ANTI-NY TIMES HOME PAGE

Half Truths & Globalist Bias of The NY Times Front Page Headlines

___________________________________________________________________

          OCTOBER, 2015    1 FED RESERVE NOTE

___________________________________________________________________

 

"We read and rebut their vile crap so you won't have to!"

*****************************************

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 30, 2015

REBUTTAL BY     The public acceptance of stories such as "the killing of Osama Bin Laden" demonstrate that the mentally debilitating effects of Sulzberger's Slimes and the rest of the Piranha Press go beyond mere stupidity and gullibility. Whereas the belief in most media lies is the result of superficiality, stupidity and blind trust -- faith in this singularly transparent fairy tale is truly a sign of insanity. Apart altogether from the fact that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by clandestine elements of the Israeli and American Defense and Intelligence establishments; and apart from the fact that Bogeyman Bin Laden repeatedly denied any role in the attacks; and apart from the fact that even the Director of the FBI and the Secretary of Homeland Security both admitted that no evidence linking Bin Laden to 9/11 was ever discovered; and apart from the fact that Bin Laden never made another video after the area that he was known to be hiding was bombed to kingdom-come in December 2001 --- the story of the 2011 "raid" in which U.S. Navy Seals were said to have "killed" Bin Laden is supported only by some very, very weird photos and the ridiculous claim that Bin Laden's body was quickly dumped in the ocean out of respect for Muslims (who bury their dead in the ground!).     2002: HS Director Ridge and FBI Director Mueller admitted that neither "Al Qaeda cells" nor a "paper trail" linking Bin Laden to 9/11 could be found.   London Times (2002): "Thousands of FBI agents have rounded up more than 1,300 suspects across America since September 11, but they have failed to find a single Al-Qaeda cell operating in the United States...Tom Ridge, Director of Homeland Security could not explain why none had been caught."  "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." - FBI Director Robert Mueller  . Predictably, Directors Ridge and Mueller attribute this total lack of any evidence to the skill of the Al - Qaeda "terrorist network".   Let's examine a few excerpts from this latest incarnation and elaboration of the Bin Laden Fairy Tale: From the article: Weeks before President Obama ordered the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound in May 2011, four administration lawyers developed rationales intended to overcome any legal obstacles — and made it all but inevitable that Navy SEALs would kill the fugitive Qaeda leader, not capture him. Analysis: If Bogeyman Bin Laden was truly the head of this vast international terrorist operation, why on earth would you deliberately plan in advance to kill him on the spot? It would have been child's play for a team of Navy Seals to gas him, grab him and then put him on a helicopter. Just imagine the inside information that could have been obtained from "the leader of Al Qaeda".  Can it possibly be that the addle-brained masses are not even capable of asking themselves this basic question? Evidently so. From the article: Stretching sparse precedents, the lawyers worked in intense secrecy. Fearing leaks, the White House would not let them consult aides or even the administration’s top lawyer, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. They did their own research, wrote memos on highly secure laptops and traded drafts hand-delivered by trusted couriers. Analysis: Oh the bloody drama! "Intense secrecy" -- "trusted couriers". Sounds like quite a "conspiracy theory", eh Sulzberger? We wonder which Hollywood script-writer fed this crap to Sulzberger's Slimes? From the article: Just days before the raid, the lawyers drafted five secret memos so that if pressed later, they could prove they were not inventing after-the-fact reasons for having blessed it. “We should memorialize our rationales because we may be called upon to explain our legal conclusions, particularly if the operation goes terribly badly,” said Stephen W. Preston, the C.I.A.’s general counsel, according to officials familiar with the internal deliberations. Analysis: There it is -- "according to officials familiar with the internal deliberations". Which "officials" revealed these new facts? The article does not say. Typical!   Those "official sources" are at it again.   From the article: While the Bin Laden operation has been much scrutinized, the story of how a tiny team of government lawyers helped shape and justify Mr. Obama’s high-stakes decision has not been previously told. Analysis: The story "has not been previously told" because it was only recently invented. Duh! The rest of the piece reads like a chapter from some cornball B Level legalistic suspense novel. The most outrageous part are the "iconic" photos which The Slimes boldly resurrected. We say "boldly" because the photos alone should have been enough to discredit the silly story of "The Bin Laden Raid" years ago. That's how bad, how laughable, how amateurishly sloppy these staged photos are. Take a look:      Bin Laden watching news stories about himself on television in a video image released by the Pentagon in May 2011. Five incriminating videos were "conveniently" found in his compound.  *                    Packed together like sardines, Homo-Obongo, Joe Biden, Killary Clinscum, Robert Gates and others watch a "live video feed" (with blank laptops open?) of the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. Weren't there any bigger and more comfortable rooms available in the grand White House? After 4 years, why can't the rest of us see the video that are looking at? Or at the very least, a still image from the show? Why hasn't the media demanded to see it? Answer: Because the video doesn't exist!   With regard to the persistent public belief in this particular bit of moronic mythology -- we have already said; this is more than just stupidity and gullibility that we are dealing with here. It is MASS INSANITY! And Boobus Americanus thinks that is we 'conspiracy theorists' who are "crazy"?         Boobus Americanus 1: I read a fascinating piece in The New York Times today about the behind-the-scenes legal manuevering that led up to the Bin Laden raid in 2011.     Boobus Americanus 2: It's too bad we couldn't catch him alive and get some information out of him before we killed him. Nonetheless, the killing of that monster will go down in history as an important part of Obama's legacy.   ***       "You frickin' cretinss are inssane! Ossama the Innocsent was killed in 2001!"   (Sugar, what did you do with that bottle of vodka you finished off yesterday? I want to smash it over one these Boobus's head!)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 29, 2015

REBUTTAL BY     The deceptive shock-headline, along with the psychologically manipulative shock-photo of "melting Greenland", dominate the front page of Sulzberger's Slimes. The headline and photo are intended to implant the illusion of a massive, Global Warming TM caused meltdown of the icy northern landmass. Weak-minded libtards will surely wet their pink panties over this shocking bit of "evidence". Between sips of their Starbucks lattes they will shriek: "Look! The ice is melting in Greenland!" Calm down girlie-boys and manly-girls. It's called a river -- you know, a flowing body of water usually fed by melting snow and ice. A photo of a flowing river in Greenland is no more indicative of Global Warming TM than an image of the Hudson River flowing beneath the George Washington Bridge. Yes, you heard right! Greenland has, and has always had, thousands of rivers -- and happy inhabitants too! Of course, most of the huge island is uninhabitable -- but it ain't all Antarctic-ish either. Nothing to be alarmed about here; but shame on Sulzberger's Slimes for frightening their child-like readers with such out-of-context imagery and hype.      Greenland is an autonomous country with 58,000 inhabitants, a Queen and a Prime Minister. We ought therefore not be shocked by images of fast-flowing rivers, seasonal melting and greenery.   As for the accompanying article, some of it is just a rehash of typical pseudo-scientific alarmist dog crap. For example, a Professor Laurence C. Smith, head of the geography department at UCLA, and the leader of the team that worked in Greenland this summer, makes the following shock claims: “The rivers melt down faster than the surrounding ice, like a knife through butter.” And --- “The ice sheet is porous, like Swiss cheese. We didn’t know that until this year.”   "Great Scott! The ice is like Swiss Cheese! We shall need more money to study this dangerous phenomenon!"   *Note: According to the Danish Meterorological Institute, the ice shelf has slightly expanded over the past 5 years. The article below, from 1940, tells of a warming spell in Greenland. (here)   * But the main subject of the article is not so much about the "science" as it is about the funding cuts for Global Warming TM research that some Republicans are pushing for. Here are a few very telling excerpts from the article, accompanied by some analysis from The Anti-New York Times: From the story: Each year, the federal government spends about $1 billion to support Arctic and Antarctic research by thousands of scientists like Dr. Smith and his team. Analysis: One BILLION dollars?! That amount of taxpayer-cash can feed a lot of scientific sluts such as Dr. Smith for a long time! Several state governments, the E.U., the U.N. and various tax exempt Left Wing Foundations and NGO's also fund this gravy train. From the story: Any cuts could directly affect the work of Dr. Smith and his team, who are supported by a three-year, $778,000 grant from NASA. Analysis: In other words, if a no-talent punk like Dr. Smith wants to keep eating, he better find some "melting ice-shelves" and frozen "swiss cheese" to scare the commie kiddies with. From the story: Every scientist, Dr. Smith said, is keenly aware that the research costs “a tremendous amount of taxpayer money.” Analysis: This is known as a "yeah-but". Psychos will often utilize this tactic to patronizingly pacify you, before returning to their original position. The true sentiment expressed here is : "Yeah. Yeah. I know it costs taxpayers a lot of money. But we need it --- so screw you!"   Academic con-men like Dr. Smith and friends should immediately be cut off from the government teat. Better still, they ought to be thrown in Federal prison for fraud. No, scratch that. Prosecute and hang these lying bastards for TREASON! But ultimately, these university usurpers aren't the problem. They amount to little more than hired "expert witnesses" -- similar to the ones that a crooked ambulance-chasing lawyer would use to "prove" his case. Forget Smith, for now. It's the "big boys" that we should focus on -- the ones that even some of the most vocal "skeptics" of Global Warming TM never want to talk about - and we know who those "big boys" are, right? On Planet Rothschild, all roads lead to the Globalist Crime Syndicate. Global Warming TM  is about instituting "carbon taxes", controlling private enterprise, stifling the development of poor countries, and absorbing national sovereignty. Sulzberger's seditious scribblers know this, but the pathetic "intellectuals" who worship the unholy scripture of "the paper of record" do not.     Laurence Smith's apocalyptic 'The World in 2050' was puffed by the Piranha Press. But book-sale income and a fat university salary aren't enough for the profiteering pinko professor. He wants to keep his government grants too!     Boobus Americanus 1: I saw a most disturbing image of Greenland on the front of The New York Times today.      Boobus Americanus 2: Yes! I saw that too! The ice is melting so rapidly that it's flowing like a river! And now the damn Republicans want to cut off funding for Global Warming research!   ***       "Zzzzzzzzz. Zzzzzzzzz"   (Look at what you two blithering ass-clowns have turned my precious Sugar into!)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 28, 2015

REBUTTAL BY     Flashback -- 1941: The non-compliant Nationalist Asian government of Japan has refused to submit to the dictates of the tyrant Roosevelt. Though Japan is also a target of the NWO, the more pressing concern is Hitler's Germany -- which is allied with Japan by a mutual defense treaty. Because Hitler will not take FDR's bait (attacks on German submarines, impounding of vessels, direct aid to Britain etc) the warmongers shift their provocations toward Japan. Included among these various bullying tactics are the "Pop-Up Cruises" which grew out of The McCollum Memo. The McCollum Memo, also known as the Eight Action Memo, was a 1940 memorandum sent by Commander Arthur McCollum,  to Navy Captains Dudley Knox - who agreed with the actions described within the memo. The memo outlined the general situation of several nations in World War II and recommended an eight-part course of action for the United States to take in regard to the Japan, suggesting the U. S. provoke Japan into committing an "overt act of war". Several in the Office of Naval Intelligence also promote the idea of goading Japan into war.     As he publicly spoke of peace during his 1940 re-election campaign, FDR secretly plotted war against Germany and Japan. A series of 1941 provocations was necessary to negate his 1940 campaign promises.   The McCollum Memo was first widely disseminated with the publication of Robert Stinnett's Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor. Stinnett made a convincing case that the Roosevelt gang conspired to provoke the Japanese to attack the U.S. in order to bring the U.S. into the European war -- without enraging the public over broken political promises. The Great Deceiver had, on many occasions, issued impassioned campaign promises that the U.S. would not enter in Europe's war.   The memo contained an eight-part plan to challenge Japan: A. Make an arrangement with Britain for the use of British bases in the Pacific, particularly Singapore B. Make an arrangement with the Netherlands for the use of base facilities and acquisition of supplies in the Dutch East Indies C. Give all possible aid to the Chinese government of Chiang-Kai-Shek D. Send a division of long range heavy cruisers to the Orient, Philippines, or Singapore E. Send two divisions of submarines to the Orient F. Keep the main strength of the U.S. fleet now in the Pacific, in the vicinity of the Hawaiian Islands G. Insist that the Dutch refuse to grant Japanese demands for undue economic concessions, particularly oil H. Completely embargo all U.S. trade with Japan, in collaboration with a similar embargo imposed by the British Empire Stinnett goes on to write, "throughout 1941, it seems, provoking Japan into an overt act of war was the principal policy that guided FDR's actions against Japan" and "Roosevelt's cabinet members, most notably Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, are on record favoring the policy, according to Stimson's diary". Further evidence that suggests Roosevelt was operating in accordance with the memo was his support of "pop-up" cruises -- an elaboration upon Points D & E of the eight recommended actions. FDR wrote: "I just want them to keep popping up here and there and keep the Japs guessing. I don't mind losing one or two cruisers, but do not take a chance on losing five or six." (here)   Stinett's research into original source material leaves ZERO DOUBT! Roosevelt deliberately baited Japan with 'Pop-up Cruises' and knew of the Pearl Harbor attack in advance. (here)   Admiral Husband E. Kimmel (later wrongly blamed for negligence over the Pearl Harbor attack) opposed the "pop-up" cruises, saying they were "most ill-advised and will result in war if we make this move", but "the decision [on the 'pop-up' cruises] may go against me". In fact, at the time, Kimmel was not even aware of Washington's 8-point policy. Admiral James O. Richardson also opposed the plan and quoted FDR as saying: "Sooner or later the Japanese would commit an overt act against the United States and the nation would be willing to enter the war." Japan never did take the "pop-up cruise" bait. But they were forced to react to FDR's oil embargo and direct threat of war. That is why Japan struck first at Pearl Harbor. And the rest, as they say, is history. Understand that, and you will know all there is to know about the true motives behind Homo-Obongo's provocative challenge to the Chinese Navy, and Sulzberger's misrepresentation of same. This ain't about "freedom of the seas", folks. As it was with World War II, so it is with current events. It's all about The New World Order and the Russia-China alliance's refusal to submit to it. Keep that in mind should the Chinese Navy fire upon Obongo's outrageous "Pop-up Cruise" near "the disputed islands".   HARRY STIMSON'S CONFESSION! . "We face the delicate question of the diplomatic fencing to be done so as to be sure Japan is put into the wrong and makes the first bad move. … The question was how we should maneuver them into the position of firing the first shot."  *** "When the news first came that Japan had attacked us my first feeling was of relief that … a crisis had come in a way which would unite all our people. This continued to be my dominant feeling in spite of the news of catastrophes which quickly developed." . From the diary of Henry Stimson, FDR's Secretary of War   *  CORROBORATED BY HIROHITO     "To cultivate friendship among nations and to enjoy prosperity in common with all nations, has always been the guiding principle of our Empire's foreign policy. It has truly been unavoidable and far from our wishes that our Empire has been brought to cross swords with America and Britain. More than four years have passed since China, failing to comprehend the true intentions of our Empire, and recklessly courting trouble, disturbed the peace of East Asia and compelled our Empire to take up arms. Although there has been reestablished the National Government of China, with which Japan had effected neighborly intercourse and cooperation, the regime which has survived in Chungking, relying upon American and British protection, still continues its fratricidal opposition." From Japan's December 7, 1941 Declaration of War (Full Declaration -- here)   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times  today that an American Destroyer is going to challenge China's claim to international waters.   Boobus Americanus 2: The Chinese government is trying to divert public attention away from its economic problems by rattling sabres at us.   ***       "Thosse who fail to learn from hisstory are doomed to repeat it ----- dumb-assses! "   (Dadgummit, Sugar! You had to go and ruin the classic proverb by adding the shelter-talk at the end!)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 27, 2015

REBUTTAL BY     Throughout the process of the QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show), the Piranha Press will generally grant every candidate his or her "15 minutes of fame" (unless their name ends in 'Paul'; in which case there are 0 minutes)-- before knocking them down.  Like played-out pop songs, the Republicant's will wear out their welcome before the badly-wounded eventual winner gets to face off against Killary Rotten Clinscum in the QFS Stuper Bowl of 2016. The current flavor-of-the-fortnight (and hoped-for de-railer of the unpredictable Donald Trump) is Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson. We here at The Anti-New York Times once had a soft spot for Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson. He seemed like such a decent, humble, logical-thinking and godly man who, though a bit light on knowledge, was trustworthy and intelligent enough to offer a bit of hope for the hopeless GOP. Alas, even your intrepid reporter and his feline sidekick here err in judgement from time to time. But we now know that beneath the veneer of the soft-spoken Christian gentleman, Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson is little more than an ambitious book salesman and deceitful Zionist tool whose sudden rise is directly related to his expressed love for Israel and, more importantly, his wildly aggressive posture towards Putin and Russia.   Nothing sells books like a Zionist-approved QFS campaign! . From the mendacious mouth of Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson himself: On Israel: "Israel is our only democratic ally in the Middle East. She is surrounded by nations that threaten her very existence. We can never let her enemies believe that our deep commitment to Israel’s peace and security will waver. --- We must always stand with Israel and her people." On Vladimir Putin: "Vladimir Putin’s Russia has become dangerously belligerent. It is actively destabilizing Ukraine, endangering Europe in the process and continuing to fuel destabilization in the Middle East. This newfound aggressiveness is a rising threat to the peace and security of the American people." "History has painfully taught us that letting dictators run amok and hoping for the best fails. -- President Putin must come to learn that there will be grave and serious consequences when Russia engages in naked aggression against other sovereign nations and free peoples. All options should remain on the table when dealing with international bullies such as President Putin." On the use of force against Russia: “I would, obviously, do that in consultation with very competent generals and people who are more knowledgeable in that area than I would be. -- But, clearly, if the interest and the existence and the safety of the people of the United States was at stake – and that was the only way to protect them – of course, I would do whatever was necessary.” ***** Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson is currently polling very well in Iowa - a state infested with fellow mentally deranged Zio-Christian fundamentalists who worship Israel and await man-made Armageddon so that they can be zapped up to the Pearly Gates while the rest of the world burns. It is doubtful that he will outlast Trump, but we suspect that he doesn't want to anyway. You see, Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson's dubious dabbling in this QFS campaign (which happens to coincide with a book tour!) has pushed his book sales through the roof - for all of his best-selling, platitude-filled titles!     The "humble" doctor sure loves to have his mug plastered on his own books. Even his wife has one!   Congratulations, Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson! You are the first candidate for any office to have ever fooled The Anti-New York Times. In our defense, let us just say that there was no record to go on other than your conservative rhetoric, your calm manner, your medical achievements (which we now understand were a bit exaggerated) and your facade of devout Christianity. But after listening to your disgusting warmongering and filthy slandering of Christian Russia, the pious "soft-spoken" TV act is oh-so-transparent now. To the Devil with you, Uncle Tom, er, Dr. Ben Carson -- and your equally money-grubbing wife too!   "Massa" Bill Kristol of 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" fame LOVES Uncle Tom, er Dr. Ben Carson. Kristol tweet: "Best ticket for country: Cheney-Cotton. But Cheney won't run. Next best, electable, can govern: Sen Tom Cotton & Ben Carson." --- Enough said!   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times  today that Ben Carson is polling ahead of Trump in Iowa.   Boobus Americanus 2: Yes, his calm and humble demeanor is really resonating with voters.   ***       "Daddy; I told you that frickin' housse-n%$#*% was owned by Zion from day 1!"   (So says the cat who insists that the CIA is posioning her kitty litter.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

MONDAY / OCTOBER 26, 2015

REBUTTAL BY     For this piece of Yellow Journalism, Sulzberger's Slimes enlists two of its big shot "correspondents" -- David Sanger (cough-cough) and Eric Schmitt (possible cough-cough and two-time winner of the "prestigious" Pulitzer Prize) -- to frighten us all with tales of Russian submarines lurking about in close proximity to our underseas Internet cables. Our first reflex is to laugh - but considering the historical reality of "predictive false-flag pre-programming" - the journalistic joke of Messrs. Sanger & Schmitt may not be a laughing matter. Let's examine this selected excerpts from this newest version of "The Hunt For Red October".              Schmitt and Sanger are the type of dirty hacks that Publisher Joseph Pulitzer (cough-cough) would have hired. Putrid Pulitzer, along with competitor William Randolph Hearst, shamelessly incited for the Spanish-American War of 1898.   Schmitt and Sanger: Russian submarines and spy ships are aggressively operating near the vital undersea cables that carry almost all global Internet communications,... Analysis: The subs are "aggressively operating"? What the bloody hell does that mean? Are the subs biting surfers? Harassing dolphins? Schmitt and Sanger:  ... raising concerns among some American military and intelligence officials that the Russians might be planning to attack those lines in times of tension or conflict. Analysis:   "American military and intelligence officials" -- the same cast of characters who "raised concern" about "Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction"; and Assad's "gassing of children"; and Putin's mythical "invasion" of Crimea. No thanks! "Talk to the hand", bloody no-good liars!   "Aggressively operating" submarines? Talk to the hand, Dr. Strangelove.   Schmitt and Sanger:  The issue goes beyond old worries during the Cold War that the Russians would tap into the cables — a task American intelligence agencies also mastered decades ago. Analysis: Oh? Are you two ass-clowns saying that the U.S. can not only "tap into the cables", but that this nasty task was "mastered decades ago"? We must have missed that headline story. Sure sounds like "aggressive operating" to us! Schmitt and Sanger:  The alarm today is deeper: The ultimate Russian hack on the United States could involve severing the fiber-optic cables at some of their hardest-to-access locations to halt the instant communications on which the West’s governments, economies and citizens have grown dependent. Analysis: Total crap! Russia would never undertake such an aggressive action to start World War III - unless the U.S. attacked first. Schmitt and Sanger: While there is no evidence yet of any cable cutting,.. Analysis: OK. Heart palpitation time. Sugar, you have my permission to go full blown psycho on this one.   "No evidencse"?! If there issn't any &^%$#^ evidencse of wrong-doing; then why would you %$#(&% sscumbags even bother writing ssuch a provocative sstory?!!   Schmitt and Sanger: ... the concern is part of a growing wariness among senior American and allied military and intelligence officials over the accelerated activity by Russian armed forces around the globe. Analysis: Ah, those "senior military and intelligence officials", again. These are the same crazed cast of villains who operate as many as 1,000 troop, proxy and missile bases "around the globe" -- many of them encircling Russia. Project much, Dr. Strangelove?   "The Russians are coming! "The Russians are coming!"   Schmitt and Sanger: At the same time, the internal debate in Washington illustrates how the United States is increasingly viewing every Russian move through a lens of deep distrust. Analysis:  Classic criminal psycho behavior -- accusing the innocent of not being "trustworthy" when it is the Globo-Zionist U.S. that should be viewed "through a lens of deep distrust" -- given how it has been setting the world on fire as far back as 1898. Schmitt and Sanger: “I’m worried every day about what the Russians may be doing,” said Rear Adm. Frederick J. Roegge, commander of the Navy’s submarine fleet in the Pacific. Analysis: Rear Adm. Roegge is talking out of his own rear. Only a paranoid ignoramus or a filthy warmongering liar would say that "what the Russians may be doing" is a cause for daily worry. Schmitt and Sanger: Cmdr. William Marks (cough-cough?), a Navy spokesman in Washington, said: “It would be a concern to hear any country was tampering with communication cables; however, due to the classified nature of submarine operations, we do not discuss specifics.” Analysis: Of course! The good old "We-can't-tell-you-how-we-know-what-we-know-because-it's-classified" trick. Very well, Cmdr. Marks, we shall take your word at face value.  (rolling eyes) Schmitt and Sanger: One NATO ally, Norway, is so concerned that it has asked its neighbors for aid in tracking Russian submarines. Analysis: The pathetic p-words of de-balled Norway ought to be more "concerned" about the rape epidemic brought to its once gentle society by the real invaders pouring in from the Turd World. Schmitt and Sanger: The operations are consistent with Russia’s expanding military operations into places like Crimea, eastern Ukraine and Syria... Analysis: (Deep sigh, face-palm) All proxy problems engineered by CIA - NGO's - "Muslim"mercenaries.   I know Vlad .... I know.   Schmitt and Sanger: “The risk here is that any country could cause damage to the system and do it in a way that is completely covert, without having a warship with a cable-cutting equipment right in the area,” said Michael Sechrist, a former project manager for a Harvard-M.I.T. research project funded in part by the Defense Department. Analysis: This statement truly is cause for "concern"! "Any country" damaging the system "covertly" could mean the U.S. inflicting the wound on itself -- or -- our "best ally" in the Middle East (cough-cough) dispatching one of its state-of-the-art German subs to do the job. Schmitt and Sanger: So important are undersea cables that the Department of Homeland Security lists their landing areas — mostly around New York, Miami and Los Angeles — at the top of its list of “critical infrastructure.” Analysis: If this means, and it appears as though it does, that the dangerous DHS has "protective" jurisdiction over our underseas cables, well ---     "We got problems. Drink up, sweetie."       Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times  today that the Russians are stalking our Internet cable lines.   Boobus Americanus 2: Wow! That is scary. It sounds like a plot from a Hollywood movie.   ***       "Zzzzzzz - Zzzzzzz "   (You know, Sugar -- I think I like you better after a few shots of vodka.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

SUNDAY / OCTOBER 25, 2015

REBUTTAL BY   Remember the "good old days" when, although homosexuality had become socially acceptable, mentally disturbed cross-dressers were still universally regarded as deranged freaks? That was like, what -- 1 year ago?! Yes indeed; the 'slippery slope' to degradation is now covered with grease and blanketed with banana peels; and we have the seditious scum of the Jewish Piranha Press and Jewish Hollywood to thank for it. Speaking as "The Editorial Board", sex-mad degenerate pig Andrew Rosenthal (cough-cough) comes out full force in favor of trannie "rights".  Let's dig into Rosie's rant: Be neither afraid nor impressed by all the smoke and noise. It's only a pathetic little word-smith typing out lies from behind the curtain.   Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Thursday announced an executive action establishing the first-ever statewide regulations protecting transgender New Yorkers from discrimination. Analysis: Apart altogether from the evil and degeneracy that is the sudden "tolerance" for female (and also, male) impersonators, this trend of Presidents and Governors throwing Executive Orders around as if they were ordering pizzas should be a cause for great concern and alarm. Where is the "American Civil Liberties Union" on this? Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": The regulations extend the provisions of a 1945 state human rights law to prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity in housing,... Analysis: A tranny freak wants to rent the upstairs of an owner-occupied two-story home. If the owner, a good family man who is appalled by cross-dressing freaks, refuses to expose his children to the spectacle of a freak tenant -- he will be fined and could even lose his home. Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": ... employment... Analysis: A Catholic school tells a tranny freak that he / she / it cannot cross dress, that school can be fined or even shut down. Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": ... and public accommodations like restaurants, .... Analysis: A degenerate tranny freak is asked to wear men's attire in order to eat at an upscale or even just a family restaurant, that restaurant can be fined or shut down. Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": They also protect transgender people from discrimination when seeking mortgages, credit cards and other financial services. Analysis:  As if money lenders give a hoot about how tranny freaks dress! Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": Transgender people who have experienced discrimination can file a complaint in court, with the attorney general or with the State Division of Human Rights. If the division finds that discrimination has occurred, it can award compensatory damages, require policy changes, and levy fines and penalties of up to $100,000. Analysis: $100,000!!! America, land of the free, eh?   Attention all landords and school districts. You WILL rent your home to these psychopaths and allow them to cross-dress at the prom.    Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": The regulations come after years of failed efforts to enact a state law. The State Assembly has passed an anti-discrimination bill called the Gender Expression Nondiscrimination Act, or Genda, eight times, but the Republican-controlled State Senate has repeatedly blocked it. Analysis: So, if Cuomo the pro-homo is passing executive orders in defiance of EIGHT denials of "Gender Expression Nondiscrimination Act" (barf!), doesn't that mean that he is violating his oath of office? The Slimes is "OK" with such dictatorial action? Evidently so. Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": And transgender people in New York face disturbingly high rates of discrimination: 75 percent have experienced workplace harassment, 53 percent have suffered discrimination or harassment in a public place like a restaurant, and 19 percent have been denied a house or an apartment because of their gender identity, according to a 2011 survey. Analysis: Stop acting like sick twisted degenerate fools in public. Keep your insanity at home and no one will bother you. Problem solved! Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": Nationwide, transgender people are at high risk of unemployment and homelessness. Analysis: Yes; because they are freakin' nuts! Duh.   "Ya know -- I wonder why my career isn't where it should be by now."   Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": In the absence of an anti-discrimination law, Mr. Cuomo’s executive action offers much-needed protections quickly. Analysis: The people that we should be giving "much-needed protections" to are the innocent little children being raised in the cesspool that is modern day Trotsyite Marxist America. Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board": The new regulations set an important example for the country. More than 30 states lack comprehensive anti-discrimination laws that protect transgender people. Their governors should study Mr. Cuomo’s move and see if they can do the same. Analysis: A very ominous recommendation by Rosenthal, er "The Editorial Board" -- because that is EXACTLY how the successful drive to mandate faggot marriage played out. Paedophiles will be next. Bet on it!   How civilizations die! 1- The parents of those children should be fined $100,000 -- and lose custody! 2- When going wigless and sans make-up, the deteriorating First Tranny manifests classic Male Pattern Balding -- and a face that would make the Frankenstein Monster run away.     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times  today that Governor Cuomo used an executive action to implement anti-discrimination laws that will protect transgenders.   Boobus Americanus 2: That's good. If a man wants to become a woman or vice versa, it's their business.   ***       "If I were to put on a sspiked collar, doess that make me a pit bull terrier? Do I get to sstay in a dog kennel? -- Wuff wuff! Dumbasss! "   (As logical as you are lovable.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 23, 2015

REBUTTAL BY   Fanatical anti-Russian, anti-Syrian degenerate liar Steven Lee Myers (cough-cough) has become as delusional and he is hateful. So deep is the psychosis of Sulzberger's seditious scribblers that it really appears as though these odious characters are actually beginning to believe some of their own bull-shine! Let's have a look at a few excerpts. Haz-Mat suits on -- into the filthy fraudulence we go:   Myers, Myers, one of the worst liars -- rip out your tongue with a pair of pliers.   Myers:  In the winter of 2012, when the civil war in Syria had already consumed tens of thousands of lives... Analysis: Dadgummit! Stop calling it a "civil war"! It's a proxy war and you bloody well know it. Myers. A civil war is a fight among fellow countrymen (U.S. Civil War, Spanish Civil War, etc). The majority of these imported terrorists are mercenary killers recruited, financed, armed, trained and organized by the U.S. - Israel - Saudi Axis of Evil. Myers: (In 2012) Vladimir V. Putin, the Russian president, sounded dismissive of Syria’s beleaguered leader, Bashar al-Assad, and unconcerned about his future. Mr. Assad, he said, acidly, had spent more time courting leaders in European capitals than he ever had in Moscow. Analysis: Your snooping reporter here and his feline sidekick scoured the Internet to confirm any such statement from Putin, and we came up empty. Notice that Myers does not use quote marks to indicate what Putin actually said. Sloppy journalistic hear-say. Myers: “We are not that preoccupied with the fate of Assad’s regime,” Mr. Putin said then. Analysis: That is an accurate quote, but for Meyers to take a 3-year old quote out-of-context in order to support his fictional narrative of Putin and Assad having a troubled relationship, shows just how deceitful and desperate he is. Here is the full quote, from a 2012 press conference: "We are not that preoccupied with the fate of Assad's regime," the Russian president told a press conference. "We understand what's going on there and that his family has been in power for 40 years. Without a doubt, change is demanded. We're worried about something else – what happens next. We don't simply want for today's opposition, having come to power, to start fighting with the current authorities, who then become the opposition, and this continues for ever." It is interesting how Myers ignores a much more telling, and much more recent Putin quote. When asked, during his recent 60 minutes interview with Charlatan Rose last month, whether Syrian President Bashar al Assad should be forced to go, Putin said: "It's only the Syrian people who are entitled to decide who should govern their country, and how." Myers: Three years later, the two presidents have bound themselves together in an alliance that reflects not only the urgent priority of salvaging the crumbling central government in Syria, but also each man’s eroded standing on the international stage.  Analysis: "Each man's eroded standing on the international stage?" You cannot be serious, Myers! Well, you are a degenerate Marxist-Zionist liar -- so I guess you are. But as even many of your colleagues in the Piranha Press have conceded, Putin is the man-of-the-hour on the "international stage".     The "international stage" is much bigger than the dying U.S. and already dead Europe.   Myers: Mr. Putin’s military has forcefully intervened to shore up Mr. Assad’s government in its struggle against an array of insurgents... Analysis: Oh those naughty, naughty "insurgents". That doesn't sound nearly as bad as calling them what they really are -- MERCENARY TERRORISTS! Myers: ... but, even as Mr. Assad flew secretly to Moscow on Tuesday night for a meeting to assess the fighting in Syria, the chilly personal relationship between the two men has not changed Analysis: Pray tell us, Mr. Myers - from a one investigative journalist to another - How did you personally come to know of this "chilly personal relationship" between Putin and Assad? Be specific. Myers: ... according to officials, diplomats and analysts. . .   Myers: By all accounts, the two leaders remain distant and wary of each other. Analysis: Ah, yes! The time-tested "by-all-accounts" trick -- a staple of Yellow Journalism if there ever was one. "By all accounts" of the specifically cherry-picked "officials, diplomats and analysts" that Myers counts among his "sources". Myers: The Kremlin in particular has been frustrated by what it sees as Mr. Assad’s arrogance. Analysis: Says who? Myers: “It’s not personal, this whole thing,” said Dmitri Trenin, the director of the Carnegie Moscow Center, referring to Mr. Putin’s intervention. Analysis: That's your source, Myers? The Director of the Carnegie Moscow Center -- one of the most notorious Globalist NGO-NWO traitor groups in Russia? You may as well just quote the skanks of 'Pussy Riot', or the hideous hag, Masha Gessen! Myers: “To them, Assad is not a sacred cow,” Mr. Trenin added. “The issue to them is to save the Syrian state, to prevent it from unraveling the way Libya unraveled, Yemen unraveled.” Analysis: Directly speaking, Assad may not be a "sacred cow" for Putin. However, a sovereign and secure Syria is indeed a high priority for Russia. Given the fact that Assad is popular with most Syrians, the difference between the continued rule by Assad and a sovereign Syria is one without a distinction. You see, in a sovereign Syria, the people themselves would keep Assad. So, in essence, Putin is indeed personally committed to Assad because he is personally committed to a sovereign Syria. Nice try, Mr. Tenin and Mr. Myers --- but an epic fail nonetheless. Myers: That has given hope to those who want to see a negotiated end to the war in Syria and hasten the departure of Mr. Assad himself — Analysis: Keep dreaming. Assad ain't going. Myers: ... something Mr. Putin has signaled he is prepared to accept. Analysis: "Prepared to accept" IF -- repeat -- IF that's what the people of Syria want -- which they don't!      Assad, like Putin, is not without support on "the international stage".   Myers: Others, though, remain skeptical. “Not being wedded to Assad does not mean that they’re prepared to negotiate a way for him to go,” said a senior administration official in Washington.  Analysis: Finally! A bit of truth. Putin is NOT going to sell out Assad. Myers: Despite such similarities, the two (Putin & Assad) have strikingly different backgrounds and temperaments that have precluded a close bond, the officials and analysts said. Analysis: UNNAMED "officials and analysts". It's bad enough that Myers cherry-picks his "sources", but it seem that he also has a tendency to cherry-pick imaginary ones as well.   The "diplomats and officials" of Myers' imagination.   Myers: even as the events in Syria and beyond have forced them together. Mr. Assad, the awkward son of an authoritarian leader, ...  Analysis: "the awkward son". What is that supposed to mean? You ain't exactly Clark Gable either. Mr. Myers. Myers: ..... Mr. Putin, a former intelligence officer, ..... Analysis: KGB! ---KGB! --- KGB! We knew that was coming! How childish. Myers: “There’s not much chemistry in the relationship,” said one long-serving Western diplomat in the region. Analysis: "Not much chemistry" -- so says yet another cherry-picked and unnamed "long-serving diplomat". Perhaps Assad should send some flowers to Putin. Myers: Mr. Trenin, of the Carnegie Center, described Mr. Putin’s relationship with Mr. Assad as based on coinciding interests as much as ideology or values. "it remains essentially transactional, rather than values-based or strategic.” Analysis: Carnegie's Traitor Trenin, again. Ignore. Myers: Mr. Putin’s primary goal in Syria, as he laid it out in remarks at the United Nations last month, has been to prevent the toppling of another sovereign state in the Middle East by what he considers foreign interference... Analysis: No, Myers! It's not what Putin "considers" foreign interference. It's what IS foreign interference! Tell the truth, dammit! Myers: A secondary purpose, though, has been to reassert Russia’s re-emergence as a crucial player in the Middle East and beyond, forcing through military action an easing of the diplomatic isolation imposed on Mr. Putin after events in Ukraine. Analysis: Myers, PLEASE -- don't even get us going with that bullshit about "the invasion of Ukraine"! Sugar is getting old and is already at risk of getting a heart attack from reading Sulzberger's Slimes every day. Myers: At the same time, they emphasized their united front against terrorists, which is how both characterize not just the Islamic State but all armed opponents of Mr. Assad’s government. Analysis: And don't us started on this "bad terrorists" vs, "moderate terrorists", either! Myers: The question now is whether Mr. Putin can press Mr. Assad to accept a negotiated end to his rule. Analysis: Myers; get it through your skull. Putin is not going to press for anything that the people of Syria do not want. Give it a rest already. Myers: Mr. Assad has, in fact, proved at times to be a reluctant partner in Russia’s efforts to end the conflict. He has stood up on many occasions to the Kremlin, to the extent that diplomats and analysts say it has irritated Mr. Putin. Analysis: There go those "diplomats and analysts" again. Myers: “I think they know how confused the Assad regime is, and they’re frustrated by it,” said Andrew J. Tabler, an expert on Syria at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy who has followed the conflict closely, referring to the Russians. Analysis: Andrew Tabler (cough-cough) of the 'Washington Institute for Near East Policy'?! Those Globalist-Zionist madmen still want to blow up Iran! Do you ever talk with any normal people, Mr. Myers? Myers: After the failure of talks, Mr. Putin summoned Syria’s foreign minister, Walid al-Moallem, to Moscow in late June, for a meeting that was described as tense. Analysis: "a meeting that was described as tense" --- described by who, exactly? (Myers doesn't say)   "Psssst! The meeting was tense."   Myers: It was then, evidently, that Mr. Putin began laying the groundwork for the military intervention. That appears to have given him far more leverage over Mr. Assad, something analysts said could weaken Mr. Assad’s standing at home by emphasizing his junior status to Mr. Putin. Analysis: Wrong again. Assad remains popular as the Syrian army continues to do the bulk of the heavy lifting -- only now, with Russian air cover. A final victory will only enhance Assad's standing. ********* No more to say about this piece, dear reader. Dissecting liars like Myers is as exhausting as it is frustrating.     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times  today that Putin and Assad don't get along too well.   Boobus Americanus 2: Hopefully, Putin will convince Assad to step down after the civil war is over.   ***       "It'ss none of America'ss damn businesss who runs Ssyria! You frickin' butt-headss!"   (Sugar, come take your meds, sweetie.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 22, 2015

REBUTTAL BY A Google Search of the term 'Assad Must Go' yields an astounding 3,520,000 results. Here is but a small headline sampling of the rogue's gallery of Globalists, Zionists, Communists and other assorted scumbag regimes that have been repeating this worn out mantra ever since the early days of the WikiLeaks-triggered 'Arab Spring' protests: Assad Must Go, Says Obama -- Washington Post: (here) Britain Says Assad Must Go At Some Point -- Jerusalem Post: (here) Saudi Arabia insists Assad Must Go or Be Overthrown -- AFP: (here)  U.N. Envoy to Syria: Assad Must Go -- The Daily Beast: (here) Turkey Insists 'Assad Must Go' -- Today's Zaman (Turkey): (here) Francois Hollande of France Says Assad Must Go -- NY Times: (here) Assad Must Go Declares Dutch Foreign Minister -- DutchNews.nl (here) U.S. Senators (McCain & Graham): Assad Must Go -- Daily Sabah (here)   That was before the surprisingly impressive Russian military unleashed hell from land and sea upon the terrorist mercenary scum of ISIS / FSA / "moderate opposition". But over the course of the past few weeks, a different tune is being sung, albeit with qualifiers -- 'Assad Can Stay'!   Russia has spoken in the only language that tyrants understand.   And now, a few lyrics from the new tune:   Turkey: Syria’s Assad Can Stay in Power for Six More Months (here)   UK: Assad can stay in power for 3 years or longer (here) Saudis: Assad can stay in power temporarily  (here) Let’s talk to Syria’s Assad, Merkel says (here)  .   . This is not to say that the NWO will give up on subverting Syria (and Russia) in the long term; or that the Globalists don't have some other tricks up their sleeves. But for now, clearly, Putin has beaten them. Dr. Assad ain't going nowhere! (pardon the grammar). There are two ways to analyize this. It can either mean that the world is a safer place, or, a more dangerous place. It all depends upon how far the Globo-Zio crime syndicate wants to keep pushing the Russia-China bloc. The psycho neo-cons clearly want World War III and they want it now. But the long term, generational chess playing faction (Brzezinski, Kissinger et al) probably think that the NWO can resume subverting Russia and attacking its allies after Putin is gone. As long as traitors, weaklings and western wannabees continue to infest elements of the Russian ruling class, the game is not over.     There's a new sheriff in the Middle East -- and the neo-cons are seething!     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times  today that Assad visited Putin in Russia.   Boobus Americanus 2: Maybe it's best if Assad stays in power.   ***       "Boobusess armchair warriorss ain't talkin sso tough anymore since Russsia showed what it can do."   (Too bad Russia was on its back when the neo-cons destroyed Iraq back in 2003.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 21, 2015

REBUTTAL BY What's this? Sulzberger's slippery and sleazy Zionist Slimes reporting on the murder of an African migrant by a racist Israeli mob? Well, obviously the accusations of Zionist bias aimed at the Jewish-owned "paper-of-record" need to be re-examined now. Right? Not exactly.   You see, this outrageous attack, caught on film, could not so easily be disappeared down the Orwellian memory hole. So the Slimes had to run it. The trick was putting it at the very bottom of the front page and with no accompanying photo to draw the reader's attention. Compare and contrast this semi-silent treatment with the front page or front International page spreads of dead migrants in Europe (faked images) or the "iconic" image of that righteous (or acting?) Hungarian camerawoman tripping a fleeing migrant. The whole damn piranha press cried for a week straight over that one!       "Waaa! Waaa! She tripped me on the way to the welfare office!"      But there is no such degree of hysterical hype for Haptom Zerhom, the Eritrean man (mistaken for an attacker) who was beaten to death with whatever the Israeli mob could get its bloody hands on. Evidently, the tripping in the grass of some welfare-seeking foreign invader is a far greater offense than the mistaken mob murder of a legal African migrant who actually had a work visa and a job! Can you say, "Double standard"?!   From the bottom page, small headline story:   JERUSALEM — An Eritrean asylum seeker who was mistaken for an assailant in an attack Sunday at a bus station in Beersheba was shot by a security guard and then beaten by a mob. ---   Graphic video images of the beating appeared to show people kicking the Eritrean man, identified by the Israeli authorities as Haptom Zerhom, 29, and hurling a chair and bench at his head as he lay injured on the ground."   The gruesome photo above is nowhere to be found in Sulzberger's Slimes. Had the murder happened in Europe, the bloody images would be front-center paged and whined about for days! You may be still wondering to yourself -- why even cover the story at all? Why not just spike it totally? Answer: By giving the story some coverage instead of no coverage at all, Sulzberger's Slimes cleverly innoculates itself from charges of bias or self-censorship. This clever ruse becomes all the more effective when the "right wing" Zionists accuse the Slimes of "bashing Israel". That is how they play the dirty game of journalistic good cop - bad cop. Don't fall for it!     Boobus Americanus 1: Did you catch that story in the New York Times about the African migrant killed in Israel?   Boobus Americanus 2:  That's odd. I read The Times everyday. I must have missed that story.   ***     "A brief glancse of the main headliness doess not consstitute critical reading; you &%$#@ ssuperficial clod!"   ("Clod?" I was wondering where my Thesaurus went.)   *      Q3 is ready! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT!----QUARTER 3 -- Starring 'Sugar!' Available at Amazon

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 20, 2015

REBUTTAL BY As a cooking aficionado and a "conspiracy theorist", this piece caught the attention of your amateur chef / "paranoid" reporter here for those two reasons. Several years have passed since we abandoned the use of pine nuts for our pesto sauce recipe. You see, just like the cost of coffee, chocolate, laundry detergent, cereal, ice cream, butter etc. have all risen steadily; so too has the cost of pine nuts. Because the nuts were already a bit on the expensive side to start with, the price increases are really noticeable. Pesto recipes today consist of pistachios instead - although at the rate they are also rising in cost, peanuts may soon take their place!   As anyone with even a basic understanding of the counterfeiting operation known as The Federal Reserve knows by now, it is the incessant creation of debt-based currency that is causing food prices to rise and rise and rise - and store packages to shrink and shrink and shrink. Not to worry, dear reader. The evil geniuses at the Bureau of Labor Statistics have been good enough to remove food prices from the Consumer Price Index. You're fine!     1- Food inflation is rising far faster than wages! 2- BANCAROTTA! by M S King (due out soon) will explain why.   From the point of view of a Globalist criminal, this piece is deceptive on three levels. First, it completely ignores the true "How" and "Why" of pine nut inflation. Secondly, the writer, Jonathan Slaght, uses the piece to promote goofy unscientific environmentalism. And finally; well, we'll leave that as the not-so-hard-to-predict surprise.   A few excerpts, each followed by truthful analysis:   Slaght: The tiny, delectable pine nut is often viewed as essential to a classic pesto “alla Genovese,” but it is the most vexing ingredient — for the high cost of even a small packet or jar of them.   Analysis: You got that right Slaght. As previously stated, we at The Anti-New York Times have switched to pistachio pesto sauce.   Slaght: They also come at another kind of price: The pine nut industry may be contributing to the crash of an ecosystem.   Analysis: Oh please! Pine trees are as abundant as blades of grass (well, not quite). What are you trying to accomplish by peddling this nonsense about "the crash of an ecosystem?"   Slaght: According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature..   Analysis: The IUCN is a Globalist organization founded by Julian Huxley -- an "evolutionary humanist", Fabian Socialist, and an outspoken proponent of One World Government. Thanks for the clue, Slaght.       Huxley's Globalist IUCN couldn't care a rat's rear-end about polar bears or pine nuts.     Slaght: ... a majority of pine nuts imported into the United States come from the Korean pine tree, a keystone species found primarily in the southern parts of the Russian far east.   Analysis: So, the IUCN, an NWO "environmentalist" front if there ever was one, is calling attention to America's Russian imports of pine nuts. Where are we going with this, Mr. Slaght?   Slaght: The temperate rain forest of this wild corner of Russia represents a mere 1 percent of the country’s territory yet contains about a quarter of its endangered vertebrate species.   Analysis: So many "endangered species" now barely holding up in Putin's Russia, eh Slaght? The astute readers of The Anti-New York Times are on to you now.   Slaght: As a biologist, ...   Analysis: "As a biologist" -- Self promoting sophist! Sleazy Slaght is expecting that we all bow down to his "scientific credentials" and accept everything he says at face value.   Slaght: I’ve spent much of the last 20 years exploring the region’s forests ...   Analysis: Oh yeah? And your humble reporter here, speaking "as a historian", has "spent much of the last 20 years" studying and exposing the Globalist bullshit of folks like you, Sulzberger and the IUCN. How's that for "credentials", Slaght?   Slaght: An ever-expanding road network, driven by selective logging, is exposing more and more of the region to the covetous reach of pine nut harvesters. Once collected, the cones are shucked and the nuts, still in their shells, are sold to Chinese merchants, who haul truckloads across the border to China. From there, they are shipped to overseas markets.   Analysis: Oh the bloody drama! Slaght's ominous description of "covetous pine nut harvesters" and "Chinese merchants" hauling their loot "across the border" sounds like he is describing African poachers trafficking in elephant tusks or rhino horns. They are just frickin' pine cones!   Oh those naughty, naughty Russian pine cone harvesters. They are as bad as ivory poachers -- shipping pine cones "with the nuts still in their shells". Despicable!   Slaght: The global demand is making this harvest unsustainable. The entire Korean pine ecosystem (located in Russia) could collapse if it continues.   Analysis: And exactly what observable scientific evidence of this "ecosystem collapse" can you provide for us, Mr. "biologist"?   Slaght: We are already seeing the cracks appearing: The shortage of pine nuts in the forests may have contributed to recent incidents of starving bears roaming the streets — and even attacking residents — in Luchegorsk, a Russian town near the Chinese border.   Analysis: Lions and tigers and "starving bears in the streets" -- Oh my! Mamma Mia! Ban pesto sauce, now!   Slaght: The Korean (Russian) pine nut pesto you eat today thus carries with it an unseen cost that could shatter an ecosystem bottom to top, seedling to tree, and chipmunk to tiger.   Analysis: Oh no! Not the chipmunks too! This is really serious.   Even the chipmunks and Tony the Tiger are not safe from Putin's pesto poachers! Have you no sense of decency, Mr. Putin?   Slaght: For those who feel that it’s the combination of roasted nuts and fresh basil that gives pesto its unique flavor and texture, walnuts, cashews, pistachios and even almonds are all palate-pleasing alternatives. Or if you must have pine nuts, then one option is to buy local.   Analysis: In other words, pine nuts are still OK to eat, just not the ecosystem-busting ones that come from Russia. Cue up Church Lady in 3...2...1...       Slaght: The other possibility is simply to leave the pine nuts out. Cookbooks and websites are rife with pine-nut-free recipes. Ask yourself: Is a nutty pesto really worth risking a priceless ecosystem?   Translation: Save the planet. Boycott Russia.   Closing line: Jonathan C. Slaght is the projects manager for the Russia program of the Wildlife Conservation Society. Analysis: From the website of Slaght's Wildlife Conservation Society: "We apply our science to discover how best to limit the impacts of climate change on ecosystems, wildlife, and people, increasing resilience and providing insurance against a rapidly changing world." Enough said.  *****   Pardon the corny pun, but Sulzberger's anti-Russian obsession is getting "nuttier" by the day. It's time for this cook to switch back to pine nut based pesto sauce-- regardless of the cost!         Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that pine nut harvesting in far eastern Russia caused a hungry bear to eat someone.   Boobus Americanus 2:  Crazy things happen when delicate ecosystems are disrupted.   ***     "Daddy; do they make pessto cat food?"   (No Sugar, but I'll be sure to mix some pine nuts in with your salmon.)     *      Q3 is ready! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT!----QUARTER 3 -- Starring 'Sugar!' Available at Amazon

MONDAY / OCTOBER 19, 2015

REBUTTAL BY The "I" in BRICS (Brazil - Russia - India - China - South Africa) has just been hit with "spontaneous" protests - triggered by "dissident" writers concerned about "human rights abuses" in Prime Minister Narendra Modi's Nationalist India.  “Dissenters now live in fear and uncertainty.”, whines novelist Nayantara Sahgal.   “Violent retrogressive forces are dictating terms in the field of literature and culture.” alleges short-story writer G. S. Bhullar.   “(I protest against ) the attacks on rationalists.”, moans poet Mandakranta Sen.   If these 35 liberal "intellectuals" are actually under threat of physical attack by Modi's Indian Nationalists; would they really be so "brave" as to further provoke their tormentors with a public stunt to be plastered across the front page of Sulzberger's Slimes? This sounds very much like the boastful "bravery" of the small handful of Russian "dissidents" who never seem to have any fear at all when publicly bashing "tyrannical" Russia -- while in Russia itself!   The cause of Sulzberger's steadily growing animosity towards India is linked to the developing giant's growing defiance of the NWO Globalists. As it is in Russia and China, economic and cultural conservatism is back in fashion -- and the Leftist degenerates of India don't like it.     The New York-based Globalist Ford Foundation has been playing its wicked game of promoting "human rights" in India for many years.  Subversive "NGO's" (Non-Governmental Organizations) and their Indian agents / sympathizers are now under attack in India.   Standing in stark contradiction to the predictable narrative that India's 15% Muslim minority is now being "persecuted" by Modi's Hindu Nationalists, is the fact that many Muslims (perhaps as many as half of them) voted for the Hindu Modi! (here) Nonetheless, it is very thoughtful and touching of Zionist Sulzberger to suddenly care about Muslims so much. (rolling eyes)   The article describes the liberal temper tantrum: "With each passing day of silence from Mr. Modi (regarding the killing of some liberal writer), more writers stepped forward to say they, too, were returning their awards from the academy, also known as Sahitya Akademi." Waaaa! Waaaa! Waaaa! Why is it Modi's role to make a spectacle of condemning the killing of some writer (assuming the murder wasn't a false-flag of some sort)? Doesn't it go without saying that all murders are wrong? The following excerpt is good for a smile and a laugh: At least a dozen more writers have joined since Monday, when right-wing Hindu activists in Mumbai smeared black paint on the face of Sudheendra Kulkarni, a think tank leader, for agreeing to host an event for a book for a former Pakistani foreign minister." The term "think-tank leader" is Globalese for CIA-NGO traitor -- so, this facial paint-job, if true, is actually wonderful news! By the way, Kulkarni was once a member of India's Communist Party.   This is how NGO liberals should be treated. Or was the Al Jolsonization of Kulkarni actually a staged stunt to make Nationalists look bad? Wash your face and stop looking for sympathy, dude!   In a Facebook post, Modi’s finance minister ridiculed the writer protests as sour grapes by leftist writers reeling from “the shrinking fortunes” of their traditional government patrons, the Indian National Congress and the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. “A few questions to the protesters: How many of them courted arrest, protested or raised their voice against the dictatorship of Mrs. Indira Gandhi during the emergency? “With an insignificant Left lacking legislative relevance, the recipients of past patronage are now resorting to ‘politics by other means. The manufactured protest of the writers is one such case."   Naturally, the liberal writers scoff at the idea that their protests have a hidden political motive. But the fact remains, any Prime Minister who is pissing off "think tanks", "dissidents" and Sulzberger's Slimes - to the extent that Modi is - has got to be doing something right!   Namaste Mr, Modi!      1- Sending a message: Indian military units were invited to march in Moscow's Victory Day parade. 2 & 3 - Like Putin of Russia and Jinping of China, the conservative Narendra Modi is traditionalist, nationalist and pro-business. Good news for India. Bad news for the Globalists.   *   Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that Indian Nationalists are harassing intellectuals.   Boobus Americanus 2:  India is starting to act just like Russia and China.   ***     "Harasssing ain't enough! They sshould hang thesse liberalss!"   (Wasn't the blackfacing enough for you?)   *      Q3 is ready! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT!----QUARTER 3 -- Starring 'Sugar!' Available at Amazon

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 15, 2015

REBUTTAL BY   For today's rebuttal, we cross the Hudson River back into our home state of New Jersey to address a story appearing only in the widely-read Newark Star Ledger - owned by the Newhouse Family (cough-cough). This piece was simply too good (or bad) to pass up. The only reason that Sulzberger's Slimes didn't pick up on it is because Jersey Governor Chris 'Crispy Creme' Christie is no longer a serious political contender to win the QFS (Quadrennial Freak Show). Though the Jersey Fatboy is a total non-entity at this point; his recent blustering about "taking on Russia" is cause for concern for what it reveals to us.    The fact that a desperate bottom-tier candidate would suddenly issue such highly provocative anti-Russian threats - before a TV audience (FOX) which, for the most part, really doesn't care too much what Putin is doing Syria - is very telling. Truth be told, many of the Republicans who do care about foreign policy are actually cheering for Russia against ISIS!   So, if not to the voting public, then to what audience is this ogre of obesity playing to with his vile anti-Putinism? Answer: The anti-Putin Zionist Mega-Donors of the GOP and the anti-Putin Marxist Moguls of the Piranha Press - that's who!    Christie's saber-rattling is intended to convince Putin-hating scum such as Adelson and Sulzberger to resurrect his dormant campaign.    Chris Crisco's ambition is as boundless as his waistline. Indeed, it was his enthusiastic service to the coverup of the 9/11 false-flag attacks that launched his meteoric rise -- first in New Jersey, and then nationally. In 2003, as a U.S. Attorney in Newark, blubber-boy threatened a local NJ Sheriff who uncovered a plot in which a check cashing store (Sphinx Trading) provided the fake ID's for two of the 9/11 "hijackers". From the Huffington Post:   "Christie, who reminded Republicans during the debate that he'd been appointed by President Bush the day before 9/11, went so far in '03 as to actually threaten to arrest that Passaic County sheriff (whose office uncovered the fake ID scandal) and "shut down" his department. Such was the embarrassment to the FBI that Christie seemed bent on protecting -- despite the massive counter terrorism failure that the ID lapse revealed."   (here)   (Christie wasn't protecting "the embarrassment to the FBI", of course. He was protecting the real perps behind 9/11!)     Sheriff Jerry Speziale was onto to something regarding fake ID's and 9/11. U.S. Attorney Christie then stopped him cold and threatened to have him arrested! A few years later, the previously unknown attorney who had never held political office was puffed-up (literally and metaphorically) for NJ Governor. Evil bastard!   Now, back to the Star Ledger article and the comments of Christie the Corpulent:   Star-Ledger: Speaking on Fox News, Christie said the first thing he would do in Syria would be to "call Putin, and tell him, 'Listen, we're enforcing a no-fly zone against everyone, and that includes you, so: Don't test me.'   Analysis: Hey lard-ass. Isn't it Syria's business to determine who can and cannot fly over its airspace? By what authority would you declare and enforce this "no-fly" zone.   Star-Ledger: And then he flies through your territory?" asked host Martha MacCallum. "You take him down," Christie answered, without hesitation. "You shoot him down?" asked MacCallum. "Yes, you do," Christie said. Analysis: Tubby the Terrible is telegraphing to "the powers that be" that if they resurrect his dead candidacy, he will hand them World War III on a silver platter -- after he has eaten all the entrees from it, of course. Star-Ledger: MacCallum followed up, saying that such bellicose action could bring the United States "back into, not even a Cold War, a hot war. ... Are you prepared to do that? "I'm not prepared to allow Russia to bring communist domination back to the world...". It's about choices. ... It's not just about what are you willing or unwilling to do. It's about what are you willing to permit to have happen. We spent untold American treasure and blood to eliminate the Soviet Union. We should not let it come back." Analysis: Communist world domination? The return of the Soviet Union?     1- Stay strong, Mr. Putin. Have a shot of vodka or two -- we'll take care of Lardo. 2-  If Crisco Christie is so concerned about "Communism", then why did he pump up Red Obongo (for his "great job" on Hurricane Sandy) just days before the 2012 re-election?   Analysis (con't): One might be tempted to say that Fatboy needs a lobotomy to go along with that 'on-the-down-low' stomach surgery he had done two years ago -- but the rotund Republican't isn't stupid. Like recently-announced Putin haters Ben Carson and Carly Fiorina, the hideous hippo is cunning -- very cunning.   Star-Ledger: As to how to confront ISIS, Christie said that when it comes to committing U.S. ground forces, "if we have to, we will. ----- Putin has no interest in taking on ISIS," Christie said. "Putin wants to prop up Assad and take down Syrian rebels." Analysis: More telegraphing from Crispy Creme. U.S. troops on the ground in Syria, coupled with a no-fly zone in the air, would surely lead to a U.S. vs Russia/Iran battles on land, sea and air.  "Pick me Mr. Adelson. Pick me!"     *****        November, 1935, (4 years before WW 2): With the world at peace and many prominent people openly admiring Adolf Hitler, Winston Churchill auditioned for the Jewish warmongers by writing an article in Strand Magazine. In the piece, Churchill is forced to acknowledge Hitler's great accomplishments and even praises him. But he also drops a 'poison pill' by writing that it was not yet clear whether Hitler would turn out to be "a monster or a hero". (here)   The veiled hit-piece marked the beginning of Churchill's Zionist-assisted comeback from the political graveyard -- culminating with him eventually becoming Prime Minister.      ************   The masters of the neo-con Jewniverse have plenty of trained warhorses in their stable. They don't need to put up someone who was damaged by a bad scandal (Crispy Creme deliberately caused traffic jams near the George Washington Bridge in order to punish a local Mayor). It is doubtful that Elephant Boy's campaign will ever be resurrected. He's done. Unfortunately, the blood-thirsty "elite" scum that he is pandering to are, sad to say, alive, well and still squeezing America by its balls.     Degrading himself and his office on late night TV wasn't enough to overcome his "Bridegate" scandal. So now the super ambitious human butter ball has turned to advocating for World War III. *   Boobus Americanus 1: Chris Christie said he would shoot down Russian jets in Syria.   Boobus Americanus 2:  How foolish of him to say that! Voters don't want to go to war with Russia.    ***       "Voterss may not want war Boobuss, but ssince when do they matter?"   (As astute as you are cute!)   *      Q3 is ready! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT!----QUARTER 3 -- Starring 'Sugar!' Available at Amazon

WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 14, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Much like the never-ending search for the elusive "missing link", the quixotic quest to pinpoint "the gay gene" has become as lucrative as it is foolish. Like their evolutionist colleagues, "gay gene" hunters have had to twist irrelevant observations about other life forms in order to make something out of nothing. In the tenuous tradition of Darwin's finches, peppered moths and "super-rats", the science section of Sulzberger's Slimes now brings you, gay worms -- faggot maggots, if you will.   Now, just to be clear and honest here, the piece itself does not link the genetic findings about worms to any human "gay gene". But the not-so-hidden insinuation of this "research" should be obvious to the astute reader. Trust us -- much like the NFL's mandatory wearin' of the pink during October "Breast Cancer Awareness Month" has nothing to do with "raising awareness" for breast cancer; this study and article on worms has nothing to do with scientific discovery. Nobody cares about worms!       Subtle subversion: The new tradition of Pink October is all about de-masculinization and homosexualization.   A goofy bit of gobbledey-gook from the story: "A new study reports that a variation in a single gene results in male worms with excretory pores that attract the sexual attentions of other males. 'Other males copulate with this excretory pore, located on the neck,' said Matthew Rockman, a biologist at New York University. Researchers report that the gene variant, known as plep-1, may somehow be altering the chemical profile of the excretions in a way that makes them more attractive to other males. Copulation often does not work out well for the male that is approached, Dr. Rockman said. Males that mate with the excretory pore of another male usually leave behind a plug that weakens the worm and reduces life expectancy. Next, the researchers want to learn what it is about a mutation in the plep-1 gene that makes males attractive to other males."   "Baby -- I was born this way!" . Before you accuse The Anti-New York Times of jumping to hasty conclusions in regard to the true motive of Dr. Rockman's "research" and Sulzberger's publishing of this article; consider this excerpt from an article in Science Daily, about the same study, confirming our suspicions: "Rockman and his colleagues were intrigued based on a general interest in understanding how and why individuals differ from one another when it comes to sexual behaviors, as well as other traits. They went in search of the genes responsible for male-male mating in the worms."   In other words, they are twisting and bending facts relating to certain reproductive oddities of worms in order to manufacture a politically correct theory which will normalize homosexuality. Not other primates, mind you, nor even other mammals, no -- frickin' worms! Can you smell an IgNobel Science Prize cooking? All that Rockhead and friends need to do now is concoct a tenuous link between worm and human genetics - maybe take a cheap shot or two at Vladimir Putin - and it's Sweden, here we come!   Again, Dr. Rockhead has not stated that the sex practices of his little lab worms suggest that there is a "gay gene" in humans. No. That would be much too drastic of a statement to issue at this "early stage" of the "scientific process". But we all know where this "science" will eventually end up, don't we?     Although Rockhead (above) did not directly state (yet!) that his worm study suggests that there may be a "gay gene" in humans; his research - even if legitimate - will surely be used to help build the fraudulent case.   *   Boobus Americanus 1: I read about a fascinating study in the New York Times today. Evidently, certain species of male worms possess a gene that causes them to be attracted to other males.   Boobus Americanus 2:  That's amazing! Once scientists finally succeed in isolating the gay gene, the homophobes will be silenced for good.   ***       "Ewwww. A queer worm!"   (We had better get your stool checked, Sugar. But don't worry; he won't multiply.)   *      Q3 is ready! COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT!----QUARTER 3 -- Starring 'Sugar!' Available at Amazon

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 13, 2015

REBUTTAL BY It is long past time for Russia to take a page out of China's book and expel the foreign-based correspondents of Sulzberger's Slimes once and for all. Slandering scum such as Andrew Kramer (cough cough) are not there to report news. They are there to wage propaganda war - nothing else. Reporting from Moscow, about the Presidential elections just completed in nearby Putin-friendly sister state of Belarus, Kramer's crap about the latest allegations of "voter fraud" serves as the latest example of The Slimes' childish anti-Putin / anti-anyone who gets along with Putin hysteria. Time for a bit of truth polishing -- starting with the photo:     Return of the Red Scare?     The Slimes has a long history of publishing CIA propaganda photos. A recent example was the "iconic" image of the drowned "migrant" child -- the one who washed up on shore feet first -- which triggered the opening of the floodgates into Europe. The above photo of the three "soldiers" all pulling aside red curtains as they exit their respective red voting booths, at the same exact moment, just reeks of NGO-CIA stage management. The unspoken but powerful message is that Belarus is a throwback Stalinist military state infested with soldiers in the streets. Many a New York libtard will surely soil his pink panties at the site of these Halloween pranksters in camouflage. Now, let's examine the text:  ***** Kramer:  Aleksandr G. Lukashenko, the authoritarian president of Belarus,  Analysis: The "authoritarian" President? How so? Belarus has a bi-cameral Parliament with 174 members, does it not? Kramer: ... who suffered the indignity last week of seeing one of his sharpest critics win the Nobel Prize in Literature, won a prize of his own on Sunday: the presidency of Belarus,... Analysis: If he is so "authoritarian", then why does he allow "one of his sharpest critics" to openly attack him? So, we were right in concluding that Ms. Alexievich's Nobel Prize was linked to a political stunt! Kramer:  ... though that outcome had never been in doubt. Analysis: Because Lukashenko is very popular. Kramer: Mr. Lukashenko, a former collective farm director.. Analysis: Yes, a former commie -- blah, blah, blah. But today's Belarus is much more market-oriented that it was during Soviet days. The remnant Communist mini-minority of Belarus actually opposes Lukashenko. So why even bring up this irrelevant nonsense about Lukashenko having once been a "collective farm director"? Kramer: ..who has led Belarus for 21 years, got nearly 83.5 percent of the vote, the Central Election Commission reported late Sunday. Analysis: Who bloody cares how long he has led Belarus if that's what the people have voted for? He is generally popular at home. So mind your damn business, Kramer. Guardian (London) / August 14, 2014 Lukashenko's Popularity in Belarus on the Rise "The popularity of the Belarusian president, Alexander Lukashenko, has increased since the start of the Ukrainian crisis, a survey found, as voters show their appreciation for stability in their country."  (here)     Hockey buddies -- brotherly relations among two brotherly nations --- driving The Slimes nuts! . Kramer: Analysts of the country’s political system said the results, like those of many elections in the old Soviet Union, had been determined long before voters marked their ballots. Analysis: What "analysts" say this? Name them and cite the evidence of "Soviet" style voter fraud. Kramer: The election, in fact, would not have drawn much attention but for the announcement on Thursday that Svetlana Alexievich, a Belarussian journalist and nonfiction writer, had won the Nobel Prize. She has long been a prominent critic of Soviet and post-Soviet governments, including the one in Belarus.   Analysis: To which, we would add -- the awarding of the Nobel Prize to that lying wench "in fact, would not have drawn much attention but for the announcement" of her victory all over the front page of The Slimes, and the echoing provided by the rest of the Piranha Press. Kramer: Speaking to reporters in Berlin on Saturday, Ms. Alexievich, who has spent periods of her life in exile, described Sunday’s election as a rigged contest that Mr. Lukashenko was sure to win, as always. Analysis: Will Mr. Kramer and Ms. Alexievich kindly cite evidence that this election was "rigged"? Kramer: “No one doubts that Lukashenko will win,” she said. “To paraphrase Stalin, it’s unimportant who votes for whom; what matters is who counts the vote. I don’t think we can expect any surprises.” Analysis: Stalin, eh? Nice smear job, bitch. But again, Mr. Kramer and Ms. Alexievich, we request:  Kindly cite any evidence that this election was "rigged". Do it now!   Lying liberal libelers Kramer and Alexievich: Plenty of accusations --- not a trace of hard data to back them up with.   Kramer: Ms. Alexievich, who was awarded the Nobel for her sweeping nonfiction works about events like the Soviet-Afghan war and the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, also described Russia as a place where “one can no longer speak of democracy” and “where ‘liberal’ is a dirty word.” Analysis: If modern Russia is indeed "a place where 'liberal' is a dirty word" -- then send me a one way ticket, baby! Kramer: Although citizens are not required to vote, the government offers free doughnuts at polling stations to draw crowds. Analysis: Wait a second! If the "authoritarian" Lukashenko is actually so unpopular that the elections have to be rigged in his favor, wouldn't the government be trying to suppress voter turnout? Kramer: About 30 percent of registered voters cast ballots in early absentee voting, a practice often criticized by election observers for offering opportunities for fraud. Analysis: That's true -- but here in America, any word of warning against early absentee voting is always dismissed by The Slimes as "racist". Something to think about, Kramer. Kramer:  The largest observer mission monitoring the vote, with 397 members, arrived from an organization of former Soviet states ... Analysis: Dadgummit! Can we knock it off already with the constant references to Stalin and the long defunct "Soviets", please?! It is getting to be almost as annoying as Hitler references (blessed be his name). Ironically, when Stalin was alive, the seditious scribblers at Sulzberger's Slimes puffed him up as really great guy, even before World War II! What Con-Man Kramer neglects to mention is that there were an additional 500 observers from nations that were not "former Soviet states." (here) Their final verdict? The elections were fair and valid. (here) Kramer: ... its observers invariably approve one another’s elections. Analysis: Hey Kramer! Could it be "its observers invariably approve one another’s elections" because those elections are "invariably" valid? Ever think of that?  ***** And with that, Kramer's latest piece of propaganda poop closes without having offered the reader so much as a single piece of even circumstantial evidence to support the allegation of an election having been stolen. Not one! Typical -- just another day at the office for the silly slanderers of Sulzberger's Slimes.      Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the elections in Belarus were rigged in favor of a Putin stooge.   Boobus Americanus 2:  Wow! There was a Nobel Prize winning writer from Belarus who just the other day was warning us about Belarus.   ***       "Sssay it with me, Church Lady!"   (Church Lady, you have no idea what a little devil you are partnering with.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

MONDAY / OCTOBER 12, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Masquerading as investigative journalism, this ugly, and we do mean ugly piece of class-warfare propaganda dominated the Sunday front page. Both the graphics and the prose are intended to leave the unwitting readers with the impression that a bunch of old rich White Republican families, worried about the diverse little people represented by the oh-so-caring Democrat Party, are out to conspiratorially dominate American politics and keep the uppity 'proles' poor and hungry. Though the names of Tribesmen Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg and George Soros are listed in the piece, no distinction is made between the Whites and the numerous Jews on the big donor list. Hence, the disproportionate number of Jewish string-pullers just blend in with the rich old "overwhelmingly White" guys. Shockingly (even by the low standards of The Slimes) a series of intrusivly detailed Google Earth images of the palatial homes of eight Houston area donor families are featured in the piece -- along with a street map showing exactly where they live! All eight are non-Jews, presumably Establishment or conservative Republicans (Hildebrand, Nau, Sarofim (Arab), McNair, Flores, Ansary (Iranian), Kinder, Krohn). Clearly, the evil intent of Sulzberger's Slimes is to "name & shame", and perhaps even frighten, these Texas families.   1- 138 Republican Families / 20 Democrat Families   2- The front page map and home photos take you right to the front doors of eight Houston Republicans!    *  . As if they were criminals that needed to be exposed; the whole world now knows where the Hildebrand (1) and McNair families (5) live. Did anyone at The Slimes seek their consent before plastering their private homes and streets all over the front page of the nation's foremost newspaper? As if the Sulzberger family live in a shack or something?   The anti-White Marxist Slimes can manipulate the early election cycle statistics all they want; but in the final analysis, big donors, though an important element of the QFS (Quanrennial Freak Show), can neither win elections nor drive public policies. Ultimately, it is media families that do that! A single cover shot on Slime or Sheeple Magazine; or a puff-piece on 60 Minutes; or an appearance on MTV; or a front-page viral love letter from Sulzberger's Slimes, the Washington Compost or the Wall Street Urinal, are worth more money to any candidate or political party than any single "funding family" or group of families could ever put together.   The tsunami of highly positive, FREE 'prime-time' publicity that the owners of the Piranha Press gave to Mr. and Mr. Obongo in 2008 & 2012 was worth BILLIONS of dollars -- far more than what any rich group of "White" families could ever donate.   And just who exactly are the first families of the Piranha Press? To paraphrase the opening line of this piece: They are "overwhelmingly" Jewish, rich, older and male. Let's meet a few of these mighty media moguls: Sulzberger-Ochs: Owners of the Jew York Slimes since 1896 Andrew Rosenthal: Editorial Page Editor of The Slimes Meyer-Graham: Owners of the Washington Compost since 1933 (sold to non-Jew Jeff Bezos in 2013) Martin Baron: Editor of the Washington Compost Sumner Redstone: Majority owner and Chairman of Viacom (which owns CBS, MTV, VH 1, Nickelodeon, BET, Paramount Pictures) Jeff Zucker: President of CNN Worldwide James Goldston: President of ABC News Barry Diller (IAC) and Estate of Sidney Harman: Owners of Newsweek / Daily Beast (Internet) Scott Greenstein: President and chief content officer of Sirius XM Radio     Sumner Redstone (born, Rothstein), Arthur Ochs-Sulzberger, Jeff Zucker   Some more: Andrew Lack: President of NBC News Brian Roberts: CEO of Comcast Leslie Moonves: Chairman & CEO of CBS Larry Kramer: President of USA Today Paula Kerger: President and CEO of PBS Mike Bloomberg: Bloomberg News and Businessweek Newhouse Family: Advance Publications (which own Parade Magazine, Newark Star Ledger, Jersey Journal, Birmingham News, Cleveland Plain Dealer, New Orleans Times & Picayune, Trenton Times, Portland Oregonian, GQ, Glamour, Vogue, The New Yorker and numerous other newspapers and cable TV stations.)  Mort Zuckerman: Owner of NY Daily News and US News & World Report Eddie Hartenstein: Chairman of Tribune Publishing (which owns the Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, Baltimore Sun, San Diego Union Tribune, Hartford Courant, Orlando Sentinel and numerous other newspapers)   Andy Lack, Mort Zuckerman, Sam Newhouse   The cash value of the targeted mass propaganda that these 'heavy hitters' of news and entertainment media can and do disseminate to the American public dwarfs the total cost of the 30 second TV ads and mailers which candidates need to raise money for. And there are plenty more lesser players that we can add to that list of kosher con men (Barbara Walters, Chris Wallace, Morley Safer, Wolf Blitzer, Dana Bash, Gloria Borger, John King, Paul Krugman, David Brooks, Tom Friedman, Bill Kristol, Dorothy Rabinowitz, Charles Krauthammer, Alan Colmes, Michael Kinsley, Carl Bernstein, Geraldo Rivera (1/2), Amy Goodman, Dennis Prager, Michael Medved, Matt Drudge, Mark Levin et al). Then, of course, there is all that AIPAC (Israel Lobby) money pouring into Congressional coffers year in and year out. Many a Congressmen has peed his pants when "The Lobby" came a knockin'. But let's get all breathless and worked-up over a handful of insignificant Texas businessmen chipping in a few hundred thousand bucks each (worthless chump change in the grand scheme of things) for Political Action Committees linked to the Republican't Party. Ridiculous! The criminal Zionist media and its death grip upon the American mind must be smoked-out for all the world to see. But who will do the exposing when the 'exposing machine' is owned and operated by the kosher criminal cabal itself? Therein lies the entire essence of our pathetic predicament. And it has been a big problem for a long, long time.    Adolph Ochs  NY Times Eugene Meyers Washington Post David Sarnoff NBC Radio William Paley (Paloff) CBS Radio   1941: A CLEAN SWEEP!  With World War II raging in Europe, four Jewish Mega-Giants control 'neutral' America's national media. Will Zionist-Marxist media manipulation soon drag America into World War III?     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that a small group of rich White families account for most of the political donations, mainly to Republicans.   Boobus Americanus 2:  That doesn't surprise me. In spite of our growing diversity, America is still run by WASPs.    ***       "WASsP'ss my assss! It's the $#@*&^%$#@!"   (Sugar, that type of blanket generalization is totally uncalled for -- as is the salty language.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

SATURDAY / OCTOBER 10, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Alhough the Globalist CIA agents who almost always win the "prestigious" Nobel Peace Prize are instantly puffed-up on the front page of Sulzberger's Slimes; Nobel Laureates in the scientific or literary fields are generally confined to the inner pages. This is not the case with this year's Literature winner - Svetlana Alexievich of Belarussia (sister state of Russia). Far from being back-paged, Ms. Alexievich is prominently plastered smack-dab in the center of the all-important front page. News of her victory has also been prominently mentioned by the TV talking heads of America and vassaled Europe. This is unusual for two reasons. First of all, she's not an American. Why such hype over a Belarussian?       Secondly, her works are not even widely read in English - the de facto "international language". So, what's up with the sudden shout-out for Sveltana? Moreover, why was the Nobel Prize for Literature even awarded to a non-fiction writer in the first place? That hasn't happened in 50 years! The astute and discerning real intellectuals who read The Anti-New York Times will have already deduced a theory behind the unusual and overnight hyping of the previously unknown Ms. Alexievich. Excerpts from the article itself will serve to confirm those suspicions - as they did for your rat-smelling reporter and his rat-killing feline sidekick here. Check out these excerpts, and our analysis: Excerpt: Ms. Alexievich often took risks by taking on contentious elements of Soviet history and challenging the official narrative. Analysis: Well, the old Soviets were not exactly choir boys. Criticizing the old regime doesn't necessarily make her a traitor.  Excerpt: She was seen as a traitor, as unpatriotic,” said Gerald Howard, the executive editor at Doubleday. He published Ms. Alexievich’s book “Zinky Boys: Soviet Voices From a Forgotten War,” about the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and the trauma experienced by the Russian soldiers and their families. The title refers to the zinc coffins that dead Russian soldiers were sent home in. “She was vilified all over the place for this book,” he said, “and she didn’t back down for a second." Analysis: Red flag! Alarm bells! In 1979. the Soviets were baited into Afghanistan after a CIA rent-an-army overthrew a non-aligned government and set up a hostile regime on Russia's border. This is not to defend the old USSR, but any Soviet writer who cast blame on their own country for the Jimmy Carter-Zbig Brzezinski proxy war in Afghanistan, was, in fact, a traitor to her country.   Instead of blaming Brzezinski and the Globalists for the suffering caused by the proxy Afghan War against Russia, seditious Svetlana blamed her own country. Excerpt: Because of her criticism of the government in Belarus, a former Soviet republic, Ms. Alexievich has periodically lived abroad, in Italy, France, Germany and Sweden, among other places. Analysis: So, long after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, this bitch is still a causing trouble by criticizing the Putin-friendly government of Belarus. Interesting. Excerpt:  In a 2013 interview with German television, she said she hoped the international attention would give her “a degree of protection” in Belarus, where press freedom is under constant threat. Analysis: Ah, yes. The old "freedom of the press" and "human rights" routine. Excerpt: "The scope and consistency of her project is unique — the sheer number of people whose stories she’s been able to record,” the writer Keith Gessen, who translated her book about Chernobyl into English, said in an email. Analysis: Keith Gessen  (cough-cough) translated one of her books? Gessen? He wouldn't perhaps be related to Masha Gessen -- the militant lesbian author of a best-selling anti-Putin book who openly stated that she wants to abolish the institution of marriage and traditional family. Nah. It's just a coincidence. But just in case, let us Google: 'Keith Gessen'. Result: Wikipedia: Russian-born American novelist --- Harvard --- Sibling: Masha Gessen Preach it, Church Lady -- preach it! Sleazy Svetlana's translator just happens to be the brother of the wicked Putin-hating Masha Gessen (Keith & Masha in Image 2).   Excerpt: Some see an obvious political message in the Nobel committee’s choice. Ms. Alexievich’s honor arrives at a moment when Russia is once again flexing its military muscles, in Ukraine and in Syria. In choosing Ms. Alexievich, the Swedish committee continued a long tradition of using the award to tweak Soviet and now post-Soviet authority. Analysis: Bingo! Excerpt: On Thursday, Belarus’s President, Aleksandr G. Lukashenko, who has been a frequent target of Ms. Alexievich’s writing, issued a terse congratulatory note. Analysis: Double Bingo! The Globalists hate President Lukashenko almost as much as they do President Putin. Excerpt: At a news conference after her award was announced, Ms. Alexievich pointedly referred to Russia’s actions in Ukraine as “occupation.” Analysis: "Here's your Nobel Prize -- and your check for $972,000 (here)--- now do your thing, baby!"  1 - Lukashenko and Putin -- both targets of Svetlana's poison pen and big mouth. 2 & 3 - Subversion pays nicely, eh Svetlana?   Excerpt: The spokesman for President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, Dmitri S. Peskov, dismissed Ms. Alexievich’s critique of Russian military aggression.  “Apparently, Svetlana just doesn’t have enough information to offer a clear evaluation of what is happening in Ukraine.” Analysis: Oh we beg to differ on that, Mr. Peskov. Diplomacy may preclude you from saying so, but not us. This vile villainette, this traitorous tramp, this betraying bitch, has all the information -- as do the sleazy scribblers of Sulzberger's Slimes. * This anti Putin, anti-Russian obsession is really getting more and more ridiculous by the hour -- and more and more ominous as well.     Boobus Americanus 1: A Belarussian woman was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature.   Boobus Americanus 2: I saw that. She took a shot at Putin during her news conference. Brave woman.   ***       "Bravery hass nothing to do with it, cretin! It wass a frickin' sset up!"   (I'm afraid the conspiracy cat is right again.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 9, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Loretta Lynch Mob, aka Al Sharpton in Drag, is preparing to release roughly 6,000 ostensibly "non-violent" inmates from federal prisons starting at the end of this month. The release of these soon-to-be Democrat voters will be one of the largest Federal discharge of inmates in American history. It coincides with a "bipartisan" and Papal effort to ease the mass incarcerations that followed years of strict sentencing for drug offenses — such as dealing crack cocaine. “Today’s announcement is nothing short of thrilling because it carries justice,” said Jesselyn McCurdy, a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).   “Far too many people have lost years of their lives to draconian sentencing laws born of the failed drug war. People of color have had to bear the brunt of these misguided and cruel policies." About a third of the inmates are illegal aliens who, we are told, will be deported -- and most likely return to some "sanctuary city" in Commiefornia. The sentence reductions would be retroactive if the legislation is enacted, and lawmakers estimated that up to 6,500 other prisoners — many of them charged with offenses related to crack cocaine — could qualify for resentencing under the changes. As we wrote last month: "The unseen danger of this 'turn-em-loose' initiative lies in what it might grow into. Beyond the approximately 12,000 federal prisoners serving excessive sentences for drug crimes, there are much larger numbers of inmates in state and local prisons who, by the same standards, should also be liberated. That would add up to about 500,000 prisoners that could, theoretically, be turned loose if new sentencing guidelines are retroactively enacted by Obongo and the Republican't Congress."   1- The cunning and cold-hearted Demonoid Obongo surely wants something in return from these prisoners. 2- Rabbi Pope Frankie's disgraceful jailhouse foot-wash & kiss routine coincides with the sudden push for an open door prison policy.   The essence of the scam here is that many of these prisoners only appear to have been excessively punished. The dirty little secret that Sulzberger the Seditious and Obongo the Merciful know, but won't tell you, is that many of these "excessive sentences" were actually the result of law enforcement officials using whatever means necessary to take some very dangerous actors off of the streets, including suspected murderers. Just like the brutal but evasive gangster Al Capone was finally jailed for the relatively minor offense of "tax invasion", so too were some of the 500,000 "non-violent" prisoners that could be set free if Obongo's logic plays out fully.   The potential prospect of 100's of 1000's unemployable Black men suddenly being set free and cared for by America's Phony Pharaoh is chilling indeed. From their loyal ranks, the Big Zero's Black right hand man who runs Homeland Security, Jeh Johnson, could secretly recruit and train an ISIS type army of cutthroats. Even if just 100,000 of the 500,000 have violent inclinations, imagine what type of organized havoc they could wreak at the behest of the Demon in the White House.     The openly Communist activists from the Ferguson, MO "Black Lives Matter" protest of 2014 chanted: "Won’t Be No Police Brutality, When the Revolution Comes. Won’t Be No Mass Incarceration, When the Revolution Comes." We know for a fact that some harmless prisoners will soon be released. We also know for a fact that some real bad-assess will be released as well. But here are a few non-violent offenders who most certainly will not be released early from any prison - be it Federal or State: Income Tax "evaders" Men who fell behind on ex-wife extortion child support payments Violators of EPA "Clean Air" regulations that are based on phony science Violators of unconstitutional gun laws Foolish pranksters who aimed harmless laser pointers at airplanes   Evidently, some "crimes" are less worthy of "mercy" than others.   1 & 2- Non-violent 88-year old tax protester Irwin Schiff (Peter's father) -- still in prison for "tax evasion". Neither Obongo, the Fake Pope, nor the ACLU seem to care about "tax evaders" -- an "offense" that has been decriminalized in "tyrannical" Russia (remedied by fines instead of prison). 3- The annoyance of aerial laser-pointing can be remedied and punished with hefty fines and/or community service. One to five year prison sentences amount to cruel and unusual punishment. One California man was sentenced to 14 years in prison! (here) *     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times that Obama is going to release a bunch of non-violent prisoners.   Boobus Americanus 2: That a very gracious act on his part. Bravo Barack Obama ---- I just hope they don't place them in my neighborhood on some Section 8 free rent deal.   ***       "I PRAY that one of these animalss moves in nexsst-door to you -- you frickin' libtard hypocrite!"   (So says the former violent street cat  that I bailed out of a shelter and domesticated -- some what domesticated, that is.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 8, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Be neither afraid nor impressed by all the smoke and noise of the Not-So-High and Not-So-Mighty "Editorial Board". It's only a pathetic little word-smith named Andrew Rosenthal typing out lies from behind the curtain. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": Why President Vladimir Putin is sending “volunteer” ground forces into Syria is not entirely clear. Analysis:  Liar. Liar. Yarmulke on fire! Putin is not sending ground forces into Syria.Why would Putin use his own men when there are more than enough Syrian soldiers and Hezbollah warriors to finish the job -- a job now made much easier due to Russian airstrikes. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": ... it may be because Russia’s Syrian ally, President Bashar al-Assad, is in such danger of falling that Russian ground troops will actually enter the fray against the innumerable insurgent groups fighting him. Analysis: Keep dreaming Rosenrat. Not only is Assad not in any danger of falling, but your beloved rebels are surrendering, dying, or fleeing by the hundreds, if not by the thousands. (here) Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": What is clear is that these “volunteers” are there about as voluntarily as were the Russian soldiers ordered into Crimea or eastern Ukraine. Analysis: My God, Rosenscum! Your evil and deceit is boundless! Russian soldiers were neither "ordered" into Crimea, nor eastern Ukraine. Both regions had their own volunteer National Guard / Self Defense units that self-activated for the purpose of resisting Washington's puppet-thugs of Kiev. For once and for all; present your evidence of any Russian troop "invasions" of Crimea or Donbass. Do it now!   1- The people of Crimea VOLUNTARILY reunited with Russia. ZERO shots fired -- ZERO Russian troops "invading". 2- The Self-Defense Forces of Donbass are better motivated and better trained that the demoralized draftees controlled by Kiev. Russian troops are not needed. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": Russians might want to ask why young Russians are being sent to face mortal danger in the Middle East in service of Mr. Putin’s very dangerous gamble. Analysis: The Russian people don't need to ask anything, Andy. You see, unlike the chumps who worship the "prestigious" Sulzberger's Slimes, the average Russian knows all about the geo-political forces that engineered the tragedy in Syria, and would like to import the same chaos into Russia. That is why more than 90% of Russians support Putin. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": Propping up a flailing ally is only one of Mr. Putin’s probable motives. Analysis: Should Putin simply allow his "flailing ally" to be replaced with a Zionist-Globalist puppet, hostile to Russia? Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": He no doubt wants to flex his muscles (again) before a Russian public increasingly feeling the pain of a mismanaged economy. Analysis: "The pain of a mismanaged economy", eh, Rosenvermin? From Forbes Magazine, October 7, 2015: Russia Turning The Corner On Sanctions Russia has turned the corner --- For investors, this may be a time to start dipping into Russian stocks. (here) Nice try, Rosenfilth.   1- Moscow's business district is humming along nicely. 2- The Russian Far East still lags behind, but is now developing at a steady pace. (Russky Bridge, Vladivostok)   Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board":  ... and to deflect attention from the stalemate in Ukraine.   Analysis: What "stalemate"? Russia is not at war in eastern Ukraine - the Donbass freedom-fighters are. So, how can Russia be "stalemated"? FYI -- it is the puppet-gangster state in Kiev that is teetering on the brink of economic and political collapse. Even the Frumpy Frau of Germany and Horrible Hollande of France are now advocating for the Donbass regions to be allowed to go their own way! (here) Pro-Russian Donbass seems destined to win its independence without Putin having to fire a shot.  Nice try, Rosenslime. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": But he may not be strutting for long. Analysis: Rosenfeces; you are as delusional as you are deceitful. Putin is on a roll and you can't accept it. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": Syria is the proverbial quagmire. Analysis: Correction. Syria (like eastern Ukraine) was intended to be "the proverbial quagmire" -- but it is not going according to Globalist-Zionist plan. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": If the United States and its allies have failed -- to eradicate the Islamic State, it is not only because of the limited effort but also because the tangle of insurgent groups, with their ever-shifting alliances, offer only an array of bad choices. Analysis: The reason that the U.S. has "failed to eradicate the Islamic State" is because it never intended to! The IS, Al Qaeda, and the "moderate" FSA all answer to various factions of the New World Order crime gang -- the same gang that Rosenpuke faithfully serves at a very high level.   The real reasons why the U.S. has "failed to eradicate" the ISIS bogeyman are obvious.     Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": By sending warplanes to bomb rebels, including those the United States has tried to shape into some semblance of an opposition, and now by sending in Russian soldiers, Mr. Putin stands to make matters far more complex. Analysis: "Complex"? Russia bombs the mercenary scum and their weapons; Syrian, Lebanese, Iraqi and Iranian ground forces mop up. What is so "complex" about it? Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": There is no assurance that his move will bring an end to the fighting any sooner. Analysis:  But there is total assurance that the U.S. approach would never bring an end to the fighting. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": If Mr. Putin had ever been eager for peace, he could have exerted pressure on the Assad government before it stoked the civil war that has killed hundreds of thousands of Syrians, driven millions from their homes and destroyed vast stretches of the country. Analysis: Assad "stoked the civil war" - really? Damn dirty lying journalistic criminal! Even the Slimes now openly admits that the CIA financed and trained foreign fighters to wage this "civil war"! The only thing Assad is guilty of is saving his country from a full Axis-of-Evil NWO takeover -- what' left of his country, that is. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": Instead, he supported Mr. Assad and his brutal reprisals against civilians and the opposition, which opened up space for extremists to operate and expand. Analysis: Assad did not carry out "brutal reprisals". The "gassing" story, as even the UN acknowledged, turned out to be fake (here) Nice try, Rosensnake. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": It may not be too late for Mr. Putin to reconsider.  Analysis: Putin has never bent over and spread em' at Rosenstink's "advice" to date. He is not about to start now. Rosenthal, er, "Editorial Board": And it would certainly be a better way for Mr. Putin to satisfy his need for respect and a role in the Middle East. Analysis: Long before this bombing mission, Putin was already respected -- both at home and abroad. Nice try, Rosenrat.  *     Boobus Americanus 1: The New York Times is saying that Putin is about to get stuck in a Syrian quagmire.   Boobus Americanus 2: Yeah. He needs a foreign diversion to take the Russian public's mind off of their failing economy.   ***       "Hey Boobusess! Your pea-brainss are sstuck in a quagmire! Russsia jusst passed Germany for #5 on the GDP lisst!"   (Russia is winning the future, and Rosenskunk can't accept it.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

WEDNESDAY / OCTOBER 7, 2015

REBUTTAL BY There is a huge "devil in the details" that turns up in this human interest story - one that really warrants a closer examination. From the file marked: "This-Is-Just-Too-Damn-Weird", comes this bizarre revelation from Laurel Harper, the alleged mother of the alleged "college shooter" of Roseburg, Oregon: "An online posting from six years ago included the unlikely revelation that she used to read to her son a book by Donald J. Trump, the real estate mogul now running for president   ----  'Fact: Before my son was even born, I was reading out loud to him from Donald Trump’s ‘The Art of the Deal,’ she wrote." So, the "killer", while still in fetal form, was already being weaned on an in utero diet of Donald Trumpisms? Seriously? How conveeeenient! Next thing you know the CIA-Slimes complex will be telling us that Christopher Harper-Mercer was also a fan of Vladimir Putin! Mom to pre-born killer:  "I can always tell a loser when I see someone with a car for sale that is filthy dirty. It's so easy to make it look better."  -- Page 84: Say what you will about Donald Trump - and indeed, we here at The Anti-New York Times have already said a lot, much of it negative, about the big-mouth blusterer with an ego the size of his Trump Tower. However, we must concede that Trump is the only remaining viable candidate who is not, in essence, calling for World War III with Russia. To the contrary, Trump has said, on numerous occasions, "I will get along with Putin."  In spite of his Democrat past and troubling love affair with all things Israeli; Trump's admiration for Putin, recently-stated tolerance for Assad of Syria, pro-growth tax plan, and his strong stand against illegal immigration, are more than enough to bring down the wrath of the CIA-Sulzberger Complex down upon his huge head. Therefore, this dubious pre-natal link to the equally dubious mass shooter of Umpqua Community College ought to set off alarm bells and raise red flags in the minds of any thinking person. We may, repeat, MAY, have to just hold our noses (very tightly!) and vote for 'The Donald' after all. Another oddity that has come to light is the fact that the Sheriff of Douglas County, Oregon, who has jurisdiction over this matter, had previously generated "controversy" by taking a strong stand against gun control. In the wake of the Sandy Hook Shooting Hoax, Sheriff John Hanlin, who once attended Umpqua Community College, wrote a defiant letter to Vice President Joe Biden in which he stated: "Gun control is NOT the answer to preventing heinous crimes like school shootings." Hanlin also posted the letter on the his Facebook page. Concluding excerpt: "The United States Supreme Court has ruled that when a Sherriff chooses to enforce an unconstitutional directive, he is violating his Constitutional oath. I will NOT violate my Constitutional oath. --- nor will I permit the enforcement of any unconstitutional regulations or orders by federal officers within the borders of Douglass County, Oregon. In conclusion, it is my position  as Sheriff of Douglas County, Oregon that I will refuse to participate in, nor tolerate enforcement actions against citizens that are deemed unconstitutional."   (full letter - here)    In 2013, the ballsy Hanlin minced no words in his powerful and public letter to Joe Biden.  He is still not backing down. But Sherriff Hanlin didn't stop there. He then went on to share a video - 'The Sandy Hook Shooting: Fully Exposed' -  which has been viewed more than 11 million times. (here). Next to the shared link he wrote: "This makes me wonder who we can trust anymore. Watch, listen, and keep an open mind."  A Google Search of 'Hanlin Sandy Hook' shows just how intense, and how ugly, the recent hate-attacks against this brave "truther" are becoming. Imagine that -- out of the 3,008 Sheriffs in America, how conveeeenient that this most recent, and most suspicious shooting event should happen right in Hanlin's backyard, at a Community College which he once attended. And, again, how conveeeenient that the dirty deed was perpetrated, we are told, by a pre-natal devotee of Donald Trump. Something doesn't smell too rosey in Roseburg, Oregon,    Slimes' whipping boys, who actually resemble each other, "coincidentally" figure into the scripted drama in Oregon. *     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times that the mother of the Oregon shooter used to read Donald Trump's book to him while she was pregnant.   Boobus Americanus 2: Wow! What an embarrassing coincidence for Trump.   ***       "Coincidencse my asss! It'ss a frickin' consspiracsy!."   (Never underestimate the gut instincts of a beast, er pretty young girl.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

TUESDAY / OCTOBER 6, 2015

REBUTTAL BY If there is a "positive" (for lack of a better way of putting it) side-effect to the cheapening of human life in post 9/11 Marxified modern America; it is the complete failure of all these mass shootings (whether real or faked) to bring about the abolition of the 2nd Amendment right to own firearms. People are numbed, and hence, harder to emotionally manipulate. They don't care about dead babies, dead Palestinians, dead Ukrainians, dead Syrians. And neither do they care about dead Americans. Think about it! If "dead" movie goers (rolling eyes), "dead" kindergartners (rolling eyes), "dead" church goers (rolling eyes) and "dead" on-air blond reporterettes (rolling eyes) haven't incited any significant movement to abolish gun rights, nothing will! If anything, more people are coming to see these incidents as arguments in favor of the 2nd amendment as a defense against all these "psychos". Thus foisted on their own petard of public immorality and apathy, the gun-hating Marxists and their libtard zombies are left to flail away in vain until the day finally arrives when the Democrats will control the Federal Government with the same monopolistic majority with which they now rule California. The present frustration is evident in the most recent journalistic bowel movement of Slimes columnist Charles M. Blow  -- irreverently referred to here as 'Blowhard'. Let's get it on, Blowhard!   EVIL Obongo's empty hugs and dry tears have failed to bring about the gun ban that he so badly desires. 1- Hugging Gabby Giffords 2- Hugging Aurora victim's family member  3- "Crying over Sandy Hook"  4- "Crying" over Charleston Church ***** Blowhard: An exasperated — and frustrated — President Obama said of the gun massacre last week in Oregon... Analysis: As if the behind-the-scenes butcher of Libya, Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, Sydan, Yemen, Pakistan, Ukraine is actually capable of shedding tears for mostly White victims of these alleged shootings. Blowhard: (quoting Obongo): “Somehow this has become routine. The reporting is routine. My response here at this podium ends up being routine. The conversation in the aftermath of it. We have become numb to this.” Analysis: Why does Obongo even have to "respond" to what are local matters? Notice how he never "responds" to the endless shootings that take place in American inner cities. Hypocrite! Blowhard: (quoting Obongo): “What’s also routine is that somebody, somewhere, will comment and say ‘Obama politicized this issue." Analysis: Well, Obongo, that's because you are politicizing this issue! Nice attempt at building a straw-man argument. Blowhard: And as if on cue, leading Republican candidates came out against more gun restrictions. Analysis: We already have "gun restrictions" - such as instant background checks at both gun stores and gun shows. What Blowhard and Obongo want, but dare not say, is not "gun restrictions" - but rather, gun bans. Tell us, Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one!   (Cue sound of crickets)  . Blowhard: (Jeb) Bush continued: “But I resist the notion — and I had this challenge as governor — because we had — look, stuff happens, there’s always a crisis. And the impulse is always to do something and it’s not necessarily the right thing to do.” Analysis: We here at The Anti-New York Times despise the whole Bush family - but what exactly is wrong with the logic behind Bush's observation about resisting impulsive actions in response to crises? Blowhard: Stuff happens? Really? That stuff is the continued gun slaughter of Americans by other Americans. This “stuff” is a scourge. Analysis: Granted, Bush's goofy use of the pop-term "stuff happens" in response to the Oregon event was less-than-artful oratory. But you and your Leftist ilk have yet to propose a "solution". Again, tell us, Mr. Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one! Blowhard: But Obama is right: We have grown numb to this scourge, and even when politicians politicize gun violence, Washington can’t seem to muster the political will to make even the most modest changes to our federal gun laws. Analysis: Sorry, Blowhard. Your relentless pit-bull reporter and his feline side-kick here aren't going to release the bites that we have hooked into your lying ass. Once again, tell us, Mr. Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one!    No one lays down the Socratic Method of inquiry any harder and more relentlessly than Mad Dog Mike & salty-mouthed Sugar! Blowhard: This has to change. We have to start the process of curtailing our gun culture...  Analysis: More pious platitudes! Define your proposal, or Obongo's proposal, for "starting the process of curtailing our gun culture". Blowhard: ... and I don’t say that as an anti-gun absolutist, but as a person who grew up around guns, and even owned a gun. Analysis: It's soooo reassuring to know that you are not "an anti-gun absolutist". We suppose that means that B-B guns, single shot 1700's revolvers, and collectible muskets will be safe from confiscation? Awesome! But what exactly is your damn proposal for further "gun restrictions"?! Blowhard: When I was growing up in the rural South, boys had rifles. There was nothing odd about it. Every boy in wood shop made a gun rack. A rifle wasn’t a weapon as much as a tool. People hunted. They raised and slaughtered food animals. Rifles were used to keep the snakes out of the grass and the vermin out of the garden Analysis: OK. We get it! You're a 'good ole boy' from the land of cotton who supports the 2nd amendment. But methinks thou does protest your pro-gun credentials a bit toooo much. Clever Blowhard! But again, what is it that you want to see happen?! Blowhard: But that seems to me another time and place. There didn’t exist the fear and paranoia that grips so many now when it comes to gun ownership. Analysis: Fear and paranoia of gun owners -- blah, blah, blah. Same old worn out ad homienm attacks. What's your damn proposal?! Blowhard:  And there wasn’t the fetish for military-style weapons... Analysis: (face - palm - deep sigh) -- Charlie, "military style" only means that the rifle looks like a fully automatic machine gun (a banned gun since the 1930's). The "semi-automatic assault rifle" actually only fires one bullet at a time. And FYI - fists kill more people each year than "military-style weapons". So, again, we ask, Mr. Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one! (bark bark, hiss hiss) Blowhard:... and armor-piercing bullets. Analysis: Evidently, Blowjob is 'OK' with flesh-piercing and organ-piercing bullets. It's those "armor-piecing" bullets that keep him awake at night -- killing all those brave Knights on horseback. Yes -- such a big problem those "armor-piercing" bullets be.   1- Senator Feinstein (cough-cough) holding "a military-style rifle". Does this dopey douche-bag not understand that it can only fire 1 bullet at a time? 2- Watchout Sir Lancelot! Those "armor-piercing" bullets are no joke!   Blowhard: And as I have mentioned before, my oldest brother is a gun collector. He is a regular at the gun shows, buying and selling, but even he talks about a sense of unease at those shows as people engage in what can only be described as panic buying and ammunition hoarding. Analysis: So, gun show enthusiasts are paranoid psychos. Got it. But they aren't the folks shooting up our inner cities and committing random mass shootings. So, again, we ask, Mr. Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one! Blowhard: These people are afraid. They are afraid of a time conservative media and the gun industry has convinced them is coming when sales of weapons, particularly some types of weapons, will be restricted or forbidden. They are afraid of growing populations of people they don’t trust. Some are even afraid that a time will come when they will have to defend themselves against the government itself. Analysis: You're bloody dad-gum right that folks are afraid of where this country is headed. Aren't you? But then again, Blowhard, you probably have a few million bucks stashed away and live in some gated community with armed guards. But we digress. AGAIN, we ask, Mr. Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one! (bark bark, hiss hiss)   The Panther and Fed thugs above sure ain't about to disarm. And Blowhard wonders why people are concerned!   Blowhard: Do we want a society in which some 33,000 people in America lose their lives to gun violence each year and more than twice as many are injured by guns? Analysis: The astute observer of the piranha press will have noticed by now how "gun deaths" have suddenly jumped from about 7,500 per year to 33,000. That's because deceptive slime like Blowhard and Obongo are now including suicides in their statistics. Blowhard: Do we want a society in which mass shootings are routine? If we do, well, we have it. But if we don’t, and I believe that most of us don’t, then we have to start thinking about ways to not only keep guns out of the wrong hands, but also about how we slow or reverse the proliferation of guns. Analysis: This question may have come up already, so pardon us for any redundancy; Mr. Blowhard, in precise terms, what further "restrictions" would you like to see implemented, but are being blocked by Republicant's and the NRA. Name just one! Blowhard: These hundreds of millions of guns will most likely be part of our society for decades, and some even for centuries, regardless of what laws we pass now. That is something of which we should truly be afraid. Analysis: No Charles. What we all should be afraid of is what will happen when the Department of Homeland Security is empowered to lord over a disarmed and de-balled citizenry. But why should scum like you care about such matters. As an "elitist" in good standing, you will be living large in The New World Order.  *****   Now, there is an important reason why Blowhard, Obongo, Killary and the Piranha Press can offer no specific plans for further "sensible" gun control. You see, with the updated-monthly National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) having been in place and working well since 1998 (actually, too well, as innocent people have been blocked), coupled with the fact that "assault rifles" account for fewer murders than fists and baseball bats, there is really nothing further that can be done to curtail gun murders in America -- except for a total ban on ownership and manufacturing of guns and ammunition. That is exactly what the Globo-Marxist vermin want. Indeed, Obongo even cited, albeit cryptically, how Great Britain and Australia reacted to school shootings (guns were banned). The problem is, they just can't say this out loud. Even many Democrats would turn on them if they tried such a bold stunt. So, all they can do at this point in time is continue to shed crocodile tears over the "mass shootings" while making vague generalizations -- generalizations which may lead to total confiscation at some time in the future, but not today. These patient devils play the long game very well.     Boobus Americanus 1: Something has got to be done about these mass shootings. Enough is enough!   Boobus Americanus 2: Absolutely. But the NRA won't allow it.   ***       "Boobuss! Gunss don't kill people. Libtardss do!"   (Tell it Sugar. Tell it!)

MONDAY / OCTOBER 5, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Slimes correspondent Steven Lee Myers (probable cough-cough)  is the author of the recently released propaganda book “The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin. A brief glance at some of Myers past anti-Putin articles, as well as the "glowing reviews" from known Globalists and Zionists, pretty much tells us, sight unseen, what a load of garbage must be compressed within the pages of his new book. Today's focus will be on select excerpts from Myers' most recent journalistic turd -- about Putin's intervention in Syria. Haz-Mat suits on -- into Sulzberger's seditious cesspool we go!   ***** Myers: On the night of Dec. 5, 1989, Vladimir V. Putin, then a lieutenant colonel in the K.G.B. Analysis: "KGB. KGB. KGB." Give it a damn rest already! Myers: ... watched with alarm as thousands of East Germans in Dresden swarmed the riverside compound of the dreaded secret police, the Stasi. Analysis: Myers misrepresents the cause of Putin's "alarm" over the event just described -- insinuating that the "alarm" was over the collapse of communism. In reality, Putin's "alarm" that night was due to a frenzied mob that was advancing towards KGB Headquarters. Myers: The takeover of the Stasi headquarters was relatively peaceful -- Analysis: "Relatively peaceful?"  Methinks Marxist Myers has left some data out of the equation. Myers: -- but in Mr. Putin’s mind the crowd was frenzied, deranged and dangerous. Analysis: Putin the paranoid -- understood (rolling eyes). Myers:  The experience that night haunted him like nothing else in his mostly undistinguished career as an intelligence officer.  Analysis: A "mostly undistinguished career" -- grow up, Myers. Grow up! Myers: East Germany soon ceased to exist, as did the Soviet Union , suffering from an affliction that Mr. Putin described as “a paralysis of power.” That diagnosis has been a driving force in his consolidation of political power, and it does much to explain Russia’s forceful intervention last week to bolster the besieged government of Syria’s president, Bashar al-Assad. Analysis: So, the show-off Putin went into Syria just to show everybody how powerful Russia is. What a profound psycho-analytic diagnosis, Dr. Myers. Myers: The specter of mass protest — of mob rule — is one that has haunted Mr. Putin, and that fear lies at the heart of his belief in the primacy of state authority above all else, both at home and abroad. Analysis: "Mass protest" is a euphemism for CIA "color revolution". As a former KGB man, Putin understands this tactic very well --- and so does Myers! The media-sanctified "Protesters" consist of CIA-NGO rent-a-mobs, dupes, mercenaries, foreign agents, homosexuals, malcontents, stupid idealistic college kids, and bored bystanders.   Myers:  The East Germans considered their protests an expression of popular will, just as many Syrians did when protests against Mr. Assad’s government began in 2011. Analysis: East Germans (though assisted by the CIA) did have legitimate aspirations of reuniting with their brothers in the West. To the contrary, the Arab Spring "protests" which targeted Syria (and other states) were totally rigged for the purpose of overthrowing governments and installing U.S. / Israel puppet states. Again, Myers knows this. Myers:  But Mr. Putin viewed them as an unlawful usurpation of government authority. And that, in his mind, leads inexorably not to positive political change, but rather to chaos. Analysis: Libya? In chaos.  Iraq? In chaos. Syria? In chaos. Ukraine? In chaos. Well, Mr. Myers, it does indeed appear that Vlad the Bad was right, no? Myers: The lesson he said he learned was that only the strong hand of the state could avoid the economic and political chaos that consumed Russia in the 1990s. That belief is widely shared in Russia, and is one reason for Mr. Putin’s genuine popularity at home. Analysis: Interesting; even a degenerate liar and anti-Putin fanatic like Myers is forced to admit that Putin is "genuinely popular" at home. This alone undermines the mendaciously manufactured image of a tyrannical "ex-KGB" dictator. Myers: “The Russian people are backward,” Putin told a group of foreign academics in 2005, according to Marie Mendras’s account in “Russian Politics: The Paradox of a Weak State.” “They cannot adapt to democracy as they have done in your countries. They need time.” Analysis: Marie Mendras is a professor of Political Science at the Rothschild, er, London School of Economics. She is also affiliated with the Globalist Chatham House (sister of the New York based Council on Foreign Relations). Third or even fourth party hear-say filtered through this wicked wench is about as reliable as The Slimes Editorial page. Myers: This distrust of popular will ... Analysis: What "distrust of the popular will?" You just admitted that Putin is very popular. So how can he "distrust" people who are in full agreement with him? Myers:  ... has been the justification for laws that have throttled dissent at home. Analysis: "Dissent" is a code word for CIA-Soros-NGO propaganda being injected into Russia. Myers refers to the expulsion of these criminal interlopers as "throttling of dissent". Don't fall for it! Myers: When tens of thousands of Russians took to the streets to protest fraud in the parliamentary election in 2011 and Mr. Putin’s own re-election in 2012 ...  Analysis: Those were CIA-NGO flash-mobs. The elections were legitimate -- and monitored by cameras, enforced by Voter ID requirements (unlike elections in America!), and preserved with permanent paper ballots (unlike elections in America!) Myers: ... the Kremlin responded forcefully to stanch the contagion. Analysis: What "contagion", Stevey Boy? Again, you earlier admitted that Putin is very popular (90% approval and rising) -- so on what basis did these mobs claim "voter fraud?" Myers: The police arrested and convicted dozens of protesters  ----while the authorities harassed the most prominent leaders of the opposition, like the anti-corruption crusader Aleksei Navalny. Analysis: "Leaders of the opposition" and "anti-corruption crusaders" = bought and paid for CIA stooges, like Navalny in Russia or Porky Pig Poroshenko in Ukraine. The world is wise to this game now, Meyers.   CIA-owned traitors, er, "opposition leaders" like Navalny and Kasparov play the game of deliberately provoking their own photographed arrests for disorderly conduct. This allows The Slimes to run front pages photos of "tyrannical" Russia.   Myers: And in February, Boris Nemtsov, a former deputy prime minister, was assassinated outside the Kremlin. Analysis: Steven! Nemstsov had 3% support among Russians. Why would Putin need to make a Western martyr out of him? (Besides, the "shooting" appeared to be a "Sandy Hookish' fake, anyway) Myers: What is striking, though perhaps consistent, is how Mr. Putin’s view of public protest has become the basis for an increasingly assertive foreign policy... Analysis: No. What is "striking" is how deceiving low-life trash like you continue to get away with printing such monstrous and deadly lies days day after day  -- week after week -- month after month -- year after year -- decade after decade since the Ochs-Sulzberger gang bought The Times in 1896. Myers: ... one aimed at countering what he views as efforts by the United States and others to violate the sovereignty of nations by encouraging political change. Analysis: The U.S. is indeed the world's foremost violator of "the sovereignty of nations". It's not a question of "what Putin views as" -- it is what he knows. And you do too, Myers. Myers: Mr. Putin considered United States support for the “color revolutions” that swept former Soviet republics — Georgia in 2002, Ukraine in 2004 and Kyrgyzstan in 2005 — as evidence of an American policy to topple governments in what had historically been Russia’s sphere of influence. Analysis: Now why would Putin think that the U.S. would ever be involved in "toppling governments?" Silly Putin! (heavy on the sarcasm) . Putin KNOWS! 1- McCain the Insane incited violence in Ukraine 2- And bolstered 'ISIS' in Iraq and Syria!   Myers: The civil war in Syria, in that view, is merely the latest in a series of messy conflicts that arise from the toppling or weakening of central authority through American aggression. Previous instances include the American war in Iraq that overthrew Saddam Hussein, and NATO’s military intervention in Libya in 2011. Analysis: Notice how miscreant Myers continues to present Putin's statements of indisputable facts as "views". There are no "views" (opinions) here. The destruction of Syria, Iraq and Libya have "Made in the USA" stamped all over them - and also stamped "Kosher for Passover" as well. Myers: When the Qaddafi government violently repressed the protests in Libya... Analysis: The Libyan "protesters" turned out to be murderous mercenary scum. Too bad Qaddafi couldn't kill them. Look at Libya today! Myers: Mr. Medvedev was moved by the humanitarian appeals of his American and European counterparts. He instructed Russia’s representative at the United Nations to abstain from the resolution, allowing the American and NATO air campaign that ultimately toppled Mr. Qaddafi. Analysis: "Humanitarian appeals" my butt-crack! Medvedev is a weak pro-western punk who got played by Obongo and Killary Clinscum in Libya; and who had previously dithered and delayed as puppet Georgia invaded Russian Ossetia and Abkhazia in 2008. No wonder the Slimes  is so fond of him. Myers: Mr. Putin was furious, and said so, prompting the most public breach in the “tandem” of power that governed the country from 2008 to 2012. “It reminds me of a medieval call to crusade,” he said of the resolution, denouncing the war as another manifestation of American hegemony that, left unchecked, would spread. Analysis: Putin was right then; and he is right today. Myers: According to several officials close to the Kremlin, Mr. Medvedev’s dangerous irresolution was a decisive factor in Mr. Putin’s decision to return to the presidency, which he announced six months later. Since his return, Russia has blocked resolution after resolution against Syria’s government, prompting criticism that its intransigence has only worsened the conflict. Analysis: Medvedev needs to be purged from government, along with the remaining remnant of western-wannabee Russian '5th columnists' still embedded within the press, Duma and Central Bank.   Medvedev the Meek got played for a fool by Killary "We came. We saw. He (Qaddafi) died" Clinscum -- with disastrous results for Libya and migrant-overloaded Europe!   Myers: By the time protests erupted again in Ukraine in the winter of 2013 and 2014, Mr. Putin was firmly back in the presidency. The upheaval seemed to him the continuation of an aggressive foreign incursion that was marching inexorably to the Kremlin itself. Analysis: "Seemed to him?" --- The Globalist hand behind the "upheaval" did not "seem to him". It WAS! Period! Myers: Mr. Putin used the chaotic flight of Ukraine’s president, Viktor F. Yanukovych, in February 2014 ....   Analysis: Point of Clarification: The "chaotic flight" of the violently ousted President Yanukovych was actually an escape for his life. The CIA's mercenaries were going to murder him as they did Qaddafi. Sneaky Myers purposely omits this little detail because it contradicts the big lie of a "peaceful" and "spontaneous" people-power uprising. Myers: ... to justify annexation of Crimea and support of the armed rebellion in eastern Ukraine that has splintered the country and led to more than 7,000 deaths. Analysis: (Oh God -- palm to face -- deep sigh) I better let Sugar handle this one.      Ssteven Lee Myerss! You no good %$#*^# lying ^6^ $#* &^%( ^$#%!!!     Myers: Many have variously interpreted Mr. Putin’s intervention in Syria as a response to domestic pressures caused by an economy faltering with the drop in oil prices and sanctions imposed after Crimea; a desire to change the subject from Ukraine; or a reassertion of Russia’s position in the Middle East. Analysis: "Many have interpreted", eh, Myers? Who are these "many" of which you speak? We can be sure that the "many" in Myers' insular circle are all either CFR members, Slimes writers, two-bit U.S. politicians, think-tank eggheads and libtard college professors. Myers: All are perhaps factors, but at the heart of the airstrikes is Mr. Putin’s defense of the principle that the state is all powerful and should be defended against the hordes. It is a warning about Russia, as much as Syria. Analysis: Wrong again, sleazy Steven. "At the heart of the airstrikes is Mr. Putin’s defense of the principle that" the Globo-Zionist Axis of Evil must be stopped from killing and conquering all states which dare to defy it. That's the truth, and even a few of your readers are waking up to it.       Boobus Americanus 1: I read a really interesting piece today in The New York Times. It explained how the collapse of the Soviet Union affected the psychology of Putin and guides his aggressive actions today.    Boobus Americanus 2: Interesting. I also think he needs to distract his people from the bad effects of the sanctions in place against Russia.   ***       "The frickin' lies in the Ssslimes articless are getting worsse by the day -- as is the sstupidity of you two Boobuses."   (All we can do is to keep telling the truth, Sugar.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

SUNDAY / OCTOBER 4, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Like the rest of his Tribal brethren at the Marxist madhouse in Manhattan; Slimes' senior slanderer Thomas Friedman is beside himself over Putin's intervention in Syria. But unlike most of his hysterical colleagues, Friedman sees a delusional version of a silver lining that he is desperately clinging to. You see, according to Friedman, Putin is "stupid" because this is all going to blow up in his face. Keep dreaming, fatboy! Let's examine some key excerpts from Freakman's fantasy. ***** Friedman: Let’s say the U.S. did nothing right now, and just let Putin start bombing ISIS and bolstering Assad. How long before every Sunni Muslim in the Middle East, not to mention every jihadist, has Putin’s picture in a bull’s eye on his cellphone? Analysis: Really, Tom? You mean to say that every Sunni Muslim in the Middle East supports the murderous mercenaries of ISIS? Really? Newsflash, Tommy-Boy -- every Arab schoolchild knows by now that ISIS / "moderate" rebels are frontmen for the CIA-Mossad. The corrupt regime in Saudi Arabia doesn't like what Russia is doing, but the average man in the Arab street - is either ambivalent, or actually happy to finally see someone stand up to the U.S. / Israel Axis of Evil.   Almost the entirety of Egypt's Muslim population is Sunni --- and they LOVE Putin!   Friedman:  The Sunni Muslims are the vast majority in Syria. They are the dominant sect in the Arab world. Putin and Russia would be seen as going all-in to protect Assad, a pro-Iranian, Alawite/Shiite genocidal war criminal. Analysis: If the Sunni Muslim super majority truly views Shiite Muslim Assad as a "genocidal war criminal", then how does Assad retain such strong support among them? Why hasn't this "vast majority" joined ISIS or "the moderate rebels"? You speak of Assad as a "genocidal war criminal" -- yet, as it was with Saddam Hussein's "Weapons of Mass Destruction" -- you offer zero evidence of this "genocide." The truth of the matter is that the difference between a Sunni Muslim and a Shiite Muslim is sort of like that between a Catholic and a Lutheran. It is a difference of doctrine that only purists, divide-and-conquer Zionists, and the CIA make a big deal out of.   1- Sunni-Shia girls are best friends 2- Sunni-Shia couple on wedding day 3- Uncle Sam and scum like Thomas Friedman stir up the Sunni-Shia tension   Friedman: Putin would alienate the entire Sunni Muslim world, including Russian Muslims. Analysis: The defeated remnants of the mercenary filth of Chechnya might not care for Putin; but Putin is respected and admired by the Muslim masses of the Central Asian part of Russia. Sorry, Freakman. But there isn't going to be any "Muslim" uprising or "color revolution" in the new Russia.   1- Putin just attended the ceremony for the opening of one of Europe's biggest mosques -- in Moscow! 2- Give up already, Friedman. The pro-Putin Muslims of Russia see themselves as Russians. 3- The Christians, Muslims and Buddhists of far-reaching Russia are all on the same patriotic page.   Friedman:  Moreover, let’s say by some miracle the Russians defeat ISIS. Analysis: "Miracle"? With Russia bombing supply lines and munitions depots from the air, and the Syrians, Iranians and Hezbollah cleaning up the scum on land, what would be so "miraculous" about putting these thugs out of business, once and for all? Friedman:  The only way to keep them defeated is by replacing them with moderate Sunnis. Analysis: Really? Why do you say that? Most Sunnis and all Christians support Assad. Who says a Shiite can't govern Syria? You, Friedman? Friedman: Which moderate Sunnis are going to align with Russia while Putin is seen as the prime defender of the barrel-bombing murderer of more Sunnis than anyone on the planet, Bashar al-Assad? Analysis: "Barrel bombing" -- "barrel bombing" - "barrel bombing" - "barrel bombing". When and where did this mendacious mantra originate from all of a sudden? I must have heard or read it 100 times in just the past week alone! The marketing boys in Langley (CIA) must have sent out a talking-point E-mail blast. Barrel Bombs -  Barrel Bombs -  Barrel Bombs -  Barrel Bombs    Friedman:  Putin stupidly went into Syria looking for a cheap sugar high to show his people that Russia is still a world power. Analysis: Yes! Of course! That's it! With his popularity only at 90%, the "stupid" Vlad the Bad needed a "sugar high". Brilliant philosophical analysis there, Freakman! Friedman:  Well, now he’s up a tree. Obama and John Kerry should just leave him up there for a month -- Analysis: Speaking of trees, Freakman, it sure would be fun to string your lying ass up from a tree - 'good old boy' style, circa 1890's. (by the feet, of course - just for fun) Friedman: - him and Assad, fighting ISIS alone — and watch him become public enemy No. 1 in the Sunni Muslim world. Analysis: Dream on, Freakman. --- Although, if, repeat, if you do turn out to be correct about a Syrian quagmire, it will only serve to further confirm what the object of this ghoulish game was all along. Friedman: “Yo, Vladimir, how’s that working for you?” Analysis: Freakman - you are a sick, twisted, evil, odious, petty, envious, immature, insecure, feckless, unprofessional, lying little sack of Marxist manure. You and your evil gang created this fake 'ISIS' bogeyman. Now that 'Vladimir' is destroying the very monsters that Sulzberger's Slimes has used to scare us with, the Globo-Zio Mafia has nothing to fall back upon other than to whine about the bombing of "moderate" rebels. "Moderates" -- "moderates" -- "moderates". I believe the operative term is, "foisted on your own petard", eh Freakman? The game is up, Freakman. Enough for today.Good day, loser.     CIArlie Rose's little buddy is throwing a journalistic a hissy-fit because Putin is puttin' a hurtin' on CIA-ISIS-"Moderate Rebels."       Boobus Americanus 1: I read an Op-Ed in the New York Times by Thomas Friedman. According to Friedman, Putin's air-strikes and Assad's barrel-bombing will soon turn the whole Muslim world against Russia.   Boobus Americanus 2: Friedman is a three-time winner of the Pulitzer Prize. When such an astute observer of the world scene speaks, Putin would be wise to listen.   ***       "Hey Boobuss! Come here. I got a 'barrel bomb' I want to sstick up your --"   (Sugar!!!)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 2, 2015

The Umpqua Community College False Flag / Non-Shooting  * There may have been some people killed - but the fact that there was an active shooter drill at the college just last week (here), coupled with the cheesy crisis actor images - indicates that this was false-flag of some degree or another.     The images above are all we care to say about the latest crisis-actor shooting hoax at this time. There are plenty of "mourners" - but no images of dead bodies (other than the above "victim" with a towel over his face). With all due respect to those of our readers who still believe all of these bloodless & bodyless  mass shootings are real -- you either "get it" by now, or you don't.   Let's move on to today's rebuttal about the "secret meeting" between Pope Fakeness and Kim Davis. -- see below.

FRIDAY / OCTOBER 2, 2015

REBUTTAL BY In spite of intensely sympathetic media hype, the Pinko Pope paid a dear price for his recently (and thankfully) completed political tour through the New York - Philadelphia - DC corridor. As elements of the "conservative" press and the Catholic faithful themselves savaged Frankie's Marxist positions of Global Warming TM, open borders and wealth redistribution, much of the shine was removed from Frankie Fakeout's felonious facade. Vatican image-makers were left with some serious repair work to do. This is just a speculative observation; but it is one that we are now 90% certain of. Here goes: What if Kim Davis serves the same "powers that be" that Frankie Fakeout does? What better way to tone down the growing and troublesome image of a liberal pope who is soft on abortion and homosexuality than to issue a false claim of a "secret meeting" having taken place between Poop Fakeness and anti-homosexual marriage activist Kim Davis (the Kentucky clerk who did a brief stint in jail for denying marriage licenses to a pair of fags). Though our previous coverage of Kim Davis was sympathetic, we were a tiny bit suspicious that she may have been a plant; and that her principled denial of homosexual marriage licenses was a stunt intended to show the world what the true face of Southern Christian "intolerance" looks like. (Yikes!) Indeed, in retrospect, the comically unsophisticated and crazed-looking Ms. Davis, and her hilarious husband Joe, really do seem like invented characters straight out of Hollywood casting, a la "The Beverly Hill Billies". This meeting with the Pope - for which there is zero evidence - adds further weight to our belief that the actors involved in these corny dramas are all, well, actors.       Crazy Kim the Kentucky Christian with a very checkered moral past-- straight out of CIA-Hollywood casting. Check out the overalls and straw hat on Joe Davis!   Excerpts from the article simply do not ring true: "Vatican officials initially would not confirm that the meeting occurred, finally doing so on Wednesday afternoon, while refusing to discuss any details." "Initially would not confirm"  -- "refusing to discuss details". Why not? “I put my hand out and he reached and he grabbed it, and I hugged him and he hugged me,” Ms. Davis said Wednesday in an interview with ABC News. ‘Thank you for your courage.’” You have any pictures, Kim? "The secretiveness of the meeting, and the Vatican’s refusal to give any information, will inevitably raise questions about why Francis chose to meet with Ms. Davis — and why he kept the meeting secret." Why such secrecy? With millions of eyes and cameras on the Pope Fakeness and his entourage, how were the Davises smuggled in?                                                                                                           Beverley Hill Billies "We sho nuff don't reckon the good Lord was a fixin' for dem dere sodomites to be a gettin' hitched." For God's sake Joe, can't you ditch the grungy overalls and straw hat for your meeting with Governor Huckabee?! (Notice the "Don't Tread on Me" Tea Party Snake in the background -- Nice touch!)   More: "Mr. Staver (Davis's lawyer) said that he, the Davises and Vatican officials had agreed to not publicize the meeting until after the pope had left the United States because, he said, “we didn’t want the pope’s visit to be focused on Kim Davis.” It is inconceivable that the Vatican would risk exposure of such a controversial meeting during this all-important propaganda trip. Sorry -- not buying it. "Mr. Staver said the idea for a meeting was first discussed on Sept. 14, more than a week before the pope’s arrival. He declined to say who proposed the meeting." Why would a Pope who has been so accommodating and so "tolerant" of opposing views on homosexual "marriage" want to meet with the heroine of "homophobia"? "The Davises snapped selfies inside the Vatican Embassy. Can we see these 'selfies' -- Kim? Hello? Kim? However, he said, “out of deference and respect they didn’t want to pull out a cellphone with the pope. Of course. (rolling eyes) "The Vatican had their own photographers there and we’re told the pictures will be released later. No photographs had been released by Wednesday evening in Rome." No photographs yet, eh? We anxiously await the release of the photos -- along with the photos of the dead Osama Bin Laden as well as the "victims" of the Aurora Movie Theater, Sandy Hook School, Charleston Church, and Umqua College mass shootings.        Anonymous and unseen "sources" in the Vatican have "confirmed" the Davis-Pope meeting.   "Coincidentally", news of this "secret meeting" broke on the very same day that a story about the Pope's conflict with Ignazio Marino, the Marxist Mayor of Rome, made the rounds of the Piranha Press. From Yahoo: Pope shows no mercy as he blasts Rome mayor as a 'pretend Catholic' "He pretends to be Catholic, it came on him all of a sudden. It doesn't happen like that," Francis said. The pope's cutting comments on the politician -- who observers say rubbed the pontiff up the wrong way with his vocal support of gay marriage and euthanasia -- came as Francis returned from a barnstorming visit to the United States."      Image 1: Don't believe Vatican Press releases about the Marino-Francis split! The Pinko Pope of Poofterism and the Marxist Mayor are totally in sync. Image 2: Meeting of Marxist Mayors against Global Warming TM -- Pope shakes hands with Mayor Marino as NY Mayor Bill de Blasio looks on.   As it was with the Davis meeting, there is no video / audio evidence of the Pope's "attack" upon the Marxist Mayor. This is yet another indication that the Pope's public relations handlers are feeding disinformation to willing (or just gullible) accomplices in the Piranha Press. These two unconfirmed and un-confirmable "events" have suddenly confounded and confused Frankie's conservative critics and empowered his libtarded apologists. "See! The Pope is not as liberal as you right wingers make him out to be." - goes the latest liberal line. In order to re-sheep dip His Unholiness, it may be necessary for the liberal media to lob a few more soft attacks against him -- just enough to silence critics and allow the moderately damaged Pope some time to recover his standing as a "conservative". It's all showbiz, folks -- nothing but magic tricks and mis-directions.        Yeee Haww! Praise Jesus! Hollywood Joe later changed his straw hat for a hunter's cap -- an NRA member we presume?   2nd Amendment supporter Joe Davis, in his own words: "I'm an old redneck hillbilly, that's all I've got to say. Don't come knocking on my door." (here)     Boobus Americanus 1: I read in The New York Times that Pope Francis secretly met with that Kentucky clerk during his visit here. Evidently, he is not as liberal as his conservative critics say he is.   Boobus Americanus 2: It's amazing how they managed to pull that meeting off with all the media scrutiny surrounding both of them.   ***       "No Boobus! What'ss amazing is how you frickin' ssimpletonss are sso eassily fooled time and time and time again."   (It is amazing -- and also amusing.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

THURSDAY / OCTOBER 1, 2015

REBUTTAL BY Just yesterday, your favorite prophets here at The Anti-New York Times forecast: "Once the Russians begin pounding the mercenary scum who have turned Syria into hell-on-Earth, the Globalists will scream that Russia is attacking the "moderate rebels" that the U.S. is supporting." Nailed it! We were, however, expecting the Slimes-Pentagon propaganda attack to materialize a week or two after the strikes began. It turned out to be an hour or two instead! Secretary of Offense Ass Carter, speaking out of same: "We have been observing Russian activities, and I don't want to go into detail about that at this time, but the reason, one of the reasons, why the Russian position is contradictory is exactly the potential for them to strike as they may well have in places where ISIL is not present ... others are present."     Bust out the hip-waders! In the coming days and weeks, Carter's Pentagon and Sulzberger's Slimes will spewing out rivers of raw rubbish aimed at Russia.   Coming next on the heels of Globalist whining about Russia's attack on the "moderate rebels" will be tall tales of civilian casualties -- supported by crying ketchup-stained crisis actors. Bet on it! These cunning clowns become very predictable after a while. According to the article, Asston Con-man added: “By supporting Assad and seemingly taking on everybody fighting Assad,” Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter said on Wednesday, Russia is 'taking on the whole rest of the country that’s fighting Assad.' Some of those groups, he added, are supported by the United States and need to be part of a political resolution in Syria." Even the Pentagram and The Slimes are essentially admitting (and have never really concealed) that the U.S. is inciting and prolonging the conflict by aiding certain "groups". Again, from  the opening line of this article: "including at least one group trained by the C.I.A.". But the key word there is, "essentially". For a media-addled dummy, "essentially" is not good enough. They need everything spelled out for them. You see, the obedient Boobuses who kneel in Sulzberger's filth every day, in spite of some of their advanced degrees and "education", are simply not capable of putting 2 + 2 together. How can people not realize that the U.S. (and Israel/Saudi) are responsible for keeping the bloodbath alive, even after The Slimes, as dishonest as it is, has actually been giving them the key elements of the equation all along? Evidently, without the "=" and the "4" handed to them, they still can't figure out a logical equation on their own.   Typical Times subscriber on "2 + 2": "There is insufficient empirical data to arrive at a definitive conclusion in regard to such a complex matter."   This explains why the very same people now figuratively crying over the deaths and suffering of so many Syrians, and the related "migrant crisis", are not the least bit angered by America's admitted -- "essentially" admitted, that is -- role in prolonging the war in Syria. How weird is that?! And yet, these very same non-thinking blockheads (who fancy themselves as "intellectuals") will soon be crying on command when images of "dead civilians" - purportedly killed by the big bad Putin - start appearing on the Slimes front page. Dadgummit! If The Slimes were to report that dog feces sandwiches were delicious and nutricious, Boobus Americanus would head out to the nearest park with a pairs of tongs, hamburger buns and a bottle of A-1 steak sauce -- and that's no joke!   Oh how the Editorial Board of The Anti-New York Times wishes it had Sulzberger's power and influence over people. What fun we would have!   ADDENDUM: This just in, from another Slimes piece entitled: Syrian Rebels Say Russia Is Targeting Them Rather Than ISIS By ANNE BARNARD “They are the most violent strikes,” says a man filming the grim aftermath of what he asserts was a Russian air attack on the town of Talbiseh, in the Homs Province of Syria. “This is the Russian criminal regime.” The voice then trails off into laments and prayers: “Oh God, oh God, oh God. God is all we need.” He concludes: “This is what the criminal Russian planes did.”   The Bolshevik bull-shine is only going to get worse!   Boobus Americanus 1: The war in Syria seems like an endless humanitarian tragedy -- going on 4 years now.   Boobus Americanus 2: Tragic and endless indeed! Absolutely heart-breaking. I am against putting American 'boots-on-the-ground, but we have to support the moderate rebels.   ***       "Double-thinking cretinss want to sstop the war by prolonging the war! #&^%#(*&!!!"   (It is amusing --sad, but amusing.)   COMMENTS / FEEDBACK / INSULTS / KUDOS     Email address: Comments:   greattomatobubble2@gmail.com NOW IN PRINT! Available at Amazon

ANTI-NY TIMES HOME PAGE