Welcome to nazigassings.com

Links to complete essays by Friedrich Paul Berg:

Diesel Gas Chambers;
Ideal for Torture—Absurd for Murder

Part 1 -- Introduction with Toxicology of CO
Part 2 -- Producer Gas
Part 3 -- Conclusions and Notes

auf Deutsch: Diesel-gaskammern: Mythos im Mythos

Nizkor Lies about the Toxicity of Diesel Exhaust

Self-Assisted Holocaust Hoax.

auf Deutsch: Der selbstassistierte Holocaust-Schwindel

Zyklon-B and the German Delousing Chambers

Typhus and the Jews

Poison Gas Über Alles

auf Deutsch: Giftgas über Alles

Blue Women on the Beach—and the False Toxicity of CO2 in Diesel Exhaust

Gas Chambers for Robert Faurisson

Pat Buchanan and the Diesel Exhaust Controversy

Guidelines for Safety with Poison Gas-generating Vehicles

Index Page 2

Index Page 3

Essays by other Authors

Hitler's Persecution of Jews: the Influence of Christianity by Verohnika Clark

Hitler's Jewish Nazis by Verohnika Clark NEW

auf Deutsch: Gasgeneratoren im Krieg und Frieden by Major-General and Undersecretary of State von Schell NEW




Although photos like this are used endlessly to brainwash the public into believing in Nazi gassings, it has long been conceded that no one was gassed at Bergen-Belsen.  There simply are no photographs anywhere that are seriously presented as photos of gassing victims.  The US Holocaust Museum has more than 6.000 photos available on-line, but not one picture of a supposed victim of gassing with diesel exhaust or Zyklon-B, or any other gas--not even one.
America's handiwork: Victims of disease–generally typhus–at Belsen, a direct result of the Anglo-American bombing of axis civilians. The Germans were falsely blamed. General EISENHOWER even forced thousands of German civilians to walk past the dead as if they were somehow responsible. Instead of being tried and hung for being the depraved war criminal that he truly was, EISENHOWER actually rose to become president of Columbia University, and later the United States. The above picture and countless others like it are used to support the gassing claims when, in fact, the people who do this know perfectly well that not even one of the bodies shown in any photo anywhere is of someone killed with poison or poison gas of any kind. Shame on America!.

During the American civil war, the Union army lost twice as many men to disease as from wounds. Near the end of World War 1, the United States lost roughly half-a-million people to the Spanish influenza without even one enemy bomb having been dropped on the USA–and without any serious food shortages either. In September 2005 in peacetime America, the entire world witnessed the human disaster following Hurricane Katrina–not in defeated Germany, but in the richest country in the world. New Orleans had become Bergen-Belsen on the Mississippi. Americans should bite their tongues regarding Nazi Germany and the German concentration camps.

A real GAS VAN.  When I first saw this photograph in the German automotive literature from the war, my last doubt about the revisionist position ended.  This was a gas van--but quite different from everything that was alleged.
A typical, self-propelled, poison gas generating bus (up to 35% CO)—never implicated in mass gassings!! Thousands of these vehicles were in daily operation in Austria and Germany already before the war. In German, they were called Holzgaswagen. In English, they were called “producer gas vehicles.” They burned wood chips with a restricted air supply. The result was a highly-combustible gas, principally carbon monoxide, which was also highly toxic. Producer gas is poison gas! Holzgas ist Giftgas!

There is much more on Index Page 3 regarding these life-saving shelters with gas-tight doors and peepholes. This was a double-door to a basement operating room in a German hospital to permit surgery during air raids. Peephole as required was right half of door. Were they planning to gas the patients--of course, NOT!  

Steel, gas-tight bombshelter doors with peepholes for safety–typical of tens of thousands of identical doors throughout German-occupied Europe. At the US Holocaust Museum in Washington DC, the only piece of physical evidence on display was a similar door with a peephole. It proves absolutely nothing when one understands what was really happening. Peepholes were required in all such bombshelter doors according to the German industry standard: DIN-Vornorm 4104. For more about German bombshelters, especially the gastight doors, see Index Page 3


Real Holocaust victims, which is what these victims were, look far worse than the dead at Bergen-Belsen.
German civilian victims of Allied terror bombing found inside a Hamburg bombshelter. The British dropped the actual bombs, but America, ever since the start of Lend Lease in March 1941 and long before Pearl Harbor, provided the financing for these true atrocities. The British had begun the deliberate bombing of civilian targets in WWII already in May of 1940. The German response in kind only began after much restraint in August of 1940–more than three months later, and only after numerous German peace proposals were totally rejected by Churchill.


The establishment historians were, and probably still are, totally unaware of this wide-spread, poison gas technology.
Poison Gas to Go. One of more than 500,000 self-propelled, poison gas generators in German-occupied Europe. The poison gas (with as much as 35% CO) was a necessary alternative to the liquid fuels, mostly synthetic, which were reserved for combat vehicles and aircraft. HITLER approved! Each producer gas vehicle could have been easily adapted for mass gassing if there had ever been any such intention. Each generator was equipped with its own start-up blower (Anfachgebläse) which normally blew some of the generated gas only to atmosphere–but which could easily have been connected to a hose or stovepipe to fill a jail cell, or barracks, or gas chamber.


Was this artistic logo intended to promote the mass gassing of Jews or anyone in order to make Germany strong?  Of course, not!
Strength through the use of Gas. The above logo was used to promote voluntary use of producer gas in early years of war. Already by September of 1942, all medium and heavy vehicles including buses throughout German-occupied Europe had to use producer gas as fuel. However, by September of 1943, ALBERT SPEER made producer gas use compulsory for all civilian motor vehicles as well, including all trucks and buses–liquid fuels were prohibited except for military and emergency services. Diesel and gasoline engines at all concentration camps were also driven with the highly toxic, producer gas! The resulting engine exhaust, from diesel or gasoline engines, was harmless in comparison to the fuel itself--and one more reason among many to reject all of the "Holocaust" gassing claims.


Instead of Hess, a true hero, being offered the Nobel Peace Prize--it went instead to one of the most scurrilous liars of all time, Elie Wiesel.
RUDOLF HESS: Prisoner for Peace. In May of 1941, HESS flew alone from Germany to Britain to prove with his own physical presence that Germany's offers of peace with Britain were sincere and not mere propaganda. For this heroic, Christ-like act HESS was rewarded with life imprisonment, most of it in solitary confinement–until he was actually murdered in Spandau Prison by a British assassin in 1987 at age 93. No man ever deserved the Nobel Peace Prize more than RUDOLF HESS.

"Vergiftungsgefahr!" means Danger of Poisoning!

Producer Gas technology was extremely dangerous and therefore all drivers and users of this technology were repeatedly warned about the dangers. The poster above was widely used to tell everyone involved: “Vergiftunsgefahr (Danger of Poisoning)“ The bottom of the poster goes on:Do not start the generator except in the open or else vent gases to the outdoors!”

500,000 Poison Gas Generators on Wheels. The key to the entire Holocaust HOAX is the fact that the Germans actually used poison gas as a fuel to drive nearly all of their civilian motor vehicles as well as many military vehicles–throughout the war and throughout all of their occupied territories including Russia.. The best evidence of this is the German wartime literature–but, a recent book Alte Technik mit Zukunft from 1986 summarizes the wartime history of the German producer gas technology. One key sentence appears already on its back cover: “More than 500,000 suction-gas-driven trucks and cars were driven until the end of the Second World War in nearly all european countries...” The term “suction-gas-driven” refers only to producer gas (Holzgas) vehicles. The most important fact revealed here is the large number–“more than 500,000.” For the Nazis to have used diesel exhaust, or even gasoline engine exhaust, as a source of toxic carbon monoxide when the actual fuel they were most likely to use to drive their diesel engines, or gasoline engines, was itself far, far more toxic–containing from 18% to 35% CO–is simply too unbelievable. It never happened!

 

Producer Gas is Poison Gas with 18% to 35% carbon monoxide!!

Guidelines for Safety with Gas-generating Vehicles. Each of the hundreds of thousands of producer gas vehicle drivers was required by law to know just how potentially deadly his fuel actually was–and was required to keep the above guidelines with the vehicle registration papers on the vehicle. See full text with translation. The safety of each vehicle and its cargo, which was often munitions, as well as the driver's own survival depended on strict adherence to the technical guidlines and rules that were also spelled out in numerous publications related to these vehicles. The fuel was potentially explosive as well as toxic.

Guidelines for Mass Murder? Today, as the newest fuel crisis worsens, one can use Google “search” to find thousands of discussions for the keyword Holzgas and the related producer gas technology. However, none of those recent discussions even mention the toxic hazards. By contrast, the German guidelines for the use of Holzgas during the WW2 begin with a concise description of the actual toxic dangers with a stern warning. The first two sentences tell any would-be mass murderer all he needs to know to choose an extremely deadly and readily available poison gas. The first two sentences explain that Holzgas contains as much as 35% carbon monoxide–and that even as little as 0.1% can kill; Vergiftungsgefahr! How ironic and stragne, to say the least, that this widespread German technology has never been implicated in any Holocaust claims, and that diesel exhaust is blamed instead. As one comes to understand what was really happening in the war–what was merely absurd becomes unbelievable. Nazi gassings never happened.

 

Manufactured Evidence as a result of Torture. The above appeared after the “Forward” in the 1960 first edition of Auschwitz by Dr. MIKLOS NYISZLI. Although the signature with title and rank of RUDOLF HOESS may well be genuine, the text of his outlined “confession statement” is in English and clearly in a different handwriting. No doubt, United Press International was quite proud of itself when it distributed this “scoop” world-wide to its wire service subscribers. Here was all the proof needed to convince the world that HOESS had “personally arranged on orders received from Himmler in May 1941 the gassing of two million persons between June/July 1941 and the end of 1943 during which time I [Hoess] was commandant of Auschwitz.” This “voluntary evidence” from March 1946 was obviously manufactured so as to condemn HEINRICH HIMMLER as well. It is typical of

German Wartime Cyanide Concentrations from Zyklon-B in Gas Chambers

LEFT: with circulation orKreislauf” throughout the chamber. RIGHT: without circulation—the gas must find its own path.

The heavy lines represent concentrations in the center of the chamber whereas the other lines represent concentrations in each of the four corners of the chamber. With circulation, the cyanide levels range from 8 to 12 grams per cubic meter throughout the chamber within less than half-an-hour and then gradually drop off as the cyanide is absorbed. But without circulation, ONLY one of the cyanide levels reaches 8 grams per cubic meter in the corner nearest to the Zyklon granules–and for the rest of the chamber, the cyanide levels remain much lower for the entire four-hour period. (original source: DEGESCH as given in Blausäuregaskammern zur Fleckfieberabwehr by Puntigam, Breymesser and Bernfus, Sonderveröffentlichung des Reichsarbeitsblattes, Berlin 1943, page 33.)

Cyanide Dispersal in Real gas Chambers The two figures show the way cyanide disperses throughout a small,. filled gas chamber over a four-hour period. On the left, the gas concentrations increase rapidly because of circulation or Kreislauf of the gas. Warm air is driven through Zyklon-B granules near one corner of the chamber. The gas mixture is continually withdrawn from the opposite side of the chamber and returned after being driven through an external circulation blower. In effect, the blower drives the entire process. On the right, we see how slowly the cyanide concentrations increase when there is no circulation or Kreislauf.

Without circulation or Kreislauf, the heavy line in graph (above right) shows us that even after half-an-hour, the cyanide level only a few feet away in the center of the chamber has risen to only about 1/10 of a gram per cubic meter. In other words, the concentration gradient in the chamber is about 100 to 1 without circulation. This means that whatever HCN concentration would have been lethal for any individual would of necessity have required that one hundred times that concentration would have been required near the source of the HCN. A more inefficient and wasteful way to disperse HCN is hard to imagine—but such nonsense is just what one is expected to believe. By merely applying some basic, common sense HVAC (heating ventilation and air conditioning) to this problem using a blower and suitable ducting, the problem would have been easily solved. But that is not what is claimed by the hoaxers at all. What we are given instead is a thoroughly absurd theory about “Zyklon introduction columns” (Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtungen) which, in reality, would have only made the dispersal of the gas much more difficult. The simple answer (obvious to any German engineer) would have been to simply modify the existing ventilation ductwork with a much larger blower and a sheet metal opening somewhere in the ductwork to allow a basket of Zyklon-B granules to be placed into the air stream–and removed afterwards.

Zyklon-B releases cyanide S-L-O-W-L-Y. The product was designed that way in order to allow far safer handling of cyanide than earlier methods such as the “pot” method. The pot method is still used in American gas execution chambers. The figure on the right corresponds to what one can expect for the alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau–and it shows that those “executions” would have been a fiasco. Mass murder with Zyklon-B would have required hours of exposure and nothing like the three minutes that self-styled “eyewitnesses” have claimed. The alleged homicidal gas chambers had NO circulation; persons standing near the Zyklon B granules might have been effected in less than half-an-hour, but persons in at least one remote corner of the chamber would have only been effected hours later. But more than that, even American gas execution chambers with a rapid release and dispersal of cyanide simply cannot kill their intended victims in less than an average time of nine minutes–see links below. These simple facts are good reason to reject the anti-Nazi cyanide gassing claims as complete rubbish. The self-styled “eyewitnesses” to the alleged mass gassings lied bigtime. That postwar courts and judges accepted such “evidence” merely showed how thoroughly corrupt those courts and judges were.The absence of any better evidence for the gassing tales should persuade everyone that the homicidal gassings never happened! There simply is no credible “scientific evidence” for any of the gassing claims. By “scientific evidence” this author means objective evidence that has not been the product of corrupt judges and prosecution teams determined to convict at any cost, using methods the USofA and others sitll use to this very day to gain information and convictions (such methods are still common in police precincts throughout America).

If the Germans had ever concocted anything as silly as the alleged “Zyklon introduction columns,” they would more than likely have called them something like Drahtnetz-e-i-n-f-a-l-l-vorrichtungen instead based on the fact that a similar stovepipe in the standard DEGESCH delousing chambers was called a Fallrohr. See Figure 1, item #7 in Zyklon-B and the German Delousing Chambers. By contrast, the word schieben means to “push” or “slide” instead of “dump” and is inappropriate for the function alleged by the hoaxers. The strong similarity between the Fallrohr and so-called “Zyklon Introduction Columns” suggests that the innocent Fallrohr had been the basis through misunderstanding, or worse, of its lifesaving function. In Autobiography which was supposedly written by Rudolf Hoess and published by the Auschwitz Museum in 1978, German edition, we have on pages 50 and 51 the claim that holes in the ceiling were tied to a Fallrohr which allowed the granules to drop to the floor. Here we see how part of the hoax was constructed from a small piece of something which is true--but which really makes no sense technically for homicidal gassings. Simply letting the basket hang a foot below the ceiling would have at least let the breathing of intended victims provide some air movement through the granules. Dropping the granules to the floor put them into a cul-de-sac with absolutely NO air circulation at all. This is all the more reason to reject the gassing claims as sheer fabrication.

Other Links of Interest

 

 

To print pages from this site, you may need to reduce the “print area” on your printer. Essays and images can also be copied into other word or image processing programs for printing.


www.nazigassings.com

REVISIONIST HERESY


Just as there were no weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq prior to the recent war–no Jews or gentiles were ever killed in gas chambers or gas vans by the Nazis during World War 2. The “intelligence experts” and “scholars” were wrong. Whatever crimes and atrocities the Nazis and Hitler did commit, they certainly did not include gassings of Jews nor anyone else. The historians have blindly accepted the wildest pseudo-scientific nonsense imaginable.

The Jews were still alive

The simplest reason for rejecting the Holocaust story is that the vast majority of European Jews were still alive at the end of World War 2. Professor Arthur Butz, the author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, made this claim nearly thirty years ago–and he was absolutely correct as the following quote from a credible, recent Jewish source shows.

The Jewish Week 11-28-2003
Two new studies to determine the location of Jewish Holocaust survivors, for use in making future allocations to the most needy, differ widely on the number of survivors worldwide, The Jewish Week has learned. Sergio Della Pergola, a demographer for the Institute of Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, found 1,092,000 survivors worldwide. Jacob Ukeles, a policy researcher in Manhattan, found 688,000. The Ukeles survey, an update of one he prepared in 2000 for the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, found only minor differences from his previous effort. Lawrence Eagleburger, chairman of the International Commission on Holocaust Era Insurance Claims, commissioned both surveys. Eagleburger had hoped to use the figures in determining how to distribute $13.2 million annually in humanitarian funds for needy survivors worldwide.

Clearly, the numbers of “Jewish holocaust survivors” alive more than fifty-five years after the war are so enormous that one must surely wonder if any Jews at all perished in World War 2. Any conservative and reasonable statistical analysis of population decline over fifty-five years would surely conclude that there were more than six million Jewish “holocaust survivors” alive at the end of the war. No doubt, some innocent Jews were killed–but, there is no good reason to believe Jewish deaths were statistically unusual for a long, horrific war in which many tens of millions of innocent civilians were killed of all nationalities. On the basis of numbers alone–the generally accepted story is a monumental hoax. The continued worldwide acceptance of that hoax, even in Germany, is a tribute to the enormous power and influence of the supposed victms and the Jewish community in general. The uniqueness of the alleged mass gassings has also appealed to the darker side of the human imagination and gullibility.

The hoax has become a new religion which one must believe without question or be condemned as “evil”–even imprisoned as in Germany or Austria, and ruined as well. “Guilt for the holocaust” has come to replace “original sin” for which all except the jewish victims themselves must “bear responsibility.”

The Nazis could have done It – the Technology for Mass Murder was there

Mass gassings were technically possible–and the Germans were more than capable technically of committing such deeds, just as all modern industrial nations are. However, the gassing claims break down technically if one simply examines them critically. Even if one makes the most generous allowances for “errors” (major, as well as minor) on the part of self-styled “eyewitnesses” to such gassings–the gassing claims, including those involving so-called “gas vans,” are so technically ridiculous that they are simply unbelievable. There are no exceptions.

One great irony is that German facilities and technology which could have been easily used for mass murder have never been implicated in any way by the accusers. Of enormous importance was the German use throughout German-occupied Europe of poison gas as fuel (producer gas or Holzgas with as much as 35% CO) to propel nearly all civilian motor vehicles in order to conserve conventional liquid fuels for the military. Producer gas has never been implicated anywhere in the holocaust literature. Every historical work on the subject, even on World War 2 generally, is totally oblivious to the existence of that enormously important technology. Producer gas was a major feature of German economic and even military survival during throughout the war.

In addition, the Germans also had huge, superbly designed gas chambers in strategic locations such as Budapest and other major cities in eastern Europe for fumigating entire railroad trains with cyanide and Zyklon-B. Those facilities were vitally important to prevent typhus-infected lice from being shipped to the west with returning soldiers, or workers, or Jews. Typhus was endemic in many parts of eastern Europe, especially Poland, Those gas chambers would have also been perfect for mass murder–but, they are never even mentioned in any of the tales of mass gassing. Also, hundreds of thousands of German civilian bomshelters were “gas-tight” by law and would have been ideal for suffocating victims trapped inside—without any poison gas, although gas could have been added easily enough. The existence of all such facilities was widely and openly discussed in great detail in the German technical literature of that period and is readily available today in major libraries throughout the world–but the “historians,” including those who specialize in “holocaust studies,” have simply not bothered to use it if they even looked at it. Shame on them all! They have not done their homework!

The heart of the hoax--DIESELS

Even among the most ardent proponents of the WMD theories about SADDAM HUSSEIN, or even among the Israelis, or the most extreme neo-conservatives—no one has ever suggested that the exhaust of Iraq's many hundreds of thousands of diesel trucks or diesel tanks might have been used for mass murder. If they had, they would have been laughed at–and rightly so. And yet just such an insane theory is still at the very heart of the Holocaust legend. Two million of the alleged three million Nazi gassings of Jews were supposedly committed with diesel exhaust. The fact that most people do not even know of the importance of diesels to the “Holocaust” suggests that the hoaxers themselves know just how thoroughly stupid the diesel claims truly are–otherwise, they would have certainly made much more of that part of the story. Nonetheless, when one reads the works of the Jewish holocaust “scholars” (HILBERG and GILBERT, for example) it is clearly spelled out that two million Jews, as well as countless non-Jews (no one really cares how many) were all supposedly murdered by the Nazis with diesel exhaust in gas chambers or gas vans–whereas only about a million were supposedly murdered with Zyklon-B and cyanide.

Diesel exhaust smells bad, it may even look bad, and it may cause cancer.  But, as a source of a toxic gas for killing anything in half-an-hour, diesel exhaust is thoroughly impractical.  Diesel exhaust might be useful for torture–but certainly not for murder. In 1957 a British scientific study on hundreds of living animals showed that five hours of continuous exposure to full-strength, diesel exhaust from an idling diesel (two separate tests) failed to kill even one of the test animals. Each test used 4 rabbits, 10 guinea pigs and 40 mice. There has never been any refutation of those results–before, or since. Diesel gassings are not technically impossible because one can indeed achieve toxicity if the diesel is running under a substantial load, which is far different from simply pressing the fuel pedal to the floor–but short of that, diesel exhaust is completely harmless for short term exposures! Everyone who works on diesels in any number of diesel repair shops across the world knows this perfectly well. Nonetheless, the gassing claims including those involving diesel exhaust persist through endless repetition by a hopelessly corrupted and wilfully blind media.

The Nazi Alternative Fuel–POISON GAS

As today's fuel prices rise, can anyone imagine using poison gas to drive their car or truck? Well, in World War 2 the Germans did precisely that–and so did the people of many other countries, even long after the war.

Wartime German-occupied Europe was desperately short of liquid fuels which had to be conserved for combat vehicles of every sort. To deal with this desperate situation, most non-military automotive transport used neither gasoline nor Diesel fuel, but used producer gas instead. The gas was made in generators mounted on the vehicles by burning solid materials such as wood, coke, or coal. The solid material was first converted into a mixture of combustible gases by incomplete burning in the generator, The resulting mixture of gases would then be drawn into the modified diesel or gasoline (spark ignition) engines at the front of the vehicles by engine vacuum. The principal ingredient of the gas was carbon monoxide–18% to 35%–which burned very well. But, it was also extremely toxic. That gas would have been ideal for mass murder if the Nazis had ever intended to gas anyone.

The most shocking feature of this technology was that it was used throughout German-occupied Europe to drive more than 500,000 motor vehicles. It was everywhere. In addition, all drivers of these vehicles were especially licensed only after rigorous training in this dangerous, but necessary, technology. They were all required by law to know that this fuel contained as much as 35% carbon monoxide and that as little as 0.1% carbon monoxide was already enough to kill (albeit only in about ten hours). They all needed to know this for their own safety and that of the people around them–and even keep written reminders (the Safety Guidelines) in the glove compartments of their vehicles. And yet, nowhere have any Nazis ever been even accused of employing this superb and readily available, deadly gas to kill even one person. How ironic?

The “Eyewitnesses” Lied

All of the self-proclaimed “eyewitnesses” to the alleged mass gassings are, in fact, easily exposed as liars. There are no exceptions! If one reads a dozen accounts even for the same location, one almost inevitably finds a dozen totally different stories except for, perhaps, one or two details. In other words, there is hardly any consistency among the eyewitnesses and yet, judges have consistently juggled the evidence–a bit of one story here, added to a bit of another story there–to make the most damning judgements as to what supposedly happened. The historians, most notably RAUL HILBERG, did exactly the same thing. They “cherry-picked” the evidence; they ignored and even suppressed what was obvious lunacy, and retained whatever might be believed. Prosecutors and defense lawyers are entitled to do such “cherry picking” in order to prod witnesses during a trial–but “historians” have no such excuse. They have time to reflect and do rigorous research free of the constraints that are inevitable in all legal trials.

SS disinfection officer and Obersturmführer KURT GERSTEIN is still a major prop for the Holocaust myth–and yet, all of his statements are generally ridiculous. HILBERG had “cherry-pickedthe so-called “Gerstein Statement.” as he actually explained when he was on the witness stand at the trial of Ernst Zuendel in Toronto, Canada in 1988. HILBERG's use of KURT GERSTEIN is a prime example of the shoddiest scholarship imaginable–but GERSTEIN was, and still remains, the best reference HILBERG has.

The focus of GERSTEIN's “statements” was on diesel exhaust for mass murder in Belzec and Treblinka. Although he wrote about personally delivering Zyklon-B to some of the camps, he gave no specific information about Zyklon-B gassings even though that would have been the logical focus for his expertise. As a German disinfection officer he would have been extremely familiar with the widespread German use of Zyklon-B to save millions of lives especially in the east where typhus raged throughout the war and for years after the war as well..

The statements of Dr. Prof. WILHELM PFANNENSTIEL, a world-renowned professor of hygiene, in numerous post-war court appearances are incredible also. Only the smallest portion of his testimony ever appears anywhere. The statements of second-string “eyewitnesses” such as FILIP MÜLLER (Eyewitness Auschwitz: Three Years in the Gas Chambers) or RUDOLF VRBA are even worse than that of GERSTEIN. In his most famous book Night, ELIE WIESEL neglected to even mention gas chambers anywhere in his book. According to Wiesel, the Nazis committed mass murder of the Jews by simply marching the victims directly into flaming pits–in other words,
there was no need for gas chambers.

Pro-Nazi Collaboration by Elie Wiesel and hundreds of thousands of Jews

Although Elie WIESEL is today the poster-boy of the “Holocaust,” he clearly “chose” to collaborate with the Nazis in January 1945 rather than be “liberated” by Soviet troops advancing on Auschwitz. Both he and his father trekked west with the Nazis in a terrible winter on foot by their own choice and assisted the Nazis during the last months of the war. The Jews on “Schindler's List,” just thirty miles to the east of Auschwitz, also chose to collaborate and went west eagerly also rather than hang back, or hide, or go east to be “liberated” by the Soviets. Their last months of the war were spent in what is now the Czech Republic making ammunition (all supposedly “defective and useless” by their postwar accounts) for the Nazis until they were “liberated” by Soviet troops in May of 1945. Of course, they could have been “liberated” six months earlier and put to work making ammunition for the Allies–but they had all chosen to collaborate with the Nazis instead.

ZYKLON-B: the misunderstood Lifesaver of Millions

RUDOLF VRBA achieved fame for his part in the famous VRBA-WETZLER Report of April 1944 on the basis of which many holocaust fanatics insist that America should have bombed the tracks leading to the gas chambers of Auschwitz. One book which promotes this bit of lunacy is The Bombing of Auschwitz edited by NEUFELD and BERENBAUM, 2000. That book contains some of VRBA's claims on pages 242-248. According to VRBA and WETZLER, see page 244: “After three minutes everyone in the chamber is dead.” That never happened. Anyone with any expertise on the subject, and there were many experienced experts in the US where gas executions were already quite common at that time, could have explained that gassings of the sort imagined by VRBA and others with Zyklon-B would have taken far, far longer than three minutes. At least two of the last 11 gas chamber executions in the US over the last thirty years (Walter La Grand, 1999, Florence AZ, Ricky Sanderson, 1998, Raleigh, NC) took 18 minutes to kill their victims in well-designed, cyanide gas chambers with a rapid and highly concentrated release of cyanide gas. It took 17 minutes to kill David Lawson, 1994, Raleigh NC.  

Zyklon-B  by contrast releases its cyanide so slowly that more than half-an-hour is needed for most of the cyanide to escape the granules–and then in addition, far more time (four hours–see below left) is also needed for the cyanide to disperse by convection throughout any gas chamber not equipped with circulation or Kreislauf. In addition, it takes about 2-1/2 hours for nearly all of the cyanide to escape from Zyklon-B at room temeperature once a can has been emptied. That should give everyone a good general idea as to how slowly cyanide escapes from Zyklon-B–especially when compared with the pot method which releases nearly all of its cyanide within about five minutes, probably a lot less. After just three minutes (the alleged Nazi mass execution time), the escape of cyanide from the Zyklon-B has barely even begun; the vast bulk of the cyanide is still escaping regardless of how large, or small, the initial dosage of Zyklon-B granules was. Merely opening the doors after three minutes, or even 30 minutes, even with a fan running during venting will not provide good ventilation of the corpses at all since more cyanide is still escaping the granules. Unless the ventilation of the corpse-filled room continues for at least 2-1/2 hours, anyone entering the chamber without a gas mask during that time will succumb to the cyanide that is still coming out of the Zyklon-B granules.

Since there was no real “evidence” (such as autopsies) to support the charges, the Allies did the next best thing which was to follow an old police rule which is: “if you have no evidence, try to get a confession.” The real basis of the “testimonials” cited again and again is the willful lying of the self-styled, Jewish “eyewitnesses” and lying on the part of some of the Germans under torture to either save their own lives or minimize the suffering of colleagues and family members. The purpose of the Nuremberg trials was the perpetual criminalizing of Nazi Germany and at great expense, even to this day, using all the pomp and hooplah possible. But even with all the formality of elaborate legal proceedings, with lawyers and stenographers present, and with movie cameras and CBS journalists in the court room–they could NOT make the nonsensical testimony any less nonsensical. Not even the courts and torturers of the Grand Inquisitors of the middle ages could actually make the sun go around the earth–even if everyone on earth had been persuaded to “testify” under oath that it did.  The Allied courts in Nuremberg or in Guantanomo today are no better. Throwing revisonists in jail in Germany or anywhere merely shows, ultimately, how thoroughly depraved the hoaxers truly are.

VRBA and WETZLER had obviously lied about the most important feature of their atrocity tale. Even if the intended victims had been assisting the fiendish nazis by taking deep breaths of the cyanide vapors, the execution times would have been far longer because of the slow rates with which cyanide leaves Zyklon-B granules unless it is actually forced out of the granules by warm air. That forcing process (forced circulation or Kreislauf) was common in gas cham“bers for delousing clothing, even in Birkenau's delousing stations only a hundred yards from the crematoria—but strange as it may seem, it has never even been alleged that such logical methods were ever used for homicidal gassings of thousands of Jews daily in Birkenau or anywhere else. Nothing even remotely close to what would have been needed has ever been suggested in the Holocaust gassing stories. Without the gassing angle, the rest of the Holocaust legend, even if it were all true, has no “uniqueness.”

Zyklon-B was widely used to fumigate clothing and countless other items which might harbor lice–which were the frequent carrier of typhus to humans. Zyklon-B gas chambers were widely used in German POW camps, and transit camps, and labor camps only to keep people alive. The Auschwitz camp was so huge that it served all three purposes.

The infamous “Vergasungskeller

A single letter from SS-Hauptsturmführer BISCHOFF dated January 29, 1943 contains the word “Vergasungskeller” and is to this day the strongest evidence for the mass extermination hoax with cyanide (see Pressac page 211 [link] ). The word has several possible translations, the most literal being a “cellar where gas is released, or generated.” It has been given the most sinister meaning possible by the exterminationists who insist that it must have been a place where people were gassed to death. But, the word is actually explained by a related letter, also from Bischoff, dated December 18, 1942 (see Pressac page 210 [link]) in which the very first sentence says: “Im Monat Dezember musste wegen Entlausung und Entwesung die Arbeit an mehreren Tagen ruhen.. (During the month of December work had to be stopped for several days because of delousing and disinfestation.) It is clear enough that the fumigations were occurring somewhere within the building–or else, why would there have been any need to stop work? The work was actually stopped for days (Pressac actually mistranslated the text) and delayed completion of this urgently needed crematorium. The surrender of five million Soviet soldiers to the Germans by this time would have been a major reason for completing these Kremas as quickly as possible. But obviously, the need for “delousing and disnfestation” was even greater.

Some historians using the shabby logic of HILBERG will, no doubt, continue to insist that the words “delousing and disinfestation” were merely euphemisms for mass murder–but even Pressac insists (see Pressac page 227 [link]) that the first homicidal gassing occurred on March 14, 1943. This was just a day after the crematorium was finished–but nearly three months after life-saving fumigations had been carried out in the incomplete structure over several days. In other words, rather than being a place off mass murder, the Vergasungskeller was actually used to keep people alive. These are just some examples of how life-saving activities–shaving of hair and showering are other examples–have been turned upside down and made to appear as “evidence” of mass murder. The hoaxers have nothing better. Out of necessity, the underground mortuary rooms also served whatever other purposes seemed most important–from simple storage, or as workrooms, and even as gas-tight bombhelters with hand-operated ventilators.

Cremation

Cremation and crematoria are important features of the hoax because they are needed to explain the fact that there simply is no forensic evidence of gassings–supposedly, all of the physical evidence went up in smoke. How convenient for those who might otherwise be pressed for real evidence for their paranoid fantasy. Many thousands of dead bodies (from other causes, primarily disease) were found in the camps at the end of the war, but all of the “gassing” victims had been vaporized–so goes the hoax.

Where one might have expected huge crematory ovens or incinerators to dispose of enormous numbers of bodies, and co-mingling of the remains–one finds instead, only ovens designed to burn one body at a time consistent with ordinary cremation practice in most of the advanced countries around the world. The remains from corpses were put into individual urns and returned to family members. In other words, there was nothing at all like the “assembly line killing and/or disposal of bodies” that has been so widely and consistently alleged.

A Challenge to Historians

Surely, if future historians wish to help us understand the greatest mass murderers in all of human history and not merely describe their alleged deeds, they must also explain why those otherwise fiendishly clever and highly technical people were so stupid as to use diesel exhaust, or even gasoline engine exhaust as sources of lethal carbon monoxide for most of their alleged mass exterminations. The German Nazis, many of whom had advanced academic degrees in science and medicine, would have surely known better. The alternative fuel for both types of engines was far more deadly, and readily available, and not at all subject to the strict rationing that applied to liquid fuels–not just in Germany where the rationing was especially strict but throughout the world, even in the USA which had most of the world's petroleum production at that time.

The diesel exhaust gassing claims are too absurd to be believed but only if one understands what was actually happening technologically in German-occupied Europe. Unfortunately, historians as a rule are technologically ignorant. They are a social class of “techno-idiots.” One can read a thousand books on the history of World War 2 without finding even one word about the German producer gas technology, or the railroad delousing tunnels, or the gas-tight bombshelters. So how much do historians really understand about the war? How seriously should they be taken when they accuse Germans of mass gassings for which not even one corpse has ever been found?

The general ignorance of historians as a social class was brought home to me when I tried to convince an historian that producer gas in German-occupied Europe was enormously important. He dismissed my arguments by first reminding me that he had read far more books about the war than I, and that this technology had never even been mentioned in any of his readings, therefore, it could not possibly have been more than some kind of experimental technology applied to, at most, a few thousand vehicles. The references I cited seemed to mean nothing to him since they were all technical and in German and, therefore, were neither interesting nor even worth reading. By such pig-headedness truth is often lost.

A modest leap of faith in favor of the Holocaust revisionists is entirely reasonable in view of the total lack of credible evidence to support even one of the gassing claims. There are, for example, no forensic reports of gassing victims from any of the thousands of dead found in German camps near the end of the war. There are no photos of supposed gassing victims either. Photos of concentration camp inmates who died from disease and even from Allied strafing are used instead to blind and persuade nearly everyone that the evidence of Nazi gassings is “overwhelming”– when in fact it is nil.
But perhaps, worst of all is the fact that there is not even a valid, science-based theory as to how the great murder weapons–those mythical gas chambers–actually worked. The hoax continues because people still believe, falsely, that mass murder with gas chambers is almost childishly easy when, in fact, it is far from easy–even for a country as technically advanced as the United States.

Terror against Revisionism

To sustain the holocaust mythology, terror is still applied with impunity. For the years immediately following WW2, if an SS prisoner spoke out against the allegations of mass murder–his chances of survival were minimal. Today the terror amounts to little more than economic harassment, at least in the US–but in many other countries, especially in Europe, people are still routinely imprisoned for expressing any serious disagreement with the holocaust. In Germany, Austria, France, Belgium and even Switzerland–people are still imprisoned for years merely for expressing revisionist views. The ongoing imprisonment of ERNST ZÜNDEL, GERMAR RUDOLF and DAVID IRVING are only the best known examples–but there are many others. And yet, those same countries which imprison revisionists will routinely send their highest representatives around the world to advise on human rights, freedom of speech and the importance of democracy. Such extraordinary hypocrisy does not go unnoticed. It demonstrates, for all to see, the vile methods that sustain the holocaust legend and why it is not merely false history–but is a shabby and vulgar hoax.

Is it really necessary to explain that the prosecution of Ernst Zuendel in Toronto in 1988 was itself a crime? Is it really necessary to explain that when Hilberg gave his services to the prosecution at that time, he was aiding and abetting a crime? There is also a vast difference between historians and others helping and testifying on behalf of Ernst Zuendel in that case and an American citizen going to Canada voluntarily to help the prosecution put Ernst Zuendel in jail. That ain't rocket science, folks. That is basic ethics 101. The trials of revisionists right now in Germany are also crimes. They are crimes against humanity as well as crimes against the basic human rights of the defendants.

Friedrich Paul Berg

contact us by e-mail: hoaxbuster@earthlink.net

please go to: Index Page 2

please go to: Index Page 3