Pat Buchanan has been denying World War 2 as a triumph for
the West and has aroused most of the barking dogs. He
has much more historical backing than Americans know.
Despite what we may like to believe to be true, Americans
did not respond as the stalwarts we believe we are.
Much more to the point the Jews of America did not respond
in any manner close to what they would like to believe about
themselves. Much, much more to the point Jews would
like others to believe that the Jews of the world were in
the front of the fighting the evil forces. Hitler
finished out of the money in the 20th century
when determining the great butchers. From my book:
When America does think of Europe and World War II, German
occupation of the Rhineland and the callous sellout of
Czechoslovakia in 1938 in Munich for which we blamed the
treacherous, cowardly British government of Neville
Chamberlain have been regarded as preliminary activities.
That the United States of Franklin Delano Roosevelt was not
prepared to do anything to assist the beleaguered government
of Czechoslovakia in any meaningful way is not remembered at
all as we regard our public display of concern as being
sufficient to assert our virtue. Historian A.J.P.
Taylor had Leon Blum and the rest of France welcoming the
Munich agreement with relief and shame. The British also
have had a difficult time in remembering the deal between
Hitler and Chamberlain was widely popular at home. Very few
Britons were prepared to fight for Czechoslovakia.
Roosevelt and his Jews
|
 |
Some
years later in his diary James Forrestal, who served as
Secretary of War under Roosevelt, revealed American
Ambassador Joseph Kennedy's account of his conversation with
Chamberlain. The British Prime
Minister blamed the American government of Franklin
Delano Roosevelt along with world Jewry for forcing England
into war.[1]
In 1938 the England of Chamberlain had nothing to
fight with and could not risk war with Hitler.
|
|
 |
Old Joe Kennedy thought if England had refrained from
entering the war over Poland, Hitler in time would
have taken Germany into war with Russia with no
resulting conflict with England.
Currently in England revisionist historians have been
saying if Britain had avoided fighting Germany in
World War II, she would be much richer today, and the
country would be better for it.
|
Kennedy blamed William Bullitt, then American
Ambassador to France, for forcing Roosevelt to insist
that Germany be faced down over Poland as neither
England or France wanted to fight.
|
American historian, Charles Beard, thought of the
war as being necessary for the survival of the nation. What
did disturb Mr. Beard was the behavior of the American
wealthy who had so little confidence in the citizenry and so
little respect for the truth, that they unashamedly lied
about the central issue of war or peace.[2]
The question of democracy's future perturbed Mr. Beard as he
thought the actions of Mr. Roosevelt had left the populace
with no effective choice.
Lindbergh
was one of the few voices of reason
|
|
In September 1941 Lindbergh increased his venom and started
to blame "The British, the Jews, and the Roosevelt
administration" for agitating for war.[3]
These three groups included the two mentioned by Neville
Chamberlain plus the government of Britain which then was
fighting Germany. The
politically correct hyenas of that era howled over that
speech. Fellow members of the America First movement
led the way. John T. Flynn, head of the New York
chapter, publicly rebuked Lindbergh. In a private
letter to Lindbergh Flynn admitted to his distress. The
anti-Semites of his chapter had been delighted.
|
Later after a private
conversation Lindbergh wrote in his private journal
that Flynn thought as strongly as he that Jews were in
the forefront of pushing the country to war.
Flynn was agreeable to discussing the matter in small
private conversations. But, Lindbergh surmised
that Flynn would rather see the United States in war
before bringing the matter to a public debate.
Norman Thomas, the lion of American socialism,
regarded most of what Lindbergh said to be largely
true and much of the criticism of Lindbergh to be
"insincere and hypocritical".
|
John T. Flynn
 |
|
Media Jews block Lindbergh's speeches |
|
|
Lindbergh had noted in his
diary of a successful threat by Jewish advertising
firms to withhold placements from a radio network
unless a proposed program was withdrawn.
The threat worked and
the program was not run.[4]
Writing more than 20 years later, critic Edmund
Wilson remarked on the motive of American Jews wanting
to save their own people. They had stronger
reasons than had their ancestors for fighting the
Greeks and the Romans, and they were glad for the
United States to fight Germany.
|
However, the extermination of 6 million Jews was already
far advanced before the United States took action.
Wilson candidly admitted that Roosevelt lied and connived
with the British.[5]
|
If readers would care to quote from this, please do.
[1].
Walter Millis editor, The Forrestal Diaries,
pp121-2 (Viking Press, 1951)
[2].
William Appleman Williams, The Contours of American
History, p463 (Quadrangle Paperbacks, 1966)
[3].
Commonweal, p532, Sep 26, 1941
[4].
Wayne S. Cole, Charles A. Lindbergh and the Battle
Against American Intervention in World War II,
pp171-85 (Harcourt, Brace, 1974)
[5].
Edmund Wilson, Patriotic Gore: Studies in the
Literature of the American Civil War, pxxvi (Oxford
Press, 1962)
|
