I have never viewed what he said on the Occidental College 
				scholarship application as particularly significant. Along with 
				the remainder of the Indonesian citizen and activities evidence, 
				most of which has also been scrubbed. 
As a lawyer, I 
				recognize that there is a much broader legal issue behind the 
				"natural born citizen" Constitutional provision if it ultimately 
				proved that he was in fact born in Hawaii, to which this 
				Indonesian citizen evidence would be relevant. 
However 
				having been in court once or twice and looking at the likely 
				development of a courtroom legal controversy over this issue, I 
				have come to the relatively firm conclusion that if he could 
				ultimately prove he was born in Hawaii, he is going to remain 
				President of the US, notwithstanding what looks like a 
				reasonable legal Constitutional argument that he still doesn't 
				qualify. That is just how it is. 
So I have ignored the 
				evidence behind the rest of these arguments. Although I will say 
				that a year ago, in the early stages of the long thread, a link 
				was posted to a person who had been at Occidental College in his 
				period or who had been involved with getting him there (maybe 
				not a fellow student) who as I recall stated that he had been 
				subsidized as a foreign student from Indonesia. I ignored 
				that--in the modern world, kids going to college get all the 
				financial aid they can get on any basis they can get it and it's 
				just part of the dance of dealing with the educators who have 
				constructed an uneconomic and unfair admissions system. Just 
				part of life. But I think that comment was the origin of the 
				inquiry about what he might have said to Occidental. 
My 
				interest in the issue has continued because as a lawyer who has 
				been involved in legal contests of this variety, my judgment is 
				that it is pretty clear that he was in fact born at Coast 
				Hospital in Mombassa Kenya. 
And I will tell you that the 
				next upcoming round is likely to get into the factual contest 
				over where he was born. I expect to see much better fake 
				documents than we have seen to date. I expect that ultimately, 
				officials at the state of Hawaii will decide to scrub their 
				records of whatever offending documentary material they have 
				that does prove he was born in Kenya; and we will be left with 
				needing to introduce documents and evidence on the subject 
				ourselves. 
I think Polarik has been in a courtroom 
				before and understands what we are likely to face. It isn't 
				going to be enough that it turns out that once Hawaii gets done 
				with their files, there is no real evidence that he was born in 
				Hawaii. Although he ought to be required to prove he was born in 
				the US and that he meets whatever other legal test is implicit 
				in the "natural born" requirement, that isn't going to be the 
				way the courtroom argument will come out. 
It is going to 
				be necessary to at least make a prima facia case that he was 
				born in Kenya. For that purpose, it would be very helpful to get 
				our hands on the record certification document that has been out 
				there floating around. I am concerned that the Opposing Forces 
				may have reached it first. 
				
FreeRepublic.com -- 
				post #
				
				697 --posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:59:16 AM by David 
				(...)