|
Obama tells
banks and corporation
how it's gonna be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
event |
description |
|
Finally |
Somebody finally asked Barack Obama's
White House press secretary about the president's elusive birth
certificate.
When
asked by WorldNetDaily.com White House
correspondent Les Kinsolving why Obama, who has pledged transparency in
his administration, would not release his long-form birth certificate to
establish his constitutional eligibility for office, spokesman Robert
Gibbels,
employing Alinsky's Rule 5, guffawed in unison with members of the Washington press corps,
about the concerns of 400,000 petitioners who have demanded it.
Here is the
video.
"Are you looking for the president's birth certificate?" Gibbels asked
incredulously. "Lester, this question in many ways continues to astound
me. The state of Hawaii provided a copy with the seal of the president's
birth. I know there are apparently at least 400,000 people -- (laughter)
-- that continue to doubt the existence of and the certification by the
state of Hawaii of the president's birth there, but it's on the Internet
because we put it on the Internet for each of those 400,000 to download. I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we'll
have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy."
It was the
first time any member of the press corps has publicly asked a member of
the administration a question directly related to Obama's constitutional
eligibility for office as a "natural born citizen."
Gibbels
continues the lie that Obama released his birth certificate. It's a
damnable lie. Obama has never released his birth certificate and Gibbels
and the rest of the White House staff knows it.
There are actually 3 lies in
Gibbels statement:
1. The State of Hawaii has never provided a
copy of Obama's birth certificate -- with or without a state seal --
never.
2. The State of Hawaii has never certified Obama was born
in Hawaii -- never.
3. There has never been an Obama birth certificate on the
Internet -- never.
Now you know why I refer to Gibbs as Gibbels.
He's Obama's propagandist.
Go here
for the background on Obama's bogus birth records, and
here for the law behind the
eligibility question. |
|
Fox Reports |
Bret Baier, host of Fox New's
"Special Report with Bret Baier," is the first mainstream media reporter
to address the issue of Obama's "birth certificate."
Here is the video of Bret's comments. There's a 30 second
commercial at the beginning.
Dr. Ron Polarik
sent the following email to Mr. Baier:
Dear Bret:
Congratulations to you and FOXNEWS for being the first news agency to
bring Obama's birth certificate controversy into the mainstream.
This controversy, however, goes far beyond the question of Obama's
citizenship status -- it also raises the specter of President Obama's
involvement in document fraud.
What the Obama campaign actually
posted on its website on June 12, 2008, is a forged document image and
not a real copy of Obama's birth certificate. I spent five months
conducting intensive research on the document images alleged to have
been made from Obama's "original birth certificate." My research proves
that the document image posted on Obama's website and on other pro-Obama
websites, was fabricated using Photoshop, and that no such document
actually exists.
My final research report and executive summary
can be found here:
http://polarik.blogtownhall.com
Obama's campaign manufactured
this bogus birth certificate to deceive the American public into
believing that Obama was born in Hawaii, and was therefore eligible to
be President. This forgery was also used to derail attempts to see his
actual original birth certificate which undoubtedly contains birth
information that differs from what his fabricated birth certificate
image shows. The reason why Obama still refuses to release his original
birth certificate is because it would confirm that he is not eligible
to be President, that he lied about his history and citizenship status,
and that he engaged in document fraud to hide these facts from the
American public.
To help cover up this scam, Obama's campaign
called upon patently partisan, pro-Obama "fact checking sites" like
Factcheck and Politifact to proffer, protect, and promote this
fabricated image as being a real copy of Obama's actual birth
certificate, and to engage in slander and public ridicule of anyone
having the audacity to question its validity.
In every news
conference that he's had up until now, Obama and his Press Secretary
have side-stepped all of the questions raised about his birth
certificate, including the use of intimidation of reporters to do so. When Press Secretary Gibbs said that "The state of Hawaii provided a
copy, with a seal, of the president's birth," it was a bald-faced lie. Hawaii never produced a Certification of Live Birth document for Obama,
with a date-stamp of June 12, 2007.
Furthermore, Hawaii denied
that Obama, a family member, or someone Obama personally authorized,
ever requested and received a copy of this alleged Certification of Live
Birth (COLB) in June 2007 or in any other month of that year.
Not one governmental official, in Hawaii or in any other place in the
nation, has ever seen this COLB document in person, let alone validate
it as genuine.
The reason is simple: this document does not exist
and never did. Hawaii announced that it has Obama's original birth
record, but has refused to reveal what's on that record. Hawaii never
confirmed where Obama was born, and if he had been born in Honolulu as
Obama claims, Hawaii would not have any reason to withhold that
information.
What has unfolded is a genuine conspiracy to commit
document fraud. This bogus birth certificate constitutes a false
identification document, and is a violation of federal forgery laws
punishable by five years in prison (for each count) and up to a $250,000
fine. Not only were federal forgery laws violated, but also Hawaiian
forgery laws, as well.
That, Bret, is the untold story here. Why
would a President risk committing document fraud just to prevent his
original birth certificate from ever being seen?
The answer must
be that the information it contains would spell the end of his
Presidency and his charade as well. He would be exposed as a fraud and a
usurper, and the political landscape would be forever changed, along
with how the media shapes public policy.
Dr. Polarik holds a Ph.D. in
Instructional Media and specializes in computer graphics with over 20
years experience with computers, printers and typewriters.
|
|
Narcissus And Echo |
It is troubling that Obama is a pathological narcissist caught up in the thought patterns
of Darwin, Marx, and Alinsky. Even more troubling is the fact that the
Mainstream Media (MSM), suffering from an Obama-inspired narcosis,
shirks its duty, refusing to publish or even explore any aspect of
Obama's dark side. There is room for much optimism, however. If the
ancient story of Narcissus and Echo plays itself out as Ovid recorded
it, and Obama and the MSM are their contemporary counterparts, both will
fade away in the not too distant future.
Narcissus did not fall
in love with his own reflection by accident; he was thus cursed by
Nemesis for his audacious mockery of others. As for Echo, it was her
dishonesty and deception that caused Hera, queen of the gods, to curse
her so that her body would dwindle away to a mere voice able only to
echo the words of Narcissus.
Comparing the particulars of the
original Narcissus and Echo tale to Obama and the MSM will spotlight for
us the unnatural patterns of feeling and thinking currently operative in
the latter pair, and help us see that they are similarly cursed. You can
read Ovid's original story
here, wherein you may glean some insight I
may have missed.
Let's
begin . . . |
|
Strongest Possible Adjectives |
One day after
North Korea launched a successful test of a nuclear weapon, Obama said
that the United States was prepared to respond to the threat with "the
strongest possible adjectives."
In
remarks to reporters at the
White House, Obama said that North Korea should fear the "full force and
might of the United States' arsenal of adjectives" and called the
missile test "reckless, reprehensible, objectionable, senseless,
egregious and condemnable."
Standing at Obama's side, Joe Biden
weighed in with some tough adjectives of his own, branding North Korean
President Kim Jong-Il "totally wack and illin'."
Later in the
day, Defense Secretary Robert Gates called the North Korean nuclear test
"supercilious and jejune," leading some in diplomatic circles to worry
that the U.S. might be running out of appropriate adjectives with which
to craft its response.
But Obama attempted to calm those fears,
saying that the United States was prepared to "scour the thesaurus" to
come up with additional adjectives and was "prepared to use adverbs" if
necessary.
"Let's be clear: we are not taking adverbs off the
table," Obama said. "If the need arises, we will use them forcefully,
aggressively, swiftly, overwhelmingly and commandingly." |
|
Obama's Intel Team In Disarray |
The nation's
two intelligence chiefs are locked in a turf battle over overseas posts,
forcing National Security Adviser James L. Jones to mediate, according
to current and former government officials.
The jockeying
between CIA Director Leon Panetta and National Intelligence Director
Dennis Blair centers on Blair's effort to choose his own representatives
at U.S. embassies instead of relying only on CIA station chiefs. Current
and former U.S. officials described the dispute on the condition of
anonymity, because of the sensitivity of intelligence issues.
Blair's office was created after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks
to better coordinate intelligence gathering and make sure critical
information isn't overlooked. But former and current CIA officials warn
that his plan could do just the opposite -- creating competing chains of
command inside U.S. embassies and potentially fouling up intelligence
operations. They also worry it could complicate the delicate
relationships between U.S. and foreign intelligence services, and leave
ambassadors confused about where to turn for intelligence advice.
CIA station chiefs posted in American embassies have handled the
national intelligence role abroad for the last four years, but Blair
wants the option of designating other intelligence specialists for the
job. That prompted strong objections from Panetta.
The question
has been referred to Jones, Obama's national security
adviser, to settle.
More
here . . |
![]()
©
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved
|
