Obama once dressed as a
Somali elder. Now he has to kill Somali
pirates.
|
|
|
|
event |
description |
Welcome to Cuba |
Atlas Shrugs asks if you have you seen
this .pdf? It is Obama's fascist blueprint to create a police
state and legalize gulags. This is not a spoof. This is
the "mission statement" for Obama's "civilian army."
The Document's "Scope"
This product is one of a
series of intelligence assessments
published by the Extremism
and Radicalization Branch
( Homeland
Environment Threat Analysis
Division, Office of Threat
Analysis. Coordinated with the
FBI.) to facilitate a
greater understanding of the
phenomenon of violent
radicalization in the United
States. The information is
provided to federal, state, local,
and tribal counterterrorism and
law enforcement officials so they
may effectively deter, prevent,
preempt, or respond to terrorist
attacks against the United States.
Federal efforts to influence
domestic public opinion must be
conducted in an overt and
transparent manner, clearly
identifying United States
Government sponsorship.
So, now only the federal
government may "influence domestic
public opinion."
Rightwing extremism in the
United States can be broadly
divided into those groups,
movements, and adherents that are
primarily hate-oriented (based on
hatred of particular religious,
racial or ethnic groups), and
those that are mainly
antigovernment, rejecting federal
authority in favor of state or
local authority, or rejecting
government authority entirely.
It may include groups and
individuals that are dedicated to
a single issue, such as opposition
to abortion or immigration.
Obviously, Homeland Security
is no longer concerned with
Islamic extremism, and even
though left-wing extremists tear
up cities from Seattle to New
York, they are not a threat.
Only the "right-wing" is now a
threat -- but is that perceived
threat a threat to America, or is
it a threat to Obama's socialist
and fascist policies?Key Findings
The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no
specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are
currently planning acts of violence, but rightwing extremists may be
gaining new recruits by playing on their fears about several
emergent issues. The economic downturn and the election of the
first African American president present unique drivers for
rightwing radicalization and recruitment.
Translation: There is no threat.
Give us time, we'll create one.
Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment
groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated
plans to carry out violent acts. Nevertheless, the consequences
of a prolonged economic downturn -- including real estate foreclosures,
unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit -- could create a fertile
recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in
confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to
those in the past.
Translation: There is no threat. Give us time, we'll
create one.
The current economic and political climate has some
similarities to the 1990s when rightwing extremism experienced a
resurgence fueled largely by an economic recession, criticism about the
outsourcing of jobs, and the perceived threat to U.S. power and
sovereignty by other foreign powers.
American sovereignty is now a radical position.
During the 1990s, these issues contributed to the growth
in the number of domestic rightwing terrorist and extremist groups and
an increase in violent acts targeting government facilities, law
enforcement officers, banks, and infrastructure sectors.
Sounds like they are describing Bill Ayers and Bernardine
Dohrn, Obama's great friends and terrorist patriots!
Growth of these groups subsided in reaction to increased
government scrutiny as a result of the 1995 Oklahoma City
bombing and disrupted plots, improvements in the economy, and
the continued U.S. standing as the preeminent world power.
Their evidence is one terror attack 15
years ago -- but fail to mention the
13,000
Islamic attacks since 9/11.
The possible passage of new restrictions on
firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant
challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the
potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable
of carrying out violent attacks.
Ah, there it is. take their guns away.
Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and
weapons bans likely would attract new members into the ranks of
rightwing extremist groups, as well as potentially spur some of them to
begin planning and training for violence against the government. The
high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by
rightwing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some
parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law
enforcement.
Ban? What ban? This is a staging. Fake staging to seize
weapons.
Returning veterans possess combat skills
and experience that are attractive to rightwing extremists. DHS/I&A is
concerned that rightwing extremists will attempt to recruit and
radicalize returning veterans in order to boost their violent
capabilities.
America's heroes are to be considered extremists
because they have combat skills.
These wonderful young people, who daily
risks their lives in defense of our
country are now being painted as
extremists by the bunch in the White
House.
And these paragraphs are just the
introduction to this radical document,
which is nothing more than Obama's plan to
paint anyone that disagrees with Obama's
agenda as an extremist.
If you
oppose illegal immigration -- you are an
extremist.
If you are a supporter
of your 2nd Amendment rights and an
opponent of federal firearms registration
-- you are an extremist.
If you oppose mandatory tagging and
registration of ammunition -- extremist!
If you oppose a "One World Government"
-- you are an extremist.
"Disgruntled" military veterans --
yup, extremists!
If you oppose government infringement
on civil liberties -- you are an
extremist.
Are you a member of the "cabal of
Jewish financial elites" -- you're an
extremist.
Do you "bemoan" the decline of U.S.
stature -- away with you -- you are an
extremist.
If you are unemployed, you are
susceptible to forming rightwing extremist
beliefs in your children -- specifically
xenophobia and antidemocratic ideals --
you are an extremist.
And, it goes on and on.
This document was prepared by the Obama
Administration as a result of "the
historical election of an African
American president and the
prospect of policy changes (that) are
proving to be a driving force for
rightwing extremist recruitment and
radicalization."
The document closes with a charge for
Americans to spy on their fellow
Americans:
"DHS encourages recipients of this
document to report information concerning
suspicious or criminal activity to DHS and
the FBI."
Read
this ten-page document. Send it
to your friends and associates. Let
them know what Obama plans for those who
disagree with his socialist programs and
"One World Government."
|
Presidential Approval Index |
|
Obama Is The Most Polarizing Ever |
In his first
two months in office, Obama has succeeded in widening the political gulf
among Americans more than any other president in modern history,
according to a new poll. The "partisan gap" between Republicans and
Democrats is 10 points larger than it was under George W. Bush.
The gulf -- between Democrats and Republicans who say President Obama is
succeeding -- is also showing signs of further widening, according to a
new Pew Research poll.
The poll indicates that 88 percent of
Democrats approve of the president's job performance, while just 27
percent of Republicans say the same thing -- a 61-point difference.
By comparison, the gap for President George W. Bush at a similar
point in his administration was 51 points. It was 45 for Bill Clinton,
38 for George H. W. Bush, and 46 for Ronald Reagan.
The Pew
Research Center poll -- a survey of polls six weeks into the Obama era
-- concluded that despite the frequent calls for bipartisanship, U.S.
politics is more polarized than at any equivalent point in the past four
decades.
More
here . . .
|
Obama Says America
Is Not A Christian Nation |
Obama, the man
who raised his right hand and swore on Lincoln’s Bible: in accordance
with Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution:
"I do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will
faithfully execute the office of President
of the United States, and will to the best
of my ability, preserve, protect and
defend The Constitution of the United
States" has in a
news conference in the sovereign Nations
of Turkey and Indonesia (which means "on
foreign soil") stated that
"We do not
consider ourselves a Christian nation, a
Jewish nation or a Muslim nation. uh uh...
we consider ourselves uh uh a nation of uh
citizens."
From an article found
here:
When President Harry
Truman wrote to Pope Pius XII in 1947 that
"This is a Christian nation.", he
certainly did not mean that the United
States has an official or
legally-preferred religion or church.
Nor did he mean to slight adherents of
non-Christian religions. But he
certainly did mean to recognize that
this nation,
its institutions and laws, was founded on
Biblical principles basic to Christianity
and to Judaism from which it flowed.
As he told an Attorney General's
Conference in 1950,
"The
fundamental basis of this nation's laws
was given to Moses on the Mount. The
fundamental basis of our Bill of Rights
comes from the teachings we get from
Exodus and Saint Matthew, from Isaiah and
Saint Paul. I don't think we
emphasize that enough these days. If
we don't have a proper fundamental moral
background, we will finally end up with a
totalitarian government which does not
believe in rights for anybody except the
State."
Woodrow Wilson, in his election campaign
for President, made the same point:
"A nation which does
not remember what it was yesterday, does
not know what it is today, nor what it is
trying to do. We are trying to do a
futile thing if we do not know where we
came from or what we have been about....
America was born a Christian nation.
America was born to exemplify that
devotion to the tenets of righteousness
which are derived from the revelations of
Holy Scripture."
The crucial role of
Christianity in this nation's formation is
not without dispute, although as Revolutionary
leader Patrick Henry said: "It cannot be
emphasized too strongly or too often that
this great nation was founded, not by
religionists, but by Christians; not on
religions, but on the gospel of Jesus
Christ. For this very reason peoples
of other faiths have been afforded asylum,
prosperity, and freedom of worship."
John Ashcroft was roundly criticized for
his "No King but Jesus" speech at Bob
Jones University, but he was only
reminding us of our colonial and
Revolutionary War heritage. In a 1774 report to
King George, the Governor of Boston noted:
"If you ask an American, who is his
master? He will tell you he has
none, nor any governor but Jesus Christ."
The pre-war Colonial Committees of
Correspondence soon made this the American
motto: "No King but King Jesus." And
this sentiment was carried over into the
1783 peace treaty with Great Britain
ending that war, which begins "In the name
of the most Holy and Undivided Trinity...
."
Samuel Adams, who has been called 'The
Father of the American Revolution' wrote
The Rights of the Colonists in 1772, which
stated: "The rights of the colonists as
Christians...may be best understood by
reading and carefully studying the
institution of the Great Law Giver and
Head of the Christian Church, which are to
be found clearly written and promulgated
in the New Testament."
It is frequently
asserted by those seeking to minimize
Christianity's central role in our
nation's founding and history, that the
founders themselves were not practicing
Christians, but rather were Deists or
Agnostics. In
a 1962 speech to Congress, Senator Robert
Byrd noted that of the 55 delegates to the
Constitutional Convention, 29 were
Anglicans, 16-18 were Calvinists, and
among the rest were 2 Methodists, 2
Lutherans, 2 Roman Catholics, 1 lapsed
Quaker-sometimes Anglican, and only 1 open
Deist — Benjamin Franklin who attended all
Christian worships and called for public
prayer.
The last paragraph of
this article states:
Can America still be
called a Christian nation? It is
certainly a more religiously pluralistic
and diverse society than it was during the
18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries.
There are increasing numbers of
non-Christians immigrating to this
country, and there has been a rapid rise
in adherents to Islam among our
population. There are millions of
Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Shintoists,
Unitarians, Hindus, Wiccans, Naturists,
Agnostics, and Atheists, but Christians
comprise roughly 84% of the population.
Our
constitutional legal system is still based
on the Jewish/Christian Bible, not the
Koran or other holy book. We still
observe Sunday, the Christian Sabbath, as
an official holiday. Easter and
Christmas still have a special place in
the holiday lexicon. The Ten
Commandments are still on the wall behind
the Supreme Court Justices when they take
the bench. Our coins still display
the motto "In God We Trust." The US
is still firmly part of a Western
Civilization fashioned by a
Judeo-Christian religious ethic and
heritage. Alexis de Tocqueville
observed more than a century and a half
ago, "There is no country in the world,
where the Christian religion retains a
greater influence over the souls of men
than in America." That is still true
today. We live, not under a
Christian government, but in a nation
where all are free to practice their
particular religion, in accommodation with
other religions, and in accordance with
the basic principles of the nation, which
are Christian in origin. It is in
that sense that America may properly be
referred to as a Christian nation.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the
Obama, retract his statement and apologize
to this Nation and to the memory of the
Founding Fathers for broadcasting to the
world (on more than one occasion) that "we
are not a Christian nation."
May I remind you all
that the
definition of traitor is "one who leads
you to believe something that is not
true." A traitor who betrays his
Country commits treason. And treason
is an impeachable offense.
Is, in your minds, Obama, a traitor yet?
What will it take for him to so
demonstrate?
Posted by FReeper HighlyOpinionated
|
©
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved
|