May 13, 2009
 

Custom Search

 

Obama tells

banks and corporation

how it's gonna be.

 


 

 

help fight the media
 

 

 

 

event

description

If
The Eyes Are The Windows To The Soul


 

Doesn't that glare give you a warm, comfortable feeling?

  

Obama Cancels Nuke Program Michael Crowley, writing at The New Republic, says that Obama's new budget plan includes a little-noted sea change in U.S. nuclear policy, and a step towards his vision of a denuclearized world.  It provides no funding for the Reliable Replacement Warhead program, created to design a new generation of long-lasting nuclear weapons that don't need to be tested.  (The military is worried that a nuclear test moratorium in effect since 1992 might endanger the reliability of an aging US arsenal.) 

But this spring Obama issued a bold call for a world free of nuclear weapons, and part of that vision entails leading by example.  That means halting programs that expand the American nuclear stockpile.  For the past two budget years the Democratic Congress has refused to fund the Bush-era program.  But Obama's budget kills the National Nuclear Security Administration program once and for all.

"My colleagues just stared at that line," says Joe Cirincione, a longtime nonproliferation expert and president of the Ploughshares Fund.  "They had never seen anything like that."  Killing the program, he said, was "the first programmatic impact of the new [zero nukes] policy.  People have said they want to see more than words, this is the very first action."

Here's the relevant language from Obama's budget explaining the thinking behind the move:

In the upcoming year, NNSA will participate in the national debate to lay out a vision for our nation’s nuclear security and non-proliferation goals.  This vision is based on the reality that nuclear security is not just about warheads and the size of the stockpile.  The vision emphasizes that we must increase our focus on nuclear security and transforming the Cold War nuclear weapons complex into a 21st century national security enterprise.  We must ensure our evolving strategic posture places the stewardship of our nuclear arsenal, nonproliferation programs, missile defenses, and the international arms control objectives into one comprehensive strategy that protects the American people and our allies.

One particularly interesting angle here: Obama has overruled his secretary of defense, Robert Gates, who has been pushing for months to maintain the warhead program.  Last October, Gates warned that

"[t]o be blunt, there is absolutely no way we can maintain a credible deterrent and reduce the number of weapons in our stockpile without resorting to testing our stockpile or pursuing a modernization program."

But even though "modernization" has now been halted, Obama will almost certainly not resume nuclear testing.  So one has to presume Gates is not a happy camper on this score.
Obama's Poison Photo-Drop American soldiers, American civilians, and other innocent people are going to die because Obama wants to release photographs of prisoner abuse.  Note: I said, "wants to release" -- not "has to release," or "is being forced to release," or "will comply with court orders by releasing."  The photos, quite likely thousands of them, will be released because Obama wants them released.  Any other description of the situation is a dodge.

If Obama wanted to refrain from releasing these photos in order to protect the military forces he commands or promote the security of Americans -- his two highest obligations as president -- he could do so by simply issuing an executive order.  The applicable statute expressly allows for it, just as it provides for Congress -- now in the firm control of the president and his party -- to withhold the photos from disclosure.  Instead, Obama and congressional Democrats are choosing to release the photos.

Continue reading here . . .
Obama To Release Bin Laden Associate The U.S. Justice Department has decided to release another detainee from Guantanamo, a Yemeni named Ayman Saeed Abdullah Batarfi.  It is not entirely clear why Batarfi has been cleared for release.  But we can be reasonably sure, based on Batarfi’s own freely given testimony, that he was no innocent swept up in the post-9/11 chaos of Afghanistan, as his lawyers claim.

Batarfi first traveled to Afghanistan in 1988 to fight the Soviets.  The government claims he was trained at the Khalden camp, which graduated hundreds of al Qaeda members, but Batarfi denies this.  Batarfi has admitted to participating in at least one nighttime raid against Soviet forces.  This is important because it shows that he was willing to participate in hostilities from a young age -- and was not merely a humanitarian adventure seeker in Afghanistan.

Batarfi then went to Pakistan, where he became an orthopedic surgeon.  From there, things get really interesting.

There are at least three aspects of Batarfi’s testimony given before his administrative review board hearings at Gitmo that are noteworthy.  Keep in mind that these hearings were not interrogations, and the detainees had the option of not participating, or simply issuing blanket denials, as some detainees did.

First, Batarfi admitted that he was an employee of al Wafa, a charity that has been designated a terrorist organization.  Al Wafa is discussed in brief in the 9/11 Commission’s report as an al Qaeda front.  The unclassified documents released from Guantanamo are littered with references to the organization.  It is clear that al Wafa actively supported al Qaeda and the Taliban in a variety of ways -- from transporting jihadists to Afghanistan (often through Iran) to purchasing sophisticated weaponry.  Al Wafa was not a real charity -- it was a terrorist front group, and Batarfi admitted to working for the group for several months in 2001.  He says he left the organization after it was designated as a terror-supporter, but this was most likely just Batarfi’s way of trying to explain away his al Wafa ties.  As we will see below, he was at Tora Bora after the designation on al Wafa came down.

Second, Batarfi admitted that he met with a "Malaysian microbiologist" and authorized the purchase of medical equipment for this individual.  As I have written previously, this microbiologist is most certainly Yazid Sufaat. Batarfi denies knowing that Sufaat was working on anthrax when they met in 2001.  Over and over again, Batarfi claimed that he just happened to run into and consort with terrorists without knowing who they were.

Third, the best example of this last point is Batarfi’s admitted ties to Osama bin Laden.  Batarfi admitted that he met with bin Laden in the Tora Bora Mountains in November 2001.  But he claimed that he sent a letter to someone (he does not say whom) asking to meet with the "head of the mountain" and, somewhat magically, he just happened to get a face-to-face sit down with the world’s most wanted terrorist…at Tora Bora…in November of 2001…you know, when the whole world was looking for him.  This was the second time Batarfi claims to have accidentally met bin Laden.  The first time came at a funeral in Kabul when, again, bin Laden just happened upon the scene.

Continue reading here . . .

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009
All right reserved