - No denim allowed - Collared shirt is required - Soft spikes only. Players & guests are required to follow all course policies and procedures as outlined by the staff.



If you know someone that would like to sign up for tee times at GolfNow.com/Phoenix, forward this email to them and have them click here.
Thank you for playing Vista Verde Golf Club. 



From:American Airlines@aa.com
Subj: E-Ticket Confirmation-EMCCIF 09JUL
Date: 5/01/11 6:51:43 PM
Show details
AA banner
	
Date of Issue: 01MAY11

Gary Harrison:

Thank you for choosing American Airlines / American Eagle, a member of the oneworld® Alliance.  Below are your itinerary and receipt for the ticket(s) purchased.  Please print and retain this document for use throughout your trip.

Record Locator: EMCCIF

You may check in and obtain your boarding pass for U.S. domestic electronic tickets within 24 hours of your flight time online at AA.com by using www.aa.com/checkin or at a Self-Service Check-In machine at the airport.  Check-in options may be found at  www.aa.com/options.  For information regarding American Airlines checked baggage policies, please visit www.aa.com/baggageinfo.   For faster check-in  at the airport, scan the barcode at any AA Self-Service machine.

You must present a government-issue photo ID and either your boarding pass or a priority verification card at the security screening checkpoint.




From:generalmanager@midwaychevy.com
Subj: Midway Chevrolet - Your complete satisfaction is our goal
Date: 6/12/11 4:10:26 AM
Show details


Dear Stephen,

This is simply a letter to thank you for choosing myself and my team here at Midway Chevrolet for the purchase of your 2005 VOLKSWAGEN JETTA.  I know that we will maintain your complete satisfaction, not just in the purchase of your vehicle, but also in meeting your service needs.  

If you have any friends or family in the market for a new or pre-owned vehicle, please send them our way, and we will treat them with the same courtesy and respect you received. 

I know you will take much pleasure and pride in your vehicle.

Thank you again for choosing the team here at Midway Chevrolet!

 

Sincerely,

Shaun Frink
Sales Consultant
Phone: 602-866-0102

MidwayChevy.com

 


This email was sent to: vcu5080@hotmail.com.
From: Midway Chevrolet 2323 W Bell Rd Phoenix, AZ 85023

Update Preferences - to update your communication preferences.
Remove - to choose which lists to be safely and instantly removed from.
Report Abuse - to safely report abuse and to stop all future email communications [REF_V6215260-164545_NO].



From:Avangate Customer Service
Subj: Advanced SystemCare PRO v4
Date: 5/03/11 6:12:24 PM
Show details

 
Dear Stephen Harrison,
 
 
Please follow the link below to download your copy of the product you 
have ordered, Advanced SystemCare PRO v4:
 
https://secure.avangate.com/?sid=7764f31de3&dld
 
To avoid truncated link errors, copy/paste the entire link into your 
web browser.
 
Please find below the license registration/activation information for 
the product you have ordered, Advanced SystemCare PRO v4:
 
Name: Stephen Harrison
Email: vcu5080@hotmail.com
 
License code: 4EE4A-E06BE-F54A4-20AAA
***********************************************************
 
Detailed information from Iobit:
 
Registration guide:
 
1) Open Advanced SystemCare v4 Free. If you do not have one, you need 
download it from
 
http://www.iobit.com/downloadcenter.php?product=advanced-systemcare-v4
 
 
2) Click "Upgrade Now" button at the bottom, and click "Enter 
License", then enter the following license to activate your Advanced 
SystemCare v4 PRO.
 
====================================
License Code:	4EE4A-E06BE-F54A4-20AAA
====================================
This license can activate 1 PC(s)
 
Note: please use "Copy"&"Paste" to enter the license information.
 
Should you have any inquiries regarding the IObit products, please 
feel free to write to us. We will be pleased to help you.
 
***********************************************************
 
Please keep this email for future reference.
 
For product installation, activation and other technical support 
issues, please contact the software publisher:
 
Iobit
Email: http://www.iobit.com/onlinesupport.html
 
For download, or other payment related issues please contact Avangate 
by email at: support@avangate.com
To get further payment support for your purchase, please sign-up 
using your email address vcu5080@hotmail.com to Avangate myAccount at 
https://secure.avangate.com/myaccount/?lang=&e=vcu5080@hotmail.com&k=825d53300154ae1d30d02385ad9dd6f1.
With Avangate myAccount you can:
 
    * View order details and keep track of your online orders status
    * Gain instant access to your online shopping history
    * Re-download license keys/codes* and download invoices
    * Manage your subscription payments (auto-renewal)
    * Renew the license of the purchased software when it expires
    * Find support contact details such as phone and email addresses 
of software publishers
    * Download the installation files of the purchased software
 
Thank you for shopping with us.
 
Best regards,
--
The Avangate Team
 
Avangate BV
http://www.avangate.com
support@avangate.com



From:Xbox LIVE
Subj: Price change for Xbox LIVE Gold subscriptions
Date: 8/30/10 6:52:13 PM
Show details
If you are having trouble viewing this e-mail, please view the online version.
	
Xbox 360 - Jump in.
								
Dear YoUnG x YaCoB69:
Thank you for being a valued member of Xbox LIVE Gold. We hope you are enjoying the many exciting and exclusive features that are included in your membership. We wanted to let you know about an upcoming price increase for your Xbox LIVE Gold subscription and how you can lock in your current price to continue enjoying everything you've come to love about Xbox LIVE, plus all the upcoming additions, including ESPN and Hulu Plus.
Over the past seven years, Xbox LIVE has evolved from an online gaming platform to an all-in-one gaming and entertainment service. As an Xbox LIVE Gold member, you can not only play blockbuster games, such as Halo: Reach with your friends online, you can also stream movies from Netflix* and music from Last.fm right to your TV. You can even connect with friends near and far on Facebook® and Twitter™. Plus, you also enjoy exclusive discounts and early access to game demos.
And we aren't even close to being done. This holiday, Xbox LIVE is adding new Gold features, including ESPN and Video Kinect, with Hulu Plus coming on Xbox LIVE in 2011.
• 	With ESPN on Xbox LIVE, you can stream and watch over 3,500 live and on-demand sporting events plus highlights.*
• 	Video Kinect allows you to chat with family and friends on the big screen, right from the comfort of your living room—no headset or controller required.*
• 	With Hulu Plus on Xbox LIVE you will be able to enjoy a customized Hulu Plus experience that will include Kinect navigation and Xbox LIVE Parties*
Besides launching the new features and titles, we will also be increasing the price of Gold membership on November 1, 2010. The new prices are as follows:
	
		Old Price 		New Price 	
	 1-Month Gold Subscription 		$7.99 		$9.99 	
	 3-Month Gold Subscription 		$19.99 		$24.99 	
	 12-Month Gold Subscription 		$49.99 		$59.99 	
If the renewal date on your current subscription is on or after November 1, 2010, your subscription will automatically renew at the new price, charged to the credit card we currently have on file for your account.
								
								
		At only $5 per month, our 12-month offer continues to be your best value. And, because you are a loyal member, we want to give you the opportunity to lock in your current price with an additional discount. Click here or log on to Xbox LIVE from your console to review and take advantage of these limited-time offers. 		
								
								
As always, you can cancel your membership before the renewal date by calling 1-800-4MYXBOX, although we certainly would not want you to miss out on all the great new features coming this November. And don't forget that your friends will want you to get online this holiday to play the latest blockbuster games, including Halo: Reach, Call of Duty®: Black Ops™, Kinect Sports, Kinect Joy Ride, and more.
We hope that you will continue to enjoy all the great gaming, entertainment, and social experiences that Xbox LIVE has to bring today—and in the future.
Sincerely,
The Xbox LIVE Team 



From:PC Tools Sales
Subj: Privacy Guardian Confirmation #206932325
Date: 5/21/08 8:02:47 PM
Show details

Dear Stephen,
 
Thank-you for your purchase of Privacy Guardian from PC Tools!
 
Please save this message as it includes important license information and instructions on how to register your copy of Privacy Guardian. 
 
Instructions to register Privacy Guardian
-----------------------------------------
Privacy Guardian is registered by clicking "Register" and entering your name and license key into the evaluation version. Once valid license information is entered the program will then be activated. For detailed instructions please follow the steps below:
 
1. Please ensure you have the latest evaluation version of Privacy Guardian installed on your computer. If not, please open the link below in your web-browser and then run the downloaded file to install. 
 
http://www.pctools.com/downloads/pginstall.exe
 
2. Once installed, launch Privacy Guardian from the Start menu and when you see the main screen click on the "Register" button found in the top right corner. 
 
3. The registration screen will then be shown where you should enter both your name and license key exactly as shown below (please copy & paste). 
 
Licensed to:
Stephen Harrison
 
License code:
EC3C-409B-3F32-2F04-7F10-5761-5F38-9CB4
 
Please note both must be entered exactly as shown as they are both required to validate the license information. 
 
4. Click the "Register" button at the bottom of the screen and you will be shown a message indicating that the program is now successfully registered, click "OK" to continue. 
 
5. Congratulations, the registration process is now complete and you will now be returned to the fully registered version of the Privacy Guardian. 
 
If you have any questions regarding this process please contact PC Tools Support at http://www.pctools.com/support/ and include your receipt number "206932325", license information and a detailed description of the problem you are experiencing. 
 
Thank-you,
 
PC Tools Software
sales@pctools.com
http://www.pctools.com/



From:PC Tools Sales
Subj: Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus Confirmation #206932325
Date: 5/21/08 8:02:46 PM
Show details

Dear Stephen,
 
Thank-you for your purchase of Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus from PC Tools!
 
Please save this message as it includes important license information and instructions on how to register your copy of Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus. 
 
Instructions to register Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus
------------------------------------------------------
Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus is registered by entering your name and license code into the evaluation version. Once valid license information is entered the program will then be activated. For detailed instructions please follow the steps below:
 
1. Please ensure you have the latest evaluation version of Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus installed on your computer. If not, please open the link below in your web-browser and click on the large green button, then run the downloaded file to install. 
 
http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/download/
 
2. To enable the full registered version please run Spyware Doctor with AntiVirus. 
Click on the 'Register' button along the left hand column of the main interface. You will now see the Register Spyware Doctor screen. 
 
3. Copy and Paste your Name and License code referenced below into the two registration textbox fields. 
 
Name:
Stephen Harrison
 
License key:
EC3C-7EC4-3528-A4B2-2007-831D-A2B9-7315-33D7-91B4
 
Please make sure that all information is entered to the far left of the textbox fields and that there are no blank spaces to the left. 
 
4. Click the "Register" button at the bottom left corner of the window and you should be advised that the program is now successfully registered and that you should perform a Smart Update. Click "Yes" to perform the Smart Update and follow the prompts to download any available updates. If you are advised the license details are invalid, please double check you have entered the details exactly as above into the two fields. 
 
5. Click 'Finish' at the end of Smart Update to complete the registration process of Spyware Doctor. 
 
If you have any questions regarding this process please contact PC Tools Support at http://www.pctools.com/support/ and include your order number "206932325", license information and a detailed description of the problem you are experiencing. 
 
Thank-you,
 
PC Tools Software
sales@pctools.com
http://www.pctools.com/





From:PC Tools Sales
Subj: Registry Mechanic Confirmation #206932325
Date: 5/21/08 8:02:46 PM
Show details

Dear Stephen,
 
Thank-you for your purchase of Registry Mechanic from PC Tools!
 
Please save this message as it includes important license information and instructions on how to register your copy of Registry Mechanic. 
 
Instructions to register Registry Mechanic
-----------------------------------------
Registry Mechanic is registered by clicking "Register" and entering your name and license key into the evaluation version. Once valid license information is entered the program will then be activated. For detailed instructions please follow the steps below:
 
1. Please ensure you have the latest evaluation version of Registry Mechanic installed on your computer. If not, please open the link below in your web-browser and then run the downloaded file to install. 
 
http://www.pctools.com/downloads/rminstall.exe
 
2. Once installed, launch Registry Mechanic from the Start menu and when you see the main screen click on the "Register" button found in the top right corner. 
 
3. The registration screen will then be shown where you should enter both your name and license key exactly as shown below (please copy & paste). 
 
Licensed to:
Stephen Harrison
 
License code:
EC3C-12D6-DADE-175B-0BEE-0C01-4271-D114
 
Please note both must be entered exactly as shown as they are both required to validate the license information. 
 
4. Click the "Register" button at the bottom of the screen and you will be shown a message indicating that the program is now successfully registered, click "OK" to continue. 
 
5. Congratulations, the registration process is now complete and you will now be returned to the fully registered version of the Registry Mechanic. 
 
If you have any questions regarding this process please contact PC Tools Support at http://www.pctools.com/support/ and include your receipt number "206932325", license information and a detailed description of the problem you are experiencing. 
 
Thank-you,
 
PC Tools Software
sales@pctools.com
http://www.pctools.com/





From:WHarri3116@aol.com
Subj: Fwd: Lone Sailor E-News
Date: 7/24/10 3:34:01 PM
Show details
HI IF YOU WANT TO SEE WHAT i LOOKED LIKE BACK THEN CHECK THIS OUT WHERE IT SAYS NAVYTV click on it then at top click on nay log then put my name and it should come up  thanks love Dad
 

    From: info@navymemorial.org
    To: wharri3116@aol.com
    Sent: 7/23/2010 12:25:42 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
    Subj: Lone Sailor E-News
    
    
    From:WHarri3116@aol.com
Subj: Fwd: USS NYC
Date: 7/24/10 3:13:17 PM
Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, Image.jpg, ...
Show details
Hi Guys see we arew not down yet the fellow that sent this was on our ship    thanks  love  dad 
 

    From: akabastian@embarqmail.com
    To: vivgram@wmconnect.com, ffooxxiiee.one@verizon.net, ghowlett@twcny.rr.com, dotemac@att.net, glubert@bellsouth.net, gcjhiggins@netzero.com, caldrich7@tampabay.rr.com, Lou@TheNashes.org, rrhea@twcny.rr.com, Cstahlhammer@aol.com, rdmfennell@att.net, gerdwork@comcast.net, WHarri3116@aol.com, dseifert@ptd.net, cooneyt@sprintmail.com, haljk317@aol.com
    Sent: 7/24/2010 10:05:58 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
    Subj: USS NYC
     

     
     
     
     From:WILLIAM HARRISON
Subj: Fwd: Fw: Have a Happy Thanksgiving!
Date: 11/21/09 10:57:16 AM
2.2140096638, 4.2140096638, 6.2140096638, 1.2140096638, 3.2140096638, 7.2140096638, 5.2140096638
Show details


----- Forwarded Message -----

From: Russ

To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;

Sent: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:01:48 -0500 (EST)

Subject: Fw: Have a Happy Thanksgiving!



        HAPPY

THANKSGIVING TO ALL.   RUSS

    Subject: Have a Happy

      Thanksgiving!

    Be

      sure to click on the Pumpkin Pie at the end for a great card.
      
      
      
From:WHarri3116@aol.com
Subj: Fwd: Read this one!
Date: 11/18/09 3:00:30 PM
Read this...eml
Show details
Hi guys  Steve you probably know about this. I guess you will have to use the inside lock   Thanks  Dad


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: akabastian@embarqmail.com
To: vivgram@wmconnect.com; ffooxxiiee.one@verizon.net; ghowlett@twcny.rr.com; dotemac@att.net; caldrich7@tampabay.it.com; gcjhiggins@netzero.com; glubert@bellsouth.net; Lou@TheNashes.org; gerdwork@comcast.net; WHarri3116@aol.com; cooneyt@sprintmail.com; alhowlett@juno.com
Subject: Read this one!
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:01:24 -0500

 

    Thought this was very interesting!!!
    ---
    How to Lock Your Car and Why

    I locked my car.  As I walked away I heard my car door unlock.  I went back and locked my car again  three times . Each time, as soon as I started to walk away, I would hear it unlock again!!  Naturally alarmed, I looked around and there were two guys sitting in a car in the fire lane next to the store. They were obviously watching me intently, and there was no doubt they were somehow involved in this very weird situation.  I quickly chucked the errand I was on, jumped in my car and sped away.  I went straight t o the police station, told them what had happened, and found out I was part of a new, and very successful, scheme being used to gain entry into cars.  Two weeks later, my friend's son had a similar happening....
    While traveling, my friend's son stopped at a roadside rest to use the bathroom.  When he came out to his car less than 4-5 minutes later, someone had gotten into his car and stolen his cell phone, laptop computer, GPS navigator, briefcase.....y ou name it.  He called the police and since there were no signs of his car being broken into, the police told him he had been a victim of the latest robbery tactic -- there is a device that robbers are using now to clone your security code when you lock your doors on your car using your key-chain locking device..

    They sit a distance away and watch for their next victim. They know you are going inside of the store, restaurant, or bathroom and that they now have a few minutes to steal and run. The police officer said to  manually lock your car door-by hitting the lock button inside the car -- that way if there is someone sitting in a parking lot watching for their next victim, it will not be yo u.

    When you hit the lock button on your car upon exiting, it does not send the security code, but if you walk away and use the door lock on your key chain, it sends the code through the airwaves where it can be instantly stolen.
    This is very real.

    Be wisely aware of what you just read and please pass this note on.  Look how many times we all lock our doors with our remote just to be sure we remembered to lock them -- and bingo, someone has our code...and whatever was in our car.

    Snopes Approved --.Please share with everyone you know!!
    
    
    From:WHarri3116@aol.com
Subj: ADDRESS change
Date: 12/14/08 1:02:09 PM
Show details
Hi steve addresschange from embarq to wharri3116@aol.com   It was nice talking to you this afternoon and yes sent me your home address ,so i can sent you  your xmas check    thank you dad




From:WHarri3116@aol.com
Subj: Fwd: FW: 6/16/08
Date: 6/29/08 11:34:17 AM
P1000671.jpg, P1000672.jpg, P1000673.jpg, P1000674.jpg, P1000676.jpg, P1000677.jpg, P1000678.jpg, P1000679.jpg, P1000680.jpg, P1000681.jpg, ...
Show details
hi Steve see if these go thru this from peggy's computor


Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.


--Forwarded Message Attachment--
Subject: FW: 6/16/08
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:19:52 -0700
From: Paula.Payne-Boland@wellpoint.com
To: WHARRI3116@AOL.COM

 
 
Paula Payne-Boland
Senior Claims Rep.
300 Brickstone Sq.
Andover , Mass.
Phone : 413-782-7683 ( Paula.Payne-Boland@wellpoint.com)
                                                                                              
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

From: Tomusafret@verizon.net [mailto:Tomusafret@verizon.net]
Sent: Mon 6/16/2008 8:04 AM
To: Payne-Boland, Paula; Tomusafret@verizon.net
Subject: 6/16/08



From:scorecards@golfshot.com
Subj: Cave Creek Municipal Golf Course - Scorecard
Date: 6/12/11 3:53:53 PM
Show details
  	Scorecard 	 
  	

Thanks for playing your round with Golfshot. You can view your scorecard below. Forward this email to share with the other golfers in your round.
	 
	

Cave Creek Municipal Golf Course
Blue Tees 71.6 / 119
Phoenix, Arizona United States
June 12, 2011
	
	EAGLE 		BIRDIE 		PAR 		BOGEY 		2BOGEY+

STEVE 	1 	2 	3 	4 	5 	6 	7 	8 	9 	OUT 	10 	11 	12 	13 	14 	15 	16 	17 	18 	IN 	TOTAL
BLUE 	363 	510 	195 	387 	397 	532 	197 	437 	422 	3440 	341 	521 	370 	171 	392 	383 	518 	208 	388 	3292 	6732
HANDICAP 	15 	5 	17 	11 	7 	13 	9 	1 	3 		16 	4 	14 	18 	6 	10 	12 	2 	8 		
PAR 	4 	5 	3 	4 	4 	5 	3 	4 	4 	36 	4 	5 	4 	3 	4 	4 	5 	3 	4 	36 	72
SCORE 	5 	5 	3 	5 	5 	4 	4 	5 	5 	41 	4 	6 	5 	4 	5 	4 	6 	4 	5 	43 	84
ROUND SCORE 	E 	-1 	-2 	-2 	-2 	-4 	-4 	-5 	-5 	-5 	-6 	-6 	-6 	-6 	-6 	-7 	-7 	-7 	-7 	-7 	-7
NET SCORE 	0 	-1 	-1 	0 	0 	-2 	0 	-1 	0 	-5 	-1 	0 	0 	0 	0 	-1 	0 	0 	0 	-2 	-7
TEE CLUB 	1W 	1W 	4i 	1W 	1W 	1W 	5W 	1W 	1W 		1W 	1W 	1W 	5i 	1W 	1W 	1W 	5W 	1W 		
FAIRWAYS 	x 	x 		x 	x 	x 		x 	x 	100% 	x 	x 	⇒ 		x 	x 	x 		x 	86% 	93%
GIR 		x 	x 	x 		x 	x 			56% 	x 	x 		x 		x 				44% 	50%
PUTTS 	2 	2 	2 	3 	2 	1 	3 	2 	2 	19 	2 	3 	1 	3 	2 	2 	2 	2 	2 	19 	2.1/38
SAND SHOTS 																					
PENALTIES 																				



From:customerservice@salliemae.com
Subj: User ID Reminder
Date: 7/24/10 9:13:38 AM
Show details

*** AUTOMATED MESSAGE. DO NOT REPLY. *** 
 
 Your request for your User ID has been processed. Our records indicate that your user ID is: vcu5080
 If you require further assistance, you may call 888/2Sallie (888/272-5543).
 
*** AUTOMATED MESSAGE. DO NOT REPLY. ***



From:Sallie Mae
Subj: Your Sallie Mae Statement is ready to view
Date: 3/23/10 5:39:21 AM
Show details

Please do not respond to this automated message. Emails sent to this    
address are not monitored.                                              
                                                                        
You have a new student loan account document available online. To get it
now, simply click on this link:                                         
https://mediaserver.salliemae.com/MediaServer/ecorrespondence.do        
                                                                        
Use the same user ID and password you created for your Sallie Mae       
online account to access this site. If you have not yet created an      
account, you'll be able to do so on the web site.                       
                                                                        
You'll need Adobe Reader 5.0 to view the file. For optimal viewing, we  
recommend Adobe 6.0 or higher. Download a free copy of the Adobe Reader 
at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html.                
                                                                        
If you'd rather get account correspondence via U.S. mail, please log    
into your account and click on "Edit email address and permissions' to  
update your preferences.                                                
                                                                        
We appreciate the opportunity to serve you.                             
                                                                        
Sincerely,                                                              
                                                                        
Sallie Mae Customer Service




From:Facebook
Subj: Geralyn I. Edwards posted on Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS), Arizona Highway Patrol's...
Date: 6/25/11 8:57:09 AM
Show details
facebook
	
Geralyn I. Edwards posted on Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS), Arizona Highway Patrol's Wall.
"THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOU DO!!!..."
View This Wall Post
Reply to this email to comment on this Wall post. 


From:Facebook
Subj: Geralyn I. Edwards also commented on Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS), Arizona Highway P...
Date: 6/25/11 8:53:09 AM
Show details
facebook	
Hi Steve,
Geralyn I. Edwards also commented on Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS), Arizona Highway Patrol's link.
Geralyn I. wrote: "Awesome!!"

See the comment thread

Reply to this email to comment on this link.
Thanks,
The Facebook Team



From:billpay@billpay.bankofamerica.com	
Subj: You have a new bill from Southwest Gas Corporation
Date: 6/23/11 11:51:54 PM
Show details
Bank of America Logo
	Remember:
Always look for your
SiteKey before you
Sign In »
		You have a new e-Bill from Southwest Gas Corporation - Southwest Gas :



Pay To Account Number:  	*********2006
Due Date:  	07/13/2011
Amount Due:  	$ 24.81
Account Balance:  	$ 24.81

View This e-Bill

e-Bill Initiated Payment Message: This e-bill has been scheduled to be paid automatically on July 12, 2011.*
*Note: The payment date is the date the Pay To account is scheduled to receive the payment.




From:Craig W. Floyd
Subj: Join the Law Enforcement Ride & Run to Remember Today
Date: 6/24/11 12:27:48 PM
Show details

 Ride and Run Email Stationery

Dear Stephen,

Because of your past support of the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund, we’re giving you a chance to register for the inaugural Law Enforcement Ride & Run to Remember at the early bird discounted rate of only $25.

But don't wait! Your early bird discount expires at 8pm EST on June 30th!

The Law Enforcement Ride & Run to Remember includes:

    * metric century: 62-mile bike ride for advanced cyclists;
    * half metric century: 31-mile bike ride for intermediate cyclists;
    * quarter metric century: 15-mile bike ride for beginning cyclists;
    * 5k run/walk; and
    * a family festival.

Register today at www.RideAndRunToRemember.org. Whether you are a law enforcement officer, know someone who is, or simply respect the work law enforcement officers do — This event is for you!

We hope you can join us for the Law Enforcement Ride & Run to Remember. We’re looking forward to a day of fun celebration with our families and our community.

Sincerely,
Craig Floyd
Craig W. Floyd
Chairman and CEO




From:Jim Waring for City Council
Subj: Police & Sheriffs Endorse Waring for Council
Date: 6/22/11 3:53:58 PM
Show details 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 22, 2011
	
Contact: Jim Waring
602-451-0402

 

Waring Receives Endorsement of  

Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs

 

Organization for police cites Waring's "Unwavering Support for Public Safety"

 

PHOENIX, AZ - Jim Waring, Republican Candidate for Phoenix City Council, today proudly announced that his campaign has been endorsed by the Arizona Conference of Police and Sheriffs (AZCOPS).

 

Larry Lopez, President of AZCOPS, cited Jim Waring's "unwavering support for public safety issues."

 

"I am very pleased and honored to receive this endorsement," said Waring. "Public safety has always been a top issue for me in public life, and it will continue to be a top priority for me when I represent my neighbors on the Phoenix City Council."

 

Waring has previously received numerous accolades for his work on behalf of public safety. Aside from being a graduate of the Phoenix Citizens' Police Academy, Waring was the Men's Anti-Violence Network's Man of the Year, and authored the state's toughest DUI laws, which has reduced fatalities related to drinking and driving.

 

###

 

Jim Waring is the Republican candidate for Phoenix City Council in District 2. He previously served in the Arizona State Senate from 2003 - 2010, where he was named Champion of the Taxpayer for his efforts to reign in government spending and reduce waste.

 

To learn more, visit JimWaring.com.


From:Revolution Golf
Subj: [Customer] Important information regarding your recent purchase.
Date: 6/22/11 8:04:20 AM
Show details

Dear Revolution Golf™Student,

How would you like to upgrade your recent purchase and get the physical versions of 3 of my best selling products shipped to your door?

Hundreds of people have asked if we had physical versions available, so we rushed to get a limited quantity printed.

This is your chance to get your "hands" on these amazing training programs.  Pop the dvd's into your dvd player, or take the fully illustrated manual with you out on the course or the range.  Either way you can't lose.

There are an extremely limited number available, so you better act fast.  

The clock is ticking down on this opportunity to upgrade your order, and do it at a massive savings.

Just our way of saying thank you for being such a valued customer.

Click the link below to watch a short video I put together explaining everything.

Click Here For The Details And To Upgrade

Paul Wilson & The Staff At Revolution Golf™


605 Prince Street, Beaufort, SC 29902
www.revolutiongolf.com

This email was sent to: vcu5080@hotmail.com

© 2011 Copyright Maven Marketing, LLC. All rights reserved.

Follow this link to be removed from my daily Revolution 
Golf Tips newsletter.




From:Match.com by Mail
Subj: See today's matches: jar1822, BondGirlinAZ, and more.
Date: 6/23/11 12:55:27 AM
Show details
Add matchmail@connect.match.com to your address book to ensure delivery.
Match.com 	MORE dates, relationships and marriages than any other site.
	
Browse your Match.com by Mail results on the site. View Now »AzSteve517,
Here are your newest matches.
	
		
Here are your Mutual Matches:

	jar1822 	
	jar1822 	
	90% match
9 photos
47, Scottsdale, AZ
View Profile »
		
	BondGirlinAZ 	
	BondGirlinAZ 	
	83% match
13 photos
50, Phoenix, AZ
View Profile »
		
	NewEnglandGir111 	
	NewEnglandGir111 	
	90% match
13 photos
50, Surprise, AZ
View Profile »
	maybebaby1210 	
	maybebaby1210 	
	81% match
3 photos
44, Phoenix, AZ
View Profile »
		
	dianekarla 	
	dianekarla 	
	83% match
8 photos
43, Chandler Heights, AZ
View Profile »
		
	GwendoAZ 	
	GwendoAZ 	
	86% match
4 photos
46, Scottsdale, AZ
View Profile »
	wildflowernmt 	
	wildflowernmt 	
	95% match
7 photos
48, Scottsdale, AZ
View Profile »
		
	LUVNME42 	
	LUVNME42 	
	86% match
12 photos
42, Phoenix, AZ
View Profile »
		
	pikurpoison 	
	pikurpoison 	
	88% match
10 photos
45, Phoenix, AZ
View Profile »
	64julie 	
	64julie 	
	90% match
4 photos
47, Phoenix, AZ
View Profile »
		
	Bajabyrd 	
	Bajabyrd 	
	77% match
9 photos
46, Gold Canyon, AZ
View Profile »
		
	melinda9999 	
	melinda9999 	
	83% match
2 photos
47, Mesa, AZ
View Profile »
There are new people joining Match daily, so visit the site for even more great matches.
	


Want to see everyone who's viewed you? Subscribe Now »

Chemisty.com: What does the length of your fingers say about your personality? Take the free personality test! 	
	  		
							
Your satisfaction is important to us. To ensure that you receive these emails, select "Add/Save to Address Book" in your email browser and follow the appropriate instructions.

Please do not reply to this email as your response will not be received.

To discontinue receipt of this type of email, sign in and choose "Do not send me Match.com by Mail."

You've received this email because you asked to have matches emailed to you daily. You are in control and can change the frequency with which you receive this email at any time. Or, contact Customer Care directly.

Match.com, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 25458
Dallas, TX 75225

Please note: This email may contain advertisements.




From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: email
To: Nancy Harrison
Date: 11/02/10 1:57:22 PM
Hide details
Nancy, it was great talking with you today.  Enjoy your roller blading and say hello to the girls.  My email account is: vcu5080@hotmail.com 




From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: RE: LEMSC Meeting
Date: 10/20/10 9:38:19 AM
Show details
Sorry, I guess I forgot to include you in the distribution list.  I sent out a message via lotus notes yesterday.  Basically I only stayed for the pilots grievance and our hearing.  They seated the new member, Jay Heiler.  The council voted to re-instate the pilot's SDA by a vote of 2-1. Heiler and Goodman for, Luck against.  They continued our hearing to November 17th.  Mr. Heiler will review the file from the previous meetings and we will be able to present new information, but we will not re-present the whole case.  Mr. Heiler seemed very fair and articulate...so at least we should get a fair hearing...I have my fingers crossed.

Rumour has it that Hegerty said in a Director's meeting to metro that by transferring those 21 positions to CVEB, the department will save $3 million, annually.  Dale wanted me to check to see if anyone who was there would be willing to write and sign a letter to that effect. Apparently Brant Benham was there...not sure if that is good enough, but I asked him to contact Dale and work something out.

From: mprochko@cox.net
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: LEMSC Meeting
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:19:03 -0700

Steve,
 
Did anything happen today?

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Stephen Harrison
    To: Kelly Heape ; William Beck ; Heather Alvarez ; Timothy Chung ; Ray Butler ; Walter Mercer ; Mike Prochko ; Brant Benham
    Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:59 AM
    Subject: RE: LEMSC Meeting

    I plan on attending...

    > Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 06:43:57 -0700
    > From: kelly.heape@cox.net
    > To: wdbeck@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; rynososa@yahoo.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; mprochko@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com
    > Subject: Re: Re: LEMSC Meeting
    >
    > I will not be. Still in Virginia.
    >
    > ---- "rynososa@yahoo.com" <rynososa@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > Is everyone attending Monday ?
    >
    > Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
    >
    > ----- Reply message -----
    > From: "Timothy Chung" <tchung4609@gmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, Oct 15, 2010 12:43 PM
    > Subject: LEMSC Meeting
    > To: "Kelly Heape" <kelly.heape@cox.net>, "Brant Benham" <d8lt@yahoo.com>, "Heather Alvarez" <princesscop@hotmail.com>, "Steve Harrison" <vcu5080@hotmail.com>, "Ray Butler" <rynososa@yahoo.com>, "Walter Mercer" <waltermercer4193@msn.com>, "Bill Beck" <wdbeck@cox.net>, "Mike Prochko" <mprochko@cox.net>
    >
    > Please keep this to yourselves.
    >
    > Here is Iven's response to a question posed by Phil Case. Phil asked
    > if Iven expected any substantive discussion/action on the RIFs at next
    > Monday's meeting?
    >
    > I have been advised from the Governor's office that Mr. Heiler plans
    > on attending the meeting on Monday. However, he will not be able to
    > participate in any decision regarding the RIF. There may be
    > discussion on the RIF and the two Council members, Mr. Luck and Ms.
    > Goodman could still render a decision, but I don't expect that. Other
    > than discussion, I think the action will be to continue to another
    > date when all members can participate in the decision. I won't know
    > the mechanics of that later meeting until next week at best.
    >
    > --
    > Sent from my mobile device
    >
    >
    > Tim





From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: RE: ASU Football Assignment: Saturday 9/25/2010
Date: 9/23/10 7:20:34 AM
Show details
That will work just fine.  See you saturday

From: bymorris@cox.net
Subject: Re: ASU Football Assignment: Saturday 9/25/2010
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 07:10:08 -0700
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

Steve,

How about I drive on Saturday and pick you up about 1600?  You can drive on Sunday.

Does this work for you?

Ken

On Sep 22, 2010, at 7:19 AM, Stephen Harrison wrote:

    Sounds great. Do you have a preference on which day to drive, or I can drive on both days if needed.

    From: bymorris@cox.net
    Subject: Fwd: ASU Football Assignment: Saturday 9/25/2010
    Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:47:35 -0700
    To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

    Steve, 

    Are you up for car pooling this weekend.  Do you want to alternate driving duties on Saturday and Sunday?

    KW

    Begin forwarded message:

        From: VMcCraw@azdps.gov
        Date: September 21, 2010 9:24:22 PM MST
        Cc: escudero@asu.edu, victor.mccraw@phoenix.gov
        Bcc: bymorris@cox.net
        Subject: ASU Football Assignment: Saturday 9/25/2010


        Greetings!
        You are assigned to work the ASU vs Oregon SATURDAY 9/25/2010 game at the Arizona State University Stadium.
         
        PLEASE READ THIS EMAIL CAREFULLY.
         
        Assignment
        ·         Kick-off for this game is scheduled for 1930 hours.
        ·         Below is an alphabetical list with 10-8 and 10-7 times, and your pre-game assignment.
        ·         Your 10-8 time is your on-post time or your briefing time (Check the schedule to be sure). Be at your post or the briefing site ready to go as indicated.
        ·         If you cannot fulfill your assignment, please contact me immediately at 602-513-3535 so that I can give as much notice as possible to your replacement. If I do not hear from you, I will assume you will be working.
         
        Uniform
        ·         Uniform of the day is Class B with smokey, corfam belt (no web gear), with polished brass and footwear.
        ·         BLACK T-SHIRTS ARE REQUIRED.
        ·         Bring your AZ DPS portable radio with lapel mic. (State Car-Car). Earpieces are recommended.
        ·         Bring your response gear (gas mask, chemical suit, helmet) in a bag with your name on it. Store these as directed by your supervisor, or briefing instructions.
         
        Parking
        (NOTE: Department vehicle use is not authorized for this assignment unless you are instructed otherwise by the Traffic Supervisor.)
        ·         Law enforcement parking will be in the Parking Lot #3, northeast of the stadium. Only thirty (30) spaces are reserved, so carpooling is recommended.
        ·         MAP  ATTACHED
        ·         DO NOT park near Wells Fargo Arena. Your vehicle will be towed.
        ·         If Lot #3 is full, you can park at Lot #19, east of the ASU PD HQ, which is on the southeast corner of Apache and College (325 E. Apache Blvd.)
        ·         There is no designated shuttle from Lot 19, so you will need to contact dispatch to let them know you need transportation.
         
        Briefing
        ·         If there it says “Post *” in the “Report to” box next to your 10-8 time, report directly to your assignment. DO NOT attend briefing.
        ·         All others, your 10-8 time is your briefing time in Wells Fargo Arena rooms 35-41.
        ·         Enter Wells Fargo Arena through the bottom doors on the WEST side. Go down the corridor to the right. The room will be on the left.
         
        BADGE
        	
        NAME
        	
        REPORT TO
        	
        10-8
        	
        10-7
        	
        PRE-GAME
        4451
        	
        Anderson, George
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SW Gate Supervisor
        4391
        	
        Andersson, Edward
        	
        Post *
        	
        1430
        	
        TBD
        	
        5th & College (Road Closure)
        4958
        	
        Aranda, Aurelio
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SE Gate 30 (Outside)
        6889
        	
        Auer, Benjamin
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SE Gate 20
        6143
        	
        Bailey, Robert
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        6th & College 10
        5281
        	
        Baum, Jeff
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        N Gate Supervisor
        5805
        	
        Begley, John
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SE End zone (Field)
        5005
        	
        Benitez, Jim
        	
        Briefing
        	
        0600
        	
        TBD
        	
        N Vehicle Gate Supervisor
        6138
        	
        Borquez, Jennifer
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SW End zone (Field)
        6829
        	
        Borquez, Nathan
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        NE End zone (Field)
        4031
        	
        Borquez, Peter
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        DPS Field Command
        5867
        	
        Bottoms, Richard
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        Structure 7 10
        4314
        	
        Chavez, Jimmy
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        W Bench South (Field)
        3444
        	
        Davis, Eddy
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        Field Supervisor
        5666
        	
        Dodge, Russ
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        Rio Salado & Packard 10
        6508
        	
        Drake, Devon
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        NFL Experience 20
        6755
        	
        D'Souza, Chris
        	
        Post *
        	
        1430
        	
        TBD
        	
        6th & Veterans Way (Road Cl.)
        4574
        	
        Enteman, Stephen
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        North Ticket Trailer
        6603
        	
        Felan, Daniel
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        W Bench North (Field)
        6250
        	
        Goodman, Heath
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        6th & Rural 20
        5784
        	
        Gregor, George
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        South Ticket Office
        4698
        	
        Hansen, Deloy
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        Structure 7 20
        5080
        	
        Harrison, Stephen
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        E Bench South (Field)
        3910
        	
        Herrera, Chuck
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        E Bench North (Field)
        5672
        	
        Kozubal, John
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        6th & Packard
        7121
        	
        Krizan, Andrew
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        6th & College 20
        7194
        	
        Logue, Gary
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        NW Gate
        4937
        	
        Mason, Timothy
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SW Gate 10
        4682
        	
        Mayfield, Samuel
        	
        Post *
        	
        1600
        	
        TBD
        	
        Student Line
        3781
        	
        McCraw, Victor
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        Command Post
        3782
        	
        McFarland, Shane
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        NW Gate Supervisor
        6514
        	
        Meadows, Travis
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        NFL Experience 30
        6282
        	
        Molter, Benjamin
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        NFL Experience 10
        4384
        	
        Morris, Kenneth
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        NE Gates Supervisor
        4885
        	
        Nelson, Christopher
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        Rio Salado & Packard 20
        7028
        	
        Osborn, Neil
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        Structure 5
        4808
        	
        Philpot, John
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        NE Gate
        4297
        	
        Romero, Chris
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SE Gates Supervisor
        8912
        	
        Sanders, Harold
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        South Tunnel
        9446
        	
        Schantz, William
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        Locker Room/South Tunnel
        7035
        	
        Schmidt, Clinton
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        Section 32 Bottom
        6094
        	
        Seeger, Jason
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SE Gate 10
        4759
        	
        Simpson, Warren
        	
        Post *
        	
        1430
        	
        TBD
        	
        Traffic Supervisor
        5019
        	
        Tanguma, Michael
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        Section 36 Bottom
        5443
        	
        Torres, Luis
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        NW End zone (Field)
        6964
        	
        Vasey, Michelle
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        SE Gate 40 (Outside)
        2954
        	
        Vasquez, Andres
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        Upper Stadium Command
        6468
        	
        White, Michael
        	
        Briefing
        	
        1700
        	
        TBD
        	
        Section 33 Bottom
        6100
        	
        Yeager, Jason
        	
        Post *
        	
        1630
        	
        TBD
        	
        6th & Rural 10
         
        Please call me if you any questions, mobile 602-513-3535.
        See you at the stadium,
         
        Vic
         
        Lieutenant Vic McCraw #3781
        Operational Training Commander
        Agency Support Division
        Arizona Department of Public Safety
        602-223-2297
         
         
         
         From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: (No Subject)
To: Gary Harrison
Date: 9/13/10 11:36:43 AM
Hide details
Gary and Dee.  Thanks for all of the updates on Dan.  I hope you two are doing OK.  My thoughts and prayers are with you and Dan.  My email address for access to Dan's web page is; vcu5080@hotmail.com.
 
Best wishes,



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Recent Intranet Posting - Taser X3
Date: 9/11/10 8:49:09 AM
Show details
I have heard Bud speak of owning Taser Stock in the past and I believe he is one of their adjunct trainers.  I do not know if this is still the case...but I would suspect so.  I would certainly be a conflict of interest if Bud was affiliated with Taser or owned stock and participated in the procurement process.

Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 08:04:21 -0700
Subject: Recent Intranet Posting - Taser X3
From: tchung4609@gmail.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com
CC: norrislaw@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com

I read the Intranet posting on the department's move to purchase the Taser X3s (attached).  I had a few questions since the message began with "Executive Staff has identified..." and knowing that not all members of Executive Staff were involved in this decision.
 
In years past, Bud Clark, who posted the message, was heavily involved in Taser International both with being one of their instructors and having a monetary interest by, I was told he holds stock in the company.  Can anyone confirm/verify if that is still the case???  This decision and activity seems to be dominated by Bud Clark and Jack Hegarty and has a hint of a conflict of interest.

-- 

Tim



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: Updated LEMSC Agenda
Date: 9/02/10 9:23:32 AM
Show details
I see the department posted an updated LEMSC agenda on the intranet.  They added the Introduction of Independent Legal Advisor - Presentation and discussion about the role of the independent advisor in the hearing process.  I am only speculating, but I wonder if this has to do about having a tie vote? 
 
Steve



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Aug 18 AHPA Meeting Notes
Date: 8/24/10 1:27:31 PM
Show details
Jim Bee is the recording secratary; however, I believe he had a proxy in his place, Officer Mark Howie.  In order to use them at the LEMSC hearing I don't know if we have to go through some formal process with the AHPA? or can you or Dale just request a copy of the recording(s)?
 
> From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
> To: princesscop@hotmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:58:51 -0700
> Subject: RE: Aug 18 AHPA Meeting Notes
>
> Who can get these recordings?
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Heather Alvarez [mailto:princesscop@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 10:18 AM
> To: Stephen M. Harrison ; kelly.heape@cox.net ; rynososa@yahoo.com ; wdbeck@cox.net ; Neil Landeen; preston-ahp@lycos.com ; tchung4609@gmail.com ; mprochko@cox.net ; d8lt@yahoo.com ; waltermercer4193@msn.com ; norrislaw@cox.net
> Subject: Re: Aug 18 AHPA Meeting Notes
>
> I agree, and we should also get the recording of the previous meeting where he said 2 captains would be reinstated and later denied ever saying it.
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Stephen M. Harrison" <vcu5080@hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:16:11
> To: <kelly.heape@cox.net>; <rynososa@yahoo.com>; <wdbeck@cox.net>; <landeen@ypklaw.com>; <preston-ahp@lycos.com>; <tchung4609@gmail.com>; <mprochko@cox.net>; <d8lt@yahoo.com>; <princesscop@hotmail.com>; <waltermercer4193@msn.com>; <norrislaw@cox.net>
> Subject: RE: Aug 18 AHPA Meeting Notes
>
> I find Lt. Col Stanhope's comments very interesting, as it relates to the RIF's.  It goes back to what we have always said, the RIF's are not due to the department's funding.  I would suggest we get a copy of the audio recording of the August 18, AHPA meeting, and ask Lt. Col. Stanhope on the stand at the Sept. 8 LEMSC hearing about his comments, and then use the recording to impeach his testimony, should they be different...
>  
> > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:37:11 -0700
> > From: kelly.heape@cox.net
> > To: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net
> > Subject: Aug 18 AHPA Meeting Notes
> >



From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: (No Subject)
To: Stephen Harrison
Date: 4/17/11 7:06:00 PM
Hide details
Well if I spell it out, if I get it out,
will you hear me when I tell you about
what I have to say before it gets too late.
It's not as easy as they said it'd be,
but there's something right about you and me,
something right about you and me.

Well you're the color of a burning brook,
you're the color of a sideways look
from an undercover cop in a comic book;
you're the color of a storm in June
you're the color of the moon.
You're the color of the night that's right.
The color of a fight you move me.
You're the color of the colored part of the Wizard of Oz movie.

We're like Romeo and Juliet,
we're like 40 dogs cigarettes.
We're like good times that haven't happened yet but will.
I can tell you where we're gonna be
when the whole world falls in-to the sea,
we'll be livin' ever after, happily.

All the boys taking you for granted,
tell you what they want with their eyes all slanted.
I don't like the way they look at you.
I don't like the way they talk, too.
I don't like the way they talk to you.
I wouldn't let 'em talk to you like that.

Put 'em up high reach for the ceiling
tell 'em that I don't walk damnit
I'm reelin'
it ain't no crime it's just dreams
we're stealing.
Anything to get more of this feeling.
you take the high and I'll take the low,
we'll get there before you know.
We ain't got no time to waste,
we got too much life to taste.

We're like Romeo and Juliet
and 40 dogs cigarettes,
we're like good times that haven't happened yet but will.
I can tell you where we're gonna be
when the whole world falls in-to the sea,
we'll be livin' ever after happily.

Sometimes you remind me of a moonbeam
on the ghost of a moonbeam
out on the beach down by the coast.
Slip into the nil like the most..
beautiful thing...
I've ever seen.

Come out tonight come out with me baby,
we'll throw the careful into the crazy.
Turn the sky black into a sky blue.
Turn a close shave into a hoo hoo!
What I say is true.
Make a fire ought to burn a few.
Make a fire ought to burn a few
we can do what we want to do.

We're like Romeo and Juliet
40 dogs cigarettes
we're like good times that haven't happened yet but will.
I can tell you where we're gonna be
when the whole world falls in-to the sea,
we'll be livin' ever after happily.




From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: RE: RIF lawsuit dismissed
Date: 12/09/10 2:35:53 PM
Show details
Thanks Neil
 
Steve
 
From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; wdbeck@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; rynososa@yahoo.com; mprochko@cox.net
CC: Komadina@ypklaw.com
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 10:15:41 -0700
Subject: RIF lawsuit dismissed

Hello,

 

DPS is dismissing its RIF lawsuit.  I think that this ensures that you are all off of promotional probation prior to your July demotions, thus there is no chance that can be reversed.  I am meeting with Dale on Dec 14th to discuss LEMSC’s decision, so I will let you know where we are at after that meeting. 

 

Best, Neil

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

 



From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: p90x
Date: 11/24/10 9:54:57 AM
Show details
I am interested in purchasing your P90x exercise program.  Is it still available?  I can be reached at 602-568-4195. 

Thanks,

Steve



From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: RE: Meeting with Dale Norris and Neil Landeen
Date: 11/09/10 5:19:19 PM
Show details
I am scheduled to be at the Ben Avery Range from 0900 til 1200 and probably won't make it.  I trust those of you who do, will represent the rest of us very well.  Thanks
 
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:12:41 -0700
Subject: Meeting with Dale Norris and Neil Landeen
From: tchung4609@gmail.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com
CC: norrislaw@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com

In preparation for our upcoming LEMSC hearing, Dale Norris and Neil Landeen have agreed to meet with us at the Phoenix Police Sergeants and Lieutenants Association office located at 8821 N. 7th Street, Suite 210, on Tuesday, November 16th at 11:30 am.  They will provide us with a briefing and their strategies for the hearing and perhaps elaborate on their perspective on the Director's recent DPS Intranet posting reinstating the SDA, uniform allowance and reducing remote housing to $50.

-- 

Tim


From:Stephen Harrison
Subj: Intranet Posting
Date: 11/08/10 1:51:38 PM
Halliday ...docx
Show details
The Director posted the attached intranet posting today about "making a few mid-course corrections."  I don't know what, if any impact this may have on our hearing, but it does seem intersting that the department is re-instating funding to the SDA program ($800k?), Uniform allowance ($500k +/-), and reduced all state housing rent by $50, but they couldn't come up with $200k to re-instate us.  Just another example of disparate treatment of us by this administration.  See you all next week... 



From:Facebook
Subj: Your Weekly Facebook Page Update
Date: 6/21/11 1:50:40 AM
Show details
facebook	
Hi Steve,
Here is this week's summary for your Facebook Page:

	
Arizona Department of Public Safety (AZ DPS), Arizona Highway Patrol
66 monthly active users120 since last week
267 people like this1 since last week
0 wall posts or comments this week0 since last week
24 visits this week30 since last week

    * Send an update to people who like this
    * Visit your Insights Page
    * Promote with Facebook Ads


Learn more about how to update via mobile

Thanks,
The Facebook Team


From:Facebook
Subj: Blue Knights Arizona VI wants to be friends on Facebook.
Date: 6/20/11 8:24:24 PM
Show details
facebook
Blue Knights Arizona VI wants to be friends with you on Facebook.
	
Blue Knights Arizona VI
20 friends
Confirm Friend Request
	
See All Requests



From:iTunes Store
Subj: Your receipt #204020013287
Date: 6/20/11 6:27:49 AM
Show details


	


Billed To:
vcu5080@hotmail.com
Stephen Harrison
26435 N. 42nd Place
Phoenix, AZ 85050-8943
USA 




From:Facebook
Subj: Jen Lango Gannon posted on your Wall.
Date: 6/19/11 10:27:20 AM
Show details
facebook
	
Jen Lango Gannon posted on your Wall.
"Happy fathers day!"
View This Wall Post
Reply to this email to comment on this Wall post. 



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony
Date: 8/19/10 10:09:51 AM
Show details
LEMSC Rule R13-5-802, O.2 states in part, "The Council shall investigate and respond to the employee and the agency head by submitting a final decision on the review within 30 days after receiving the employee’s request. "
 
Because of our appeal and hearing on May 4th, I believe the council has already made a FINAL decisision, since none of the material facts have changed between the last RIF and this one.  In Major Wooten's latest investigation, the Director admits that nothing has changed; therefore, in my mind the council has already ruled on this issue.  Is this worth arguing or making a motion to dismiss?
 
Rule R13-5-704 Rehearing a council decision, says the contested party has 30 days to file a request for a rehearing.  Section C, states, "Decisions not subject to rehearing. The Council may issue a decision as final upon making a specific finding that a decision’s immediate effectiveness is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or that a rehearing of the decision is impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. "
 
Again, the council rules state that a RIF appeal is considered a FINAL decision.
 
I don't think we hurt our case by asking the council to rule on a motion to dismiss.  Just my thoughts on this issue...I will defer to our attorneys for their point of view/expertise.
 
I think it would be easier if we meet to discuss questions/strategy's, rather than trying to present them in multiple emails.  I will do my best to make myself available any day that works
 
Steve

 
> From: norrislaw@cox.net
> To: kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com
> Subject: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:20:32 -0700
>
> I'm not available at all on the 2nd. I can make myself available on the 3rd. I don't think Council is going to entertain anything but brief arguments.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net [mailto:kelly.heape@cox.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:01 PM
> To: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; Dale Norris
> Subject: Meet Regarding Testimony
>
> Neil & Dale,
>
> I suggest we meet, like we did before our last hearing, to discuss which questions we want asked of the witnesses and whether any of us should speak at the hearing.
>
> I believe we should limit our questions to the most significant issues so we don't lose the attention of the Council. Anyone wishing to speak (assuming we are given the chance) should bring his/her primary points to the meeting so we are not overly repetitive.
>
> I am available September 2-7, with the 2nd being my first choice.
> 


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE:
Date: 8/09/10 4:56:18 PM
Show details
I can meet at your office at 11:30 as well.
 
From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
To: rynososa@yahoo.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; wdbeck@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; mprochko@cox.net
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 15:12:43 -0700
Subject: RE: Re:

I can still meet at 2pm if needed, but will be meeting here with Dale at 11:30am if you want to meet then instead.

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

From: RRB [mailto:rynososa@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:03 PM
To: Stephen M. Harrison; Neil Landeen; Kelly Heape; William Beck; Heather Alvarez; Mike Prochko
Subject: Re:

 

I will call at 2:00 pm

 

From: Stephen M. Harrison <vcu5080@hotmail.com>
To: Neil Landeen <landeen@ypklaw.com>; Ray Butler <rynososa@yahoo.com>; Kelly Heape <kelly.heape@cox.net>; William Beck <wdbeck@cox.net>; Heather Alvarez <princesscop@hotmail.com>; Mike Prochko <mprochko@cox.net>
Sent: Mon, August 9, 2010 11:19:11 AM
Subject: RE:

Neil, I will be at your office tomorrow at 2 pm.   
 

From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
To: rynososa@yahoo.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; wdbeck@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; mprochko@cox.net
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:32:56 -0700
Subject: RE: Re:

Thank you all for the feedback.  I have been compiling everyone’s comments and insights, and I am also working with Dale in order to coordinate our plan at the hearing.

 

I will be available here in the office all afternoon tomorrow (Tuesday), so let’s set a 2pm conference where you guys can either call in or meet here.  If that time doesn’t work, the rest of the afternoon is flexible, just let me know.

 

Regarding my opinion of your chances, some of my biggest concerns are Phil Case’s recent comments.  He’s probably the guy with the most credibility with this council, so it really hurt our case when Phil told Iven: “I do not believe the Department could have balanced its budget without a RIF”.  We still have some good arguments, but with this council, I think it is an uphill battle too.  We barely squeaked by last time when it clearly should have been unanimous in our favor.

 

Best, Neil

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

From: RRB [mailto:rynososa@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 07, 2010 11:47 AM
To: Neil Landeen; kelly.heape@cox.net; William Beck; Heather Alvarez; Stephen M. Harrison; Mike Prochko
Subject: Re:

 

A couple of points that I took from this:

 

1)  The agency is not counting 7,285,000 in the budget to account for new hires (a hiring freeze has been in effect for two years), step raises (we are laying off and demoting personnel and they are trying to save money to give raises?, we have not hired or promoted anyone in almost two years that would receive step raises, how much are they anticipating this year?) and retirees, there are rarely unnacounced retirements most go into drops first and we have a list that tells when people must go, and counting the two commanders that left as RIF savings tells everyone the ultimate goal was to get rid of us.  That should be vacancy savings not RIF savings.  I would also like to see what the department spent the last two years on retirement payouts, I doubt it is even close to 7.285 million.

 

2)  When they say they had to spend the money to keep from sending it to the general fund that means to me we have a budget surplus as it stands now.

 

3)  1,500,000 – Reduction by half of year-end discretionary expenditures from      uncommitted funds held in reserve (approximately $3,000,000 spent at end of    FY2010)

     This is money held in reserve for end of year expenditures this again is a surplus.

 

4) All of these savings and uncommitted funds more than cover the 4 million even without "turning off the lights and sitting in dark offices" as previously stated by Carpenter.

 

5) The findings did not address the fact that the Director did say during his confirmation that he was going to get rid of management regardless of the budget out come.

 

6) It appears Phil Case is drinking the cool- aid with the rest of executive staff! 

 

7) The Director did state that nothing has changed since the RIF's started although he has given several different reasons for the RIF it is still a re-organization which is not permitted by LEMSC

 

8) Is the hearing going to be oral arguments again or are we submitting a written response? 

 

9) I guess I feel we are in an uphill battle with this one, Neil what do you think of our chances?

 

From: Neil Landeen <Landeen@ypklaw.com>
To: "kelly.heape@cox.net" <kelly.heape@cox.net>; William Beck <wdbeck@cox.net>; Heather Alvarez <princesscop@hotmail.com>; Stephen M. Harrison <vcu5080@hotmail.com>; RRB <rynososa@yahoo.com>; Mike Prochko <mprochko@cox.net>
Sent: Thu, August 5, 2010 3:21:11 PM
Subject: FW:

FYI

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

From: IWooten@azdps.gov [mailto:IWooten@azdps.gov]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 10:55 AM
To: Andrewluck@cox.net; ggoodman@deloitte.com; rsokol@azdot.gov; jedwards@azdps.gov
Cc: norrislaw@cox.net; Neil Landeen; dennis.carpenter@azag.gov; epr@robainalaw.com
Subject:

 


Good Morning All,

Somehow the copy of the RIF investigative report sent to you yesterday was not the finished copy.  I am, therefore, forwarding to you the finished copy.  The only information missing in the report you received yesterday is the bolded print in the "Findings".



Major Iven T. Wooten
Business Manager
LEMSC, Phoenix
602-223-2286(Office)
602-223-2096 (FAX)
iwooten@azdps.gov

 




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: DPS Appeal
Date: 8/05/10 11:50:17 AM
Review of...docx
Show details
I don't think another council member will be appointed soon enough to hear our case.  Also, I agree with Mike's statement about being RIF'ed again, despite having won an appeal before the LEMSC, and the department admitting nothing has changed.  If anything, with all of the unexpected retirements/seperations, the deparmtents budget shoud be even better.
 
I have reviewed Major Wooten's investigtion and offer the attached observations/comments.
 

 
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 20:21:17 -0700
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net
> To: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net
> Subject: RE: DPS Appeal
>
> Iven is not the only Board/Commission trying to get members replaced. The ACJC has commented that it has been a 'rediculously long' time they've been asking the governor's office for a replacement member. Looking at the vacancies in the Boards and Commissions section on the governor's website further convinces me that the governor and her staff are in no hurry to replace Enrique Cantu. It has always been a struggle to get LEMSC Council members replaced under all governors, so I don't see this governor helping us any time soon. I would not give high hopes of a replacement in the near future.
>
> However, a third board member may in and of itself be a justifiable reason to request a rehearing if our appeal is unsuccessful due to a tie. If it is not an unreasonable distance into the future, we could request a rehearing just to ask the Council for a tie-breaking decision.
>
> ---- Neil Landeen <Landeen@ypklaw.com> wrote:
> Also, Iven told me that he's been trying to get the Governor to appoint another council member for the past 4 months, but no success yet.
>
> If continuing the hearing would give us enough time to get another council-member, it may be worth it (depending on the council-member). However, we have no way of knowing how long it will take for another council-member to be appointed.
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
> ________________________________
> From: Neil Landeen
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 5:13 PM
> To: 'kelly.heape@cox.net'; 'William Beck'; 'Heather Alvarez'; 'Stephen M. Harrison'; 'RRB'; 'Mike Prochko'
> Subject: DPS Appeal
>
> Hi all,
>
> Regarding the appeal by DPS, you do NOT need to adjust your schedules/vacations. Generally, in appeals seeking judicial review of administrative decisions, there is no formal discovery (so don't worry about having to be in town for depositions, etc). Instead, the parties simply brief the court and perhaps attend oral arguments.
>
> We have until August 9th to file an Answer to DPS' Complaint. However, rather than file an Answer, I have decided to join Dale's motion to dismiss (i.e. 12(b)(6) motion). By joining Dale's motion to dismiss, we risk nothing. If it prevails, then DPS' appeal will be dismissed. However, if it does not prevail, and DPS is allowed to amend their Complaint and proceed, then we would have 10 days to file our Answer. Accordingly, by joining Dale's motion to dismiss, we will give ourselves a shot at dismissing it. In my opinion, it is not a good shot, but we have nothing to lose.
>
> I intend on filing the joinder tomorrow, so if you have any questions/concerns, please let me know.
>
> Also, after you have a chance to review Iven's report, please let me know your thoughts. I'll contact the other 2 attorneys and get their thoughts as well. Thanks.
>
> Best, Neil
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE:
Date: 8/04/10 1:49:24 PM
Show details
I would also prefer that we proceed with the hearing as scheduled.
 
Steve
 
> Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:48:09 -0700
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net
> To: Landeen@ypklaw.com; wdbeck@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; rynososa@yahoo.com; mprochko@cox.net
> Subject: Re: FW:
>
> I would proceed as scheduled on the 11th.
>
> ---- Neil Landeen <Landeen@ypklaw.com> wrote:
> Do any of you have any preference on this?
>
> I will be sending you an email later today explaining what our plan is regarding DPS' appeal.
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
> ________________________________
> From: IWooten@azdps.gov [mailto:IWooten@azdps.gov]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 8:52 AM
> To: norrislaw@cox.net; Neil Landeen; dennis.carpenter@azag.gov; epr@robainalaw.com
> Subject:
>
>
> Good Morning All,
>
> I have just been advised that the Director will be out of state on the 11th. He may be able to get to a phone for telephonic attendance. The Deputy Director will be available to attend the meeting, so please let me know if you would like to proceed or continue for a later date, most likely September time frame.
>
> Major Iven T. Wooten
> Business Manager
> LEMSC, Phoenix
> 602-223-2286(Office)
> 602-223-2096 (FAX)
> iwooten@azdps.gov



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Supplemental Memorandum
Date: 7/30/10 12:23:54 PM
Show details
Neil, et al, thanks for the information.  There is an oversight in Mr. Robaina's calculations.  He failed to take into account the $4 million budget reduction for mid-year FY2010 in his calculations. Also, I beleive there have been additional vacancy savings between March 2010 and June 2010.  It is not clear to me if he is using any of the people who were RIFed in his June 2010 vacancy savings calculations, or only those employees who left voluntarily?
 
The department recently recieved a $1.6 million grant from the Governor for Border Security related expenses.  While this does not directly impact the budget, it certainly frees up money that might have been spent along the border to be used elsewhere.
 
I head a rumour yesterday that the department is in the process of building a firearms range/office in the Flagstaff area and have assigned a single sergeant to the Flagstaff area as a full time firearms instructor (Sgt. Steve Shroufe), which had been filled by an officer. I do not have any information as to the funding source, or if this is just in the planning stages.  Either way, this would be a significant expenditure. 
From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
To: kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; wdbeck@cox.net
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:43:57 -0700
Subject: FW: Supplemental Memorandum

Hello,

 

Attached, please find a supplemental memo from attorney Robaina. 

 

Also attached, please find LEMSC’s Answer to the appeal lawsuit.

 

I’m looking forward to seeing Iven’s report on Aug 4th.

 

Let me know if anyone has any updates or has heard anything from the rumor-mill.  Thanks.

 

Best, Neil

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

From: Edmundo Robaina [mailto:epr@robainalaw.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 7:21 PM
To: IWooten@azdps.gov
Cc: Neil Landeen; norrislaw@cox.net; dennis.carpenter@azag.gov; JEdwards@azdps.gov
Subject: Supplemental Memorandum

 

Dear Commander Wooten,

 

I am attaching a supplemental memorandum for your and the council’s review.  Thanks.

 

Edmundo Robaina



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Mid-Year Budget Reversion
Date: 7/20/10 11:06:09 AM
Show details
Jaime McGuffin called me last week about the rumour that two of us would be re-instated.  I told him I had heard the rumour, but did not know the source or the validity of it.  He spoke with the Director, who allegedly spoke with Hegerty and Stanhope and all denied that any such discussions have occurred or that any of them had any plans to reinstate any of us.  They also denied ever making such a statement to anyone...
 
From: princesscop@hotmail.com
To: tchung4609@gmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net
CC: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net
Subject: RE: Mid-Year Budget Reversion
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:21:35 -0700

this is interesting. at the AHPA meeting last week stanhope announced they will probably promoting two captains. maybe these guys should talk to each other
 
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:04:41 -0700
Subject: Re: Mid-Year Budget Reversion
From: tchung4609@gmail.com
To: kelly.heape@cox.net
CC: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net

From all that I have talked to in the recent past, Jack is the only person spreading this information about a mid-year reversion.  I know that Jack is the only assistant director talking about any type of budget woes and the potential of an additional RIF in September/October.  Because of what Jack has been saying and the impact it's been having on the civilian employees, Georgene brought these rumors up in the last Executive Staff meeting.  According to Georgene, no one spoke up and all denied having any specific/concrete information of any further reversions of our appropriated monies or RIFs at this point in time.  The Director had said he has taken enough criticism and he did not expect any further RIFs.  We will have some budget sweeps to the tune of $11 million but that will be revenue/tax-generated funds (detailed in the list I sent out last week).
 
I want to meet with Phil Case tomorrow to get the attrition rate for the past fiscal year and I'll inquire about the information Jack is putting out.  I'll keep everyone posted.


 
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:29 PM, <kelly.heape@cox.net> wrote:

    Jack Hegarty talked with me today.  He asked if I was interested in returning to an operational assignment someday.  He said he had a couple captains openings in his division and 'they' were reluctant to promote anyone because they may have to re-demote anyone they promote now due to the mid-year reversion.  I asked him about the reversion because I knew the JLBC's most recent report showed unexpected revenue growth.  He said that was true but federal funding to the state fell considerably short this year and other revenue accounts were not faring so well.  He said some projected a half billion dollar shortfall for the state.  He said DPS already went to the governor and/or her staff and explained how we have bled enough and cannot take any more financial hits, but he said we were told to just accept what we are given, which Jack took to mean you will receive cuts like everyone else.




-- 

Tim



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE:
Date: 7/12/10 7:37:32 AM
Show details
I agree that we would appear unreasonable if we push the 30 day deadline.  Hopefully, this will be the last time we all need to go through this.
 
> From: mprochko@cox.net
> To: Landeen@ypklaw.com; kelly.heape@cox.net
> CC: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net
> Subject: Re: FW:
> Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 20:40:03 -0700
>
> Neil,
>
> I agree also, I think allowing Iven the time to do the investigation is
> beneficial to us. Thanks for the work on the draft. I thought Dale did a
> great job of laying everything out, and I agree we don't need to repeat it
> all again.
>
> Mike
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neil Landeen" <Landeen@ypklaw.com>
> To: <kelly.heape@cox.net>
> Cc: <rynososa@yahoo.com>; <wdbeck@cox.net>; <preston-ahp@lycos.com>;
> <tchung4609@gmail.com>; <mprochko@cox.net>; <vcu5080@hotmail.com>;
> <d8lt@yahoo.com>; <princesscop@hotmail.com>; <waltermercer4193@msn.com>;
> "Dale Norris" <norrislaw@cox.net>
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 1:16 PM
> Subject: RE: FW:
>
>
> I agree, plus it will allow us more time to gather public records and
> provide them to Iven/LEMSC. I will check the status on those on Monday,
> hopefully there are more records ready.
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
> the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or
> by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please
> immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in
> error, then delete. Thank you.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net [mailto:kelly.heape@cox.net]
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 12:50 PM
> To: Neil Landeen
> Cc: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; Neil Landeen; preston-ahp@lycos.com;
> tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com;
> princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; Dale Norris
> Subject: Re: FW:
>
> Neil,
> I do not have a problem with waiting beyond the 30-day deadline. I think it
> could be detrimental to us if Iven did not finish his investigation and/or
> the Council viewed us as unreasonable.
>
> ---- Neil Landeen <Landeen@ypklaw.com> wrote:
> FYI
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
> the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or
> by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please
> immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in
> error, then delete. Thank you.
> ________________________________
> From: IWooten@azdps.gov [mailto:IWooten@azdps.gov]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:15 PM
> To: Neil Landeen; norrislaw@cox.net
> Subject:
>
>
> Neil, Dale,
>
> I am beginning to have doubts that because of the unavailability of
> attorneys during several days of July, and the uncertainty of when the
> Council's investigation will be completed, that a Council meeting to deliver
> a decision can be completed in the 30 days reguired by A.A.C.
> R13-5-802(O)(2). Therefore, this is an inquiry to determine if each of you
> would be agreeable to waiving the aforementioned requirement. Attorney
> Edmundo Robaina has already given his OK. If you agree to a waiver, the
> latest date the meeting would be scheduled is August 16, 2010.
>
> Iven
>
>
> Major Iven T. Wooten
> Business Manager
> LEMSC, Phoenix
> 602-223-2286(Office)
> 602-223-2096 (FAX)
> iwooten@azdps.gov
>
> 


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: DPS RIF - Request for Review
Date: 7/02/10 10:18:16 AM
Show details
Neil, you should have received all documents from me last week, via fax.  I am on vacation and will send them to you again, first thing next week...
 
Steve
 
> From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
> To: rynososa@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; wdbeck@cox.net
> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 10:04:04 -0700
> Subject: RE: DPS RIF - Request for Review
>
> I had some issues with my email(s) this week so I wanted to make sure you guys got this:
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Landeen
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:16 PM
> To: 'RRB'; 'Heather h '; 'Kelly Heape'; 'Mike Prochko'; 'Steve Harrison'; 'Timothy Chung'; 'Bill Beck'
> Subject: FW: DPS RIF - Request for Review
>
> Greetings organizational-lepers,
>
> Please see the request from Jennie, below, wherein she wants 3 documents from each of you. I have the request and response documents already from Heather and Ray (so you two only need to send me your initial 3rd round letter from Halliday), but I need all 3 docs from the rest of you. Also, if you have submitted your own individual request for LEMSC review, please send me a copy of that as well. Thanks.
>
> Best, Neil
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: JEdwards@azdps.gov [mailto:JEdwards@azdps.gov]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 3:05 PM
> To: Neil Landeen
> Cc: IWooten@azdps.gov
> Subject: Re: DPS RIF - Request for Review
>
> Good afternoon, Neil. We're just having a wonderful time these days! :-)
>
> Regarding your clients, we need the documents for review. Please send:
>
> Each person's initial (3rd round) letter
> The request to the Director for review from each
> The Director's response from each (unless it was a form letter)
>
> The sooner, the better, of course! Have a Happy Hump Day!!
>
> Jennie Edwards, Admin Services Officer
> Law Enforcement Merit System Council
> P O Box 6638, Mail Drop 1290
> Phoenix, AZ 85005-6638
> (602) 223-2286
> jedwards@azdps.gov
>
>
>
> Neil Landeen
> <Landeen@ypklaw.c
> om> To
> Iven Wooten <IWooten@azdps.gov>
> 06/30/2010 12:46 cc
> PM "JEdwards@azdps.gov"
> <JEdwards@azdps.gov>
> Subject
> DPS RIF - Request for Review
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Iven & Jennie,
>
> Hope you guys are well. Attached, please find a request for LEMSC review
> of the latest RIF on behalf of my seven DPS clients, a hard copy of which
> has been mailed today as well.
>
> Iven, in the event that you initiate an investigation of this RIF, do you
> have any objections to me supplying you with a brief list of questions and
> issues that my clients would like you to implement during your
> investigation?
>
> Finally, please note that, just like last time, I am happy to work with and
> consolidate my clients with Dale Norris and any of his clients who are
> similarly affected. Hopefully that makes this matter more efficient for
> the Council to deal with.
>
> Best, Neil
>
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not
> the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering
> the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or
> by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this
> message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please
> immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in
> error, then delete. Thank you.
> (See attached file: 20100630135520.pdf)


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Questions for Iven Wooten
Date: 7/02/10 10:16:37 AM
Show details
Kelly,
 
Excellant questions/observations.  I would add one; if this RIF is the result of a reduction in funding, $4 million, then what effect has the unexpected retirements had on the number of employee's being RIF'ed.  I.E. Captain Dave Myers, as well as a number of other sworn/civilians.  It would appear that the vacancy savings by people retiring unexpectedly should prevent some people from having to be rif'ed.
 
Has the department explored and/or exhausted all other options, i.e. reduce the number of other agency personnel, reduce fuel costs by limiting miles driven, cut overtime, travel, training, etc... budgets.  If the department has exhausted all other options then this RIF is not necessary by LEMSC rules. I believe the director simply wants to demote us ten, and is using the budget as an excuse, which he thinks he can convince the LEMSC as being necessary.
 
As Kelly stated, there have been two Majors and one Captain retire unexpectedly; therefore, by the departments own organization structure there should be at least three less captains needing to be rif'ed, not to mention the vacancy savings.
 
The director has repeatedly said the department is 'top heavy'; however, we have had one chief, one chief of staff - civilian (Major equivelant), five majors, and one captain retire in the past year.  In addition there are at least two other captains vacancy's with the elevation of Jeff Stanhope and Jack Hegerty, so there should be at least three captain's vacancy's. How many upper/middle manager postions does the director want to reduce.
 
Also, over the next 4 1/2 years there are scheduled to be three Majors and seven Captains retiring in DROPS.  The director could accomplish the same reduction in uppper/middle management through attrition.
 
 
> Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:20:55 -0700
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net
> To: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; norrislaw@cox.net
> Subject: Questions for Iven Wooten
>
> Neil,
> Here are some questions for Iven.


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: Homeowners
Date: 6/23/10 7:24:18 AM
Show details
Gary my homeowners association is:
 
Tatum Highlands Community Association INC.
7740 N. 16th Street
Suite 300
Phoenix, AZ 85020
 
602-906-4940
Toll Free: 866-516-7424
Email: csr@aamaz.com
 
My account number is: TH0020000604.
 
If you need anything else, let me know
 
Steve Harrison


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: FYI
Date: 6/18/10 9:17:01 AM
Show details
Emotional Breakdown? I am begining to see a pattern...no wonder he fits in so well with the current administration! Georgenne excluded, of course:)
 
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:36:42 -0700
Subject: FYI
From: tchung4609@gmail.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com

Last Friday, I spoke with Phil Case to verify the precise percentage of employee related expenses (ERE) that should be used when calculating the savings of RIFing the ten of us.  He provided a rate of 44 percent.  To elliviate any confusion with how he was calculating our savings, I verified the method he used and the annual savings for RIFing the ten of us comes to $275,000 including ERE.
 
We also talked about the projected $1.4 million in DROP savings for FY2011.  He spoke in general terms and explained the legislature typically does not fund 100 percent of all DPS positions and there are several unfunded obligations that have to be met throughout the year.  Phil emphasized that 75 percent of the DPS budget is in personnel cost.  The DROP savings will be used toward anticipated unfunded obligations such as the step pay increases for the civilian employees, increases to the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System and health insurance and any unanticipated shortfalls such as fund sweeps that occur throughout the year.  Phil said he could not provide a specfic accounting of how the DROP savings would be allocated right now, however, it would basically be put into a "pool of money" and used as it was needed.  Phil confirm that the $1.4 million in DROP savings was anticipated based upon those employees that were in DROP.  Phil then confirmed that the department realized an additional unexected and significant savings when people in DROP unexpectedly retire before their five years expire such as Capt. Dave Myers and all the others.
 
I've been working on our Division's RIF of civilian employees and we will be moving five employees destined to be separated from the agency into alternate funded positions.  I've been told this fact was raised to the Deputy Director at the AHPA meeting in Prescott last week and it took him by surprise.  In addition and out of the kindness of his heart, Rand Bruder decided to retire in order to save Rick Knight Jr. from being separated from the agency.  Rand's supervisor position is being eliminated and he was being reclassified to a Facilities Coordinator and bumping Rick out of the agency.  There have been some other retirements which allowed us to eliminate those positions in lieu of separating employess due to a RIF.  I mention that to demonstrate retirements have saved civilian's job which is unlike our RIF, i.e., Dave Myers retirement hasn't save Heather's position.  AD Ramming and I met with Phil Case yesterday and that fact was mentioned.  Phil Case said he was curious how Myers' retirement would be handled because it should allow DPS to save a Captain RIF.
 
As another note, I had the opportunity to serve a civilian employee with the Director's response to the employee's request for review.  The employee allowed me to have a copy since I found the following statement very interesting as it described the process of the RIF.  The memo stated in part, "The reduction in force process occurs by eliminating a series of positions in sequence.  When a position is eliminated; transfers, reclassifications, demotions, and separations occur according to the rules until an employee is separated."  That doesn't sound like our process either.
 
Last thing.  I heard today that Steve Campbell was attempting to obtain his AZPOST certification.  Apparently he has completed his range qualifications and AZPOST is still working on "other things".  It is rumored that he had some type of emotional breakdown and had to retire early from Phoenix PD because he couldn't carry a gun. Can anyone confirm that? 
 
-- 

Tim




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: 2011 budget info
Date: 6/18/10 9:11:18 AM
Show details
Thanks Tim!
 
A follow up question.  the 2.75% performance pay cut is applied directly to employee's pay checks; however, I have not seen, heard or know of any information that the department's personnel/ERE was cut a corresponding 2.75%?  I have to assume it was, otherwise the department would effectively have an additional $4 million +/- in savings from personal salaries.
 
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:40:55 -0700
Subject: Re: 2011 budget info
From: tchung4609@gmail.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; norrislaw@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com

 
On March 8, 2010, Phil Case sent the following message to senior staff (I added notations in red):
 
FY 2011 DPS Impact

    * $3,974,700 operating lump sum reduction (The $4 million reduction)
    * $980,000 is eliminated from the DNA Special Line Item (wipes out arrestee testing program, and maybe more)
    * $11,084,100 is left in the Photo Enforcement Special Line Item (should be more than sufficient to wind down the program)
    * Continuation of 2.75% performance pay reduction 
    * Six furlough days per employee.  Agency directors may apply to DOA for an exemption from the furlough program for specific positions if essential services (e.g., public safety) would be significantly negatively affect.  In lieu of a furlough day, employee pay would be reduced by 2.3%. (DPS elected the furlough day instead of the 2.3%. There was no reduction to our budget for the positions that were exempted from the furlough)
    * $4.1 M in additional fund sweeps from various funds. (Included in this amount is $2.8 M from the Crime Laboratory Operations Fund, which would probably amount to a lump sum cut.)  Some fund sweeps (with spending reductions) are continued from FY 2010.

I talked to Phil Case last Friday and he said DPS sensed the $4 million deficiet prior to February and, "technically", DPS knew on March 18th when the Governor actually signed the budget bill.  With that, I think it's fair to say that the budget has not changed since March 18th.  And, Phil gave his budget presenation to the LEMSC on April 19th. 
Here's the links below for guidance from DOA on performance pay and furloughs.

http://www.hr.az.gov/HR_Professional/PDF/HB/Raber_Memo_March_22,2010.pdf
 
http://www.hr.az.gov/HR_Professional/PDF/HB/Peckardt_Memo_March22,2010.pdf

 


 
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Stephen M. Harrison <vcu5080@hotmail.com> wrote:

    Thanks Neil.
     
    Does anyone know the impact the performance pay reduction, furlough days and exemptions have on the budget?  Was the department's budget reduced 2.75% (performance pay) and/or 2.3%, the equivelant of all employees taking a furlough day in FY2011? or was the savings somehow passed on to the department?  Is this where the $4.2 million budget reduction is coming from the department keeps talking about?
     
    Also, just for discussion, but it seems to me the department's budget has not changed since the last LEMSC hearing, which we prevailed at; therefore, the department should have been asking for a re-hearing, not trying to RIF us again, using the same facts and circumstances as the last rif.
     
    From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
    To: tchung4609@gmail.com
    CC: wdbeck@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; kelly.heape@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; rynososa@yahoo.com; norrislaw@cox.net; ddd_res@yahoo.com
    Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 12:12:38 -0700
    Subject: RE: 2011 budget info


    Hello,
     
    Attached, please find 2 documents that may be helpful.  Also, I have submitted more public records requests, so we’ll see if anything helpful manifests. 
     
    Dale, I will give you a call back later today to discuss.
     
    Best, Neil
     
    Neil Landeen, Esq.
    Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
    6017 N. 15th Street
    Phoenix, Arizona 85014
    TEL: (602) 241-0474
    FAX: (602) 241-9687
    This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
    From: Timothy Chung [mailto:tchung4609@gmail.com]
    Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:39 PM
    To: Neil Landeen
    Cc: wdbeck@cox.net; Steve Harrison; Mike Prochko; kelly.heape@cox.net; Heather h; RRB; Dale Norris; ddd_res@yahoo.com
    Subject: Re: 2011 budget info
     
    Neil,
     
    While reviewing the emails included in the public records request, the $1,485,100 FY2011 DROP Savings is listed on RIF00718 (the 7th Group).


     
    On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Neil Landeen <Landeen@ypklaw.com> wrote:
    Here is some more info that may be crucial:
     
    According to the 2011 Budget numbers, there will be 4 million dollars in cuts.  However, DPS will save 1.4 million dollars due to DROPS.  Apparently, this 1.4 million was not included in the 2011 budget numbers.  Instead, DPS is saving that 1.4 million, and merely anticipates that DPS may need to use it later (but it is pure speculation for what they may eventually spend it on).
     
    Has anyone else heard anything along these lines?
     
     
    Neil Landeen, Esq.
    Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
    6017 N. 15th Street
    Phoenix, Arizona 85014
    TEL: (602) 241-0474
    FAX: (602) 241-9687
    This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
     



    -- 

    Tim




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: 6/14/10 3:26:55 PM
Show details
2102 W. Encanto Blvd., 
P.O. Box 6638
Phoenix, AZ 85009
 
Subject: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:45:20 -0500
From: gfoster@NASB.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

What is the physical address of your work?

 




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: 6/11/10 1:12:24 PM
Show details
gary,  I just faxed you two copies of my driver's license.  Hopefully, at least one of them is legible.
 
Subject: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:10:28 -0500
From: gfoster@NASB.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

I am having trouble reading the drivers license. Is there a way that we could get a clearer copy?

 

 

 

GARY FOSTER | Loan Consultant
NORTH AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK (: 913.327.2035 | 866.627.2141 7: 913.327.4035
10950 El Monte, Suite 210 | Overland Park, KS 66211 | www.nasb.com



From: Stephen M. Harrison [mailto:vcu5080@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 5:04 PM
To: Foster, Gary
Subject: RE: Loan disclosures

 

Sorry, got tied up and was having some technical difficulties scanning the documents.  See attached documents.
 
Steve

 

Subject: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:18:24 -0500
From: gfoster@NASB.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

I have not seen any of the documents. Do you have an ETA?

 

 

GARY FOSTER | Loan Consultant
NORTH AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK (: 913.327.2035 | 866.627.2141 7: 913.327.4035
10950 El Monte, Suite 210 | Overland Park, KS 66211 | www.nasb.com

 

From: Stephen M. Harrison [mailto:vcu5080@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:06 PM
To: Foster, Gary
Subject: RE: Loan disclosures

 

I am working on them as we speak.  Hope to have them done by this evening...
 
Steve
 

Subject: Loan disclosures
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:30:34 -0500
From: gfoster@NASB.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

I had not seen the signed loan disclosures, I know that you are busy I just wanted to get an eta on them.

 

 

 

GARY FOSTER | Loan Consultant
NORTH AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK (: 913.327.2035 | 866.627.2141 7: 913.327.4035
10950 El Monte, Suite 210 | Overland Park, KS 66211 | www.nasb.com




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: 6/10/10 3:03:38 PM
Scanned M...pdf
Show details
Sorry, got tied up and was having some technical difficulties scanning the documents.  See attached documents.
 
Steve

 
Subject: RE: Loan disclosures
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:18:24 -0500
From: gfoster@NASB.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

I have not seen any of the documents. Do you have an ETA?

 

 

GARY FOSTER | Loan Consultant
NORTH AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK (: 913.327.2035 | 866.627.2141 7: 913.327.4035
10950 El Monte, Suite 210 | Overland Park, KS 66211 | www.nasb.com



From: Stephen M. Harrison [mailto:vcu5080@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 6:06 PM
To: Foster, Gary
Subject: RE: Loan disclosures

 

I am working on them as we speak.  Hope to have them done by this evening...
 
Steve
 

Subject: Loan disclosures
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:30:34 -0500
From: gfoster@NASB.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

I had not seen the signed loan disclosures, I know that you are busy I just wanted to get an eta on them.

 
 
From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony
Date: 8/19/10 3:55:07 PM
Show details
both dates work for me.  I believe the council will aslo ask to interview the deputy director.
 
From: Landeen@ypklaw.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; norrislaw@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:21:57 -0700
Subject: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony

Let’s meet on Monday, 8/30 at 11:00am at my office (unless anyone has a larger conference room available).  Anyone have any objections to attorney Ed Robaina and his civilians attending this meeting?

 

Let’s also have a follow-up/back-up meeting here at 11:00am on Friday, Sep 3rd, if necessary.  We can make this one sworn only, if necessary.

 

If these dates/times are bad, let me know by the end of the day tomorrow.

 

In the event that DPS talks about efficiency and consolidation to increase span of control, I intend on placing a public records request for all PAR's for sworn since 02/01/10.  This may provide conflicting evidence.

 

Are there any other specific public records that we need?  I intend on submitting any requests ASAP, and I also intend on requesting Dennis (and LEMSC, if necessary) to ensure that the public records are provided expeditiously.

 

It is my understanding that we will be allowed to question/x-examine whomever LEMSC questions.  I believe that will be Halliday, Jack H, and Phil Case, at least.  Anyone disagree?

 

Best, Neil

 

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

From: wdbeck@cox.net [mailto:wdbeck@cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:26 PM
To: Dale Norris; Steve Harrison; Kelly Heape; Ray Butler; Neil Landeen; Brian Preston; Tim Chung; Mike Prochko; Brant Benham; Heather Alvarez; Walt Mercer
Subject: Re: Meet Regarding Testimony

 

FYI, the Department is transcribing the 8/11 Lemsc meeting.

From: "Dale Norris" <norrislaw@cox.net>

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:39:08 -0700

To: <wdbeck@cox.net>; 'Steve Harrison'<vcu5080@hotmail.com>; 'Kelly Heape'<kelly.heape@cox.net>; 'Ray Butler'<rynososa@yahoo.com>; 'Neil Landeen'<landeen@ypklaw.com>; 'Brian Preston'<preston-ahp@lycos.com>; 'Tim Chung'<tchung4609@gmail.com>; 'Mike Prochko'<mprochko@cox.net>; 'Brant Benham'<d8lt@yahoo.com>; 'Heather Alvarez'<princesscop@hotmail.com>; 'Walt Mercer'<waltermercer4193@msn.com>

Subject: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony

 

Steve,

 

This is one of the points Neil made to the Council at the last meeting.  I don’t think they will rule on it, but Neil has preserved it as an issue on appeal if necessary.

 

Let me know if we’re meeting on 8/30 or 9/3 and I’ll be there.

 

Dale F Norris

LAW OFFICE OF DALE NORRIS, LLC

517 W Monte Vista Rd

Phoenix, AZ 85003

Office (602) 307-5627

Fax (602) 374-8471

 

 

 

From: wdbeck@cox.net [mailto:wdbeck@cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 10:22 AM
To: Steve Harrison; Dale Norris; Kelly Heape; Ray Butler; Neil Landeen; Brian Preston; Tim Chung; Mike Prochko; Brant Benham; Heather Alvarez; Walt Mercer
Subject: Re: Meet Regarding Testimony

 

I concur with meeting. I should be available.

Bill

From: "Stephen M. Harrison" <vcu5080@hotmail.com>

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:09:51 -0700

To: Dale Norris<norrislaw@cox.net>; Kelly Heape<kelly.heape@cox.net>; RayButler<rynososa@yahoo.com>; William Beck<wdbeck@cox.net>; Neil Landeen<landeen@ypklaw.com>; Brian Preston<preston-ahp@lycos.com>; Timothy Chung<tchung4609@gmail.com>; Mike Prochko<mprochko@cox.net>; Brant Benham<d8lt@yahoo.com>; Heather Alvarez<princesscop@hotmail.com>; Walter Mercer<waltermercer4193@msn.com>

Subject: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony

 

LEMSC Rule R13-5-802, O.2 states in part, "The Council shall investigate and respond to the employee and the agency head by submitting a final decision on the review within 30 days after receiving the employee’s request. "
 
Because of our appeal and hearing on May 4th, I believe the council has already made a FINAL decisision, since none of the material facts have changed between the last RIF and this one.  In Major Wooten's latest investigation, the Director admits that nothing has changed; therefore, in my mind the council has already ruled on this issue.  Is this worth arguing or making a motion to dismiss?
 
Rule R13-5-704 Rehearing a council decision, says the contested party has 30 days to file a request for a rehearing.  Section C, states, "Decisions not subject to rehearing. The Council may issue a decision as final upon making a specific finding that a decision’s immediate effectiveness is necessary for the preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or that a rehearing of the decision is impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. "
 
Again, the council rules state that a RIF appeal is considered a FINAL decision.
 
I don't think we hurt our case by asking the council to rule on a motion to dismiss.  Just my thoughts on this issue...I will defer to our attorneys for their point of view/expertise.
 
I think it would be easier if we meet to discuss questions/strategy's, rather than trying to present them in multiple emails.  I will do my best to make myself available any day that works
 
Steve

 
> From: norrislaw@cox.net
> To: kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com
> Subject: RE: Meet Regarding Testimony
> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:20:32 -0700
>
> I'm not available at all on the 2nd. I can make myself available on the 3rd. I don't think Council is going to entertain anything but brief arguments.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net [mailto:kelly.heape@cox.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:01 PM
> To: rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; tchung4609@gmail.com; mprochko@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com; Dale Norris
> Subject: Meet Regarding Testimony
>
> Neil & Dale,
>
> I suggest we meet, like we did before our last hearing, to discuss which questions we want asked of the witnesses and whether any of us should speak at the hearing.
>
> I believe we should limit our questions to the most significant issues so we don't lose the attention of the Council. Anyone wishing to speak (assuming we are given the chance) should bring his/her primary points to the meeting so we are not overly repetitive.
>
> I am available September 2-7, with the 2nd being my first choice.
>



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Ford Expedition still available?
Date: 5/14/10 7:16:06 AM
Show details
It is still available.  Some minor door dings...no leaks of any kind or any mechanical issues
 
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 20:51:36 -0700
From: andrewm2911@yahoo.com
Subject: Ford Expedition still available?
To: sale-xpx7h-1711670746@craigslist.org

** CRAIGSLIST ADVISORY --- AVOID SCAMS BY DEALING LOCALLY
** Avoid: wiring money, cross-border deals, work-at-home
** Beware: cashier checks, money orders, escrow, shipping
** More Info: http://www.craigslist.org/about/scams.html


Steve

Just wondering if your vehicle is still available? if so, any dents, oil leaks, etc.

Andrew




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Request
Date: 4/15/10 10:50:02 PM
DOA RIF Q...pdf
Show details
Neil, while searching the Arizona Department of Administration website I found the attached document, which addresses FAQ's related to RIF's.  Of particular note is the third paragraph under GENERAL, which states, "

For the purposes of this document, "legislative or executive action" refers to a statutory change by the State Legislature or an Executive Order issued by the Governor, respectively.
 
I think this just bolsters our position that the director never had an executive or legislative mandate.  More information on DOA's position on RIF's can be found on their website, http://www.hr.az.gov/HR_Professional/HRP_EPL_STATE_RIF_Guidelines.asp
 
Thanks for all of your work on this...we appreciate it.  See you Monday!




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Update
Date: 4/12/10 5:35:04 PM
Show details
Neil,
 
I faxed copies of my documents from the second RIF to you last week.  I was served on Friday, April 2, 2010 with the second RIF notice.  I filed an request for review on the same day, and received a response from the department.  I would like to appeal this second RIF to the council.  If you need me to fax you the documents again, let me know.  Also, I still have not recieved any 'formal' notice that the first RIF has been rescinded.  I was told by the deputy director that the second RIF notice supersedes the first one. 
 
Subject: Update
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:08:29 -0700
From: landeen@ypklaw.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; mprochko@cox.net

Hi all,

 

I appreciate all of the feedback from you guys and I am preparing our case accordingly.

 

Several issues:

 

1)  Dale Norris has filed a motion seeking info, attached hereto.  I am also working with Dennis Carpenter to provide us with everything he intends on using as well.  We will also have another investigation from Iven.  In sum, there should be no surprises by the time we have a hearing.

 

2)  For each of you, please let me know what your status is on receiving Halliday’s response and filing a Request for LEMSC review.  Tomorrow, I intend on filing a Notice of Appearance and Request for LEMSC Review for each of you six, so I want to make sure we’re all on the same page.

 

3)  Please be aware that John Ortolano is working closely on this matter with me.  Ortolano has been and continues to be an invaluable asset to both DPS employees as well as to the attorneys here at our firm – in fact, I probably owe him a steak dinner or at least a couple of cheap beers for all of his hard work and sticking his neck out for other employees.  As far as this RIF issue goes, John is very concerned for your plight, and he and I agreed from the beginning that he would be more helpful working directly with me, rather than making a big public display that would not be all that helpful.  As always, please feel free to let John or I know if you have any concerns or if you see any other ways we can assist.

 

Best, Neil

 

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

 




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Update
Date: 4/12/10 5:35:04 PM
Show details
Neil,
 
I faxed copies of my documents from the second RIF to you last week.  I was served on Friday, April 2, 2010 with the second RIF notice.  I filed an request for review on the same day, and received a response from the department.  I would like to appeal this second RIF to the council.  If you need me to fax you the documents again, let me know.  Also, I still have not recieved any 'formal' notice that the first RIF has been rescinded.  I was told by the deputy director that the second RIF notice supersedes the first one. 
 
Subject: Update
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:08:29 -0700
From: landeen@ypklaw.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; mprochko@cox.net

Hi all,

 

I appreciate all of the feedback from you guys and I am preparing our case accordingly.

 

Several issues:

 

1)  Dale Norris has filed a motion seeking info, attached hereto.  I am also working with Dennis Carpenter to provide us with everything he intends on using as well.  We will also have another investigation from Iven.  In sum, there should be no surprises by the time we have a hearing.

 

2)  For each of you, please let me know what your status is on receiving Halliday’s response and filing a Request for LEMSC review.  Tomorrow, I intend on filing a Notice of Appearance and Request for LEMSC Review for each of you six, so I want to make sure we’re all on the same page.

 

3)  Please be aware that John Ortolano is working closely on this matter with me.  Ortolano has been and continues to be an invaluable asset to both DPS employees as well as to the attorneys here at our firm – in fact, I probably owe him a steak dinner or at least a couple of cheap beers for all of his hard work and sticking his neck out for other employees.  As far as this RIF issue goes, John is very concerned for your plight, and he and I agreed from the beginning that he would be more helpful working directly with me, rather than making a big public display that would not be all that helpful.  As always, please feel free to let John or I know if you have any concerns or if you see any other ways we can assist.

 

Best, Neil

 

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

 




From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Suggestions - Landeen's Public Records Request
Date: 4/08/10 11:31:24 PM
Show details
Two other areas we may want to explore are the salaries for this executive staff and the previous administration.  I would not be surprised if this executive staff gave themselves a raise in anticipation of the 5% pay cuts to all state employees.  Also, should we request all expeditures in excess of $5,000 since January 30, 2010?  There may additional expenditures, other than the furniture issues, that we are not aware of.  I know Lt. Col. Hegerty approached Ruben Chavez and offered to use CVEB funding to purchase an HD video camera, at a cost of around $65,000.  I do not know if this has actually occurred yet or not, but it got me to thinking there may be other Requisitions/Purchase Orders, etc... we are not aware of that would be beneficial to our cause.  There may be a way to narrow this down so we are looking at all legitimate purchases, such as fuel, bulk paper/supplies, etc...I just don't know the best way to word this to capture any superfluous expenditures on the part of this administration
 
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:16:28 -0700
Subject: Suggestions - Landeen's Public Records Request
From: tchung4609@gmail.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; blt4490@hotmail.com; d8lt@yahoo.com; preston-ahp@lycos.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; kelly.heape@cox.net; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; twoodward3@cox.net; waltermercer4193@msn.com; landeen@ypklaw.com; norrislaw@cox.net

I spoke with Ray Butler tonight and addressed his previous concerns with the GIITEM budget.  The GIITEM budget is a special line item and its accompanying legislation provides certain dollar amounts that must be dedicated to specific functions (see footnotes 2, 3 and 4 in FY2010 Budget attachment).  DPS has used the GIITEM budget to its advantage to offset shortfalls in its appropriated budget.  I strongly recommend we not include the public records request for financial records on the task forces of GIITEM, Auto Theft, etc.  Legislation is very specific on how those monies are spent and personally, I don't see how that information would help our cause since, having oversaw that particular budget, it is definitely used to significantly reduce DPS budgetary shortfalls throughout the year.  The most common examples of using the GIITEM budget to the Department's advantage is moving DPS FTEs to GIITEM funding to generate vacancy savings and charging GIITEM administrative fees and rent.  Some other examples listed in the attachment include using $2.6 million to offset a Crime Lab deficit; increased the other-agency contribution from 15% to now 25% to save $650,000; eliminated AFIT to save $1 million; and eliminated county attorney grants to save $1 million, etc.
 
As far as item 3 of the public records request, should the verbiage be modified to include emails and any attachments? 
 





From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RIF #2
Date: 4/08/10 12:31:07 AM
Show details
Neil,
 
I faxed you copies of my second RIF notice, along with my request for a review by the Director and his response.  I am not clear what the LEMSC hearing scheduled for April 19th is going to cover.  Is it only to discuss the first RIF, or can we argue this second RIF, since it is based upon the same information as the first one.  Also, I have not received any formal notification that the first RIF has been rescinded.  The Deputy Director told me verbally, that the second RIF notice supersedes the first RIF notice; however, there is nothing in writting.  I would like to appeal this second RIF to the LEMSC.
 
I believe it would be prudent for those of us represented by you if we were to meet to discuss our position, and issues.  Then you could coordinate with Dale Norris on a unified front.  Just a suggestion.
 
I believe the department intends to lay the ground work that a RIF is neccessary due to funding issues, as well as an executive and legislative mandate.  The Deputy Director told me the director believes he has a mandate based upon a conversation with one of the Governor's staffers and with three legislators.  I do not believe this constitutes a 'mandate', but I'll let you argue that point.  The Deputy Director told me that in FY2010 the department has to revert the equivelant of the amount of one furlought day.  The Deputy Director said the department believes this to be about $700,000 dollars, and that be RIFing us, the department will save $400,000.  By RIFing us this late in the fiscal year, the deparment may save around $65,000 at beast.  I believe the figure to be closer to $300,000 for the year.  I do not believe funding is an issue, especially for fiscal year 2010; however, should the sales tax not pass, there may be funding issues in FY2011. I believe there are some issues related to the budget and how the department could save money without RIFing us, but we can discuss those at a meeting.  I believe It would be prudent to start our research on funding now, as suggested by Cmdr. Chung.  We may also want to find out how much vacancy savings the department will realize based upon the people retiring during FY2011.
 
Have we, or are we going to ask for emails between the Director, Deputy Director, Lt. Col Hegarty and Lt. Col. Stanhope?  If not I think we should, from the date Halliday was announced to present.  I have been told they no longer use the email system, because of previous public records requests.
 
I have been told that the department plans to implement the ranks of Major and Captain, effective April 24.  Essentially, former commanders will be called Major and former lieutenants will be called captains.  I am not sure the department can do this without LEMSC approval.  Also, my RIF notice says I am to be placed on a 'lieutenants' reappointment list.  What effect would the rank name change have on the reappointment list?  I believe the departments intent is to change the name, after we are demoted, and then at some future date, change the KSA's and argue that those of us on a reappointment list do not meet the new qualifications.  Something to keep an eye on, at least.
 
I think we have a lot to discuss and it may be easier to do it in person, with a group of us.  Let me know what you think...
 
Steve



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: DPS RIF
Date: 3/30/10 2:06:32 AM
Show details
I think this is more of a legal issue. Can the department now argue that the current RIF is also budget related at this late stage?  While I believe they will try to RIF us again sometime in the future, should we prevail on Wednesday. I also believe it is very likely they will argue it is funding related at that time.  I would be of the opinion that this RIF is not budget related nor has the department EVER said it was.  In Cmdr. Wooten's investigation, on page six, he states:
 
"There is no indication that the agency's funding has been decreased to the extent that it affected these nine employees' positions."
 
In his interview with Cmdr. Wooten, Director Halliday does not talk about this RIF as being related to funding.
 
Also, with the departure of Cmdr. Ticer and Lu Himmelstein, the agency will effectively save the same amount of money as RIFing us.  Additionally, the Director brought on Steve Campbell as deputy director, which could have been filled by an existing Commander, saving the need to eleminate one less commander.
 
Cmdr. Mcguffin, as the executive officer is filling a position historically held by a lieutenant, and has been filled by a sergeant in the recent past.
 
Phil Case put out an Intranet posting on January 15th, which essentially said if nothing changes and there are no additional budget reductions, the department should be able to get through the remainder of this (2010) fiscal year.
 
Fiscal Year 2011's budget has not yet been set, pending the outcome of the 1 cent sales tax ballot initiative.  So I don't believe the agency is in a position to argue this RIF is budget related, when we don't know what our budget will be.
 
The department already has a significant number of upper and middle management positions vacant, including Cmdr. Ticer and Lu Himmelstein, there are; 1 Chief Vacancy (Longman), 1 Chief of Staff (Himmelstein), 4 Commanders (Fragala, Hughes, Young, & Ticer) and at least two Lieutenants (Stanhope & Hegarty). By my count there are eight fewer upper/middle managers, which is a significant monetary savings going into fiscal year 2011. I estimated vacancy savings at approximately $1.5 million.  This does not inlcude the officers/sergeants/civilians who will leave between now and the begining of fiscal year 2011, or during fy2011.
 
If asked I think we hold the agency to this RIF and the notices sent out, that this RIF is the result of a reorganization and desire by the director to trim upper and middle management.  And his response to the request for review that he had an Executive and Legislative mandate. This hearing should be based on the agency's actions to date and their failure to properly follow LEMSC rules when conducting a RIF.  If possible we should not allow them to argue any other point.
 
Just my thoughts...
 
As a side note, I still have not been notified of my new assignment.
 
 
 
> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:19:13 -0700
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net
> To: landeen@ypklaw.com; mprochko@cox.net; princesscop@hotmail.com; rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: FW: DPS RIF
> CC: norrislaw@cox.net; blt4490@hotmail.com; waltermercer4193@msn.com
>
> Neil,
> The timing of this new authority (budget reduction) is really late in the game. I don't know if we've adequately prepared for a budget argument. I know it was what we all first assumed would be the agency's stance, but since they announced it was based on mandates we really haven't put together a strategy for a budget defense.
>
> We are all tired of this roller coaster, but I do not feel we have had time to gather evidence and crunch numbers so that we can prevail against a funding reduction argument. My rough math is about $310,000 savings to reduce 7 lieutenants and 5 commanders. With Ticer and Lu Himmelstein both unexpectedly retiring in April, the agency is saving over $300,000 just for those two employees. I guess the 'necessary' part of the RIF rule is what we will have to argue against.
>
> It is very late, but if anyone wants to argue the merits of asking for a continuance, feel free to do so.
>
> ---- Neil Landeen <landeen@ypklaw.com> wrote:
> Here is the latest info from Dennis, to add to the confusion:
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
> 6017 N. 15th Street
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this
> E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The
> information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney
> client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email
> if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Carpenter [mailto:Dennis.Carpenter@azag.gov]
> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 12:32 PM
> To: Neil Landeen
> Subject: Re: DPS RIF
>
> Neil,
>
> As far as I know, we are still on for March 31st. (I like to think of it
> as a "review" rather than a "hearing.")
>
> Here's what happened late Friday: new notifications went out to
> affected employees letting them know the locations of their new
> assignments with a new RIF effective date of 20 days from Friday. So
> the RIF is being postponed in order to ensure compliance with
> R13-5-802(N).
>
> Also, the Department's position is that in addition to a legislative and
> executive "mandate" to go forward with the RIF, the Department has the
> authority to RIF those positions because of reductions in funding for
> the Department by the Legislature in both FY 2010 and FY 2011 budgets.
>
> Dennis
>
> Dennis D. Carpenter, Jr.
> Assistant Attorney General
> Employment Law Section
> Arizona Attorney General's Office
> 1275 W. Washington
> Phoenix, Arizona 85007
> (602) 542-7677
> FAX: (602) 542-7644
>
>
> >>> "Neil Landeen" <landeen@ypklaw.com> 3/29/2010 12:17 PM >>>
> Hi Dennis,
>
>
>
> Are we still on for the hearing on March 31?
>
>
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
>
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
>
> 6017 N. 15th Street
>
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
>
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
>
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
>
> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for
> delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this
> E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice: The
> information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney
> client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email
> if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: LEMSC - RIF Investigative Report
Date: 3/19/10 2:28:24 PM
Show details
The Director stated in his memorandum in response for a review of the RIF that the RIF was necessary due to legislative and executive mandate. In his interview with Cmdr Wooten he admitted that there was no executive or legislative mandate.  These are contradictory statements at best and could easily be percieved as dishonesty.  At the risk of sounding vindictive our general orders/manuals require us to report misconduct on the part of an employee.  My question to the group/attorney are two; Am I reading too much into the director's statements and two, if it is dishonesty how should we proceed?  I think we need to discuss this issue further...
 
Subject: RE: LEMSC - RIF Investigative Report
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:54:54 -0700
From: landeen@ypklaw.com
To: wdbeck@cox.net; kelly.heape@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; vcu5080@hotmail.com; mprochko@cox.net

FYI - I am meeting with Dale Norris on Monday to get on the same page.  Dale asked me whether I had written the findings for Iven’s report. J

 

Our game-plan is to each submit supplemental memorandums to LEMSC in support of Iven’s report, so we’ll make sure we’re on the same page on Monday.  I’ll keep you all posted.  Have a good weekend.

 

Best, Neil

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: Neil Landeen
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:35 AM
To: William Beck; kelly.heape@cox.net; RRB; Heather h; 'Stephen M. Harrison'; Mike Prochko
Subject: FW: LEMSC - RIF Investigative Report

 

FYI

 

Neil Landeen, Esq.

Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.

6017 N. 15th Street

Phoenix, Arizona 85014

TEL: (602) 241-0474

FAX: (602) 241-9687

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is intended to be addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail by return E-Mail or by telephone. Confidentiality Notice:  The information contained in this message may be protected by the attorney client privilege. Please immediately reply to the sender of this email if you have received it in error, then delete. Thank you.

-----Original Message-----

From: JEdwards@azdps.gov [mailto:JEdwards@azdps.gov]

Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:33 AM

To: Dennis.Carpenter@azag.gov; Neil Landeen; norrislaw@cox.net

Subject: LEMSC - RIF Investigative Report

 

 

Attached is the investigation completed by the LEMSC Business Manager

regarding the reduction in force request for review.

 

Jennie Edwards, Admin Services Officer

Law Enforcement Merit System Council

P O Box 6638, Mail Drop 1290

Phoenix, AZ  85005-6638

(602) 223-2286

jedwards@azdps.gov

 

(See attached file: RIF Investigative Report_001.pdf)





From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: RIF
Date: 3/17/10 6:59:00 AM
Show details
I agree with everyone else.  We should not be focusing on our personal situations, but on the process and procedures used by the department in conducting the Reduction in Force.  I absolutely believe there never was an Executive or Legislative mandate and the department is now trying to justify the RIF based on those two issues.
 
Neil,  I was present when Director Halliday was interviewed by the Arizona Republic, JJ Hensley on February 2, 2010.  The interview was audio recorded by JJ.  During that interview the director specifically stated that HE was taking a critical look at upper and middlemanagement.  He also stated something to the effect that he did not want anyone telling him that he should have reduced upper and middlemanagement.  I took his statements to imply that this RIF was and always has been his administrations idea.  I will work on getting a copy of JJ's interview, if I can.
 
From: princesscop@hotmail.com
To: kelly.heape@cox.net; landeen@ypklaw.com; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; wdbeck@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: RIF
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:29:29 -0700

I agree with all of you on the salary/money issue. I made the choice (in good faith) to move here. My gripe is with how it was done, waiting 23 days to hear my fate was pure torture and I also don't think they followed the rules. I also am humiliated and embarassed and although the demotion was not my fault, I feel it's a stigma that will follow me the rest of my career. I'll go along with the group on this one, we have to fight together.
 
I'll be out of the country beginning March 20 until the afternoon of the 29th, but if you want to meet while I'm gone, I'll give my permission to Kelly to vote as my proxy.
 
Heather
 
 
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:35:02 -0700
> From: kelly.heape@cox.net
> To: landeen@ypklaw.com; mprochko@cox.net; rynososa@yahoo.com; princesscop@hotmail.com; wdbeck@cox.net; vcu5080@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: RIF
>
> I appreciate you contacting Dennis Carpenter and Iven Wooten.
>
> I do see an advantage to at least comparing notes with the AHPA attorney, Dale Norris. Repeating statements and points of argument will not bode well with the Council. Although we have two attorneys assisting us, I believe we will fare better as a united group. Any appearance of a divided focus will diminish the potency of our argument.
>
> Also, I am not convinced that making public the personal negative impact to our lives is in our best interest. I copied everyone on this email to allow anyone else to disagree with me (groupthink avoided...hopefully). There is a negative perception in much of society that management in general is under-worked and overpaid. This has been voiced on many occasions throughout my career by legislators and others, and I believe may have contributed to conversations which ultimately led to our reduction in rank and pay. This is not the first time legislators and governors have whispered in a Director's ear to reduce management at DPS, it is just the first time one followed with blind obedience.
>
> This is why I would like to keep our primary arguments high-level, principle- and policy-focused to avoid we individuals being associated with any perception of self-serving intentions. Too many people have lost appeals before the Council because they thought their individual circumstances were more egregious than any other person's. We are not deciding our future, nor are we deciding how egregious our circumstances are--the Council is. It may just be my personality or personal experiences, but I would not feel comfortable with my perception of personal suffering being aired in public forum. I am not clear how this will sway votes our way in juxtaposition to our primary argument of the Director not following the rules.
>
> I will, however, support the majority opinion on this issue even if I don't submit my own examples. Maybe we can just make some general remarks about how we've all been affected but not provide examples of how Kelly or Mike or Heather were personally affected. Anything we submit to Iven will probably be forwarded via email to many department employees prior to the hearing, since it is common practice for Iven's assistant to attach these to the meeting agenda. I don't want to see these pages popping up throughout the department and we appellants only being remembered for that.
>
> Again, feel free to chime in with any opposing viewpoints on this. Neil does have a short deadline if we want to submit these examples.
>
> Thanks,
> Kelly
>
> ---- Neil Landeen <landeen@ypklaw.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> 1. I have emailed Dennis Carpenter regarding what
> evidence they have of a mandate(s). I just got a response from Dennis
> and will forward it to you all after this email. I will also try to
> keep in close contact with Iven Wooten.
>
>
>
> 2. I am happy to meet in person, talk on the phone, or
> communicate via email with any of you at anytime. Please continue to
> forward me any new information.
>
>
>
> 3. For each of you, please submit to me an overview of
> how this has negatively impacted you/your family. We want to be sure
> that LEMSC is aware how unfair you have been treated and how this
> has/will negatively impact you. Please get this to me as soon as
> possible.
>
>
>
> 4. I am putting together a comprehensive
> overview/outline of all of our issues so that nothing falls through the
> cracks. I intend on adding your statements (#3 above) and submitting it
> to Iven Wooten to assist with his report, which is why I need you all to
> complete #3 ASAP.
>
>
>
> 5. I have not coordinated with AHPA yet, but am open
> to doing so if there is some benefit to you all. Let me know if you
> guys see any benefit.
>
>
>
> As always, let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
>
>
> Best, Neil
>
>
>
> Neil Landeen, Esq.
>
> Yen, Pilch, Komadina, & Flemming, P.C.
>
> 6017 N. 15th Street
>
> Phoenix, Arizona 85014
>
> TEL: (602) 241-0474
>
> FAX: (602) 241-9687
> 


From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Order Confirmation
Date: 1/27/10 8:42:10 AM
Show details
The oranges were delivered last night.  Thanks!
 
From: WHarri3116@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:03:12 -0500
Subject: Fwd: Order Confirmation
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

Hi Steve, it's look it went by postal service  thanks dad 
 

    From: sncitrus@earthlink.net
    To: WHarri3116@aol.com
    Sent: 1/26/2010 9:54:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
    Subj: Re: Fwd: Order Confirmation
     
    I see according to the Postal Service, that package was receive by them
    yesterday, so that package should be delivered  today, if he doesn' have
    them in the next couple of days, please let us know.. Thanks for your
    order.. South Naples Citrus Grove

        -----Original Message-----
        From: WHarri3116@aol.com
        Sent: Jan 25, 2010 4:59 PM
        To: info@naplescitrus.com
        Subject: Fwd: Order Confirmation

        Hi My son  Arizona has not received his oranges  Thank You  William Harrison  Tel. 3945292
         

            From: vcu5080@hotmail.com
            To: wharri3116@aol.com
            Sent: 1/25/2010 1:45:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
            Subj: RE: Order Confirmation
             
            Dad, I have not received the oranges yet or any notice from UPS that they attempted to deliver them.
             
            From: WHarri3116@aol.com
            Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:40:11 -0500
            Subject: Fwd: Order Confirmation
            To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

            HI Steve Did you get your oranges     Love  DAD
             

                From: sncitrus@earthlink.net
                To: WHARRI3116@AOL.COM
                Sent: 1/11/2010 5:45:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
                Subj: Order Confirmation
                 


                WILLIAM HARRISON,
                Thank you for shopping at South Naples Citrus Grove. This is an automated email to acknowledge order #29753 received by us on 12/15/09 12:00:00 AM . If something is incorrect please call us at 1.888.547.6837 or send us an email at info@naplescitrus.com The details of your order are listed below.

                NOTE: If you selected your fruit to be shipped Via.UPS your tracking # and link to track your package is listed below. Tracking number assignment does not indicate your packages have actually left South Naples Citrus Grove. Keep checking the UPS link to view your current shipping status.* Due to Arctic temperatures across the country your order may be delayed temporarily.

                Item Number 	Description 	Qty Ord. 	Qty Shp. 	Qty Bck. 	Expected By
                HB 1TRHB 	Honeybell Oranges 1 tray box of 12 - 15 Honeybells 	1.00 	1.00 	0.00 	 
                Ship-to: STEVE HARRISON


                Date Shipped 	Via
                01/11/10 	UPS RESIDENTIAL APROX. 3 TO 5
                	
                Tracking Number: 1Z6F079X0300722099
                Ship-to: STEVE HARRISON
                01/11/10 	ONLY STATES CA, TX, AZ, & CANADA, & PO BOX
                	
                Tracking Number:
                Ship-to: STEVE HARRISON


                Thank you again,


                South Naples Citrus Grove
                341 Sabal Palm Rd.
                Naples FL 34114
                Toll Free: 1-888-547-6837
                Local: 239-774-3838
                Email: info@naplescitrus.com

                www.naplescitrus.com .

            =
            
            
            
            From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: SIGNING APT
Date: 7/24/09 3:34:48 PM
Show details
Noon will be fine.  And I got your other message about needing to bring $300 to the closing.  Is a personal check ok, or does it need to be a bank check?
 
Subject: SIGNING APT
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:11:42 -0700
From: Jewel.Schmitt@eomc.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

My closer has called me and can’t get docs to title until ten so then it will take an hour to work up them up. I don’t want to have you wait a hour in there for her so I asked her to move your appointment back to noon. Please let me know if that is ok, if not let me know and we can change it to what ever you want.

 

Jewel Schmitt

jewel@eomc.com

Ph: 480-635-3042

Fax: 480-452-0409

3489 E. Baseline Rd

Gilbert, Az 85234




[4]Reply | Menu
From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Animal Paintball Proof of Repair
Date: 5/30/09 1:31:17 PM
Show details
The shirts look great. You can start production. Thanks.
 
From: art5@animalpaintball.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com
Subject: Animal Paintball Proof of Repair
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:28:32 -0500

 

 

Please read below carefully.

 

Dear Stephen: 

 

Attached is a proof of your jersey order. Please review artwork carefully, check for spelling and other irregularities.  We will not be held liable for mistakes after your order is approved. Your immediate feedback will be very much appreciated. Keep in mind that changes to the art work will lengthen the production time, resulting on us not being able to guarantee your order shipping on time (especially rush orders)  If order is correct as is please email me with an approval notice. Once approved orders take 3-4 days to produce and 1-6 days for shipping, depending on shipping preference. If you feel that we will not meet your deadline in the given time frame, please contact Mondo for alternate shipping options.

 

**Please note: Only 3 “FREE” art samples may be made per order.  Add $10.00 per each additional art sample. **

 

If you have questions about the artwork, please contact me at:

 

 

Adriana Cabello

Email: art5@animalpaintball.com

Animal Paintball

Phone: 956-753-8272

Toll Free: 1-866-729-0364

 

NOTE: Size may be larger or smaller for approval purposes and the color will vary depending on the computer monitor. Keep in mind that some paintball leagues require that no orange or pink be used on team jerseys. For this reason it is very important for you to let us know if your league has jersey guidelines, before we continue designing your jersey or logos. Make sure that you check our size chart on our website so that you order the correct sizing for your team members.         (We will not be liable for incorrect sizing so it’s up to you to choose wisely.)

 

Approvals are only by e-mail only.  We advice that if you are choosing a particular color, that you use our color chart from our website.

 

Thank you.

Adriana Cabello

Animal Paintball



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: Order Confirmed.
Date: 5/29/09 10:02:25 PM
Show details
Hello Stephen harrison,

You sent a payment of $31.69 USD to PCGamerUSA (Sales@PCGamerUSA.com)

It may take a few moments for this transaction to appear in your account.

Merchant
PCGamerUSA
Sales@PCGamerUSA.com
	Instructions to merchant
You haven't entered any instructions.
Shipping address - unconfirmed
Stephen harrison
26418 N 42nd St
Phoenix, AZ 85050
United States
	Shipping details
The seller hasn’t provided any shipping details yet.
Description 	Unit price 	Qty 	Amount
Runescape 2 US 10 Million Gold
Item# , West Bank: , Panther3810: 	$31.69 USD 	1 	$31.69 USD
Subtotal 	$31.69 USD
Total 	$31.69 USD
Payment 	$31.69 USD
Charge will appear on your credit card statement as “PAYPAL *PCGAMERUSA"
Payment sent to billing@pcgamerusa.com 	
Issues with this transaction?
You have 45 days from the date of the transaction to open a dispute in the Resolution Center.

Questions? Go to the Help Center at: www.paypal.com/help.

Get verified – Pay from your bank account and you're 100% protected against unauthorized payments sent from your PayPal account. Log in and click the Unverified link below your name.

Please do not reply to this email. This mailbox is not monitored and you will not receive a response. For assistance, log in to your PayPal account and click Help in the top right corner of any PayPal page.

To receive email notifications in plain text instead of HTML, log in to your PayPal account, go to your Profile, and click Notifications.


PayPal Email ID PP120
 
From: sales@pcgamerusa.com
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com
Subject: Order Confirmed.
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 21:57:41 -0700

Dear Stephen:

Thank you for placing an order with www.PCGamerUSA.com. Please take a few seconds to verify the order information below and make sure you have provided the correct information. If there are any errors in your order, please contact us immediately*.

For faster service, please use live chat at our website to contact our 24hr customer support. Please have your order number ready.

Order Information:
Order # 	Server Name 	Faction 	Character 	Quantity 	Or der Status 	Order Date
#0 						

Our record indicates, you are a new customer. Therefore we need to perform couple of verification steps before we can process your order.The verification steps are listed below. We will start to process your order immediately after we verified your payment. This verification process is for the first time buyer only. There will be no required verification for your future orders.

1.      Please reply this confirmation email and confirm you have made purchase from www.PCGamerUSA.com.

2.      We will contact you by the phone number provided in your PayPal payment information to verify the payment (Please make sure we can reach you by that phone number, other wise your order maybe delayed).

* Buyer will be responsible for following order issues after the order is completed.
1. Item send to wrong Character because buyer provided wrong Character name.
2. Item send to wrong Server because buyer provided wrong Server name.
3. Item send to wrong Faction Character because buyer'provided wrong Faction name.
4. Any issues 48 hours after you received our Order Complete Notification Email.



From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: YOUR ORDER
Date: 3/12/09 3:41:07 PM
ATT00000
Show details
John,
 
Please send the package to:
 
Stephen M. Harrison
MD1340
2102 W. Encanto Boulevard,
Phoenix, AZ 85005
 
I can be reached at 602-568-4195
 
Thank you,
 
Steve
 
To: VCU5080@HOTMAIL.COM
Subject: YOUR ORDER
From: John.Re@SigSauer.com
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:12:13 -0400


STEPHEN

FEDEX TRIED TO DELIVER YOUR PACKAGE TO YOU BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO FIND YOU.   IF YOU FORWARD ME AN ADDRESS WHERE WE CAN SEND THE PACKAGE AND YOUR PHONE NUMBER I'LL HAVE IT SENT BACK OUT.


 
 
 
 
 From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: RE: ADDRESS change
Date: 12/14/08 4:12:46 PM
Show details
I got it this time.  My new address is 26435 N. 42nd Place, Phoenix, AZ 85050.  My new home phone number is 480-264-5545.  Talk with you soon.

From: WHarri3116@aol.com
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:02:01 -0500
Subject: ADDRESS change
To: vcu5080@hotmail.com

Hi steve addresschange from embarq to wharri3116@aol.com   It was nice talking to you this afternoon and yes sent me your home address ,so i can sent you  your xmas check    thank you dad






From:Stephen M. Harrison
Subj: (No Subject)
Date: 10/16/07 5:44:09 AM
IMG_0126.jpg, IMG_0127v...jpg, IMG_0128.JPG, IMG_0129.JPG, IMG_0129v...jpg, IMG_0130.JPG, IMG_0131.JPG, IMG_0132.JPG, IMG_0133.JPG, IMG_0133v...jpg, ...
Show details
Dad, here are copies of the pictures from your ships reunion. 
 
It was really good to see you and Peggy.  I hope you had a good flight home.  See you soon
 
Thanks for coming out to AZ!
 
Steve