Therefore, I repeat my previous proposal: Each party on their own, withone-way
linking to the article(s) or posting(s) to which each party caresto respond.
I don't see why each of us can't keep on linking independentlyas we see
fit and as it suits our purposes.
Just set up your Table of Contents, put it up-front, and give us your bestarguments.
The Zundelsite won't have a "Table of Contents"expressly
for you because our raison d'etre is not to demolishyou - as yours
is to demolish us - but we already have a link toNizkor on every document
we post, which will take readers straight to yourTable of Contents.
There you can shine to your heart's content. People can read, reflect
anddecide for themselves what is hard thought, forensic evidence, common
senseand serious research - or what is merely anti-German hate wrapped
up insophistry. Please be my guest and post as many counter-arguments to
ourarticles on your site as you wish and link them all to us. I will read
yourpostings and will reply to serious challenges. I genuinely wanta
dialogue with honest, decent people. But what I do not wish to get intois
scattered, massive linking that's nothing more than "kicking asses"and
hot air. If it is "Internetabuse" you want, Usenet is tailor-madefor
you - I want a scholarly debate and not a spitting contest.
In summary: We have already linked specifically to you on every documentand
will continue to do so until further notice. It would be nice indeedif
you would do the same. It does not require special software as you impliedin
your previous letter. Boilerplate links can be done in three ways:
1. via glossary
2. via clipboard
3. via an extra word processing page kept simply on your desk top. It iscalled
"copy-paste" and takes less than five seconds. I am nottelling
you anything you don't already know.
One last word in conclusion, and then I hope we can stop behaving like
catsin a barnyard and get on with the business at hand. And it is this:
You, Sir, have never met me. You have obviously not begun to search outand
study serious Revisionist work. By your own words I can tell that youhaven't
- as per your words in the newspaper article quoted above. Whatmakes you
qualified to judge my work or other Revisionists' work? My guessis you
have never heard or seen a tape that I have made. You know nothingabout
me as a person. You don't know what I stand for, and what I do notstand
for. You only have the image the media created of me - "archvillain
of the Right," "Neo-Nazi," "racist," "hatemonger"
and on and on, ad nauseum - and you have joined thatparty line,
maybe with all the best intentions in the world.
But it is still the party line that serves political, financial and socialinterests
that lead to where some of us do not care to go. I realize mostpeople have
no notion whatsoever that they are being manipulated".. . at the behest
of special interest groups and being groomed and stroked."But just
stay tuned and think. Apply your critical intelligence - but usethe acid
test both ways. And don't think for one moment that it does notserve a
political agenda to have a "Ken McVay clause" on the legalbooks
in Canada! (Article by K. K. Campbell, "Censorship on the Net:Ottawa's
Position," Toronto Star, September 27, 1995) Nizkor is a convenientpolitical
tool of the already powerful and influential- and don't you kidyourself!
The Holocaust is the tap root that has for fifty years been nourishedartifically
on people's best intentions, sympathy and trust.
You may be one of them. I'd like to think you are - you certainly are brightenough
to judge me on my merits. To do so, you must read, reflect and analyze-
not just react like Pavlov's dog the moment you hear "Holocaust denier."It
is on the backs of decent people's best intentions, sympathy, empathyand
trust that the so-called "Holocaust" has grown into that vast,immoral,
manipulative monster - in two words, an extortion industry. Ithas already
syphoned off from post-war Germany more than 100 billion DM! With my two
trials and with my life and everything I am and know, I havehacked through
its tap root. Now that monstrosity is dying. The Holocaustpromoters know
that it is dying - why else would they need "hate laws"?Is it
not to protect their lies and rackets from exposure? You and I aren'tenemies.
The so-called "Holocaust" and its promoters have madeus
into enemies - when all along, we had, and have, a common enemy.Is that
not food for thought?
Were I not so consistently portrayed by you - and people like yourself
whothink they serve a "noble cause" - as that crazed, bumbling
fooland "Nazi" occupied with notions about UFOs and such whom
righteouspeople couldn't possibly take seriously, I would undoubtedly have
been assassinatedlong ago. I am convinced I owe my life in part to that
convenient, politicallyuseful image. The media has invented me for you
so you - intelligent, articulate,quick-witted, clever and, no doubt, still
young and idealistic - can servethe "noble cause" of "kicking
ass." Show us you cando better, and we might cross-link, too. For
now it is one-way.
Don't kid yourself - you are not fighting us because we are so silly orso
evil or so hateful. It is because we are so right.
Sincerely yours,
Ernst Zündel