SolarGeneral Proudly Presents...
...by James Mason
Previous Chapter | Index | Next Chapter
Somehow whenever someone takes a poke at a System Stooge, the media, which is supposed to represent all sides of an issue, takes a very dim view of that guy or gal. It never fails. No matter whether the System Stooge is a Lefty like the Kennedys or whether he maintains a Rightist image like Wallace and, to a far lesser degree, Reagan, or for that matter is supposedly a private citizen like Martin Luther King, the media goes all-out to paint the hit man (or woman) as a "professional loser" and a social and moral leper. Actually it's not because the media loves the victim so much (for Big Brother is a most unloving taskmaster) but rather because the media– as the official voice of the Big Brother System– CAN'T STAND such rugged individualism and right-to-the-point direct action in the super-homogenized "1984" society they are building. They get all unglued when somebody circumvents all their rigged "debate", "due process", "redress" and "checks and balances". In this town which is Republican territory and rural, I did not truly encounter any real upset about the shooting. There have been reports of classrooms full of kids breaking into cheering and applause at the word of the Reagan shooting. Naturally, Blacks everywhere were jubilant. But the media was shocked senseless, moved to tears. Dow Jones took a dive. As revolutionaries, each of us should have been unmoved one way or the other. Notice how "murders" are all-right but "assassinations" are out. That's because to get yourself "assassinated", at least in the standard accepted jargon of the times, you've got to be among the "in crowd", one of Big Brother's elite.
So, by those rules, if we get one of them, we're "assassins". If they get one of us, they're just "murderers". (But most of the time they reserve death for their own undependables. For us they reserve jail and oblivion– I'm not complaining.) John Hinckley was declared a bad boy by the media not because he took a shot at Ronald McDonald but because he stepped outside Master's rules in a way that they couldn't hide. Again, they're not that much in love with Reagan. Remember how they bent way over backwards to make the election look like a toss-up in the rigged polls? But Reagan is to them a good little boy who does as he is told. What they fear is that those with a mind to step outside the Master's rules will start picking their targets with less fanfare and more EFFECTIVITY!
You must consider that in this filthy regime, this filthy System and Establishment, there are no real leaders. Ronald Reagan is an ACTOR, literally! At the end of his term, he'll probably receive and Oscar for his performance. You can't expect to effect change by taking out actors and puppets posing as "leaders". It takes a little study to know where the threshold of effectivity lies. You will bump into names you've never even heard before. It's so easy for them to attach the "nut" label to anyone who goes after the President because that office is so obvious and generalized. But when obscure officials, bureaucrats and wire-pullers get taken out, it puzzles people and makes them start to think and study. "Nuts" simply aren't that meticulous or methodical. Aside from that, security is much more lax if not altogether non-existent.
But one name is as good as another. "Schizophrenic" is an all-purpose favorite of theirs. The System can't be expected to pelt its enemies with roses. Seems like in any other circumstances an "irresponsible drifter" would be highly romanticized. How many sick flicks have the Hollywood Jews devoted to "irresponsible drifters"? Must be okay in film fantasy but, in real life– dynamite! Button-down Establishment Creeps and conformists are seldom found to step outside Master's rules. Being "irresponsible" and "drifting" means to be hard to keep tabs on for Big Brother. It means being hard to trace. Are there only four hundred more "irresponsible drifters" out there?? They may be great at keeping "lists" but they are essentially the same ones who brought you Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley, and Kennedy. Who can tell who'll be next on the "hit parade"?
Previous Chapter | Index | Next Chapter
Brought to you exclusively by SolarGeneral.com