Last week, Bob Mullally walked out of jail, finally free of the legal furor that turned his life upside down. Mullally, 59, served 45 days for violating a 1997 civil court order and leaking 79 confidential files detailing domestic-violence complaints involving LAPD officers to a KCBS-TV reporter.
A subsequent investigation by the police department’s inspector general affirmed the TV revelations, documenting how LAPD officers suspected of domestic violence received favored treatment from their department. (See: "Life of a Whistleblower", June 6 - 12.)
The reward for Mullally, a criminal-defense consultant, was a jail term at Oxford Federal Prison in South Central Wisconsin. “It was nothing more than a warehouse,” he said, “holding people who could have been sentenced to home arrest. They didn’t even make a pretense of rehabilitating or re-training people.” He spent his first night in a solitary-confinement cell with lights blazing. “I was strip-searched three times during intake and given only a long T-shirt to wear,” he said. “I was first assigned to clean toilets, then I got to wash dishes. Finally I got promoted to bussing tables in the cafeteria.”
Inexplicably, he was initially labeled a wife-beater. “Somehow that story got around, and I was getting a lot of dirty looks and hostility. But I finally got things straightened out, and one guard even told me, ‘Way to go.’”
Mullally says he is still trying to make sense of his odyssey. He also has to find a job and a place to live. “I just can’t believe the courts continue to hide information about police officers abusing their wives and children. I want to come back to L.A. and talk to the City Council about what happened.”
He’s heading home to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to nail down a new job and a place to live. “I feel optimistic and, most importantly, I finally feel free.”
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and for the general purpose of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, research and / or educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use this material for purposes other than provided by law. You must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/index.html,