Barack Obama -- April 25, 2009

April 25, 2009

Custom Search

Obama once dressed as
a Somali elder. Now he has
to kill Somali pirates.

event	description
$25,000,000 Reward	The owners of "Reward for Obama's Birth Certificate" website are offering to pay $25,000,000 to Barack Hussein Obama if he will produce his "real" long-form birth certificate. They are asking for help. They are NOT asking for donations or contributions. They ask that you spread the word about their $25 million reward to Barack Hussein Obama for him to produce his "real" long-form birth certificate. They say they will continue to increase the amount of the reward until it is so huge that the American people will begin to question why he has sealed all his background info to hide something -- his nationality, his religion, his commie background --what is he trying to hide? They want to know. Payment will be made after document experts prove the validity of the document. The website owners ask, how much do you think it will take to get him to produce the "real" birth certificate -- $5 million, $10 million, $25 million, $50 million, $100 million, $1 billion? More details here . . .
Obama To Release Terrorists Into Virginia	Andrew McCarthy reports that despite being steeped in jihadist ideology, trained in explosives and assassination tactics, and anxious enough to get that way that they high-tailed it from China to Afghanistan to become more lethal terrorists, the Uighur Muslim detainees will be released by the Obama administration into the United States, according to this Los Angeles Times report. After all, Obama has promised to close Guantanamo Bay this year, and that promise can't be fulfilled unless we release the jihadists since many of them can't be tried. How are we going to convince other countries to be good sports and endanger their populations unless we sow a few of them among the American people? (The LA Times suggests that you folks in Virginia may be the lucky winners in this lottery: "[M]any Uighur immigrants from China live in Washington's Virginia suburbs, and advocates have urged that the detainees be resettled near people who speak their language and are familiar with their customs.") No reason to worry about these guys. What about Tom Joscelyn's thorough reporting about their training by Abdul Haq, a member of al Qaeda's shura council (the network's inner circle)? What about their joining other jihadists in rioting at Gitmo? What about federal statutory law that makes aliens excludable from the U.S. if they have received terrorist training or been affiliated with a terrorist organization? No problem for Mr. "rule of law" Obama who says the security of Americans is always foremost in his mind. Should be an interesting assimilation. Here's a sampling from the LA Times story (italics are mine to emphasize the weasel adjectives -- even the sympathetic Times can't bring itself to say these people are not a security threat): • The Uighurs oppose the Chinese government but do not consider the U.S. government a direct enemy. Still, many of the Uighurs hold strict views of what is permitted under Islam. • Within the prison, Uighurs are not considered a grave threat and are allowed greater freedom, such as television privileges, than other detainees. • But the TV privileges underscored potential difficulties to come, according to one current and one former U.S. official. Not long after being granted access to TV, some of the Uighurs were watching a soccer game. When a woman with bare arms was shown on the screen, one of the group grabbed the television and threw it to the ground, according to the officials. • Since then, officials at Guantanamo have bolted down the TVs and shown pre-taped programs, editing out any images they thought Uighurs might find offensive. No word yet on how the administration plans to bolt down and pre-tape the Uighurs' new neighbors. Now, you absolutely know, while millions of Americans are struggling, that the Uighur's resettlement and their ongoing subsistence will be funded by taxpayer money. These Uighurs just hit the lottery. I hope they send a thank-you note to brother Obama. The hits just keep coming.
Why Does Obama Hate America So	Gerald Warner asks, if al-Qaeda, the Taliban and the rest of the Looney Tunes brigade want to kick America to death, they had better move in quickly and grab a piece of the action before Barack Obama finishes the job himself. Never in the history of the United States has a president worked so actively against the interests of his own people -- not even Jimmy Carter. Obama's problem is that he does not know who the enemy is. To him, the enemy does not squat in caves in Waziristan, clutching automatic weapons and reciting the more militant verses from the Koran: instead, it sits around at tea parties in Kentucky quoting from the US Constitution. Obama is not at war with terrorists, but with his Republican fellow citizens. He has never abandoned the campaign trail. That is why he opened Pandora's Box by publishing the Justice Department's legal opinions on waterboarding and other hardline interrogation techniques. He cynically subordinated the national interest to his partisan desire to embarrass the Republicans. Then he had to rush to Langley, Virginia to try to reassure a demoralised CIA that had just discovered the President of the United States was an even more formidable foe than al-Qaeda. "Don't be discouraged by what's happened the last few weeks," he told intelligence officers. Is he kidding? Thanks to him, al-Qaeda knows the private interrogation techniques available to the US intelligence agencies and can train its operatives to withstand them -- or would do so, if they had not already been outlawed. So, next time a senior al-Qaeda hood is captured, all the CIA can do is ask him nicely if he would care to reveal when a major population centre is due to be hit by a terror spectacular, or which American city is about to be irradiated by a dirty bomb. Your view of this situation will be dictated by one simple criterion: whether or not you watched the people jumping from the twin towers. Obama promised his CIA audience that nobody would be prosecuted for past actions. That has already been contradicted by leftist groups with a revanchist ambition to put Republicans, headed if possible by Condoleezza Rice, in the dock. Talk about playing party politics with national security. Martin Scheinin, the United Nations special investigator for human rights, claims that senior figures, including former vice president Dick Cheney, could face prosecution overseas. Ponder that -- once you have got over the difficulty of locating the United Nations and human rights within the same dimension. Obama should have thought twice before sitting down to play poker with Dick Cheney. The former vice president believes documents have been selectively published and that releasing more will prove how effective the interrogation techniques were. Under Dubya's administration, there was no further atrocity on American soil after 9/11. Obama's recent world tour, cozying up to all the bad guys, excited the ambitions of America's enemies. Here, they realized, is a sucker they can really take to the cleaners. His only enemies are fellow Americans. Which prompts the question: why does Obama hate America so badly?
Barack Obama: The Vindictive President	Observations notes that the current silliness taking place in the third ring of the circus that is Washington, DC over the Bush administration’s successful efforts to defend the nation against additional terrorist attacks after 9-11-01 would be laughable, were it not so absurd and so un-American. A very good and on-point analysis of that situation appeared in a recent column by Wesley Pruden, a portion of which follows: The president's on-again, off-again, maybe-he-will and maybe-he-won't decision to punish someone who loosened tongues of Islamist terrorists at Guantanamo suddenly threatens not only the CIA interrogators and Justice Department lawyers, but even members of Congress. Maybe it won't stop there: if the lawyers who offered legal opinions are at risk of punishment for their legal advice, why not the members of Congress who knew what was going on? Why not the secretaries who typed up the transcripts? Why not the interns who fetched the coffee? All were accessories either before or after the fact. We're on unfamiliar ground now. No president before has sought to punish his predecessor for policy decisions, no matter how wrong or wrong-headed. Lyndon B. Johnson's management of the Vietnam War was often ham-handed, as anyone who was there could tell you, and his policy makers sometimes verged on criminal incompetence. But Richard Nixon was never tempted to send LBJ or any of those presidential acolytes to prison. Abraham Lincoln, by his lights, would have had ample opportunity to hang Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee, but even the rabid Republicans who survived the assassination stopped short of putting Davis in the dock, finally releasing him from imprisonment at Fort Monroe when judgment overcame lust for revenge. Lee was never touched. Exacting revenge for unpopular policies is the norm in the third world, heretofore more likely in Barack Obama's ancestral Kenya than in America, more in the tradition of gangland Chicago than in Washington, where we count on cooler heads to prevail when raw emotion threatens to overwhelm sobriety and the undisciplined senses. We recall perceived national mistakes with the sadness of regret and even gratitude for lessons learned, not the frenzied catharsis of a St. Valentine's Day Massacre. Obama, having won the White House, is entitled to change any presidential policy he chooses, but the vindication of a national election does not entitle any president to exact mindless revenge. It is getting more and more difficult to endure the Obama presidency without acknowledging the need for numerous impeachments and firings.