Document Fraud
 

  

U. S. Constitution

Article II

Section 1

 


 

 

event

description
The
Issue		 Obama (or his designated agents) forged his online COLB.

By forging those COLBs, Obama, his campaign, and Factcheck committed Federal (x1) document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and election fraud, and State (x50) document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and election fraud.

Throw in a little obstruction of justice as well.
False
Identity
Documents		 There are current Federal laws in place that prohibit the use of false identity documents, such as a birth certificate, and they are spelled out in Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information.  In particular, there are specific paragraphs that relate to the use of a false identification document:

The term "false identification document" means a document of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that -- (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and -- (B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization.

Given the overriding fact that the individual whose identity document is in question, has repeatedly failed to provide a genuine identity document, the charge that this individual, along with other individuals, did conspire to proffer in its place, a false identification document, is hereby levied by the American people, by way of one of its citizens.  To summarize the seriousness of these actions and this charge, and to the importance of what is contained within this report:

There is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the COLB image created and distributed by Obama’s campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg’s Factcheck, and the St. Pete Times, Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false identification document.  Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the photos taken by Annenberg’s Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama campaign, are themselves, false identification documents, having been made from the same false identification document image, as well as from additional false identification documents created for the same purpose; namely, to proffer these false identification documents as true reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, "Certification of Live Birth" document, and thereby, intentionally deceive the American public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and thereby, fully qualified to become their president.
Does Anyone See A Pattern Here
From the first day he ran for the Office of the President of the United States, Barack Obama, a constitutional lawyer, knew that he was not a natural-born citizen and not constitutionally qualified to become president.  But, he ran anyway.  Obama may also have known that he was not born in Hawaii, that he came to Hawaii as an illegal immigrant, and that he was never naturalized as a US citizen.

Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing his original birth certificate?

If all of the information shown on the scan image were true, then there would not be any reason to hide the original.  If all of the information shown on FactCheck's photos were true, then there would not be any reason to hide the original.  If all of the information we've seen is actually true, then why fabricate bogus birth certificates when a real one can be made for $12?  What is worth committing felony document fraud just to keep it hidden?

Well, it's a lot more than that.  This bogus birth certificate was used to deceive over 300 million Americans in regards to Obama's true identity and birth origins.  This bogus birth certificate was used to deceive members of our government, our judiciary, our armed forces, and law enforcement into believing that Obama was born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural-born US citizen who is constitutionally qualified to become president.

Obtaining a real birth certificate copy is the very last thing that Obama would ever do, then or now, because it would absolutely confirm that the images and photos posted on the Internet are forgeries and would expose anyone involved in this fraud to criminal prosecution.  Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing it?

There is no question that Obama fails to meet the constitutional qualifications for being a natural-born citizen because his father passed his British citizenship onto Obama as a child and made him a dual citizen.  But, what about the question of document fraud?  Has a crime been committed?  Who's responsible?  What if a president was complicit in committing this document fraud and intentionally covering it up by all legal means possible?

Conspiracies in presidential elections do happen.  Does "Watergate" ring a bell?

Recently, another Illinois politician was impeached for selling Obama's Senate seat.  It that act really worse than committing felony document fraud, as defined by Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information?.

As people are wont to say at times like this, "Where is the outrage?"  Where, indeed.
Criminal Document Fraud The only thing I'll sign is a petition for Obama, Obama for America, and FactCheck to be charged with criminal document fraud and Internet fraud for creating and proffering a false identification document, aka the fabricated COLB image posted on Obama's website, among others, that Press Secretary Gibbs publicly admitted was put there by the aforementioned President of the United States and his Presidential Administration.

These said individuals and parties did willingly, and with malice aforethought, violate Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information, by creating and preferring what they allege was Obama's actual, original birth certificate, but was, in fact, a false identification document as defined by statute below:

A "false identification document" is any document *or facsimile of a document) of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals that -- (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and (B) appears to be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a State, a political subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international governmental or quasi-governmental organization.

The Obama Administration, the Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, FactCheck.org, and Barack Hussein Obama as the principle mastermind of this document fraud who directed the creation and distribution of a false identification document for himself, are hereby charged with the commission of felony document fraud, punishable by up to five (5) years in prison, and a maximum fine of $250,000 for each offense.

It is a statement of fact, and admission therewith, that the Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, did create a minimum of three (3) false identification document copies and distributed said copies to the Daily Kos, FactCheck, and Politifact; and, additionally, posted the original false identification document on Obama's own website, "My.BarackObama.com" and also on a separate website known as, "Fight The Smears."

Furthermore, two months after the creation and distribution of these false identification documents, Obama for America, in collusion with FactCheck.org, a subsidiary of the Annenberg Public Policy Center, owned by the Annenberg Foundation and funded by billionaire George Soros, created and posted nine (9) photographs of what they further alleged was the same, false identification document that they had earlier alleged was a scanned facsimile of Obama's original birth certificate -- thus compounding their earlier offenses with further violations of the same statutes.

In all, then presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, his campaign organization, d/b/a Obama for America, and Annenberg's FactCheck.org organization are hereby charged with thirteen (13) separate violations of Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028.

It is further alleged that these individuals and organizations, by virtue of displaying and promoting these fraudulent images as genuine government-issued documents, to the voting populaces of all 50 states in the Union, are hereby, also guilty of committing Internet fraud, in violation of individual state laws and Federal laws.

Lastly, these false documents are also in violation of Hawaiian state forgery statues as the State Government of Hawaii was directly deceived and harmed irrespective of the other charges.

I call upon the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Attorneys General of the other 49 states, the DC District Attorney, the Attorney General of the United States, and the Congress of the United States to launch their own investigations of the crimes committed against the respective state and national governments, and the citizens under these jurisdictions.

Or...something like that.

Ron Polarik, Ph D . . .
Just
One		 Obama made his birth record information part of the public record on June 12, 2009 when he submitted his "birth certificate" TO THE PUBLIC.  He cannot legally change its status from being in the public domain to being private information.

The HUGE mistake made by ALL of the eligibility litigants is NOT demanding to see the "ACTUAL" Certification of Live Birth that was publically revealed as a "scan image," and then publically revealed for a second time as a series of photographs.

I cannot tell you how many times I have begged and pleaded with Taitz, Berg, Apuzzo, and Keyes to make them show Obama's COLB -- which as we now know DOES NOT EXIST!  There is no way in Hell that Obama could have complied with that request because there is a clearly and irrefutably forged birth certificate "facsimile" AND a clearly and irrefutably forged birth certificate "document" made to resemble what is a nonexistent document.

Obama should be required to release the COLB that he and his Administration falsely claim was copied and posted on the Internet.  Obama is guilty of creating and proffering a False Identification Document irrespective of where he was born, irrespective of other requests made to release his vault birth certificate, and irrespective of any other event not related to the commission of this crime.

All we need is for one citizen -- just one citizen -- who actually donated money to Obama's Campaign for President, who voted for Obama, and who now realizes that he or she was scammed into doing both by the birth certificate fraud.

That one citizen, with the resources to file a lawsuit in Civil Court, would then sue Obama, Obama for America, and Factcheck for obtaining money and votes by fraudulent means and for disbursing that money for illegal purchases; e.g., payment to a personal attorney to quash eligibilty suits.

The Petitioner can cite on that Complaint, the specific acts of Internet fraud, Consumer fraud, and Election fraud, committed by the Defendants, and put the onus on the Defense to provide concrete proof that this COLB is genuine, and that it accurately reflects Obama's original birth certificate.

The claim would be that the Defendants have previously gone on record, that Obama submitted an "actual" 2007 COLB, date-stamped "June 6, 2007," containing his original birth record information, that was subsequently scanned into a digital image, distributed and shown nationally.  In addition, the Defendants have also gone on record, as claiming that the digital photographs shown nationally on Factcheck's wbsite, were made from the very same COLB in question that was used to make the scan image.

The Defendants must provide(a) the actual paper COLB that was scanned and photographed, (b) the actual "scanner" that was used to make the scan image, and (c) the actual camera that was used to make the photographs.

Furthermore, to check the authenticity of the paper COLB, Obama will have to provide a copy of the original birth record information and match it against the corresponding data on the paper COLB.

If that ever happens, I fully expect the Defendants to settle it ot of court in any way they can.
   

©  Copyright  Beckwith  2009
All right reserved