| 
					
						
							| 
							 
								
							
							  
								Obama tells  
								banks and corporation  
								how it's gonna be. 
							  |  
							| 
							
							 
 |  
							|  |  
						| 
							
 
 
  
 |    | 
	
		| event | description |  
		| The Billboard | 
  Donations
		
		are being accepted for a national billboard
		
		campaign with this simple message.
 
 |  
		| Obama's Strategy Of Delays | An attorney 
		handling one of the many lawsuits challenging Barack Obama's eligibility 
		to occupy the Oval Office is urging a court to deny a demand from a 
		lawyer for the president for still more time to answer simple questions 
		such as whether Obama was born in Hawaii, citing the dangers of having 
		an president many identify as a "usurper" in office. 
 "Whether or 
		not the president of the United States is eligible for the office he 
		currently occupies is of utmost national important," wrote attorney 
		Mario Apuzzo of New Jersey in a motion opposing Obama's request for more 
		time.
 
 "Every passing day Mr. Obama takes executive action, that 
		significantly impacts on the lives of Americans," he continued.
 
 "It can be argued that Mr. Obama is currently the most powerful human 
		being on the planet.  He could conceivably end all life on earth in a 
		single day.  Every executive action that Mr. Obama takes impacts not only 
		the plaintiffs but also every other American," he said in the legal 
		document submitted in the court case yesterday.
 
 Apuzzo filed his 
		lawsuit in January on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. 
		Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr.
 
 The 
		action names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, 
		the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick 
		Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
 
 Apuzzo told 
		WND 
		that while it may be good strategy on the part of a defense lawyer for 
		Obama to delay answering such questions as long as possible, the 
		American people also are impacted by the case every day in which there 
		is not a resolution.
 
 He outlines in the document that while 
		ordinary court rules require answers to such lawsuits within 60 days, in 
		this case the actions of the defense lawyer probably will generate a 
		delay of 124 days -- or more -- for Obama's answers.
 
 Apuzzo said the first issue is simple:  Was Obama born in Hawaii as he has said?  The second question seeking a definition of "natural born" citizen is 
		more complicated.
 
 WND reported earlier on the request submitted 
		by Ralph Marra Jr., the acting U.S. attorney, and Elizabeth Pascal, the 
		assistant U.S. attorney in New Jersey, that explains that the Department 
		of Justice, operating under Obama appointee Attorney General Eric 
		Holder, still is working on a decision on representation for the 
		defendants.
 
 "The failure to file an answer, move, or to 
		otherwise respond before the expiration of the time specified is not the 
		result of any neglect on any of the Defendants' parts," the court filing 
		said.
 
 "Representation decisions are made by a specialized group 
		of individuals in the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. In order 
		to provide a fair opportunity for the Department to review this matter 
		and to complete the representation determinations, Defendants 
		respectfully request an extension of twenty (20) days from the date of 
		this Order in which to answer, move, or otherwise respond," the court 
		filing said.
 
 |  
		| Obama's New Rules | Some soccer moms will have 
		to give up hulking SUVs. Carpenters will still haul materials around in 
		pickup trucks, but they will cost more. Nearly everybody else will drive 
		smaller cars, and more of them will run on electricity.  The higher 
		mileage and emissions standards set by the Obama administration on 
		Tuesday, which begin to take effect in 2012 and are to be achieved by 
		2016, will transform the American car and truck fleet. 
 The new 
		rules would bring new cars and trucks sold in the United States to an 
		average of 35.5 miles per gallon, about 10 mpg more than today's 
		standards.  Passenger cars will be required to get 39 mpg, light trucks 
		30 mpg.
 
 That means cars and trucks on American roads will have to 
		become smaller, lighter and more efficient.
 
      Eric Fedewa, vice 
		president of global powertrain forecasting for the auto consulting firm 
		CSM Worldwide in Northville, Mich., said the changes will make pickup 
		trucks so much more expensive that they will be used almost exclusively 
		for work. 
 And instead of a minivan or SUV, more parents will haul 
		their families in much smaller vehicles with three rows of seats -- 
		something more like the Mazda 5 small van, he said.  The Mazda 5 gets 
		about 28 mpg on the highway.
 
 "I think what you'll see is a lot 
		more creativity in interior packaging," Fedewa said.  "You'll get more 
		rows of seats where you traditionally had cargo space."
 
 Update:  With a stroke of the pen, Barack Obama has imposed 
		higher fuel-economy standards on the American auto industry.  Those 
		standards can only be met by making the average car smaller and lighter 
		than consumers prefer.  The inevitable result is that thousands of 
		innocent Americans, possibly tens of thousands, will die painful and 
		sometimes fiery deaths, while many thousands more will be seriously 
		injured.  This prospect apparently gave Obama no pause whatsoever.  
		He has never so much as hinted that he sees a moral dimension in the 
		trade-off between human life and reduced carbon emissions.
 
 On the 
		other hand, Obama sees the brief and physically harmless discomfort of 
		three terrorists as posing a moral crisis of almost unparalleled 
		dimension, necessitating endless apology and hand-wringing.  The 
		contrast in Obama's priorities is striking, to say the least.  I 
		would submit that this is what happens when you substitute preening for 
		intelligent policy-making.
 
 Another 
		update:  The National Academy of Sciences has linked mileage 
		standards with about 2,000 deaths per year.  The National Highway 
		Traffic Safety Administration estimates that every 100-pound reduction 
		in the weight of small cars increases annual traffic fatalities by as 
		much as 715.
 
 And what will be gained by the new mileage 
		standards?
 
 The Natural Resources Defense Council said that the 
		35 MPG standard would save about one million gallons of gas per day.  
		So how does that savings balance against the 2,000 fatalities per year 
		that the National Academy of Sciences says are caused by those same 
		lighter cars?
 
 For the sake of being utilitarian, let’s 
		generously assume that the mileage standards reduced the price of 
		gasoline by $1.  That would translate to daily savings of $1 
		million.  Is that savings worth killing more than five people per 
		day, plus other non-fatal injuries and property damage?
 
 The U.S. 
		Environmental Protection Agency -- for the purposes of risk assessment 
		-- values a single human life at $6.9 million dollars.  So under 
		the new mileage standards, it would cost about $35 million per day in 
		human lives (not including non-fatal injuries) to save $1 million in 
		gas.
 
 Just makes me want a 
		
		1958 Cadillac El Dorado 
		even more.
 
 |  
		| Obama Funds Hamas | Obama has 
		asked Congress to 
		let aid to Palestinians continue if 
		Hamas backers are included in a new 
		unity government, observers say. 
 The proposed change in U.S. law 
		would be necessary because Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, is 
		designated as a terrorist organization and therefore cannot receive U.S. 
		aid.  But power-sharing negotiations between Hamas and the rival Fatah 
		faction, which controls the West Bank, may result in a unity Palestinian 
		government that includes ministers backed by Hamas, the Los Angeles 
		Times reported.
 
 The White House sought the change as part of a 
		bill authorizing $840 million for the Palestinian Authority as well as 
		for rebuilding Gaza after this year’s 22-day Israeli military assault.
 
 The Hamas proposal brought criticism from U.S. lawmakers, the Times 
		said -- one of whom, U.S. Rep. Mark Steven Kirk, R-Ill., said the move 
		was akin to supporting a government that "only has a few Nazis in it."
 
 "We don’t want to … bind our hands in the event that such a 
		(Palestinian unity) agreement is reached, and the government that they 
		are part of agrees to our principles," U.S. Secretary of State Hillary 
		Clinton reportedly replied.
 
 So as not to confuse, Hamas is the 
		Muslim Brotherhood organization who’s sole purpose is the destruction of 
		Israel -- anyone who thinks otherwise should read Hamas in their own 
		words via the 
		Hamas Covenant which lays out their purpose, goals, and 
		ideology.
 
 In the midst of what is being called the worst economic 
		crisis since the Great Depression, where our government has created the 
		largest deficit in history, giving a billion to anyone is insane.  But 
		giving a billion dollars to a self-proclaimed Islamic jihadist group 
		that has stated the United States as its enemy is beyond insanity, and 
		it needs to stop.
 |  
		| Hamas Disses Obama | According to a key spokesman for the Islamist 
		Hamas movement, Fawzi Barhoum, Obama's
		
		proposals for a new regional peace initiative are "misleading." 
 "Obama's statements and messages of hope are meant to mislead global 
		public opinion regarding the continued existence and conduct of the 
		racist and extremist Zionist entity," said Fawzi Barhoum, quoted by Israeli daily 
		Yedioth Ahronoth.
 
      "Therefore, the stance of the American 
		president does not bode a better future for our people. What we have 
		seen is a continued development of the Zionist-American relationship at 
		the expense of our people and our rights," said Barhoum. 
 He also 
		called on the West Bank-ruling Palestinian Authority not to renew 
		negotiations with "the Zionist enemy."
 
 Barhoum concluded by 
		saying that "any return to the negotiating table presents a grave danger 
		to the Palestinian people and its interest, and could enable the racist 
		Jewish state to continue hurting our people."
 |  
		| Obama Wants To Loan $100 Billion To Global Bailout 
		Fund | Obama has 
		asked Congress to authorize $100 billion in loans 
		to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to help create a $500 billion 
		global bailout fund. 
 If passed by both the Senate and the House, 
		the bill would allow the IMF to borrow up to $100 billion from the U.S. 
		and increase the U.S. fiscal contribution to the IMF by $8 billion.
 
 But the move is questioned by some lawmakers who are skeptical about 
		lending money when the nation’s debt continues to climb -- and who are 
		concerned about the fact that the U.S. will have to borrow the money at 
		some point to pay the $100 billion.
 
 "Forcing taxpayers to borrow 
		another $100 billion from China to bailout foreign countries makes no 
		sense when we’re already facing record debt," Wesley Denton, spokesman 
		for Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), said.
 
 Contributions from the U.S. 
		and other countries would triple the IMF’s lending power and double its 
		lending resources for low-income countries.
 
 Japan has already 
		signed a $100 billion pledge and the European Union, Norway, Canada, 
		Switzerland, South Korea and Australia have also pledged billions of 
		dollars for the global bailout.
 
 The IMF is a coalition of 185 
		countries that assesses the global financial situation and fosters 
		stability and trade.  Although its programs have been criticized in 
		recent years, managing director Dominique Strauss-Kahn said he is 
		optimistic about the member-states’ cooperation in this new borrowing 
		arrangement.
 
 "$500 billion plus the $250 billion we already have 
		makes -- how do you say that? -- a fire," Strauss-Kahn, former French 
		finance minister, said.
 |  
		| Obama's Millions | Obama may earn 
		millions from taxpayer-funded 
		schools in his new book deal. 
 Five days before taking the oath of 
		office, President-elect Barack Obama signed a book deal with Crown 
		Publishing Group to publish a version of his best-selling book, "Dreams 
		from My Father", aimed at middle school and young adult age groups.  Obama would receive a $500,000 advance payment against royalties, plus 
		ongoing royalty payments.  Some in the media have questioned the 
		propriety of this deal from the angle that Obama might be unduly 
		influenced by Bertelsmann AG, the German based media publishing empire 
		which owns Random House, which is the parent company of Crown 
		Publishing.
 
 But there is a far larger dynamic at work. Random 
		House and Crown are interested in selling books.  And most middle and 
		high school students do not buy lots of books, but the schools they 
		attend do.  So we presume that Crown Publishing will primarily pitch the 
		book to schools along with libraries.
 
 The real issue then becomes 
		the tremendous influence that Obama now enjoys over the 
		spending plans of thousands of school districts which just received 
		$44.5 Billion from the Stimulus Bill plus additional billions in the 
		Omnibus Spending Bill, both of which Obama signed.
 
 When Random 
		House marketing professionals call on school districts and the 
		state-level education departments to place the book, they will more 
		likely be treated as purveyors of hope than annoying salespersons.
 
 In addition, the teacher unions, such as the National Education 
		Association, supported Obama overwhelmingly during the past election as 
		they did the Democratic candidates for House and Senate seats, and the 
		additional federal dollars the schools received in a time of need will 
		not be forgotten.
 
 The current version of Obama's book is already 
		targeted for use by high school students according to the Random House 
		website, and the abridged, easy-to-read version should be an even easier 
		sell.  Students will also appreciate the shorter version as they write 
		their book reports.
 
 I'll say!
 
 I tried to read it -- twice! 
		-- I really tried -- it was too, too much for me.
 |  ![]()
 © 
				 Copyright  Beckwith  2009All right reserved
 
 |