One really has to wonder why Obama just won't
produce his birth certificate. No, not the fraudulent "Certification
of Live Birth" (COLB) that the Obama Campaign released to the Daily Kos, that
looks like this:
click for larger image
The following is an example of a real,
honest-to-God "Birth Certificate" issued by the State of Hawaii.
They look like this:
click for larger image
Especially When There Is A Birth Certificate
We know that Obama has a birth certificate. He tells us so, in
"Dreams..."
"I discovered this article, folded away among
my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I
was in high school. It's a short piece, with a photograph of him.
No mention is made of my mother or me, and I'm left to wonder whether
the omission was intentional on my father's part, in anticipation of his
long departure. Perhaps the reporter failed to ask personal
questions, intimidated by my father's imperious manner; or perhaps it
was an editorial decision, not part of the simple story that they were
looking for. I wonder, too, whether the omission caused a fight
between my parents."
Although the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama's birth certificate has
become a focus of intense speculation -- and even several lawsuits – Hawaii's Gov. Linda Lingle has placed the candidate's
birth certificate
under
seal and instructed the state's Department of Health to make sure no
one in the press obtains access to the original document under any
circumstances.
The governor's office officially declined a
request, made in writing, by Jerome Corsi, in Hawaii, to obtain a copy of the
hospital-generated original birth certificate of Barack Obama.
"It does not appear that Dr. Corsi is within any of these categories of
persons with a direct and tangible interest in the birth certificate he
seeks," wrote Roz Makuala, manager of constituent services in the
governor's office, in an e-mailed response to a request seeking the
information.
Those listed as entitled to obtain a copy of an
original birth certificate include the person born, or "registrant"
according to the legal description from the governor's office, the
spouse or parent of the registrant, a descendant of the registrant, a
person having a common ancestor with the registrant, a legal guardian of
the registrant, or a person or agency acting on behalf of the
registrant.
The official reason for denial of access
to Obama's birth certificate would be authority granted pursuant to
Section 338-18 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, a provision the anonymous
source claimed was designed to prevent identity theft.
Still, a
source said, confidentially, the motivation for withholding
the original birth certificate was political, although the
source refused to disclose whether there was any information on the
original birth certificate that would prove politically embarrassing to
Obama.
The source also refused to answer questions about
the original document on file with the Department of Health was a
hospital-generated birth certificate or a registration of birth that may
have been filed subsequent to the birth.
The anonymous source
made clear the Hawaii Department of Health would immediately release
Obama's original birth certificate, provided Obama requested the
document be released, but the Department of Heath has received no such
request from the senator or from anyone acting officially on his behalf.
Why The COLB?
The obvious question must be asked: If Obama has an original
"long form" birth certificate issued on the day of his birth by the
state of Hawaii, why would he also have a "Certification of Live Birth"?
It would not be necessary.
Barack Obama was asked if he was
eligible to become president under the Article II ‘natural born’
eligibility clause. Obama masked the truth by posting a Hawaiian
Certification of Live Birth (COLB). His supporters declared him a
natural born citizen under the 14th Amendment and the issue was
pushed back into the realm of conspiracy theories.
Upon further
investigation, the mask of the C.O.L.B. started to be more and more
revealing of the original 1961 certificate, made much of by Hawaii’s
Governor Lingle and the state’s Department of Health official, Dr.
Fukino, as more probably a Dept. of Health document and not a
hospital long form. [See my recent post on the Hollister dismissal
in which I quoted Endnote 12 of Mario Apuzzo's Kerchner et al vs. Obama
et al case. Apuzzo's jurisprudence of challenging prima facie evidence
is brilliant.
If Obama was trying to promote his Hawaiian native
born status, he would have willingly posted a hospital certificate as
solid, best evidence. A C.O.L.B. is labeled as only prima facie
evidence; the validity of its information open to inspection by a proper
Hawaiian court venue.
If the C.O.L.B. referenced
document was not a hospital birth certificate, what was it? Under
Hawaiian statute, specifically §338-5,[7] it is compulsory for the Dept.
of Health to register a newborn child of a Hawaiian resident, even if no
documentation of place and time of birth is presented. Only the word of
one parent is required by law.
If the hidden 1961 certificate is
a §338-5 form, face down like a card in a poker game, the $800,000
Barack Obama ponied up to prevent its public release means Obama is not
just bluffing, but covering up perjury and other violations of election
law.
In the end, a §338-5 compulsory registration will be more
probative of the direct testimony evidence of Obama’s Kenyan birth,[8]
than of his claimed Hawaiian birth.
The Beginning
The Daily Kos
When the Daily Kos posted the now-infamous Certification of Live
Birth (COLB) image along with a cover story on June 12, 2008, the Kos
received 648 comments in a span of only 24 hours, of which the first 644
were about the most insipid, lame, and mindless reactions ever
accumulated in one place.
The vast majority of them consisted of derogatory comments about John
McCain and his eligibility issue:
HOWEVER, there was one, brave Kos commenter who identified all of the
key anomalies in the COLB image and had the stones to question it’s
authenticity. Her screen name is AsperGirl and
her comment was #643, or one of the last five comments to be posted.
Why is this significant?
Because I believe that her comments hit too close to home. I believe
that she struck a nerve, and that’s why the comments section was closed
off to new ones less than three hours after he post.
Here is her comments, and they serve as a testament to those loyal to
the truth:
Birth Certificate is an Obvious Fake (0+ / 0-)
Sorry to disabuse you folks, but this birth certificate on dailykos
is an obvious fake.
The fake "birth certificate" just appeared Thursday morning on
dailykos without any reference as to who released it or where it came
from.
There is a link from the FightTheSmears website to "the truth"
posting on MyBarackObama.com to it without any reference. (i.e. there is
no "this is Barack Obama’s birth certificate provided to dailykos by
person xxx of the Obama campaign")
There is no provenance explaining where the "birth certificate" came
from. In Hawaii, birth certificates aren’t publicly available and
reporters’ requests for one have been ignored for months.
There is no explanation as to whom vouches for its origins or its
authenticity.
The certificate number is blacked out. Why?
There are image artifacts consistent with forgeries and image
processing. It’s not a real, unprocessed scan of a birth
certificate.
It’s not certified. Hawaii state code provides that
certificates issued by the department of health be certified:
"§338-13 Certified copies. (a) Subject to the requirements of
sections 338-16, 338-17, and 338-18, the department of health shall,
upon request, furnish to any applicant a certified copy of any
certificate, or the contents of any certificate, or any part thereof.
(b) Copies of the contents of any certificate on file in the department,
certified by the department shall be considered for all purposes the
same as the original,..."
This certificate is what the Hawaii DOH calls a "Late" Certificate of
Birth, and it is not an original Birth Certificate for a birth recorded
near the date of actual birth. In Hawaii, anyone can claim they
were born there and submit the evidence years after the birth to obtain
a late "Certificate of Birth".
"Who is Eligible to Apply for Late Registration? As provided by
law (HRS §§338-15, 338-29.5), the following persons may apply for late
registration: Any person born in Hawaii who is one year old or older and
whose birth has not been previously registered in Hawaii, or that
person’s parent, guardian, next of kin, or older person acting for that
person and having knowledge of the facts of birth may request the
registration of a late certificate of birth.
Doe the Obama campaign have a statement on this uncertified "birth
certificate?"
Isn’t this Obama’s "birth certificate" issue getting to be kind of
strange by now?
How can a man run for President without disclosing his birth
certificate?
Why does an anonymous, no-provenance, obviously fake scan of an
uncertified birth certificate appear on DailyKos, a fanatically
pro-Obama blog?
Why won’t the Obamas or the Obama campaign just formally and
transparently release a certified copy of Barack Obama’s birth
certificate?
"It’s like these guys take pride in being ignorant." - Barack Obama
by AsperGirl on Fri Jun 13, 2008 at 08:05:30 AM PDT
COLB
Well, here's proof that Obamas "Certification of Live Birth" means
nothing.
Amended certifications of birth may be
prepared and filed with the Department of Health, as provided by law,
for 1) a person born in Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed
with the Department of Health or 2) a person born in a foreign
country.
In other words, the "Certification of Live Birth" posted on Obama's
website, Factcheck.org and the Daily KOS doesn't prove anything, simply
because someone born in a foreign country could file for an amended
certification -- click the link, read it for yourself.
A Certification of Live Birth is not a Birth
Certificate. Obama's sister Maya was born in Jakarta,
Indonesia, but Anna Dunham registered her as "born
in Honolulu" shortly after her birth.
Maya has a State of Hawaii Certification of Live Birth, just like Obama --
proves nothing.
The Law
Laws of the Territory of Hawaii
ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth
was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born
outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in
Hawaii.
Under that law, someone simply would have presented
herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born
in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and
presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities
accepted it, that was the end of it.
Hawaii Is Loose
The Hawaiian "birth certificate" program.
The Dept. of
Hawaiian Homelands does NOT accept the "Certification of Live Birth" as
documentation. This is the same document that Obama is showing the
world as proof of his Hawaiian birth and American "natural born citizen"
status.
If you submit the "Certification of Live Birth" to the
DHHL, they will make phone calls and written inquiries (to have a paper
trail) to the office of Vital Statistics, to confirm information that
WOULD BE on the "Birth Certificate," that is NOT present on the
"Certification of Live Birth."
The DHHL, being a Hawaii state
agency, KNOWS the loopholes built into the Hawaiian "birth certificate"
system. Many of the laws Hawaii has hearken back to BEFORE the Hawaiian
Organic Act, BEFORE Hawaii was a territory, BEFORE King Kalakaua
ruled...
IN FACT, the court that Ann Dunham filed for her FIRST
divorce through in 1964 was done through a Hawaiian court, the "Circuit
Court of the First Judicial Circuit" that I've traced back to the 1860s.
That court is defunct today. The judge is in his 90s and retired
from the Hawaiian court system. There are many antiquated
procedures and laws still on the books that are mired in the annuls of
Hawaiian history.
As an island nation, Hawaii has had procedures
in place to allow for "stragglers" who were born on other islands, or in
other countries (Guam is similar, BTW). Such is the "loophole" Sun
Yat-sen exploited, Chinese revolutionary and political leader often
referred to as the "Father of Modern China." He was able to file a
"Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" application and immigrate to the US in
1904 using the form. Yat-sen was born in Guangdong province, China, in
1866. His "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" was issued based on
Sun's typewritten testimony rather than on any documentation from
witnesses. The "Certificate of Hawaiian Birth" for WAS STILL
ISSUED UP UNTIL 1972; BHO was born in 1961.
SO, let's see, how
could a person like Ann Dunham (and later BHO when he was an adult)
exploit Hawaiian "birth certificate" law?
• file for a "Certificate
of Hawaiian Birth", using affidavits from herself and her mother saying
he was born in Hawaii ...
• convert the "Certificate of Hawaiian
Birth" to a "Certificate of Late Birth" as state law allows...
• convert the "Certificate of Late Birth" to a "Certificate of Live
Birth," with comments in Block 23, "Evidence for Delayed Filing or
Alteration"...
• and then BHO uses the "Certification of Live Birth,"
which was created and first used in Nov 2001, to hide any prior
alterations or modifications!
Did it happen THAT way? It's
anyone's guess. BUT because the Hawaiian "birth certificate"
program is SO freakin' loose, it's quite possible, with other variations
possible as well.
ADD TO THAT that Obama's "Certification of
Live Birth" states in the bottom lefthand corner: "Date FILED by
Registrar" vs. "Date ACCEPTED by State Registrar," there's plenty of
reason to be suspicious.
Hawaii's Multiple Birth Certificates
Generally, folks don't know that Hawaii law, even in 1961, provided for
several types of birth records, most of which are not what people
think of when they think of birth certificates. The following is a
description of those, including certificates for people not born in
Hawaii.
1. In the State of Hawaii, back in 1961, there were three
different birth certificates that were obtainable:
a. If the birth
was attended by a physician or mid wife, the attending medical
professional was required to certify to the Department of Health the
facts of the birth date, location, parents’ identities and other
information. (See Section 57-8 & 9 of the Territorial Public Health
Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in
1961).
b. In 1961, if a person was born in Hawaii but not attended by
a physician or mid wife, then, up to the first birthday of the child, an
adult could, upon testimony, file a "Delayed Certificate," that
required endorsement on the Delayed Certificate of a summary statement
of the evidence submitted in support of the acceptance for delayed
filing, which evidence must be kept in a special permanent file. The
statute provided that the probative value of the Delayed Certificate
must be determined by the judicial or administrative body or official
before whom the certificate is offered as evidence. (See Section 57-18,
19 & 20 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955
Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
c. If a child
born in Hawaii, for whom no physician or mid wife filed a certificate of
live birth, and for whom no Delayed Certificate was filed before the
first birthday, then a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth could be issued
upon testimony of an adult including the subject person) if the
Lieutenant Governor was satisfied that a person was born in Hawaii,
provided that the person had attained the age of one year. (See Section
57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955
Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961).
2. In 1982, the
vital records law was amended to create a fourth kind of birth
certificate for children born outside of the Territory or State of
Hawaii. HRS Chapter 338 was amended to add a new section authorizing the
Director of the Department of Health to issue a birth certificate for a
person NOT born in Hawaii either as a Territory or State, upon
sufficient proof that the legal parents of such individual had declared
the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least
one year immediately preceding the birth of such child.
3. The
language of the statute clearly applies to births in the days of the
Territory of Hawaii, so also births in 1961.
4. A press release
concerning numerous questions raised across the country as to whether or
not Obama was a natural born citizen was issued on October 31, 2008 by
the Hawaii Department of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino.
5. In that very carefully worded press release, Dr. Fukino said that she
had "personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures."
6. The intentional
ambiguity of that statement raises more questions that it answered.
7. That statement failed to resolve any of the questions being raised by
litigation across the country over the issue of Obama’s birth and
qualifications for the office of the President of the United States,
including:
a. The specific type of certificate was not identified. Could it be the certificate for someone born outside of the State of
Hawaii?
b. Being "on record" could mean either that its contents are
in the computer database of the department or an actual "vault"
original. If the latter, those are the words used to describe what is
there. The data base record could have been entered based on a birth
record for someone born outside of Hawaii.
c. Therefore, the value as
prima facie evidence is limited and easily overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be
obtained and verified with a Court Order.
8. It should also be noted
that in the face of all this litigation, the simple presentation of
Obama’s vault birth records would put the questions to rest.
9.
Obama has not taken this approach to a single one of the cases, but
instead has hired legal counsel across the country at no small expense,
much of it illegally from his campaign,
to defend the claims with motions to dismiss on standing and similar
procedural grounds.
10. Such response to the request for proof that
he is qualified to serve as President of the United States of America
only serves to raise more questions about this election.
COLBs For Anybody
Click the thumbnail to see a large copy of this beautifully printed
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
It belongs to Sun Yat-Sen,
the Father of Modern China, who was born in China.
This
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, dated March 14, 1904, was issued after
Dr. Sun signed a
raggedy type-written statement affirming that he was born in Hawaii on Nov. 24, 1870.
Sun
Yat-sen was born on November 12, 1866, to a peasant family in the
village of Cuiheng, Xiangshan county , Guangzhou prefecture, Guangdong
province (26 km or 16 miles north of Macau), not Hawaii, as this
document affirms.
We know Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's sister has a
Hawaiian Certification of Live Birth too, and she was born in Jakarta,
Indonesia. You can be born anywhere and get one.
Anna Dunham may not have been
America's #1 booster, but, gypsy that she was, she made sure her kids
were well-anchored in the good ole USA.
The Born Conspiracy
Dr. Ron Polarik's final report is the culmination of over four months of
intensive, empirical research, the sole purpose of which has been to determine
if the images and photographs posted on the Internet are true
reproductions of a genuine document purported to be Obama's original
birth certificate.
In his report, Dr. Polarik, who holds a Ph.D. in Instructional Media and
specializes in computer graphics with over 20 years experience with
computers, printers and typewriters, provides conclusive and irrefutable evidence
that the Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) image created and distributed by
Obama's campaign to the Daily Kos, Annenberg's Factcheck, and the St.
Petersburg Times, and Politifact, is, unquestionably, a false
identification document.
Furthermore, there is conclusive and irrefutable evidence that the
photos taken by Annenberg's Factcheck, in collusion with the Obama
campaign, are themselves, false identification documents, having been
made from the same false identification document image, as well as from
additional false identification documents created for the same purpose;
namely, to proffer these false identification documents as true
reproductions of a genuine, Hawaii-issued and certified, "Certification
of Live Birth" document, and thereby, intentionally deceive the American
public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama is a
natural-born
citizen[NaturalBornCitizen.htm - MISSING] of the United States, and thereby, fully qualified to become
their President.
Sadly, mainstream media have totally ignored this inconvenient truth and
are not even been willing to even look at this birth certificate issue.
They are all still in-the-tank for Obama, but even more so now that he
is in line to be President. They all bought into the lies and
fraudulent documents proffered up as evidence on Obama's qualifications.
They have been too quick to label as "trash" or "garbage" any legitimate
questions asked about Obama's real birth certificate. Even
high-ranking governmental officials in the state of Hawaii where Obama
was allegedly born, won't reveal what's on Obama's original birth
certificate. All they have said is that they have it. They
have not said (1) where Obama was born, (2) when Obama was born, or (3)
even to whom Obama was born.
The answer to "What's on Barack Obama's real, original birth
certificate" ranks right up there with some of the great mysteries of
our time -- and that is really hard to swallow. That a man,
with a dubious background, has been elected to the highest office of the
greatest superpower in the world without ever having to prove who he
says he is! That is not "nutty," that's just plain insane!
With all that said, and without further ado, I present to you my final
and complete report on Barack Obama's bogus birth certificate, The Born
Conspiracy. (video)
A second expert forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines has
filed an
affidavit [.pdf] associated with one of the lawsuits stating the following:
1. I am Sandra Ramsey
Lines, With an address at... I am a former federal examiner and
law enforcement officer. I began training as a forensic document
examiner in 1991. I am a Certified Diplomat of Forensic Sciences,
a member of the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners, a
member of the Southwestern Association of Forensic Document Examiners,
and a member of the Questioned Document Subcommittee of the American
Society of Testing and Materials. My background and credentials
are set forth in Exhibit I attached hereto.
2. I have
reviewed the attached
affidavit
[.pdf] posted on the internet from "Ron Polarik," who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death
threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of
experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the
internet by the various groups, which include the "Daily Kos," the Obama
Campaign, "Factcheck.org" and others cannot be relied upon as genuine.
Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm.
Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter
images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the
internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic
document.
3. Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one
aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of
the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would
allow anyone to ask the question, "Does this number refer to the
Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?"
It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there
would be no justifiable reason for obliterating it.
4. In my
experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any
document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a
definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this
case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect
Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all.
Proof Positive
Bogus State Seal
click image to see large copy
What Hawaii Really Said
Countless politicians, reporters, bloggers and even a few judges have
claimed that the State of Hawaii have
ascertained that Obama's birth certificate is on file and it proves he
was born in Hawaii.
Here is the official State of Hawaii comment from state health
director Dr. Chiyome
Fukino:
"Therefore, I as Director
of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital
Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these
type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the
Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth
certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."
There is
nothing in that
statement that states the birth certificate Hawaii holds was
issued by Hawaii; there is nothing there that states the State of Hawaii
holds Obama’s "Hawaii birth certificate."
It is very obvious, in
reading the statement of the Director of Health, that this statement was
very carefully worded, which leaves the inquiring mind asking, why?
When DOH Director Chiyome Fukino announced to the press, on October
31, 2008, that "Hawaii has Obama’s original birth certificate on
record," this should have been the time for Hawaii to also confirm the
existence of the COLB posted online, since that is what prompted
hundreds of phone calls to Ukubo and company in the first place.
The fact that she didn't only reinforces the fact that his COLB does not
exist.
If the birth information on that COLB matched the birth
information in his birth record, then why not say so? It would
have stopped them from being bombarded with phone calls, and may have
ended the quest for his long-form birth certificate.
Conversely,
if the birth information on that COLB did not match the info on his
birth record, then they would be dancing around the issue and dodging
all questions about it -- which is exactly what they did.
No One Confirmed It
In a phone call to Dr. Alvin Onaka, the Hawaii State Registrar and
Head of the Office of Health Status Monitoring (OSHM), of which Vital
Records is a part. Dr. Ron Polarik posed as a writer doing
geneology research, knowing that if he portrayed himyself as yet another
investigator seeking information on Obama's birth records, that he would
be immediately shot down. Strictly speaking, he was collecting vital
record information on Obama's heritage, after all.
He proceeded
to ask Dr. Onaka questions about the COLB that only he, or a manager in
Vital Records, would know. These are questions that Communications
Officer, Janice Okubo does not know or anyone else not connected with
Vital Records. Polarik did this as a way to corroborate his
conversation with Onaka.
Polarik asked Dr. Onaka if the COLBs are
stamped using a machine or by hand. He said, "Both." Hawaii
uses a machine that applies the Seal and stamps electronically and
simultaneously. That's why they appear to be placed in the same
position, from year to year -- except in years where the large Seal
design is used. He said that they use a desktop Seal embosser,
similar to what notaries use, but much longer, so as to place the Seal
higher up on the paper.
Polarik then asked him, "Why is the
border on 2007 COLB different from the 2008 COLB, why is the Seal
larger, and why is your signature stamp located off to the side instead
of directly under the Seal? He told Polarik that they alternate
the Seal design and border design, and when the Seal (the larger one)
doesn't leave enough room to place the signature stamp below it, it's
put off to the side. Evidently, this larger Seal is what is
applied by hand, as in every case where it has been used, the Seal
impression appears in a different spot on the paper.
Then,
Polarik slipped in the the following question. He asked him if
Janice Okubo had confirmed that his office produced a 2007 Certification
of Live Birth, date-stamped June 6, 2007, with Obama's birth information
on it, and he quickly replied:
"Absolutely not. No
one in our office confirmed it."
That promptly ended the
conversation as Dr. Onaka was not going to respond to any more questions
from Polarik. Since then, Hawaii has not answered anymore
questions about Obama's birth record from anyone.
Imprimatur
"This has gotten ridiculous," state health director Dr. Chiyome
Fukino
said yesterday. "There are plenty of other, important things
to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy." So, in what likely
will be a vain attempt to halt the inquiries, Fukino yesterday issued a
statement saying that she and the registrar of vital statistics
personally inspected Obama’s birth certificate and found it to be valid.
Will this be enough to quiet the doubters? "I hope so," Fukino
said. "We need to get some work done." Fukino issued her
statement to try to stomp out persistent rumors that Obama was not born
in Honolulu -- and is therefore not a U.S. citizen and thus ineligible
to run for president.
The document Fukino and Okubo inspected was
an email from PolitiFact of the BC Barry
posted on the web in June.
From PolitiFact look at what the conclusion actually was when she was
pressed, hardly a verification of the validity of the document:
The Hawaii Department of Health receives about a dozen e-mail inquiries
a day about Obama’s COLB, spokesman Okubo said. "I
guess the big issue that’s being raised is the lack of an embossed seal
and a signature," Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those
things are on the back of the document. "Because they scanned the
front … you wouldn’t see those things." Okubo says she got a copy
of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama
one we received. And about the copy we e-mailed her for
verification? "When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our
registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through
it." Still, she acknowledges: "I don’t know that it’s possible for
us to even say beyond a doubt what the image on the site represents."
Well, if Dr. Fukino says so, it must be
so? But Hawaiian officials never said Obama was born in Hawaii.
Another
thing, always watch the language. The Obots always use the term
"birth certificate" when referring to Obama's COLB. A COLB is NOT
a birth certificate.
It Is A Fake
People say that
Obama released a genuine copy of his actual Birth Certificate.
•
He never did, and they
are mistaken, misinformed, or misleading others if they do.
People say that
Obama released a genuine copy of his actual Certification of Live Birth.
•
He never did, and they
are mistaken, misinformed, or misleading others if they do.
People say that Hawaii confirmed
this copy to be Obama's actual Certification of Live Birth.
•
Hawaii never confirmed a
request for, nor the printing of, this Certification of Live Birth.
People say that Factcheck
verified this image as Obama's actual Certification of Live Birth, while
incorrectly referring to it as a "birth certificate."
•
Factcheck was complicit
in falsifying this image and passing it off as a genuine scan.
Obama also
knows that this image is fake and doesn't contain his actual birth
information.
• That's why Obama and his staff refuse to
answer any questions about his birth certificate, while ridiculing
anyone that dares ask.
Obama Stonewalls
It's been more than two years since
Obama announced his candidacy for President, and five months since he
was elected President, yet Obama has repeatedly refused to provide any
proof that he is Constitutionally qualified to be president.
Despite what you may have heard, Obama's eligibility issue has never
been settled. If you are looking for reasons why, there is only
one reason that you should know:
Barack Hussein Obama flat-out refuses to show the one document that
would confirm or deny his true identity, parentage, and birth origin --
his original, "vault" birth certificate.
In March 2008, a lawsuit was filed to remove John McCain, the GOP
candidate, from the ballot because his natural-born status was also in
doubt. John McCain immediately responded by showing his actual,
original birth certificate to Congress.
On June 12, 2008, about three months after John McCain settled
his eligibility issue, the pressure on Obama to do the same led to the
release of what was called his "original birth certificate" -- an image
copy, not a paper copy, by his campaign, not by himself, to the Daily
Kos blog, not to Congress, or to anyone even remotely responsible for
vetting him.
Moreover, what Obama
submitted for "release," was not an image copy of his original birth
certificate as claimed. It was an abbreviated transcript of a
birth record called a "Certification of Live Birth." HOWEVER, the
image itself was a fabricated forgery intended to mimic this transcript.
Since a forged birth document cannot represent a true birth record, it
means that someone committed forgery just to keep Obama's actual birth
record from ever being known.
What Is The Evidence Of A Forgery
Many people who also saw this image
(see Appendix A) had said that it was a "fake," and that the document
pictured in the image could not possibly be genuine. The image
anomalies that they pointed out as proof of a forgery included those
that I had found and reported, working independently. Here is an
annotated list of them:
1. The image
contains digital signatures of Photoshop
2. Only one side of alleged COLB shown (COLB is two-sided)
3. Missing second-fold line while
first fold-line is shown
4. Missing
the embossed Seal of Hawaii
5.
Missing the State Registrar's signature
6. Unusual and unnatural pixilation between the letters of text
data
7. Original text was removed by
pasting a layer of background over them
8. Different text was typed onto a text layer and merged with
background layer
9. Pixel blocks of
text data are different from the data headers
10. Heavy and unnecessary sharpening of the whole image,
except for the border
11. Border was
created as a separate layer and merged with other layers
12. Border pattern is more blurred
than the background
13. Border
pattern more transparent than those on genuine scans
14. Top and bottom black border bars
have less pixilation than text
15.
Border bars are more black in color than any of the text
16. Absence of green, background
pixels inside the border bar text
17. White lines between border bars and pattern (both sides)
18. Image colors are very different
from scan images of real COLBs
19.
Lack of pixilation in black rectangle covering certificate number
20. Different blocking artifacts
from JPG compression found across the image
It's Invalid
In Dr. Ron Polarik's final report,
"Obama's Born Conspiracy," these anomalies are explained in greater
detail.
The consensus among all of us
was that this Certification of Live Birth document image (COLB) had been
heavily doctored. What we didn't know were the lengths to which
the Obama Campaign and his enablers in the media went to rebuff any
claims of forgery by personally attacking anyone for even suggesting it.
They called us "tin-foil hat wearing, right-wing conspiracy nuts," or "birthers"
for short, but these titles are tame in comparison to the vicious and
virulent slurs hurled our way. Rather than respond with some
confirmatory evidence to support the claim that the scan image was
genuine, they offered all kinds of logical excuses as to why it wouldn't
be fake, coupled with comments from individuals and fact-checking groups
claiming to be non-partisan but clearly shilling for Obama. The
common denominator here is that all of them failed to provide a single
shred of valid evidence that Obama's actual COLB document was even
printed in June 2007 by Hawaii's DOH, let alone scanned a year later.
One thing that no one could deny was
that a black, graphic rectangle was added to the image to redact the
COLB's certificate number, and then resaved, permanently altering the
COLB shown in the image, and in effect, changing the image itself.
The following caveat appears on the COLB document:
ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE
In other words, "Which part of this caveat did the "birther"
critics NOT understand?
What's Wrong With This Picture
There were enough alterations in this
one image to fill a book on "How to falsify an image and hide the signs
of forgery." Nothing about this image was genuine, yet, five weeks
later, Factcheck posted a set of nine digital photos of what they claim
was the same, alleged birth certificate used to make the scan image.
What's wrong with this picture? (or
should I say, "pictures?")
If what's
shown in the scan image is bogus, then what's shown in Factcheck's
photos must also be bogus. We already knew that Factcheck was a
shill for Obama along with being an accomplice to his document fraud.
So, we were not surprised when Factcheck launched an all-out assault on
the "birthers" and their "right-wing conspiracy theories" along with the
photos they posted on their website. Factcheck's COLB photos
allegedly show the front side of the embossed Seal that was not shown in
the scan image (except while under image enhancements). These COLB
photos also show the second fold-line that never was seen in the scan
image under any conditions.
Factcheck intended their photos to verify the existence of a real COLB
document that the claim was used to make the scan image.
Unfortunately for Factcheck, their photos actually verify that their
scan image was bogus. For if this document object, with its
pronounced second fold-line and heavily embossed Seal, was used to make
the original scan image, then the scanner would never have missed
copying these prominent features. Added to that revelation is the
suspicious failure of Factcheck to photograph the most important part of
the document, the entire embossed Seal as seen from both sides.
Factcheck's photos taken from the back side of the Seal show that the
top third of the Seal was deliberately cropped from the picture.
Even in the full shot of the Seal, the top one-third of it was also cut
off -- well below the second fold line.
Rather than lend credibility to the original scan image, these
photos supported Polarik's conclusions that the scan image was not made
from a genuine document, but was fabricated from other images. A
top, forensic document examiner also agrees with my conclusions.
The fact that Obama's original birth certificate is not the only
document being withheld from view, only underscores the immense effort
taken to keep Obama's real identity from ever being known.
If the Obama narrative is real, and
Obama really is who he says he is, then why are there no real documents
to verify it, such as his Punahou School records, Selective Service
Registration, Occidental College records, Passport (used to visit
Pakistan), Columbia College records, Columbia thesis, Harvard College
records, Baptism certificate, Medical records, Illinois State Senate
records, Law License application, Law practice client list, and
University of Chicago scholarly articles?
Does Anyone See A Pattern Here
From
the first day he ran for the Office of the President of the United
States, Barack Obama, a constitutional
lawyer, knew that he was not a natural-born citizen and not
constitutionally qualified to become president. But, he ran anyway. Obama may also have known that he was not born in Hawaii, that he came
to Hawaii as an illegal immigrant, and that he was never naturalized as
a US citizen.
Does that sound like a
viable MOTIVE for not showing his original birth certificate?
If all of the information shown on
the scan image were true, then there would not be any reason to hide the
original. If all of the information shown on Factcheck's photos were
true, then there would not be any reason to hide the original. If all of
the information we've seen is actually true, then why fabricate bogus
birth certificates when a real one can be made for $12? What is worth
committing felony document fraud just to keep it hidden?
Well, it's a lot more than that. This bogus birth certificate was used to deceive over 300 million
Americans in regards to Obama's true identity and birth origins. This
bogus birth certificate was used to deceive members of our government,
our judiciary, our armed forces, and law enforcement into believing that
Obama was born in Hawaii, and that he is a natural-born US citizen who
is constitutionally qualified to become president.
Obtaining a real birth certificate copy is the very last
thing that Obama would ever do, then or now, because it would absolutely
confirm that the images and photos posted on the Internet are forgeries
and would expose anyone involved in this fraud to criminal prosecution. Does that sound like a viable MOTIVE for not showing it?
There is no question that Obama
fails to meet the constitutional qualifications for being a natural-born
citizen because his father passed his British citizenship onto Obama as
a child and made him a dual citizen. But, what about the question of
document fraud? Has a crime been committed? Who's responsible? What if a
president was complicit in committing this document fraud and
intentionally covering it up by all legal means possible?
Conspiracies in presidential
elections do happen. Does "Watergate" ring a bell?
Recently, another Illinois politician was impeached for
selling Obama's Senate seat. It that act really worse than committing
felony document fraud, as defined by Chapter 18 of the United States
Code, Section 1028, Fraud and related activity in connection with
identification documents, authentication features, and information?.
As people are wont to say at times
like this, "Where is the outrage?" Where, indeed.
Other Opinions
At the same time that Dr. Polarik saw Obama's alleged COLB, a
discussion of that image was taking place among the registered readers
of a popular blog (HotAir.com) that is a repository of top stories from
other blogs and websites. I had not seen these comments until now,
ten months after they were published. Although the Hot Air
community is mostly pro-Obama, a number of members had identified the
very same anomalies as I had while working independently. The
significance of this discovery cannot be overstated as it serves to
validate the work that I've done in proving this image, and ones to
follow, to be false, forged, and fabricated. Here, in their own
words, is what they said on June 12:
From JM Hanes:
it
really bothers me when something like this simply makes no sense.
I couldn't begin to guess who would have fiddled with the document -- or
the when & why either -- but I also can't think of a single logical
reason (including filters, sharpening, or conversions) that a scan of an
original document could result in the kind of selective pixelization/artifacting
in evidence here. Pasting from
one image into another, however, would produce precisely that effect.
"The pixilation around the text
is...completely inconsistent with the background, which is discontinuous
behind the text. Zoom in on the faint image of the reverse
"JUN 6 2007" in the lower middle of the document for comparison and
you’ll see that the regular jpeg pixel blocking is uninterrupted.
That’s part of whatever this original document was before someone
Photoshopped it. The SEAL was probably scanned from another actual
document and pasted up along with the necessary text. Nice try
with the "Photoshop filter" theory though! I n any case, if someone were
trying to make a real document look as fake as this one does, that would
still be a hoax.
From Spolitics:
The document looks fake, like the text
was layered over the background, not typed onto it. So I
downloaded the picture and checked the properties. According to
the file’s details, this document was originated in Adobe Photoshop CS3
Macintosh. That’s not proof of forgery, but
there’s no "date acquired" listed,
which would have indicated this was scanned.
From
LimeyGeek:
Zoom in on the lettering and check out the artefacts
surrounding them. I suspect this is a modern document, scanned,
original data scrubbed, and overlaid with digital text. Problem
is, then not all the text would match stylistically, so they had to go
over every bit of text with new lettering. Contrast the artifacts
surrounding the text on this document with the text in the top and
bottom bars -- that’s original text. The text in the body of the
document has been doctored. Obama is not claiming it as a
legitimate copy. I suspect it is somebody’s legitimate copy,
scanned, scrubbed and doctored to look like Obama’s.
As somebody
that works with the math and code in such software, I can tell you that
these artifacts are nothing of the sort. This is not a case of
lousy artifacts due to image encoding (jpeg). Such artifacts would
be consistent, these are not. In fact, if you look close enough,
you can see that the original lettering was slightly larger than the
superimposed fonts.
The point is that an original document would
have consistent artifacts due to scanning, and additional consistent
artifacts due to further encoding (in this case, jpeg
encoding/compression). Whatever
the origin of this document, it has been doctored.
From
RightWired:
It’s a 100%
forgery. There are numerous reasons, but the #1 reason: Laser
printers don’t add anti-aliasing to fonts. Zoom in to 600%
or greater in Photoshop or Corel. Look at an "A". Notice how
it’s smoothed a bit? You can see that the characters have been
laid on top of the green government background. There’s a hazy
white area in between the strokes of each line of the character.
When a laser printer prints on the paper, it basically burns it on with
a super high precision. It doesn’t turn the area behind the
actually copy white.
I work in advertising. I have studied
this...as well as our department’s graphic artist -- it’s fraudulent.
Also file properties say Adobe CS3, black copy is much darker than the
rest. The official seal is blurry and pixilated.
From Just
A Grunt:
Blending high contrast
type into a lower contrast background is particularly fussy work; it
looks to me like the original text and original background started out
at different resolutions as well. While text that bleeds
through from the other side of a document would look different from the
crisp text printed on the front, it wouldn’t change how the pixels in
the image itself are grouped. The integrity of the typical 8 x 8
pixel squares which you can see in the 6 shot aren’t busted up by
artifacts the way they are in the A shot. I may not be using the
right techno terms here -- alas, it’s easier to zero in on the anomalies
when you’re used to dealing with recalcitrant pixels than it is to
explain.
From WoosterOh:
I find it odd that every word is
pixilated around it, yet the black box is not. Those words are not
on the document. To me, it looks like it is from some HA HA
funny site that you can do your own certificates. Select a
background image, select text to put on the background image. I
guess that {the Certification of Live Birth is a computer-generated
printout) could account for the pixels, but I am not even sure that
accounts for it. You would have to assume that the generation
means taking a scan of an actual certification, using it as an image,
then generating text over that scan, then converting the text to an
image, then laying that image down over the scanned certificate.
Take the layers and flatten the image, then print the image. FAKE
From G Charles:
A word of caution -- I use Photoshop a fair
amount and I just zoomed in on the text.
I agree that this is not a scan of an
original document "AS IS". Nevertheless, it could well be a
scan of an original document that has been run through a Photoshop
filter once or twice. And the original may well look pretty much
the same to those who can’t zoom in on the photo. And as support
for my "Photoshop filter" theory, the seal carries the same pixilation
artifacts. Therefore it is NOT simply text that has been
superimposed -- whatever explanation there is has to account for the
seal and text having the same unnatural pixilation.
From
iurockhead:
Enlarge and the
text looks like it has been added on top of the green and white
background. I call fake. I don’t doubt his
citizenship and birthright, but that document is a fake.
From
wise_man:
And the black text on
this wide open field of the background, is awfully sharp and crisp for
being a copy.
From SilverStar830:
Looks
"chopped." It looks like an
exceptionally EASY document to fake.
From Buford:
When blown up it is clearly a fake.
At 2000% it is clear that the
pixilation of the text is much finer than the pixilation of the
background. It is an extremely low quality fake. If
this served any purpose but to drive traffic to the Kos site I would be
surprised.
From infidel65:
After repeated requests for
Obama’s birth certificate, a copy shows up on the Daily Kos. This
stinks to high heaven. The Obama campaign may have thought
they’d put this issue to bed, but they have only succeeded in fuelling
the suspicions.
Confused?
Does this Barack Obama birth certificate issue bug you
because, although improbable, it's possible that he's not a natural born
citizen, isn't eligible to be President under the Constitution, and this
issue could be bigger than Watergate -- or any other "gate" in history?
Are you afraid that if you were even to raise the subject with your
friends that they will think you wear a tinfoil hat, because
Factcheck.org, the final arbiter of truth in the universe, said so?
Are you with the news media, and after spending so much money to get
Barack Obama elected, you'd hate to ruin your investment?
Are you a talk radio host who thinks that if you say the burden of proof
needed to demonstrate one is eligible to be Commander in Chief should be
at least as high as, oh, say, the level to be eligible for Hawaiian
homestead status (see 1.F. below), that you'd be forced to give equal
time to someone who disagrees?
Are you a conservative, libertarian, or any conscientious
constitutionalist from any ideological side of life, who's convinced
something's not right, but you're afraid your reputation might be
tarnished because, after all, this could be one big Saul-Alinsky-style
set-up, and the joke would be on you?
Fear not! Joe the Farmer has prepared an outline showing that no
matter how this issue is ultimately resolved, you have legitimate
concerns, and that Barack Obama should, simply out of respect for the
nation he was elected to lead, disclose the sealed vault copy of his
birth certificate.
Given the circumstances, if Barack Obama respected this nation, he would
prove it by the simplest and easiest of gestures - unless, of course,
all this talk about change and hope was just a bunch of bull, and he's
just "another politician."
To date, the suspicions have not subsided, yet people are talking
about Obama's Certification of Live Birth (COLB) as if it really exists.
Why? Because they know that foreign-born children are also
issued a COLB by Hawaii, and therefore, the COLB cannot confirm one's
natural-born status. Only the actual, "vault" original birth
certificate can, and Obama knows that better than anyone. What
other reason could there be for the occupant of the Oval Office to
refuse such a simple request?
Because, it is not a "simple
request," but a bombshell that blows Obama's entire claim to the
presidency right out of the water.
Now that you see the big
picture, what are you going to do about it?
A Forged Long-Form Birth Certificate
DC sources
say that an
Administration team is working on perfecting a forgery of the long-form
birth certificate. They plan on presenting it in a a month or so. The
source is an FBI agent who has drinking buddy from University of Illinois
now in the Administration. It's second hand, but the source is supposed
to be solid.
They have already prepared the forgery with special
paper and ink. The document was printed on a fully functional 1960
Heidelberger printing press located at a print museum in Toronto. Access
was arranged by a trustee of the museum who is connected to a large
Canadian banking/investment firm with major US interests.
The
blanks in the forged form were filled in with an old Underwood Manual
typewriter bought at an estate sale in Skokie, IL. The raised seal was
the easiest piece to fake, since you can by a special order corporate
seal from just about any online office supply store.
The only
reason they haven't rolled out the forgery yet is that it is
"seasoning" under mild UV light and a back and forth rotation between
between a humidifier and a sauna. Get ready....one to two months tops.
I personally don't put a lot of stock into this report. I have
included it here in the off-chance that a couple of months down the road
Obama suddenly releases his long-form birth certificate after his long and
expensive battle to keep it from the American People. If that happens,
this report will immediately gain a great deal of credibility.
Somebody finally asked Barack Obama's
White House press secretary about the president's elusive birth
certificate.
When
asked by WorldNetDaily.com White House
correspondent Les Kinsolving why Obama, who has pledged transparency in
his administration, would not release his long-form birth certificate to
establish his constitutional eligibility for office, spokesman Robert
Gibbels,
employing Alinsky's Rule 5, guffawed in unison with members of the Washington press corps,
about the concerns of 400,000 petitioners who have demanded it.
Here is the
video.
"Are you looking for the president's birth certificate?" Gibbels asked
incredulously. "Lester, this question in many ways continues to astound
me. The state of Hawaii provided a copy with the seal of the president's
birth. I know there are apparently at least 400,000 people -- (laughter)
-- that continue to doubt the existence of and the certification by the
state of Hawaii of the president's birth there, but it's on the Internet
because we put it on the Internet for each of those 400,000 to download. I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we'll
have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy."
It was the
first time any member of the press corps has publicly asked a member of
the administration a question directly related to Obama's constitutional
eligibility for office as a "natural born citizen."
Gibbels
continues the lie that Obama released his birth certificate. It's a
damnable lie. Obama has never released his birth certificate and Gibbels
and the rest of the White House staff knows it.
There are actually 3 lies in
Gibbels statement:
1. The State of Hawaii has never provided a
copy of Obama's birth certificate -- with or without a state seal --
never.
2. The State of Hawaii has never certified Obama was born
in Hawaii -- never.
3. There has never been an Obama birth certificate on the
Internet -- never.
Now you know why I refer to Gibbs as Gibbels.
He's Obama's propagandist.
Go here
for the background on Obama's bogus birth records, and
here for the law behind the
eligibility question.
Hawaii Changes The Rules
According to the Hawaii
Star-Bulletin, the State of Hawaii, Department of Health no longer
issues copies of paper birth certificates as was done in the past, said
spokeswoman Janice Okubo.
The department only issues
"certifications" of live births, and that is the "official birth
certificate" issued by the state of Hawaii, she said.
And, it's
only available in electronic form.
Okubo explained that the
Health Department went paperless in 2001.
"At that time, all
information for births from 1908 (on) was put into electronic files for
consistent reporting," she said.
Information about births is
transferred electronically from hospitals to the department.
"The
electronic record of the birth is what (the Health Department) now keeps
on file in order to provide same-day certified copies at our help window
for most requests," Okubo said.
Asked for more information about
the short-form versus long-form birth documents, Okubo said the Health
Department "does not have a short-form or long-form certificate."
"The birth certificate form has been modified over the years and
decades to conform to national standards and models," she said.
Okubo also emphasized the certification form "contains all the
information needed by all federal government agencies for transactions
requiring a birth certificate."
She added that the U.S. Supreme
Court has recognized the state's current certification of live birth "as
an official birth certificate meeting all federal and other
requirements."
The issue of what constitutes an official Hawaii
birth certificate received national attention during last year's
presidential campaign. Those who doubted Barack Obama's American
citizenship called the copy of the Hawaii birth document posted on his
campaign web site a fake.
Asked about that document, Okubo said,
"This is the same certified copy everyone receives when they request a
birth certificate."
Is Ms. Okubo
trying to say that
Hawaii no longer has a copy of Obama's original birth certificate on
file? -- how convenient.
Is Ms. Okubo saying that the previous statement from Hawaii state health
director Dr. Chiyome Fukino is not true?
"Therefore, I, as
Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of
Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain
these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the
Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth
certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures."
Why does everyone in Hawaii have a different story?
Maybe Indiana Jones can find Obama's original birth certificate.
After all, he found the Ark of the Covenant.
First They Willl
Then They Won't
The Hawaiian certification of live birth (COLB) the Obama
Campaign posted on the Internet as proof of his eligibility would not be
accepted for eligibility for some Hawaiian state government programs.
The website of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, states
clearly the COLB touted by the Obama campaign, White House press
secretary Robert Gibbels and a host of other Obama defenders is not
acceptable as a form of identification to qualify under this program.
There are two categories of documents used in
determining eligibility: primary and secondary.
Primary Documents
The primary documents used to
show you are of age and a qualified native Hawaiian are:
A
certified copy of Certificate of Birth; A certified copy of
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, including testimonies; or A
certified
copy of Certificate of Delayed Birth. You will need the
certified
birth certificates for:
Yourself Your biological father; and
Your biological mother The state Department of Health, (DOH), Vital
Records Section, records documents by island and district
(geographically) and by the date of the event (chronologically).
If your biological parents' documents don't clearly prove that you have
at least 50 percent Hawaiian ancestry, you will also need certified
birth certificates for:
Your biological father's parents; and
Your biological mother's parents.
In order to process your
application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the
original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This
is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live
Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original
Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the
computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by
DHHL.
Hawaii Home
Lands won't take it, but Obama insists it certifies him to be
Commander-in-Chief.
Update:
This item was cut 'n' paste from the DHHL website. Between 6/8/09
and 6/18/09 DHHL has scrubbed this site. In the past 10 days they
have changed the policy above. They will now accept Certifications
of Live Birth. Click the link now. Check it out.
A
coincidence? Suuuuuuuuure! The Obots continue to scrub the
Internet for the Obamamessiah.
I'm going to have to start caching
everything.
Commonality
Breaking News From Rush
Limbaugh’s Radio Program! Rush just
said:
"...you know, a lot of people talk about Obama and his messianic
complex. He does have one thing in common with God. Barack
Obama has one thing in common with God. Do you know what it is?
God does not have a birth certificate either."
Heh, heh, heh . . .
Happy Anniversary
Dr. Ron Polarik
reminds us that today, June 12th, 2009, marks the Anniversary of the Obama COLB Forgery.
Yes, a whole year has past since Obama committed felony document fraud
and posted a false
identification document on the Internet.
As battles go, the Obots
and the liberal media and blogsphere launched a bigger assault in
defense of this bogus birth certificate than the Battle of Stalingrad in
WWII.
It was
Factcheck.org and Politifact that mounted a full-court press against
the upstart "Birthers," a name given to them by the liberal "Truthers"
who conjured up more 9/11 conspiracies than Uncle Ben has rice.
When the liberal "Truthers," so-called for the "Truth Movement" they
started, went viral on so many Leftist websites that there wasn’t enough
Reynolds Wrap in the world to fashion hats for them all.
Now, the
shoe -- or "tin foil hat" -- is on the other foot...er...head.
Like Ron says, "It’s the forgery, Stupid!"
Here
is Polarik's final
report -- the culmination of over four months of intensive, empirical
research, the sole purpose of which has been to determine if the images
and photographs posted on the Internet are true reproductions of a
genuine document purported to be Obama's original birth certificate.
The Birth Certificate Question
An Open Letter
to Shephard Smith at FOX News -- Saturday, June 20, 2009 5:44:05 PM · 99
of 113
We have no proof of where Obama was born. Anyone who
claims that he was born in Hawaii is suffering from
COLB Derangement
Syndrome. Hawaii never confirmed that he was born in Hawaii, never
confirmed that he has a Hawaiian long-form birth certificate or any
other US birth certificate on file, or even if they have anything
tangible beyond a computer record.
Most of all, Hawaii confirmed
that they never released a copy of Obama’s COLB to anyone in June 2007.
Einstein could have called himself, "Humpty Dumpty," and hid his
face, but that would not change the fact that he discovered E=mc². Likewise, Obama’s 2007 COLB would be just as nonexistent as if I had
never
discovered that it was nonexistent. But, it is a good thing that I
did.
It's positively amazing the amount of effort that people
have expended in defense of this piece of crap COLB image that the
Poseur-in-Chief now admits to posting online. There is only one reason
why, after more than a year, that only one scan image of one side only
has ever been made from what is alleged to be
Obama’s 2007 COLB: it
doesn't exist. Obama’s 2007 COLB is a forged fake, fabricated in
Photoshop, and nothing that anyone says or does can change that fact.
There is absolutely no reason, whatsoever, that the Obama Campaign
would not make another, more detailed scan, including one of the reverse
side of the COLB, and send that out to quiet critics. No reason, EXCEPT
that the document does not exist in the real world. It only exists in
the unreal, virtual world of Photoshopped fakes.
BTW, a digital
photo is not the same thing as a scan image, and it most certainly
cannot be used to validate a scan image. Certainly not when the document
object is photographed at a steep angles from the capture device (which
were intentional).
Remember that
Factcheck.org did not take a digital
photo of the reverse side (all that Factcheck photographed was only 1/4
of the entire back page, and only 2/3 of the Seal). Why was so little of
the back page shown? Because what was photographed belonged to a
different COLB!! Check it out for yourself: the Seal on the reverse side
does not match the one on the front side. It is one of several, new
discoveries I've made after revisitng the Factcheck photographs.
A year later after the bogus scan image was posted, THAT is exactly what
people are still talking about. They are referring back to the original
forged image on Fight the Smears and Factcheck. They are quoting Factcheck -- the
co-conspirator in this birth certficate scam -- as
having "verified" the bogus "scan image."
Recall that Factcheck
claimed they photographed the same object that the Obama Campaign
scanned two months earlier.
They took these photos SOLELY IN DEFENSE of
the scan image that they alleged to have "validated," and to fend off
the widespread criticism of the COLB as a forged image. However, they
failed to "debunk" the critics. This was all part of an elaborate ruse
to create the illusion that Obama had released his genuine, certified
original birth certificate to the public.
What is hard to believe
are the people in high places who actually believe that this document
exists, but of those, here is a segment who also discount it as being
proof of where Obama was actually born. COLBs are incredibly easy to get
with little documentation required. And, yes, it is a well-documented
fact that Hawaii was giving COLBs to foreign-born children.
But
the bottom line is that the original "scan image" is what people are
still talking about today, and it is an indisputable fact that Obama, or
anyone else, does not have a genuine 2007 COLB document. What
is posted online is as bogus as a four-dollar bill.
Obama
ascended to the position of President by fraudulent means, including
document fraud, Internet fraud, voter fraud, and campaign funding fraud,
to name a few. The only question at hand now is whether he will be
removed by invalidating his election, or by the articles of impeachment. If I were a Democratic Congressman, and I was going to be implicated in
this fraud, I'd be calling for impeachment in a New York minute.
The only thing I'll
sign is a petition for Obama, Obama for America, and Factcheck to be
charged with
criminal document fraud and Internet fraud for creating and
proffering a false identification document, aka the fabricated COLB
image posted on Obama's website, among others, that Press Secretary
Gibbs publicly admitted was put there by the aforementioned President of
the United States and his Presidential Administration.
These said
individuals and parties did willingly, and with malice aforethought,
violate
Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028, Fraud and
related activity in connection with identification documents,
authentication features, and information, by creating and preferring
what they allege was Obama's actual, original birth certificate, but
was, in fact, a false identification document as defined by statute
below:
A "false identification document" is any document *or
facsimile of a document) of a type intended or commonly accepted for the
purposes of identification of individuals that -- (A) is not issued by or
under the authority of a governmental entity or was issued under the
authority of a governmental entity but was subsequently altered for
purposes of deceit; and (B) appears to be issued by or under the
authority of the United States Government, a State, a political
subdivision of a State, a foreign government, a political subdivision of
a foreign government, or an international governmental or
quasi-governmental organization.
The Obama Administration, the
Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, Factcheck.org, and Barack Hussein
Obama as the principle mastermind of this document fraud who directed
the creation and distribution of a false identification document for
himself, are hereby charged with the commission of felony document
fraud, punishable by up to five (5) years in prison, and a maximum fine
of $250,000 for each offense.
It is a statement of fact, and
admission therewith, that the Obama Campaign, aka Obama for America, did
create a minimum of three (3) false identification document copies and
distributed said copies to the Daily Kos, Factcheck, and Politifact;
and, additionally, posted the original false identification document on
Obama's own website, "My.BarackObama.com" and also on a separate website
known as, "Fight The Smears."
Furthermore, two months after the
creation and distribution of these false identification documents, Obama
for America, in collusion with Factcheck.org, a subsidiary of the
Annenberg Public Policy Center, owned by the Annenberg Foundation and
funded by billionaire George Soros, created and posted nine (9)
photographs of what they further alleged was the same, false
identification document that they had earlier alleged was a scanned
facsimile of Obama's original birth certificate -- thus compounding
their earlier offenses with further violations of the same statutes.
In all, then presidential candidate, Barack Hussein Obama, his
campaign organization, d/b/a Obama for America, and Annenberg's Factcheck.org organization are hereby charged with thirteen (13) separate
violations of Chapter 18 of the United States Code, Section 1028.
It is further alleged that these individuals and organizations, by
virtue of displaying and promoting these fraudulent images as genuine
government-issued documents, to the voting populaces of all 50 states in
the Union, are hereby, also guilty of committing Internet fraud, in
violation of individual state laws and Federal laws.
Lastly,
these false documents are also in violation of Hawaiian state forgery
statues as the State Government of Hawaii was directly deceived and
harmed irrespective of the other charges.
I call upon the
Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Attorneys General of the other
49 states, the DC District Attorney, the Attorney General of the United
States, and the Congress of the United States to launch their own
investigations of the crimes committed against the respective state and
national governments, and the citizens under these jurisdictions.
