February 24, 2009
 

Custom Search

  

"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal"

Barack Hussein Obama

 


 

 

 

 

event

description

Army Officer Defies Obama A U.S. Army officer, on active duty in Iraq, has called President Obama an "impostor" in a statement in which he affirmed plans to join in, as plaintiff, a challenge to Obama's eligibility to be commander in chief.

"Lt. Scott Easterling, a retired US Army Sergeant Firs Class, wrote in a "to-whom-it-may-concern" letter, "As an active-duty officer in the United States Army, I have grave concerns about the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to hold the office of President of the United States."

Obama "has absolutely refused to provide to the American public his original birth certificate, as well as other documents which may prove or disprove his eligibility," Easterling continued.  "In fact, he has fought every attempt made by concerned citizens in their effort to force him to do so."

"Until Mr. Obama releases a 'vault copy' of his original birth certificate for public review, I will consider him neither my Commander in Chief nor my President, but rather, a usurper to the Office -- an impostor," his statement said.

"I implore all service-members and citizens to contact their senators and representatives and demand that they require Mr. Obama prove his eligibility.  Our Constitution and our great nation must not be allowed to be disgraced."

Now, this one is interesting.  If Easterling refuses to obey a "lawful order" of a superior officer, he will be subject to court martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).  Is this what Easterling seeks?

As a defendant in a court martial, he will definitely have "standing" to subpoena individuals, records and documents for his defense.

This guy is putting his personal freedom and career on the line to force this issue.  He is a patriot.
The Military Action The list of commissioned and non-commissioned military personnel who are challenging Obama's eligibility continues to grow. Here's the latest:

**  Brigadier General US Air Force, (Ret) Charles E. Jones
**  Major General (Ret) Carroll D. Childers P.E. Commanding General 29TH Infantry Division VA ARNG
**  Colonel (Ret) Harry Riley former division chief national security agency
**  1LT OD/LG Scott R. Easterling Active Army Iraq Duty
**  LtCol. David A. Earl-Graef USAFR MC
**  SSgt Brian A Keith USMC
**  Charles L. Miller, Lt. Col. USAF (Ret)
**  Major James Cannon USMC (Ret)
**  Police Sgt. and USN Cmdr. Clinton Grimes
$1 Billion For Gaza In addition to the $750 million in US foreign aid the Palestinians received the last 6 years, Obama plans to send an additional $900 million to Gaza for construction, U.S. officials said on Monday.

$900 million divided by a population of 1.5 million is $600 to every man, woman and child in Gaza.  That's more than the average American will get under Obama's reparations and redistribution swindle, and none of these Gazans pay U.S. taxes -- and they still hate us.

One deluded official, who asked not to be named, said, "This money is for Gaza and to help strengthen the Palestinian Authority.  It is not going to go to Hamas."

How this is possible?  This CNN report from the region clearly says that Hamas controls Gaza.  How do the geniuses in the White House plan on keeping the money from Hamas when they control the place?

Addendum:  A reader reminds us not to forget about that $20.3 million Obama released in the January 27, 2009 Memorandum, for the purpose of bringing Gazan "refugees" (AKA Hamas suicide bombers) to the United States -- travel, expenses and  housing -- and Obama contends it's in "the national interest."
Obama's Union Payback While everyone is talking about the pork laden stimulus that Obama and many Democrats in Congress are pushing, Obama very quietly signed a pro union executive order on Friday.  It ordered the use of union labor for federal construction projects.

The order, one of the most blatant political payoffs ever seen is a substantial boost to unions.  It says government contractors should favorably consider "project labor agreements (PLA)," that carve out jobs for union workers.

Obama's order encourages government agencies to use PLAs on projects costing at least $25 million, but unions said it also directs his administration to report back to him on whether he should go further and require PLAs for federal contracts. 

Unlike each of the other 10 orders Obama has signed so far in his young administration, the president signed this one with no fanfare and out of the public eye.

 

"This executive order encouraging all federal agencies to adopt discriminatory, union-only project labor agreements is a shameless giveaway to Big Labor, which spent over a billion dollars to get Obama and pro-forced-unionism Democrats elected last year," said Stefan Gleason, vice president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation.

 

Among his 11 executive orders so far, Obama has signed four that aid unions, part of a union-friendly blitz in his early days.

 

Some observers said he's trying to do all he can for unions now because Democrats are unlikely to be able to deliver on unions' top priority, the Employee Free Choice Act, which would allow unions to form without a secret-ballot vote by workers.

 

Opponents, though, said the agreements can increase costs by as much as 20 percent because of higher union wages. 

"Union-only PLAs drive up costs for American taxpayers while unfairly discriminating against 84 percent of U.S. construction workers who choose not to join a labor union," said Kirk Pickerel, president of Associated Builders and Contractors.  "All taxpayers should have the opportunity to compete fairly on any project funded by the federal government."

Obama Approval Falls Though he began his presidency with the second highest approval rating in the Gallup Poll's history of tracking the statistic, Obama's numbers have dropped back to merely average.

Obama's initial job approval rating in January stood at 68 percent, second only to Kennedy's 72 percent among elected presidents since Gallup began tracking the rating during Eisenhower's administration.

But after only a month in office, Obama's negative rating has doubled: from 12 percent who disapprove of the job he's doing, to 24 percent.

According to Gallup polling on all elected presidents from Richard Nixon through George W. Bush (this excludes Gerald Ford, who assumed office after Nixon resigned), the range of job approval for new presidents after about a month in office extends from 55% for Ronald Reagan to 71% for Jimmy Carter.  The average one-month approval rating for all six past presidents is 62% -- nearly identical to Obama's current 63%.

The average first-month disapproval rating for these same past presidents was 16%.  However, Obama's slightly higher 24% disapproval score is similar to those seen for the most recent two presidents -- Bush and Bill Clinton -- perhaps owing to heightened partisanship or media scrutiny in recent years.

How does the fact that Obama received NO media scrutiny and continues to receive NO media scrutiny, just media accolades.
ACORN "ACORN and Obama: Together Again" was posted on On 2/20/09, below.  It described how Obama's friends and associates in ACORN planned to illegally seize foreclosed properties and contained a video showing ACORN members breaking into a home.

Yesterday, Police in Baltimore arrested an ACORN activist who now faces criminal charges for breaking into a home in southeast Baltimore to protest the foreclosure crisis sweeping the country.

"This is our house now," ACORN member Louis Beverly reportedly said after cutting a lock on the front door with bolt cutters.

Beverly will be charged with fourth-degree burglary, according to Anthony Guglielmi, a spokesman for the Baltimore Police.  Attempts to reach his attorney, Justin Brown, were not immediately successful.

Elsewhere, Pittsburgh Police Spokeswoman Diane Richard said charges would be filed against any individual found living in a foreclosed home, whether that individual had previously lived at the residence or not.

"If someone is court-ordered to vacate and they do not, it would be trespassing at that point," Richard said. "What exactly would be charged depends on the intensity of the violation. It could go all the way up to burglary, which is a felony."

This video shows Obama at a December 2007 community organizer forum.  He says that he will invite ACORN to "shape the agenda" during the transition period and he will allow them to be actively involved during the first 100 days of his administration.

Well, ACORN is now involved -- and so are the cops.

And, check out this video -- Stuart Varney -- chews up ACORN and spits it out.  You’ll recognize Bertha Lewis from her "By Any Means Necessary" article this weekend at the Huffington Post.

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009
All right reserved