Carter and Swarm
by Israel Shamir – January 28, 2007
|
Publication of Jimmy Carter's Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid
is a great event for America and for all of us. It's not that Carter
had said something we did not know about Palestine. Before Carter
came,
we knew that the Zionists established a racist apartheid regime
in the Holy Land where Jews have rights, and goyim have duties.
Before Carter came
we knew a native Palestinian has no right to vote, move, work
freely in his land, that he is locked up behind the twenty-foot
wall. Before Carter came
we knew that the US support allowed the atrocities to occur and
the apartheid regime to entrench. But we did not know that there are
prominent Americans who would dare the wrath of organised Jewry and
spell it out loud.
|
|
|
Why did President Carter do it?
Why did he risk his peaceful old age and gently fading glory to
endure an attack of Israel's Fifth Column as merciless as the Four
Columns' onslaught on Gaza? He was moved by compassion, by this
supreme Christian virtue of feeling together with the suffering and
the oppressed. He saw the suffering of Palestine and he could not
keep his quiet. He upheld a honourable American tradition: that of
Mark Twain who condemned the US atrocities in Philippines, that of
Henry Thoreau speaking against the Mexican War. This is a universal
tradition, too: Multatuli unmasked the Dutch atrocities in
Indonesia, Roger Casement did it to the Belgians in Congo,
Radishchev bewept the fate of a Russian peasant. And their voices
changed our world, though not immediately. Carter is not a radical;
a man of hotter temper would call to terminate the infamy called
«The Jewish State» altogether. Carter's message was soft and gentle;
so soft and compassionate that only an arrogant and
power-intoxicated won't be able to live with it. Others (including
me) were more hard and explicit, but then the others weren't the US
presidents.
|
|
|
|
|
Why now?
The apartheid in Palestine was bad enough ten years ago to
warrant his intervention, but this despondent helplessness we
witness now is a new phenomenon. Hope ever kept alive up by Camp
David, by peace with Egypt, by Madrid and Oslo conferences is dead.
A year of severe blockade brought forth a confrontation between the
Palestinian parties and the Jewish wet dream, an inter-Palestinian
civil war, is about to come. The Holy Land is on the verge of
collapse. President Carter is 82, and he is not afraid of anything.
In this age, and at this stage of life, statesmen are likely to
speak their mind, like the Malaysian PM Mohammad Mahathir did after
his retirement. This is the time for unpalatable truth: the
ideological and spiritual guidance of the West while dislodged from
the hands of the Church, passed over to the usurpers of Zion. While
they rule, Palestine has no chance.
|
|
|
Ordinary Jews Need To Be Convinced
Though most ordinary US Jews are sane and sensible, the decisions
are made by super-rich, super-powerful, super-chauvinist Jews who
are anything but. They are the power pushing for war. Carter wanted
to stop the disaster in the Middle East, by convincing the sane and
rebutting the arrogant. Thus the President joined the fracas, as the
traditional WASP America tries to regain the lost ground and save
the country they love from destruction.
|
|
|
|
|
The Jewish Control Of The Universities
The WASPs, with all their immense property holdings, traditions
and roots found themselves marginalised by the Jews with their dead
hold on media and universities: indeed the spirit rules over matter.
Baker-Hamilon Iraq Study Group and
Walt - Mearsheimer report are the first salvos in this WASP
Intifada. A Jewish American columnist (resident in Israel and
writing for Israel’s
Haaretz) Burston correctly stated that “Carter's true intended
target was the organized American Jewish community.” Carter pointed
out the main reasons for apartheid in the Holy Land, says Burston:
|
|
|
Jewish Control Of Government
* Jewish control of [the US] government: “It would be almost
politically suicidal for members of Congress to espouse a balanced
position between Israel and Palestine, to suggest that Israel comply
with international law or to speak in defense of justice or human
rights for Palestinians.»
* Jewish control of the [US] media: “What is even more difficult to
comprehend is why the editorial pages of the major newspapers and
magazines in the United States exercise similar self-restraint,
quite contrary to private assessments expressed quite forcefully by
their correspondents in the Holy Land.”
|
|
|
|
|
The Jewish Swarm
After Carter spoke, he was immediately counterattacked by
organised Jewry. This was not a sight to miss. In my native Siberia,
in its short and furious summer you may see swarm of gnats attack a
horse, each tiny bloodsucker eager for his piece of action. In a
while, the blinded and infuriated animal rushes headlong in mad
sprint and soon finds its death in the bottomless moors. The Jews
developed the same style of attack. It is never a single voice
arguing the case, but always a mass attack from left and right,
below and above, until the attacked one is beaten and broken and
crawls away in disgrace.
|
|
|
Media Promotes Jewish Views
Each attacker is as tiny and irrelevant as a single gnat, but as
swarm they are formidable. Observe them separately: Dershowitz, an
advocate of
torture and of hostage killing, an apprehended
plagiarist who never was elected to any position of authority
and commands no respect, demands to debate the president. It is
indeed beyond chutzpah; but Dershowitz is supported by other Jews in
prime positions and his ridiculous demand is seconded by university
and media until this thieving nonentity gets equal time on a TV
channel to present “his case”. Another gnat is a Deborah
Lipstadt, a nonentity brought forth by the Washington Post.
Plenty of others are even smaller than these two, for instance 14
Jews who gave up their positions at Carter Center. If they would not
keep media in their hands, they wouldn't be heard but by their
spouses.
|
|
|
|
|
Attack Dogs
Their technique is quite simple. They switch the focus of
argument onto the personality of their adversary. Thus, instead of
discussing apartheid in Israel, we discuss Jimmy Carter, whether he
is a bigot and antisemite (thus Foxman, a bad Jew) or he is not (Avnery,
a good Jew). The correct answer is “irrelevant”: Carter’s love of
Jews or lack of it has no bearing on the question of apartheid in
Palestine. Likewise, if we discuss the situation in Bosnia or
Kosovo, we do not go into our sentiments towards Serbs, Albanians or
Croats. But Jews are different.
|
|
|
Clark A Self Hating Jew
For instance, General Wesley Clark said that rich Jews, the
great donors of Washington politicians, push for war with Iran.
Well, it can be discussed, maybe denied, but instead, they derail
the discussion into another topic, whether Clark is an antisemite.
Matthew Yglesias
provides the sources for the whole kosher hog, from comparison
with The Protocols, to inevitable quote from Foxman who says
Clark had “bought into conspiratorial bigotry”. From this moment,
Clark will stick to defending himself, and the guys will take care
that his hands will be full. Here again, the correct answer is a
polite shrug: who cares whether Clark is a bigot? Maybe he is also a
paedophile and usurer, but this ad hominem has no bearing on what he
said. And an accusation “you do not love Jews” is not much different
from “You do not love your aunt”, and you probably have learned to
live with it at the age of six.
|
|
|
|
A good book to accustom oneself to this sort of attack is Michael
Bulgakov’s
The Master and Margarita: this marvellous book shows a Jewish
critics’ swarm attack on a writer who dared to write about Christ.
Indeed, whoever mentions Christ will experience it sooner or later.
I also tried the taste of swarm attack. During the Tsunami disaster in
Thailand I discovered that the Jewish undertakers, Zaka, forced the
Thais to delay mass burial of victims for a day or two, despite the real
and immediate danger of epidemic diseases, in order to avoid a real
calamity: holy Jewish bodies may be inadvertently buried together with
the goyim. I was told so by the members of the Zaka team who were quite
proud of their feat. I wrote about it (Tsunami
in Gaza). It was republished by a few sites. Then, a British Jew
named Manfred Ropschitz began an ad hominem campaign – against me. Other
Jews joined the fray, discussing whether I am a Jew, or a
“Swedish-Russian Nazi antisemite”, as if it has any bearing on the
tsunami story. Instead of shrugging it off, other supporters of
Palestine switched to this piquant subject. They carried their
discussion from The Times to their email lists, until eventually,
another Jewish “antisionist” commented with deep satisfaction: “Shamir
is marginalised and brought into disrepute”.
Ropschitz did not try to disprove the story, for the story was true. He
wrote: “With an army of journalists crawling over the Tsunami story I'd
expect to have heard such shocking news by now – if it's true. I am a
journalist and I don't believe it.” No, gentlemen, you won’t hear a true
story if it is not acceptable to Ropschitzes of this world. They will
hunt you to the far-away corner of the world, and there are not many
people who care to risk their well-planned attack. Indeed one should be
a real kamikaze to enter this fight. The Ropschitzes, these quite
ordinary Jews who fully identify with their community, are the key to
the swarm attack. There are many Jewish media-lords, even more editors,
but it is the Ropschitzes that clinch the party line. These willing
executioners of our freedom, the foot-soldiers of the media lords,
automatically defend “the Jews” i.e. the organised Jewish community at
any price. Ordinary human beings of Jewish origin can be of any opinion.
Likewise, ordinary Americans do not decide whether their country will
attack Iran or not. But Bush and Cheney alone can’t fight Iraqi war, and
the Jewish media lords would be powerless without their willing
executioners of freedom.
The Gentile philosemites are even worse, noticed Eustace Mullins, the
legendary American writer whose best-selling books (running into the
millions) were never published or distributed by the mainstream. He
wrote:
|
Control Of The Media
“It has long been common knowledge since the incorporation of the
three [US] major national television networks that each of them was
owned, operated and controlled by Jews. Now at last, or so it
seemed, the Christians of America would have their own Christian
television network on which they could observe the tenets of the
Christian religion. Or so it seemed. And when the CBN began its
daily broadcasting, what was its daily message? We must love the
Jews. We must support the State of Israel in all its depredations
and its immoral devastation of the Holy Christian Shrines in the
Birthplace of Our Saviour. We must help the Jews, and we must, above
all, avoid the greatest sin, the sin of 'anti-Semitism', whatever
that is. Even the Jewish networks do not broadcast as blatantly
pro-Jewish propaganda as the Christian Broadcasting Network.”
|
|
|
Jews Even Attack A Priest
A man died this week in France, a real saint, who was known by
affectionate appellation “Abbč Pierre”, a priest who fought with the
Resistance, helped homeless, provided for the poor and was a great
friend of Palestinians. In 1996 he was hounded almost to death after
he expressed his support for another friend of Palestine, Roger
Garaudy who wrote a book
The Founding Myths of Israeli Politics A victim of Jewish
swarm attack, he went into seclusion to Italy and to Switzerland,
deserted by the people he fought for. His sorry fate should be
remembered by the French and bother their conscience. If the Maid of
Orleans was executed by the British Occupation regime (though using
French collaborationists) no such excuse is available for those who
ostracised the Abbč Pierre: they just got frightened by the swarm
attack.
|
|
|
|
|
Jews Sought To Destroy Lindbergh
This fear of Jewish swarm attacks already brought much sorrow to
mankind. In 1930s, the famous American aviator Charles Lindbergh
called the US to stay out of the coming war in Europe. He was
attacked by the Jewish media as a Nazi and a Hitler sympathiser, was
besmirched and “overnight Lindbergh
went from cultural hero to moral pariah”. Now again, the US is
being pushed by the same forces into a new war, this time in the
Middle East. Let us try and stop it by being fearless, for as a
Jewish Hassid spiritual song hath it, “haikar lo lefahed bihlal”,
the most important is not to be afraid at all. Carter brought us
hope that there is an America the world can live with, a
non-aggressive, democratic America, whose policies aren’t decided by
the rich donors, but by the ordinary Americans who voted against the
war, and who today gather in Washington calling to stop escalation.
|
|
|
|