The wealthiest
men of our nation are in control of our education system. Our schools
teach curriculums created by the Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, the
Rockefeller Foundation, and the Guggenheim Foundation. While President of
the Ford Foundation in 1954, Rowan Gaither explained the Foundation’s
mandate: "… we operate in response to directives, the substance of which
is that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the United
States so that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union." Openly
admitted, for the record, the tax-exempt foundations which determine what
and how American children learn have tried to manipulate attitudes toward
a socialist model - specifically the Soviet Union. What are some
alterations which would favor this change in attitude? In the Soviet Union
there were no guaranteed rights, freedom of political expression was
outlawed, the government regimented all aspects of life, and religion was
systematically abolished in favor of the belief in atheism.
Upon examination of my own U.S. history book from school, I
realized the Bill of Rights was excluded from the book - the only mention
of our Bill of Rights was in implied meanings, reworded by the authors.
This is a blatant attempt to undermine the original meaning of the
Constitution! It is only justifiable to interpret the meanings of each
right after reading the actual words written by the Founding Fathers.
Couple this with the passage of the Patriot Act and Homeland Security Act,
which negate major portions of the Bill of Rights, and we begin to see a
pattern: our inherent rights from God are being destroyed!
When one knows whom their readers will be they can then attempt to
alter their opinions through their writings. As Nietzsche says, “He who
knows the reader, does nothing further for the reader. Another century of
readers - and spirit itself will stink. That everyone can learn to read
will ruin in the long run not only writing, but thinking too.” Because
those who mandate our education have set a goal for themselves - the
destruction of our Republic and a merger with world government. They have
written textbooks accordingly. Through these means, they manage the
thinking processes of the readers - the children attending school to be
‘educated.’ Our children’s minds are being manipulated to turn away from
Individualism, in favor of
Collectivism.
Because the Homeland Security Act
and Patriot Act allow for indefinite detainment, it is now legal for U.S.
citizens to be held as political prisoners. The Federal Government is not
required to give any reason for detaining a person. Why isn’t this
analyzed in the media? Why is this important turn of events being swept
under the rug? Furthermore, federal agents may enter homes without warrant
or the homeowner’s knowledge; this provides the perfect opportunity to
frame their adversaries: those in favor of Constitutional Government. With
the DNA database being constructed, it will likely be possible to grow
human hairs in a laboratory that could conceivably be planted as evidence
in a crime.
The physical shackles of oppression are much
more sloppy than the restraints which can be placed on the mind. The
tragedy of our situation is that we first must win a spiritual war - then,
likely a physical one. Nietzsche observed, “We believe in reason: this,
however, is the philosophy of gray concepts. Language depends on the most
naďve prejudices. Now we read disharmonies and problems into things
because we think only in the form of language and thus believe in the
“eternal truth” of “reason.” (e.g., subject, attribute, etc.) We cease to
think when we refuse to do so under the constraint of language; we barely
reach the doubt that sees this limitation as a limitation. Rational
thought is interpretation according to a scheme that we cannot throw off.”
Nietzsche knew well the restrictions language places on thought. Another
genius, George Orwell, explained in his book 1984, how a corrupt
totalitarian government called Oceania (U.S.A. merged with Britain)
reduced the language to restrict its subject’s range of thought. In this
new language, Newspeak, a person was unable to form concepts to disagree
with the government. This becomes important as the illiteracy rate in our
nation increases every year.
The main concept of mind
control, in the book 1984, was to cause a person to ‘doublethink.’ Orwell
explains ‘doublethink’ as a willingness “to forget any fact that has
become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it
back from oblivion for just so long as it is needed.” For example, the
U.S. places Saddam Hussein in power, arms him to the teeth, then declares
him a menace to the world and attacks him. We are supposed to forget that
Donald Rumsfeld handed Saddam a briefcase - the Weapons of Mass
Destruction kit! If I hand a person a gun, then shoot him, does that make
me a hero? We are supposed to ‘doublethink’ and not care how many times
the Federal Government lies to us, yet still believe every word they say
at present. When our nation blows something up it is called an
‘operation.’ When anyone else blows something up it is called ‘terrorism.’
By this interpretation, terrorism is defined as using a bomb without
dropping it from a plane or delivering it by missile! Because they don’t
spend the money on the high-tech gear, they’re terrorists!
There
was a War on Illiteracy - more people are illiterate. There was a War on
Drugs - more drugs hit the street. Now there’s a War on Terror - a war on
a concept, which will, of course, bring us more terrorism. We see the
results of these so-called ‘wars,’ yet we ‘doublethink’ and ignore the
facts.
Perhaps the most enormous lie perpetuated upon us
today by the schools and media is the idea of Macroevolution: the notion
that we somehow evolved from apes. Of course, Microevolution is proper and
evident - for example, giraffes with longer necks survive during times of
drought, while the shorter necked giraffes starve because they can’t reach
the leaves to eat. But Macroevolution, the idea that we coincidentally,
just happened to evolve from nothingness, is absurd to the point of
lunacy!
First of all, Macroevolution defies the very laws of physics
which it is supposed to enforce. Those who believe in this theory consider
themselves “students of reason,” yet reason itself denies this theory.
Mathematicians have studied the odds of this theory taking place and the
odds are so miniscule, they are not even calculable… in other words, there
is not even a chance this actually took place. The Theory of
Macroevolution relies on an assumption that we evolved from simplicity
into something much more complex- this defies the Second Law of
Thermodynamics which states that simplification of structure is the
natural state of all things. The idea that genetic mutations might occur,
every time, to add complexity to simple genes is absurd and reckless. The
scientific evidence proves the course of genetic degeneration: Bacillus
Circulans was analyzed after 300 million years of suspended animation in
rock salt; it was found to be more genetically complex than its current
forms. We are in a state of degeneration, not ‘evolution.’
Nietzsche, who lived and wrote during the birth of Darwinism,
wrote, "Anti-Darwin.- What surprises me most when I survey the broad
destinies of man is that I always see before me the opposite of that which
Darwin and his school see or want to see today: selection in favor
of the stronger, better-constituted, and the progress of the
species. Precisely the opposite is palpable: the elimination
of the lucky strokes, the uselessness of the more highly developed types,
the inevitable dominion of the average even the sub-average types.
If we are not shown why man should be an exception among creatures, I
incline to the prejudice that the school of Darwin has been deluded
everywhere.”
”That species represent any progress is the
most unreasonable assertion in the world: so far they represent one
level. That the higher organisms have evolved from the lower has not been
demonstrated in a single case. I see how the lower preponderate through
their numbers, their shrewdness, their cunning - I do not see how an
accidental variation gives an advantage, at least not for so long a
period; why an accidental change should grow so strong would be something
else needing explanation.”
”... In summa: growth in
the power of a species is perhaps guaranteed less by a preponderance of
its children of fortune, of strong members, than by a preponderance of
average and lower types- The latter possess great fruitfulness and
duration; with the former comes an increase in danger, rapid wastage,
speedy reduction in numbers."
The great farce of Darwinian
Macroevolution has been insinuated upon mankind… but why would this be
beneficial to the globalists? Those who believe in atheism and evolution,
which is just as much a blind leap-of-faith as any other religious belief,
usually have the attitude “life is mere chance- who cares about anything?”
and “nothing is sacred, we are just monkeys ourselves, let’s defile the
world.” Those who believe in nothingness are more easily led to their
demise. Those who stand up for a code of ethics, and believe in God and
goodness, are more likely to stand up against tyranny. A belief in
Macroevolution supports the materialist philosophy of purchasing happiness
at the local Galleria and teaches nothing of discovering spiritual
happiness.
Our “education” system is not the poorest in the
world by coincidence; neither is it because Americans are of sub-normal
intelligence. The school system is designed to dumb students down - to
teach them to memorize and obey, instead of teaching them to think for
themselves. Add to the equation the intelligence-insulting media, which
couldn’t say a three syllable word if this were desired, and we have a
system of idiocy manufacturing cattle. All this is no accident. This has
been perpetuated upon us with the intent of degrading our mental
attributes for the purpose of exploitation. The veil hiding these wealthy
puppet-masters with their tax-exempt ‘educational’ foundations and mass
media must be lifted if we are to win this spiritual
battle.
Randy Lavello welcomes your comments at PAINTBOX17@aol.com
Permission
to reprint this article is granted providing the original author is cited
and a link to PRISON PLANET.com is included. The views expressed in this article may not necessarily be those of Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson.
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and for the general purpose of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, research and / or educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use this material for purposes other than provided by law. You must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/index.html,