April 13, 2009
 

Custom Search

Obama once dressed as
a Somali elder.  Now he has
to kill Somali pirates.

 


 

 

 

 

event

description

Welcome to Cuba
Atlas Shrugs asks if you have you seen this .pdf?  It is Obama's fascist blueprint to create a police state and legalize gulags.  This is not a spoof.  This is the "mission statement" for Obama's "civilian army."

The Document's "Scope"

This product is one of a series of intelligence assessments published by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch (Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division, Office of Threat Analysis. Coordinated with the FBI.) to facilitate a greater understanding of the phenomenon of violent radicalization in the United States.  The information is provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials so they may effectively deter, prevent, preempt, or respond to terrorist attacks against the United States.  Federal efforts to influence domestic public opinion must be conducted in an overt and transparent manner, clearly identifying United States Government sponsorship.

So, now only the federal government may "influence domestic public opinion."

Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.  It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

Obviously, Homeland Security is no longer concerned with Islamic extremism, and even though left-wing extremists tear up cities from Seattle to New York, they are not a threat.  Only the "right-wing" is now a threat -- but is that perceived threat a threat to America, or is it a threat to Obama's socialist and fascist policies?

Key Findings

The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several emergent issues.  The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.

Translation:  There is no threat. Give us time, we'll create one.

 

Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts.  Nevertheless, the consequences of a prolonged economic downturn -- including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit -- could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past.

 

Translation: There is no threat. Give us time, we'll create one.

 

The current economic and political climate has some similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and sovereignty by other foreign powers.

 

American sovereignty is now a radical position.

During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and an increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law enforcement officers, banks, and infrastructure sectors.

 

Sounds like they are describing Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, Obama's great friends and terrorist patriots!

 

Growth of these groups subsided in reaction to increased government scrutiny as a result of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing and disrupted plots, improvements in the economy, and the continued U.S. standing as the preeminent world power.

 

Their evidence is one terror attack 15 years ago -- but fail to mention the 13,000 Islamic attacks since 9/11.

 

The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks.

 

Ah, there it is. take their guns away.


Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence against the government.  The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law enforcement.

 

Ban?  What ban?  This is a staging.  Fake staging to seize weapons.

 

Returning veterans possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists.  DHS/I&A is concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent capabilities.

 

America's heroes are to be considered extremists because they have combat skills.  These wonderful young people, who daily risks their lives in defense of our country are now being painted as extremists by the bunch in the White House.


And these paragraphs are just the introduction to this radical document, which is nothing more than Obama's plan to paint anyone that disagrees with Obama's agenda as an extremist.

If you oppose illegal immigration -- you are an extremist.

If you are a supporter of your 2nd Amendment rights and an opponent of federal firearms registration -- you are an extremist.

 

If you oppose mandatory tagging and registration of ammunition -- extremist!

If you oppose a "One World Government" -- you are an extremist.

"Disgruntled" military veterans -- yup, extremists!

 

If you oppose government infringement on civil liberties -- you are an extremist.

 

Are you a member of the "cabal of Jewish financial elites" -- you're an extremist.

 

Do you "bemoan" the decline of U.S. stature -- away with you -- you are an extremist.

 

If you are unemployed, you are susceptible to forming rightwing extremist beliefs in your children -- specifically xenophobia and antidemocratic ideals -- you are an extremist.

 

And, it goes on and on.

 

This document was prepared by the Obama Administration as a result  of "the historical election of an African American president and the prospect of policy changes (that) are proving to be a driving force for rightwing extremist recruitment and radicalization."

 

The document closes with a charge for Americans to spy on their fellow Americans: "DHS encourages recipients of this document to report information concerning suspicious or criminal activity to DHS and the FBI."

 

Read this ten-page document.  Send it to your friends and associates.  Let them know what Obama plans for those who disagree with his socialist programs and "One World Government."

Presidential
Approval
Index
Obama Is The Most Polarizing Ever In his first two months in office, Obama has succeeded in widening the political gulf among Americans more than any other president in modern history, according to a new poll.  The "partisan gap" between Republicans and Democrats is 10 points larger than it was under George W. Bush.

The gulf -- between Democrats and Republicans who say President Obama is succeeding -- is also showing signs of further widening, according to a new Pew Research poll.

The poll indicates that 88 percent of Democrats approve of the president's job performance, while just 27 percent of Republicans say the same thing -- a 61-point difference.

By comparison, the gap for President George W. Bush at a similar point in his administration was 51 points. It was 45 for Bill Clinton, 38 for George H. W. Bush, and 46 for Ronald Reagan.

The Pew Research Center poll -- a survey of polls six weeks into the Obama era -- concluded that despite the frequent calls for bipartisanship, U.S. politics is more polarized than at any equivalent point in the past four decades.

More here . . .
Obama Says America Is Not A Christian Nation Obama, the man who raised his right hand and swore on Lincoln’s Bible: in accordance with Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend The Constitution of the United States" has in a news conference in the sovereign Nations of Turkey and Indonesia (which means "on foreign soil") stated that "We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation, a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. uh uh... we consider ourselves uh uh a nation of uh citizens."

From an article found here

When President Harry Truman wrote to Pope Pius XII in 1947 that "This is a Christian nation.", he certainly did not mean that the United States has an official or legally-preferred religion or church.  Nor did he mean to slight adherents of non-Christian religions.  But he certainly did mean to recognize that this nation, its institutions and laws, was founded on Biblical principles basic to Christianity and to Judaism from which it flowed.  As he told an Attorney General's Conference in 1950, "The fundamental basis of this nation's laws was given to Moses on the Mount.  The fundamental basis of our Bill of Rights comes from the teachings we get from Exodus and Saint Matthew, from Isaiah and Saint Paul.  I don't think we emphasize that enough these days.  If we don't have a proper fundamental moral background, we will finally end up with a totalitarian government which does not believe in rights for anybody except the State."

Woodrow Wilson, in his election campaign for President, made the same point: "A nation which does not remember what it was yesterday, does not know what it is today, nor what it is trying to do.  We are trying to do a futile thing if we do not know where we came from or what we have been about.... America was born a Christian nation.  America was born to exemplify that devotion to the tenets of righteousness which are derived from the revelations of Holy Scripture."

The crucial role of Christianity in this nation's formation is not without dispute, although as Revolutionary leader Patrick Henry said: "It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ.  For this very reason peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity, and freedom of worship."

John Ashcroft was roundly criticized for his "No King but Jesus" speech at Bob Jones University, but he was only reminding us of our colonial and Revolutionary War heritage.  In a 1774 report to King George, the Governor of Boston noted: "If you ask an American, who is his master?  He will tell you he has none, nor any governor but Jesus Christ."  The pre-war Colonial Committees of Correspondence soon made this the American motto: "No King but King Jesus."  And this sentiment was carried over into the 1783 peace treaty with Great Britain ending that war, which begins "In the name of the most Holy and Undivided Trinity... ."

Samuel Adams, who has been called 'The Father of the American Revolution' wrote The Rights of the Colonists in 1772, which stated: "The rights of the colonists as Christians...may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institution of the Great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament."

It is frequently asserted by those seeking to minimize Christianity's central role in our nation's founding and history, that the founders themselves were not practicing Christians, but rather were Deists or Agnostics.  In a 1962 speech to Congress, Senator Robert Byrd noted that of the 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention, 29 were Anglicans, 16-18 were Calvinists, and among the rest were 2 Methodists, 2 Lutherans, 2 Roman Catholics, 1 lapsed Quaker-sometimes Anglican, and only 1 open Deist — Benjamin Franklin who attended all Christian worships and called for public prayer.

The last paragraph of this article states:

Can America still be called a Christian nation?  It is certainly a more religiously pluralistic and diverse society than it was during the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries.  There are increasing numbers of non-Christians immigrating to this country, and there has been a rapid rise in adherents to Islam among our population.  There are millions of Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Shintoists, Unitarians, Hindus, Wiccans, Naturists, Agnostics, and Atheists, but Christians comprise roughly 84% of the population.  Our constitutional legal system is still based on the Jewish/Christian Bible, not the Koran or other holy book.  We still observe Sunday, the Christian Sabbath, as an official holiday.  Easter and Christmas still have a special place in the holiday lexicon.  The Ten Commandments are still on the wall behind the Supreme Court Justices when they take the bench.  Our coins still display the motto "In God We Trust."  The US is still firmly part of a Western Civilization fashioned by a Judeo-Christian religious ethic and heritage.  Alexis de Tocqueville observed more than a century and a half ago, "There is no country in the world, where the Christian religion retains a greater influence over the souls of men than in America."  That is still true today.  We live, not under a Christian government, but in a nation where all are free to practice their particular religion, in accommodation with other religions, and in accordance with the basic principles of the nation, which are Christian in origin.  It is in that sense that America may properly be referred to as a Christian nation.

Therefore, I respectfully request that the Obama, retract his statement and apologize to this Nation and to the memory of the Founding Fathers for broadcasting to the world (on more than one occasion) that "we are not a Christian nation."

May I remind you all that the definition of traitor is "one who leads you to believe something that is not true."  A traitor who betrays his Country commits treason.  And treason is an impeachable offense.  Is, in your minds, Obama, a traitor yet?  What will it take for him to so demonstrate?

Posted by FReeper HighlyOpinionated

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009
All right reserved