U. S. Constitution
Article II
Section 1
|
|
|
|
event |
description |
The Issue |
Obama (or his designated agents)
forged his online COLB.
By forging
those COLBs, Obama, his campaign, and Factcheck committed Federal (x1)
document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and election fraud, and
State (x50) document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and election
fraud.
Throw in a little obstruction
of justice as well. |
False Identity Documents |
There are current Federal laws in
place that prohibit the use of false identity documents, such as a birth
certificate, and they are spelled out in Chapter 18 of the United States
Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with
identification documents, authentication features, and information.
In particular, there are specific paragraphs that relate to the use of a
false identification document:
The
term "false identification document" means a document of a type intended
or commonly accepted for the purposes of identification of individuals
that -- (A) is not issued by or under the authority of a governmental
entity or was issued under the authority of a governmental entity but
was subsequently altered for purposes of deceit; and -- (B) appears to
be issued by or under the authority of the United States Government, a
State, a political subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a
political subdivision of a foreign government, or an international
governmental or quasi-governmental organization.
Given the overriding fact that the individual whose identity
document is in question, has repeatedly failed to provide a genuine
identity document, the charge that this individual, along with other
individuals, did conspire to proffer in its place, a false
identification document, is hereby levied by the American people, by way
of one of its citizens. To summarize the seriousness of these
actions and this charge, and to the importance of what is contained
within this report:
There is
conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the COLB image created and
distributed by Obama’s campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg’s Factcheck,
and the St. Pete Times, Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false
identification document. Furthermore, there is conclusive and
irrefutable evidence that the photos taken by Annenberg’s Factcheck, in
collusion with the Obama campaign, are themselves, false identification
documents, having been made from the same false identification document
image, as well as from additional false identification documents created
for the same purpose; namely, to proffer these false identification
documents as true reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and
certified, "Certification of Live Birth" document, and thereby,
intentionally deceive the American public into believing that Barack
Hussein Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States, and
thereby, fully qualified to become their president.
|
Does
Anyone See A Pattern Here |
From the first day he ran
for the Office of the President of the United States, Barack
Obama, a constitutional lawyer, knew that he was not a
natural-born citizen and not constitutionally qualified to
become president. But, he ran anyway. Obama may also have
known that he was not born in Hawaii, that he came to Hawaii as
an illegal immigrant, and that he was never naturalized as a US
citizen.
Does that sound
like a viable MOTIVE for not showing his original birth
certificate?
If all of the
information shown on the scan image were true, then there would
not be any reason to hide the original. If all of the
information shown on FactCheck's photos were true, then there
would not be any reason to hide the original. If all of the
information we've seen is actually true, then why fabricate
bogus birth certificates when a real one can be made for $12?
What is worth committing felony document fraud just to keep it
hidden?
Well, it's a lot
more than that. This bogus birth certificate was used to
deceive over 300 million Americans in regards to Obama's true
identity and birth origins. This bogus birth certificate was
used to deceive members of our government, our judiciary, our
armed forces, and law enforcement into believing that Obama was
born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural-born US citizen who is
constitutionally qualified to become president.
Obtaining a real birth
certificate copy is the very last thing that Obama would ever
do, then or now, because it would absolutely confirm that the
images and photos posted on the Internet are forgeries and would
expose anyone involved in this fraud to criminal prosecution.
Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing it?
There is no question that
Obama fails to meet the constitutional qualifications for being
a natural-born citizen because his father passed his British
citizenship onto Obama as a child and made him a dual citizen.
But, what about the question of document fraud? Has a crime
been committed? Who's responsible? What if a president was
complicit in committing this document fraud and intentionally
covering it up by all legal means possible?
Conspiracies in presidential elections do
happen. Does "Watergate" ring a bell?
Recently, another Illinois politician was impeached
for selling Obama's Senate seat. It that act really worse than
committing felony document fraud, as defined by Chapter 18 of
the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity
in connection with identification documents, authentication
features, and information?.
As people are wont to say at times like this, "Where is the
outrage?" Where, indeed.
|
Criminal
Document Fraud |
The only thing I'll sign is a
petition for Obama, Obama for America, and FactCheck to be charged with
criminal document fraud and Internet fraud for creating and
proffering a false identification document, aka the fabricated COLB
image posted on Obama's website, among others, that Press Secretary
Gibbs publicly admitted was put there by the aforementioned President of
the United States and his Presidential Administration.
These said
individuals and parties did willingly, and with malice aforethought,
violate
Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and
related activity in connection with identification documents,
authentication features, and information, by creating and preferring
what they allege was Obama's actual, original birth certificate, but
was, in fact, a false identification document as defined by statute
below:
A "false identification document" is any document *or
facsimile of a document) of a type intended or commonly accepted for the
purposes of identification of individuals that -- (A) is not issued by
or under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the
authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for
purposes of deceit; and (B) appears to be issued by or under the
authority of the United States Government, a State, a political
subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of
a foreign government, or an international governmental or
quasi-governmental organization.
The Obama Administration, the
Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, FactCheck.org, and Barack Hussein
Obama as the principle mastermind of this document fraud who directed
the creation and distribution of a false identification document for
himself, are hereby charged with the commission of felony document
fraud, punishable by up to five (5) years in prison, and a maximum fine
of $250,000 for each offense.
It is a statement of fact, and
admission therewith, that the Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, did
create a minimum of three (3) false identification document copies and
distributed said copies to the Daily Kos, FactCheck, and Politifact;
and, additionally, posted the original false identification document on
Obama's own website, "My.BarackObama.com" and also on a separate website
known as, "Fight The Smears."
Furthermore, two months after the
creation and distribution of these false identification documents, Obama
for America, in collusion with FactCheck.org, a subsidiary of the
Annenberg Public Policy Center, owned by the Annenberg Foundation and
funded by billionaire George Soros, created and posted nine (9)
photographs of what they further alleged was the same, false
identification document that they had earlier alleged was a scanned
facsimile of Obama's original birth certificate -- thus compounding
their earlier offenses with further violations of the same statutes.
In all, then presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, his
campaign organization, d/b/a Obama for America, and Annenberg's
FactCheck.org organization are hereby charged with thirteen (13)
separate violations of Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section
1028.
It is further alleged that these individuals and
organizations, by virtue of displaying and promoting these fraudulent
images as genuine government-issued documents, to the voting populaces
of all 50 states in the Union, are hereby, also guilty of committing
Internet fraud, in violation of individual state laws and Federal laws.
Lastly, these false documents are also in violation of Hawaiian
state forgery statues as the State Government of Hawaii was directly
deceived and harmed irrespective of the other charges.
I call
upon the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Attorneys General of
the other 49 states, the DC District Attorney, the Attorney General of
the United States, and the Congress of the United States to launch their
own investigations of the crimes committed against the respective state
and national governments, and the citizens under these jurisdictions.
Or...something like that.
Ron Polarik, Ph D . . . |
Just One |
Obama made his birth record
information part of the public record on June 12, 2009 when he submitted
his "birth certificate" TO THE PUBLIC. He cannot legally change
its status from being in the public domain to being private information.
The HUGE mistake made by ALL of the
eligibility litigants is NOT demanding to see the "ACTUAL" Certification
of Live Birth that was publically revealed as a "scan image," and then
publically revealed for a second time as a series of photographs.
I cannot tell you how many times I
have begged and pleaded with Taitz, Berg, Apuzzo, and Keyes to make them
show Obama's COLB -- which as we now know DOES NOT EXIST! There is
no way in Hell that Obama could have complied with that request because
there is a clearly and irrefutably forged birth certificate "facsimile"
AND a clearly and irrefutably forged birth certificate "document" made
to resemble what is a nonexistent document.
Obama should be required to release the COLB that he and his
Administration falsely claim was copied and posted on the Internet.
Obama is guilty of creating and proffering a False Identification
Document irrespective of where he was born, irrespective of other
requests made to release his vault birth certificate, and irrespective
of any other event not related to the commission of this crime.
All we need is for one citizen --
just one citizen -- who actually donated money to Obama's Campaign for
President, who voted for Obama, and who now realizes that he or she was
scammed into doing both by the birth certificate fraud.
That one citizen, with the
resources to file a lawsuit in Civil Court, would then sue Obama, Obama
for America, and Factcheck for obtaining money and votes by fraudulent
means and for disbursing that money for illegal purchases; e.g., payment
to a personal attorney to quash eligibilty suits.
The Petitioner can cite on that Complaint, the specific
acts of Internet fraud, Consumer fraud, and Election fraud, committed by
the Defendants, and put the onus on the Defense to provide concrete
proof that this COLB is genuine, and that it accurately reflects Obama's
original birth certificate.
The
claim would be that the Defendants have previously gone on record, that
Obama submitted an "actual" 2007 COLB, date-stamped "June 6, 2007,"
containing his original birth record information, that was subsequently
scanned into a digital image, distributed and shown nationally. In
addition, the Defendants have also gone on record, as claiming that the
digital photographs shown nationally on Factcheck's wbsite, were made
from the very same COLB in question that was used to make the scan
image.
The Defendants must
provide(a) the actual paper COLB that was scanned and photographed, (b)
the actual "scanner" that was used to make the scan image, and (c) the
actual camera that was used to make the photographs.
Furthermore, to check the
authenticity of the paper COLB, Obama will have to provide a copy of the
original birth record information and match it against the corresponding
data on the paper COLB.
If that
ever happens, I fully expect the Defendants to settle it ot of court in
any way they can.
|
|
|
©
Copyright Beckwith 2009
All right reserved
|